作物杂志,2016, 第3期: 37–44 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.03.008

• 遗传育种·种质资源·生物科技 • 上一篇    下一篇

耐碱GsCHX19基因的克隆及对苜蓿的遗传转化

杨浩,朱延明   

  1. 东北农业大学农业生物功能基因重点实验室,150030,黑龙江哈尔滨
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-10 修回日期:2016-04-15 出版日期:2016-06-15 发布日期:2018-08-26
  • 通讯作者: 朱延明
  • 作者简介:杨浩,硕士研究生,从事植物分子生物学与基因工程研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31171578);黑龙江省高校科技创新团队建设计划(2011TD055)

Isolation of a Alkali Stress Responsive Gene GsCHX19 and Transformation into Medicago sativa L.

Yang Hao,Zhu Yanming   

  1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biological Functional Genes,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang,China
  • Received:2016-03-10 Revised:2016-04-15 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Yanming Zhu

摘要:

基于实验室前期野生大豆G07256碱胁迫转录组数据,结合生物信息学方法筛选得到响应碱胁迫的cation/H +逆向转运蛋白基因GsCHX19,克隆了GsCHX19基因全长CDS编码序列并将其构建到pCAMBIA330035Su植物超量表达载体中。以肇东紫花苜蓿为受体材料,通过农杆菌介导法将重组的植物表达载体转化其子叶节,用含0.5mg/L草铵膦的筛选培养基进行筛选,获得20株抗性植株。采用PCR方法检测抗性植株中bar基因的表达,获得16株PCR阳性植株。对获得的PCR阳性植株进行RT-PCR及real-time PCR检测,鉴定共获得11株RT- PCR阳性植株,且证明GsCHX19基因在各转基因植株中均有不同程度的表达。结果表明,GsCHX19基因成功转化苜蓿,并且得到表达,该转基因植株将为耐盐碱转基因苜蓿新品种的培育提供重要的试验材料。

关键词: Cation/H +逆向转运蛋白, GsCHX19, 野生大豆, 苜蓿, 遗传转化

Abstract:

GsCHX19, a cation/H + antiporter gene, has been identified as a putative bicarbonate stress responsive gene in previous studies, through bioinformatic analysis of transcriptome sequencing data of the Glycine soja G07256 under alkali stress. In this study, the full length coding region of GsCHX19 gene was cloned and constructed into the plant expression vector pCAMBIA330035Su. The recombinant plasmid was then transferred into the cotyledon nodes of Medicago sative by the way of agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation method. And 20 resistant seedlings were obtained after screening on the medium supplement with 0.5mg/L glufosinate-ammonium. By detecting selection marker of bar gene and PCR test, and then RT-PCR, 11 plants were further confirmed as transgenic plants. The real-time PCR results indicated that GsCHX19 showed different expression levels in different transgenic plants. All the results showed that the GsCHX19 was transferred into alfalfa and successfully expressed. The transgenic plants will provide important experimental materials for development of saline-alkali tolerant alfalfa cultivars.

Key words: Cation/H + antiporter, GsCHX19, Glycine soja, Alfalfa, Transformation

图1

GsCHX19基因碱胁迫转录组表达量"

图2

GsCHX19全长基因的PCR扩增 M:核酸分子量标准 DL5000;1:去离子水阴性对照;2:PCR扩增产物"

图3

植物表达载体pCAMBIA330035Su-GsCHX19的构建"

图4

植物表达载体pCAMBIA3300-GsCHX19质粒PCR鉴定 M:核酸分子量标准 DL5000;1:阳性对照(GsCHX19 PCR扩增产物);2:去离子水阴性对照;3-5:阳性转化子"

图5

植物表达载体pCAMBIA330035Su-GsCHX19导入农杆菌PCR鉴定结果 M:核酸分子量标准 DL5000;+:阳性对照(pCAMBIA330035Su-GsCHX19质粒);–:去离子水阴性对照;1-6:阳性转化子"

图6

转GsCHX19基因抗性植株部分 PCR 检测结果 M:核酸分子量标准 DL8000;+:阳性对照(pCAMBIA330035Su-GsCHX19质粒);-:非转基因植株; 1-10:转GsCHX19抗性植株"

图7

转GsCHX19基因苜蓿RT-PCR检测 WT:非转基因苜蓿;1-5:转GsCHX19抗性植株"

图8

转GsCHX19基因苜蓿real-time PCR检测"

