作物杂志,2026, 第2期: 134–142 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.016

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

品种和采收期对藜麦芽苗菜总黄酮、总多酚及其抗氧化活性的影响

李文琦1(), 段雪妍2, 胡一晨1, 黄朝晖3,4(), 秦培友2()   

  1. 1成都大学食品与生物工程学院, 610106, 四川成都
    2北京市农林科学院农产品加工与食品营养研究所, 100097, 北京
    3海南热带海洋学院, 572000, 海南三亚
    4海南热带海洋学院崖州湾创新研究院, 572000, 海南三亚
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-02 修回日期:2025-01-17 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 秦培友,主要从事营养健康谷物品质评价与高值化利用研究,E-mail:qinpeiyou@baafs.net.cn;黄朝晖为共同通信作者,主要从事食品营养与功能研究,E-mail:554566782@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李文琦,主要从事藜麦品质评价研究,E-mail:lwq8698@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    海南省重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2021XDNY294)

Effects of Variety and Harvesting Period on Total Flavonoids, Total Polyphenols and Antioxidant Activity of Quinoa Sprouts

Li Wenqi1(), Duan Xueyan2, Hu Yichen1, Huang Zhaohui3,4(), Qin Peiyou2()   

  1. 1College of Food and Bioengineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, Sichuan, China
    2Institute of Agri-Food Processing and Nutrition, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    3Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572000, Hainan, China
    4Yazhou Bay Innovation Institute of Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572000, Hainan, China
  • Received:2024-12-02 Revised:2025-01-17 Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-16

摘要:

以河北和新疆的19份藜麦品种为试验材料,分析21~49 d藜麦芽苗菜的总多酚和总黄酮含量,采用DPPH(1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼)和ABTS(2,2′-联氮-双-3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)法评估其抗氧化活性。结果表明,随着生长期的变化,藜麦芽苗菜株高和鲜重显著增加;总多酚和总黄酮含量整体呈下降趋势;抗氧化活性也相应变化,且与总多酚和总黄酮含量呈显著正相关。结合聚类分析结果可知,来源于河北省的Y1~Y10号藜麦生长至35 d时,总多酚(10.38~12.71 mg GAE/g DW)和总黄酮(21.92~26.28 mg RE/g DW)含量较高,且具备一定的抗氧化活性(DPPH清除活性:11.65~15.64 mg TE/g DW;ABTS清除活性:24.56~33.98 mg TE/g DW),生物产量较高(株高:27.97~33.93 cm;鲜重:8.81~29.17 g/株),且品质较为鲜嫩。

关键词: 藜麦, 芽苗菜, 总多酚, 总黄酮, 抗氧化活性

Abstract:

Using 19 quinoa varieties from Hebei and Xinjiang as experimental materials, the total polyphenol and total flavonoid contents of quinoa sprouts during 21-49 d were analyzed, and their antioxidant activities were evaluated by DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS [2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] methods. The results showed that with the change of growth period, plant height and fresh weight of quinoa sprouts increased significantly; the total polyphenol and total flavonoid contents showed an overall downward trend; and the antioxidant activity also changed accordingly and was significantly positively correlated with the total polyphenol and total flavonoid contents. Combined with the results of cluster analysis, it was found that when the quinoa varieties Y1-Y10 from Hebei Province grew to 35 d, the total polyphenol (10.38-12.71 mg GAE/g DW) and total flavonoid (21.92-26.28 mg RE/g DW) contents were relatively high, and they exhibited certain antioxidant activities (DPPH scavenging activity: 11.65-15.64 mg TE/g DW; ABTS scavenging activity: 24.56-33.98 mg TE/g DW). Furthermore, these varieties showed high biological yields (plant height: 27.97-33.93 cm; fresh weight: 8.81-29.17 g/plant) and relatively tender quality.

Key words: Chenopodium quinoa Willd., Sprouts, Total polyphenol, Total flavonoid, Antioxidant activity

表1

试验材料名称及来源

编号
Number
品种名称
Variety name
材料来源
Material source
Y1 SX4 特76 张家口市农业科学院
Y2 SX12 石家庄(18) 张家口市农业科学院
Y3 QS 石家庄(19) 张家口市农业科学院
Y4 石家庄(11) 张家口市农业科学院
Y5 石家庄(3) 张家口市农业科学院
Y6 xsg70-100-3 张家口市农业科学院
Y7 LMSX4 张家口市农业科学院
Y8 2022南繁种 张家口市农业科学院
Y9 YY-11-192-3 张家口市农业科学院
Y10 XJ-SY-3 张家口市农业科学院
Y11 XJ-SY-5 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y12 XJ-SY-6 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y13 XJ-SY-10 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y14 XJ-SY-13 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y15 XJ-SY-22 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y16 XJ-SY-26 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y17 XJ-SY-29 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y18 XJ-SY-35 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所
Y19 XJ-SY-41 伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所

表2

藜麦芽苗菜生长过程中株高和鲜重变化

编号
Number
21 d 28 d 35 d 42 d 49 d
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh
weight
(g/plant)
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh
weight
(g/plant)
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh
weight
(g/plant)
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh
weight
(g/plant)
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh
weight
(g/plant)
Y1 16.40±0.07d 9.97±0.32d 20.86±0.49d 12.03±0.56d 31.65±3.25c 18.89±2.25c 49.17±4.32b 60.00±6.36b 57.07±1.12a 66.39±0.96a
Y2 15.98±0.64e 9.31±0.94c 20.94±0.58d 11.52±0.16c 31.00±0.87c 19.39±2.52c 48.40±3.75b 37.28±10.72b 51.87±1.53a 49.11±4.39a
Y3 15.85±0.44e 9.82±0.78d 21.56±1.05d 13.12±0.42d 28.60±1.82c 29.17±1.54c 45.80±2.52b 58.97±9.24b 55.25±3.12a 67.08±0.27a
Y4 15.82±0.31d 10.01±0.71c 19.33±0.63d 13.69±0.14c 31.15±4.72c 24.65±5.10b 46.00±0.10b 58.87±10.18a 60.90±4.97a 57.50±5.96a
Y5 14.98±0.58e 9.84±0.24d 21.05±0.31d 11.89±0.38d 30.23±1.15c 23.11±1.61c 48.70±3.12b 38.93±3.43b 63.42±0.61a 46.89±4.42a
Y6 14.50±0.76d 8.87±0.71d 20.91±0.54c 10.71±0.49cd 27.97±3.06b 19.39±2.77bc 38.37±3.66a 27.55±1.65b 41.77±0.58a 54.11±10.74a
Y7 15.92±0.35e 9.31±0.45d 20.96±0.81d 10.17±0.57d 29.77±2.07c 26.10±0.55c 56.87±4.44b 39.33±3.14b 63.48±2.97a 49.31±3.52a
Y8 15.98±0.60e 9.01±0.25c 22.03±1.53d 11.97±0.31c 33.93±2.21c 26.48±1.14b 63.07±1.79b 61.29±6.27a 66.93±0.84a 65.92±6.09a
Y9 15.91±0.37d 9.34±0.53c 21.28±1.97d 11.23±0.60c 33.33±2.93c 25.01±1.98b 46.77±7.46b 46.97±10.55a 57.33±1.91a 49.55±4.76a
Y10 14.79±0.40e 9.16±0.45c 20.96±1.31d 7.84±1.65c 31.30±0.82c 8.81±1.10c 56.97±2.87b 44.29±10.19b 66.92±1.99a 54.88±2.72a
Y11 15.73±0.10e 9.47±0.40c 23.96±3.08d 11.55±0.33c 32.50±3.46c 9.44±0.74c 60.03±3.56b 24.48±8.31b 72.12±1.60a 37.94±1.58a
Y12 16.31±0.16e 9.25±0.82d 22.18±1.02d 12.40±0.83cd 35.83±1.15c 13.33±2.32c 56.90±2.21b 21.90±2.51b 70.25±1.05a 37.46±1.53a
Y13 15.09±0.12e 9.40±0.86c 21.41±1.23d 12.76±0.37c 29.13±3.00c 25.19±9.61b 56.50±1.57b 22.81±1.63b 76.25±0.82a 37.95±0.91a
Y14 15.43±0.16e 9.50±0.15d 20.92±0.71d 11.80±0.49cd 27.50±2.65c 15.08±5.42c 42.43±3.00b 21.69±2.28b 63.45±2.52a 39.19±1.01a
Y15 15.78±0.73e 9.05±0.24b 20.76±0.63d 10.22±0.95b 23.43±0.75c 7.81±2.68b 37.73±0.78b 8.62±0.37b 52.60±1.74a 37.06±1.97a
Y16 15.40±0.23e 9.41±0.49c 22.15±2.52d 12.84±0.13c 32.67±1.53c 15.72±0.68bc 40.07±6.82b 24.79±12.24b 57.05±2.34a 40.24±4.19a
Y17 15.05±0.26d 8.76±0.46c 20.75±3.21d 10.64±1.00c 30.02±4.46c 19.30±2.85c 41.67±6.31b 13.42±5.79b 49.63±0.73a 37.77±1.50a
Y18 14.98±0.60e 8.09±0.73d 19.74±0.83d 10.60±0.26cd 30.60±1.87c 14.23±2.42c 40.37±0.96b 19.30±0.99b 57.12±0.42a 41.08±3.99a
Y19 15.96±0.43e 8.62±0.73c 19.99±1.48d 10.97±0.27bc 33.87±1.76c 14.42±1.60b 59.50±1.40b 33.20±5.27a 67.95±1.98a 37.64±1.59a
平均值
Mean
15.57±0.54e
9.27±0.48d
21.15±1.01d
11.47±1.33d
30.76±2.80c
18.71±6.47c
49.23±8.13b
34.93±16.51b
60.60±8.57a
47.74±10.63a

图1

藜麦芽苗菜生长过程中总多酚和总黄酮含量变化 不同小写字母表示存在显著差异(P < 0.05),下同。

表3

不同采收期藜麦芽苗菜的总多酚含量

编号Number 21 d 28 d 35 d 42 d 49 d
Y1 12.99±0.37a 12.01±0.18b 11.08±0.39c 10.75±0.13c 11.61±0.23b
Y2 15.00±0.16a 11.36±0.25b 10.80±0.13c 11.63±0.27b 10.53±0.24c
Y3 12.71±0.04a 10.29±0.17d 11.19±0.34c 11.84±0.06b 11.57±0.08b
Y4 10.59±0.35ab 10.91±0.09a 10.38±0.02b 9.81±0.20c 9.28±0.12d
Y5 11.75±0.24b 11.83±0.10b 12.19±0.06a 10.92±0.19c 10.93±0.02c
Y6 13.05±0.08a 10.99±0.38c 12.71±0.10ab 12.59±0.15b 10.50±0.02d
Y7 12.68±0.27a 12.18±0.37b 10.49±0.03c 10.74±0.12c 10.72±0.37c
Y8 13.98±0.02a 13.26±0.19b 11.19±0.23c 10.66±0.12d 9.87±0.22e
Y9 13.35±0.12a 9.98±0.19d 11.23±0.26c 11.04±0.25c 11.98±0.15b
Y10 14.58±0.05a 12.75±0.14b 10.53±0.10e 11.85±0.27d 12.33±0.04c
Y11 11.53±0.21ab 11.73±0.17a 10.39±0.22c 10.47±0.21c 11.29±0.23b
Y12 12.48±0.18a 10.66±0.14c 9.54±0.15d 11.26±0.26b 10.66±0.26c
Y13 13.88±0.11a 10.55±0.11c 9.35±0.08d 10.99±0.38b 10.48±0.15c
Y14 12.68±0.17a 11.72±0.15b 9.56±0.16e 11.26±0.32c 10.08±0.08d
Y15 12.56±0.28a 12.52±0.18a 10.47±0.28b 12.09±0.29a 10.53±0.25b
Y16 12.29±0.15b 12.80±0.12a 9.53±0.14d 9.64±0.12d 10.89±0.11c
Y17 12.70±0.46a 11.31±0.10b 10.27±0.21c 10.89±0.18b 11.47±0.46b
Y18 12.54±0.12a 11.56±0.30b 11.03±0.08c 9.83±0.21d 11.42±0.06b
Y19 13.35±0.41a 11.25±0.43b 10.94±0.01b 9.99±0.17c 9.03±0.15d

表4

不同采收期藜麦芽苗菜的总黄酮含量

编号Number 21 d 28 d 35 d 42 d 49 d
Y1 29.76±0.04a 24.37±0.44c 22.07±0.44e 23.40±0.61d 26.38±0.62b
Y2 29.18±0.45b 28.20±0.50b 25.31±0.59c 23.43±0.34d 30.22±0.67a
Y3 36.03±1.15a 26.55±0.50c 24.48±0.63d 25.85±0.65cd 33.01±0.74b
Y4 31.65±0.51a 28.10±1.00b 22.91±0.48d 22.28±0.61d 26.57±0.43c
Y5 35.60±0.09a 23.11±0.51e 24.23±0.13d 25.78±0.25c 29.15±1.13b
Y6 32.59±0.88a 23.64±0.21c 26.28±0.34b 25.44±0.39b 25.82±0.96b
Y7 29.34±1.49a 22.49±0.33c 26.20±0.82b 19.99±0.39d 27.87±0.87a
Y8 33.71±0.59a 23.97±1.00b 22.55±0.33c 22.36±0.60c 24.53±0.37b
Y9 25.72±0.14b 22.29±0.22d 23.42±0.12c 27.21±0.13a 26.87±0.78a
Y10 32.48±0.20b 25.49±0.10c 21.92±0.48d 25.61±0.66c 35.40±0.71a
Y11 35.87±0.95a 24.46±0.89c 24.14±0.90c 21.72±0.13d 28.19±0.31b
Y12 30.69±1.20a 21.58±0.06d 28.32±0.52b 26.72±0.87c 18.67±0.70e
Y13 28.33±0.31a 27.88±0.31a 28.26±0.70a 23.89±0.23b 17.23±0.55c
Y14 31.65±0.45a 19.95±0.61d 24.29±0.53c 28.27±0.18b 20.10±0.40d
Y15 29.83±0.82a 20.13±0.25c 29.11±0.90a 28.85±0.75a 23.37±0.46b
Y16 34.94±0.24a 25.33±0.19b 23.88±0.40c 20.62±0.19e 22.64±0.29d
Y17 24.84±0.94c 23.20±0.25d 28.22±0.48a 25.51±0.69bc 26.60±0.46b
Y18 30.33±0.45a 20.29±0.41e 24.74±0.49d 26.83±0.43b 25.94±0.48c
Y19 24.29±0.08a 19.36±0.29d 23.99±0.62a 22.16±0.34b 20.37±0.26c

图2

藜麦芽苗菜生长过程中DPPH和ABTS清除活性变化

表5

不同采收期藜麦芽苗菜的DPPH清除活性

编号Number 21 d 28 d 35 d 42 d 49 d
Y1 16.46±0.26a 13.61±0.11c 12.91±0.17d 14.86±0.16b 13.31±0.62cd
Y2 18.90±0.26a 13.56±0.17c 12.46±0.30d 14.88±0.22b 12.65±0.25d
Y3 15.34±0.27b 11.09±0.14d 14.21±0.51c 15.90±0.28a 14.24±0.19c
Y4 14.16±0.02a 13.15±0.17c 12.77±0.16d 12.79±0.15d 13.71±0.19b
Y5 14.67±0.07b 13.39±0.31c 15.64±0.55a 16.16±0.29a 12.94±0.09c
Y6 15.66±0.09b 14.15±0.27c 14.62±0.55c 17.55±0.18a 11.39±0.38d
Y7 14.83±0.08a 14.59±0.20a 11.65±0.28c 13.55±0.50b 14.74±0.36a
Y8 19.55±0.11a 17.16±0.09b 13.28±0.22d 14.99±0.49c 13.03±0.03d
Y9 16.58±0.04a 12.02±0.27d 13.79±0.17c 14.77±0.31b 14.68±0.17b
Y10 21.21±0.31a 16.52±0.28b 12.10±0.30d 13.42±0.24c 10.61±0.12e
Y11 15.44±0.35a 14.72±0.21b 11.17±0.05c 11.39±0.25c 14.92±0.37b
Y12 14.32±0.14a 12.02±0.26d 12.72±0.29c 14.83±0.62a 13.50±0.15b
Y13 17.92±0.10a 11.68±0.26e 12.33±0.32d 13.37±0.34c 14.09±0.03b
Y14 15.64±0.14a 13.20±0.04c 11.34±0.15d 14.83±0.45b 12.92±0.10c
Y15 14.75±0.21b 12.58±0.20d 15.29±0.21b 16.53±0.59a 13.66±0.24c
Y16 14.27±0.09a 14.14±0.24ab 11.79±0.31c 11.48±0.34c 13.75±0.02b
Y17 16.46±0.18b 14.24±0.42c 12.21±0.61d 12.50±0.05d 17.35±0.24a
Y18 16.22±0.32a 14.28±0.25b 12.91±0.48c 12.74±0.27c 13.12±0.10c
Y19 18.05±0.38a 12.00±0.26e 15.04±0.68b 12.71±0.11d 13.90±0.21c

表6

不同采收期藜麦芽苗菜的ABTS清除活性

编号Number 21 d 28 d 35 d 42 d 49 d
Y1 39.66±0.96a 25.69±1.55c 33.52±0.20b 24.78±1.01c 33.62±1.72b
Y2 39.96±0.79a 25.57±0.29cd 24.56±1.25d 30.14±0.22b 26.71±0.19c
Y3 34.48±0.32a 22.13±0.68e 26.01±0.94d 28.14±1.17c 30.00±0.24b
Y4 31.78±0.95a 28.57±0.74b 28.65±0.19b 21.07±0.32d 22.99±0.49c
Y5 32.11±1.04a 25.51±2.36b 25.30±0.58b 25.38±0.55b 28.23±2.17b
Y6 31.90±2.24ab 28.43±0.35c 33.98±0.45a 31.48±1.45b 28.56±0.39c
Y7 33.21±1.17a 26.97±1.05c 29.83±0.38b 23.17±0.70d 29.20±0.76b
Y8 33.07±1.15a 27.78±0.70c 30.34±0.48b 28.58±0.77c 23.40±0.68d
Y9 33.19±2.62a 22.29±0.50c 28.02±0.51b 27.63±0.67b 29.12±0.56b
Y10 35.07±0.49a 32.23±0.54b 25.20±0.68c 24.00±0.50d 34.09±0.58a
Y11 30.89±1.16a 26.71±1.45b 22.01±1.06c 20.51±0.27c 30.84±0.58a
Y12 31.50±0.94a 21.75±0.69d 23.09±0.12c 28.11±0.58b 28.80±0.53b
Y13 36.65±0.94a 25.72±0.83c 23.20±1.23d 21.80±0.20d 27.54±0.75b
Y14 36.29±1.20a 25.88±0.90b 23.17±0.78c 24.26±0.37bc 24.78±1.13bc
Y15 29.30±0.07b 25.43±0.40c 23.87±1.38d 31.86±0.10a 30.20±0.91b
Y16 33.09±1.29a 28.34±0.69b 20.25±1.52d 22.05±0.93cd 23.61±1.00c
Y17 34.56±1.85a 26.03±0.43c 23.73±0.30d 23.69±0.64d 30.92±0.31b
Y18 35.83±1.36a 25.21±1.34c 24.05±0.08cd 22.76±0.48d 31.36±1.19b
Y19 35.97±1.60a 26.09±1.48b 26.55±0.67b 23.44±0.63c 20.11±1.66d

表7

不同采收期藜麦芽苗菜总多酚、总黄酮和体外抗氧化活性的相关性分析

指标
Index
总多酚
Total polyphenol
总黄酮
Total flavonoid
DPPH清除活性
DPPH scavenging activity
ABTS清除活性
ABTS scavenging activity
总多酚Total polyphenol 1.000
总黄酮Total flavonoid 0.393** 1.000
DPPH清除活性DPPH scavenging activity 0.738** 0.330** 1.000
ABTS清除活性ABTS scavenging activity 0.750** 0.509** 0.622** 1.000

表8

不同来源藜麦芽苗菜材料聚类分析

来源
Source
总份数
Total number
类群Ⅰ Group Ⅰ 类群Ⅱ Group Ⅱ 类群Ⅲ Group Ⅲ
份数
Number
占比
Proportion (%)
份数
Number
占比
Proportion (%)
份数
Number
占比
Proportion (%)
张家口Zhangjiakou 50 10 20.00 40 80.00 0 0.00
伊犁Yili 45 9 20.00 0 0.00 36 80.00

表9

不同类群藜麦的总多酚含量、总黄酮含量、抗氧化活性、株高和鲜重

组合
Group
总多酚
Total polyphenol
(mg GAE/g DW)
总黄酮
Total flavonoid
(mg RE/g DW)
DPPH清除活性
DPPH scavenging
activity (mg TE/g DW)
ABTS清除活性
ABTS scavenging
activity (mg TE/g DW)
株高
Plant height
(cm)
鲜重(g/株)
Fresh weight
(g/plant)
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
平均值
Mean
标准偏差
SD
类群Ⅰ
Group Ⅰ
12.88
1.03
30.89
3.54
16.34
1.97
34.13
2.81
15.57
0.54
9.27
0.48
类群Ⅱ
Group Ⅱ
11.21
0.89
25.37
3.03
13.82
1.58
27.52
3.38
40.10
15.92
34.24
19.81
类群Ⅲ
Group Ⅲ
10.76
0.88
24.02
3.31
13.37
1.46
25.21
3.22
40.81
17.58
21.52
11.34
平均值
Mean
11.38
1.20
25.96
4.10
14.15
1.95
27.97
4.56
35.46
17.90
24.43
17.36
[1] 任贵兴, 杨修仕, 么杨. 中国藜麦产业现状. 作物杂志, 2015(5):1-5.
[2] 张燕红, 郭占斌, 刘瑞香. 50份藜麦种质资源农艺性状的综合分析与评价. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6):45-54.
[3] 杨瑞, 党斌, 张杰, 等. 青海青稞、燕麦、藜麦营养品质及抗氧化活性比较研究. 中国粮油学报, 2022, 37(5):63-69.
[4] Zhou X Y, Yue T, Wei Z F, et al. Evaluation of nutritional value, bioactivity and mineral content of quinoa bran in China and its potential use in the food industry. Current Research in Food Science, 2023, 7:100562.
doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100562
[5] Srinivasu S R, Eligar S M. Physico-chemical and techno- functional characterization of quinoa bran protein concentrate. Journal of Cereal Science, 2024, 116:103835.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103835
[6] Ayub M, Castro-Alba V, Lazarte C E. Development of an instant- mix probiotic beverage based on fermented quinoa with reduced phytate content. Journal of Functional Foods, 2021, 87:104831.
doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104831
[7] Abdelshafy A M, Rashwan A K, Osman A I. Potential food applications and biological activities of fermented quinoa: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2024, 144:104339.
[8] Zhang L, Xiong T, Wang X F, et al. Pickering emulsifiers based on enzymatically modified quinoa starches: Preparation, microstructures, hydrophilic property and emulsifying property. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, 190:130-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.212 pmid: 34481848
[9] Pandya A, Thiele B, Köppchen S, et al. Characterization of bioactive phenolic compounds in seeds of chilean quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) germplasm. Agronomy, 2023, 13(8):2170.
doi: 10.3390/agronomy13082170
[10] Hu Y C, Zhou J, Cao Y N, et al. Anti-aging effects of polysaccharides from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in improving memory and cognitive function. Journal of Functional Foods, 2022, 94:105097.
doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105097
[11] Zeyneb H, Pei H R, Cao X L, et al. In vitro study of the effect of quinoa and quinoa polysaccharides on human gut microbiota. Food Science & Nutrition, 2021, 9(10):5735-5745.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.v9.10
[12] Zhu X C, Yang G Y, Shen Y B, et al. Physicochemical properties and biological activities of quinoa polysaccharides. Molecules, 2024, 29(7):1576.
doi: 10.3390/molecules29071576
[13] Tan M H, Zhao Q S, Zhao B. Physicochemical properties, structural characterization and biological activities of polysaccharides from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, 193:1635-1644.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.226
[14] Teng C, Qin P Y, Shi Z X, et al. Structural characterization and antioxidant activity of alkali-extracted polysaccharides from quinoa. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 113:106392.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106392
[15] Xing B, Teng C, Sun M H, et al. Effect of germination treatment on the structural and physicochemical properties of quinoa starch. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 115:106604.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106604
[16] Xing B, Zhang Z, Zhu M L, et al. The gluten structure, starch digestibility and quality properties of pasta supplemented with native or germinated quinoa flour. Food Chemistry, 2023, 399:133976.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133976
[17] 张魏斌, 温日宇, 姜庆国, 等. 不同种植模式下采收期对藜麦苗菜生物量及营养品质的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2023, 69(8):29-33.
[18] Lim J G, Park H M, Yoon K S. Analysis of saponin composition and comparison of the antioxidant activity of various parts of the quinoa plant (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Science & Nutrition, 2020, 8(1):694-702.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.v8.1
[19] Pathan S U, Siddiqui R A. Nutritional composition and bioactive components in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) greens: a review. Nutrients, 2022, 14(3):558.
doi: 10.3390/nu14030558
[20] Altikardes E, Güzel N. Impact of germination pre-treatments on buckwheat and quinoa: Mitigation of anti-nutrient content and enhancement of antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry:X, 2024, 21:101182.
doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101182
[21] Obaroakpo J U, Liu L, Zhang S W, et al. Antioxidant capacity of germinated quinoa-based yoghurt and concomitant effect of sprouting on its functional properties. Food Science & Technology, 2019, 116:108592.
[22] Zhang Q P, Bao X, Sun M H, et al. Changes in bio-accessibility,polyphenol profile and antioxidants of quinoa and djulis sprouts during in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Science & Nutrition, 2020, 8(8):4232-4241.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.v8.8
[23] 胡一晨, 赵钢, 秦培友, 等. 藜麦活性成分研究进展. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11):1579-1591.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01579
[24] 张琴萍. 藜麦芽苗菜营养功能品质特性研究. 成都: 成都大学, 2020.
[25] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准食品中水分的测定:GB 5009.3-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[26] Qin P Y, Li W, Yao Y, et al. Changes in phytochemical compositions, antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities during the processing of tartary buckwheat tea. Food Research International, 2013, 50(2):562-567.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.028
[27] Sarker U, Oba S. Response of nutrients, minerals, antioxidant leaf pigments, vitamins, polyphenol, flavonoid and antioxidant activity in selected vegetable amaranth under four soil water content. Food Chemistry, 2018, 252:72-83.
doi: S0308-8146(18)30106-7 pmid: 29478565
[28] Yao Y, Yang X S, Tian J, et al. Antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of black mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(34):8104-8109.
doi: 10.1021/jf401812z pmid: 23947804
[29] Adamczewska-Sowińska K, Sowiński J, Jama-Rodzeńska A. The effect of sowing date and harvest time on leafy greens of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) yield and selected nutritional parameters. Agriculture, 2021, 11(5):405.
doi: 10.3390/agriculture11050405
[30] 吴应齐, 姚理武, 吴丽芳, 等. 不同品系藜麦苗菜农艺性状及营养品质评价. 浙江林业科技, 2021, 41(4):56-61.
[31] Aatif M. Current understanding of polyphenols to enhance bioavailability for better therapies. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(7):2078.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11072078
[32] Gómez M J R, Magro P C, Blazquez M R, et al. Nutritional composition of quinoa leafy greens: An underutilized plant-based food with the potential of contributing to current dietary trends. Food Research International, 2024, 178:113862.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113862
[33] 陆敏佳, 蒋玉蓉, 袁俊杰, 等. 藜麦叶片多酚最佳提取工艺及其抗氧化性研究. 中国粮油学报, 2016, 31(1):101-106.
[34] Wan Y, Zhou M, Le L Q, et al. Evaluation of morphology, nutrients, phytochemistry and pigments suggests the optimum harvest date for high-quality quinoa leafy vegetable. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 304:111240.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111240
[35] Teh S X, Birch E J. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of extract from defatted hemp, flax and canola seed cakes. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2014, 21(1):346-353.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.08.002
[36] 罗秀秀, 秦培友, 杨修仕, 等. 藜麦苗生长过程中功能成分含量及抗氧化活性变化研究. 作物杂志, 2018(2):123-128.
[37] 白雅晖, 虞慧彬, 徐晓东, 等. 对不同品种蚕豆芽苗菜生长期内产量、品质及相关性的研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10):98-107.
[38] Chen L, Wu J E, Li Z M, et al. Metabolomic analysis of energy regulated germination and sprouting of organic mung bean (Vigna radiata) using NMR spectroscopy. Food Chemistry, 2019, 286:87-97.
doi: S0308-8146(19)30274-2 pmid: 30827671
[39] 鲁燕舞, 张晓燕, 耿殿祥, 等. 光质对萝卜芽苗菜总酚类物质含量及抗氧化能力的影响. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(3):545-552.
[40] Yeasmen N, Orsat V. Phenolic mapping and associated antioxidant activities through the annual growth cycle of sugar maple leaves. Food Chemistry, 2023, 428:136882.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136882
[41] Zhang Y, Huang W L, Zhang C L, et al. Variation in the main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of three leafy vegetables in Southwest China. Molecules, 2023, 28(12):4780.
doi: 10.3390/molecules28124780
[42] Vázquez L A, Pimentel C V, Fuentes C F, et al. Quinoa leaf as a nutritional alternative. Cienciae Investigación Agraria, 2019, 46(2):137-143.
[43] Villacrés E, Quelal M, Galarza S, et al. Nutritional value and bioactive compounds of leaves and grains from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Plants, 2022, 11(2):213.
doi: 10.3390/plants11020213
[44] 赵齐燕, 唐宁, 贾鑫, 等. 两类紫云英苗菜生长过程中酚类物质及其抗氧化活性的变化. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(18):12-20,8.
[45] 赵天瑶, 苌淑敏, 李少华, 等. 豌豆萌发过程中生长特性、酚类含量及抗氧化性变化. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(12):1-9.
[46] 孙坤坤, 卢奕霏, 侯泽豪, 等. 苦荞芽菜游离酚、结合酚及抗氧化活性研究. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(7):1035-1044.
[47] 黄正正, 杨思睿, 沈绍武, 等. 基于中医医院双重诊断的病例相关分组模型研究. 中国医院, 2022, 26(12):53-56.
[1] 和桂青, 李兆光, 袁文珏, 和琼姬, 杨文高, 李燕, 王蕊, 叶磊, 侯志江. 藜麦生长发育特性及养分吸收分配动态变化规律研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (2): 172–179
[2] 拜伟俊, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 刘文瑜, 柴继宽, 杨发荣, 李小雨. 藜麦种子丸粒化配方的筛选及效果验证[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (2): 253–258
[3] 高艳梅, 冯鹏睿, 陈薇薇, 张萌, 张永清. 抗旱性藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (1): 182–188
[4] 杨文高, 袁文珏, 李兆光, 和桂青, 和琼姬, 王蕊, 李燕, 叶磊, 侯志江. 播期对滇西北冬播藜麦农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (1): 257–265
[5] 张业猛, 卢柯欣, 毛文钰, 张晓燕, 李文静, 杨修. 藜麦LEA基因家族鉴定及盐胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (6): 100–111
[6] 闫晶蓉, 庞春花, 张永清, 毋悦悦, 侯钰晨, 王嘉祺, 乔曼. 脱硫石膏与腐植酸配施对盐碱地土壤及藜麦生长的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (5): 47–53
[7] 李小雨, 黄杰, 杨钊, 柴继宽, 杨发荣, 魏玉明, 刘文瑜, 拜伟俊. 基于AHP法的观赏藜麦综合评价体系的建立与应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (3): 70–77
[8] 张圣昌, 魏玉明, 马丽娜, 杨钊, 刘文瑜, 黄杰, 刘欢, 杨发荣. 种植密度和施肥对饲用型藜麦生长特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (2): 128–134
[9] 景茂雅, 张子玉, 张萌, 合佳敏, 严翻翻, 高艳梅, 张永清. 水杨酸浸种对盐胁迫藜麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (1): 194–201
[10] 马丽娜, 魏玉明, 文莉芳, 张学俭, 杨钊, 黄杰, 张圣昌, 李小雨, 刘欢, 杨发荣. 云南元谋地区22份藜麦种质的农艺性状及营养品质分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (6): 47–54
[11] 侯钰晨, 庞春花, 张永清, 康书瑜, 毋悦悦, 闫晶蓉, 王嘉祺. 施用生物炭与氮肥对盐碱胁迫下藜麦幼苗生理生长特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (4): 240–246
[12] 刘建霞, 王文庆, 薛乃雯, 郭绪虎, 马赛雅, 朱国芳, 温日宇. 14个不同产地藜麦种质染色体核型分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (3): 82–89
[13] 合佳敏, 张永清, 张萌, 梁萍, 王丹, 严翻翻. 烯效唑浸种对盐碱胁迫下藜麦农艺性状及生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (2): 234–241
[14] 杨恩泽, 王树彦, 刘瑞香, 石丰源, 张锦豪, 李佳娜, 李志伟, 郭占斌. 基于SRAP的藜麦种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 79–85
[15] 郭红霞, 王创云, 邓妍, 赵丽, 张丽光, 郭虹霞, 秦丽霞, 高飞, 席瑞珍. 藜麦对低氮胁迫的响应研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (3): 221–229
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!