[1] 张立全, 张凤英 , 哈斯阿古拉.紫花苜蓿耐盐性研究进展. 草业学报, 2012,6(12):296-305.
[2] 唐立郦, 朱延明, 才华 , 等.GsZFP1基因植物表达载体构建及对苜蓿的遗传转化.作物杂志,2012(4):41-44.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2012.04.009
[3] 施莉娟, 许雷, 温洋 , 等. 新疆大叶紫花苜蓿两种再生体系的比较. 东北农业大学学报, 2010,41(4):94-97.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2010.04.020
[4] Manohar M, Shigaki T, Hirschi K D . Plant cation/H+ exchangers (CAXs):biological functions and genetic manipulations . Plant Biology(Stuttg), 2011,13(4):561-569.
doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00466.x pmid: 21668596
[5] Zhang Y, Peng X, Chai T , et al. Structure and function of tonoplast cation/H+ antiporters in plant:a review . Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 2011,27(4):546-560.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00462 pmid: 21847988
[6] Reguera M, Bassil E, Blumwald E . Intracellular NHX-type cation/H+ antiporters in plants . Molecular Plant, 2014,7(2):261-263.
doi: 10.1093/mp/sst091 pmid: 23956073
[7] Bao A K, Du B Q, Touil L , et al. Co-expression of tonoplast cation/H+ antiporter and H-pyrophosphatase from xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum improves alfalfa plant growth under salinity,drought and field conditions . Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2016,14(3):964-975.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.2016.14.issue-3
[8] Song C P, Guo Y, Qiu Q S , et al. A probable Na+(K+)/H+ exchanger on the chloroplast envelope functions in pH homeostasis and chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana . Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2004,101(27):10211-10216.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403709101
[9] Cellier F, Conejero G, Ricaud L , et al. Characterization of AtCHX17,a member of the cation/H+ exchangers,CHX family,from Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a role in K+ homeostasis . Plant Journal, 2004,39(6):834-846.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2004.39.issue-6
[10] Chanroj S, Lu Y, Padmanaban S , et al. Plant-specific cation/H+ exchanger 17 and its homologs are endomembrane K+ transporters with roles in protein sorting . Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2011,286(39):33931-33941.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.252650
[11] Evans A R, Hall D, Pritchard J , et al. The roles of the cation transporters CHX21 and CHX23 in the development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012,63(1):59-67.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/err271 pmid: 21976771
[12] Wang X Q, Shen X, Yun-mian H E, et al . An optimized freeze-thaw method for transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 and LBA4404. Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2011,18(5):382-386.
[13] 郑先哲, 王建英, 董航飞 . 干燥条件对苜蓿品质指标的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2009,40(6):101-105.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2009.06.020
[14] 李文桂, 陈雅棠 . 转基因苜蓿的研究进展. 热带医学杂志, 2009,9(10):1204-1208.
[15] DuanMu H, Wang Y, Bai X , et al. Wild soybean roots depend on specific transcription factors and oxidation reduction related genes in response to alkaline stress. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2015,15(6):651-660.
[16] Sze H, Padmanaban S, Cellier F , et al. Expression patterns of a novel AtCHX gene family highlight potential roles in osmotic adjustment and K+ homeostasis in pollen development . Plant Physiology, 2004,136(1):2532-2547.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046003
[17] Padmanaban S, Chanroj S, Kwak J M , et al. Participation of endomem-brane cation/H+ exchanger AtCHX20 in osmoregulation of guard cells . Plant Physiology, 2007,144(1):82-93.
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.092155
[18] Pardo J M, Cubero B, Leidi E O , et al. Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006,57(5):1181-1199.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj114 pmid: 16513813
[1] 刘淑霞, 魏国江 荆瑞勇 王丽艳 关向军. 接种中华根瘤菌SD101 和避光对紫花#br# 苜蓿固氮和光合作用的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 156–161
[2] 张微,王良群,刘勇,郝艳芳,杨伟,白鸿雁,武擘. 农杆菌介导高粱遗传转化的相关因素优化[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 56–61
[3] 梁晓,祁永,吝亚杰,石一均,曹卫东,刘忠宽,刘桂霞. 应用综合指标法和灰色关联度法对10个紫花苜蓿品种进行耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (4): 44–49
[4] 崔科飞,代惠萍,朱佳妮,张阿芳. 硒胁迫对大叶紫花苜蓿生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (4): 133–136
[5] 蔡进军,党薇,董立国,张源润,王月玲. 宁南山区苜蓿与羊草混播技术效果研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (3): 123–127
[6] 施伟梅, 王妙飞, 罗双慧, 等. 超声联合酶法提取紫花苜蓿总黄酮及其抗氧化性能研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (6): 64–69
[7] 肖佳雷, 姜立超, 尹静, 等. 栽培大豆和野生大豆内生真菌分布及定植特征[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (4): 16–19
[8] 孙鑫, 杨在东, 虞光辉, 等. Pinam、Pinbm和Gsp-1m基因表达载体构建及遗传转化[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (4): 55–60
[9] 温昕, 邵铁梅, 柴锡庆, 等. 基于组织培养的红花生物反应器研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (1): 25–30
[10] 李兴欣, 孟义江, 罗婉娇, 等. 基于绿色荧光标记的甘草遗传转化体系的建立[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (4): 52–58
[11] 王慧, 杨小艳, 翁建峰, 等. 抗玉米螟基因GrylA.301原核表达和玉米遗传转化[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (2): 34–38
[12] 杨向黎, 韩凤英, 秦旭, 等. 紫花苜蓿几种主要害虫的化学防治试验[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (2): 131–136
[13] 刘建伟, 陈晓峰, 刘广富, 郭宗端, 李新柱, 胡兆平, 张亮. 大豆CYP78A5基因组织特异性启动子的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (1): 54–58
[14] 郭金耀, 杨晓玲,. 苜蓿不同部位提取液的体外抗氧化活性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2013, (3): 45–48
[15] 陈萍, 沈振荣, 迟海峰, 等. 不同施肥处理对紫花苜蓿产量和株高的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2013, (1): 91–94
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2] 权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3] 黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4] 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5] 赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6] 陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7] 王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8] 朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .