45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对冬小麦生长发育的影响和主要病虫害的防控研究

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.029

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对冬小麦出苗、农艺性状、主要病虫害防效、产量等的影响,以周麦27为试验品种进行田间试验,以每100kg种子30% 噻虫嗪FS 240mL+30g/L苯醚甲环唑FS 200mL为对照药剂,设置3种不同药种质量比（400、600、800g/100kg）进行研究,以确定最佳用药量。结果表明：各药剂处理对小麦均不产生药害、出苗安全,可显著提高出苗率,增强小麦植株素质,成熟安全。各药剂处理小麦主要病虫害的病情指数（被害株率、百株蚜量）均与对照药剂处理差异不显著,但防效有所差异;除400g/100kg包衣对金针虫、纹枯病的防效低于对照药剂处理且差异显著外,其余药剂处理的防效均与对照药剂处理差异不显著。与空白对照（CK）相比,400、600、800g/100kg包衣处理小麦增产率分别为6.71%、8.16%、9.07%,对照药剂处理的增产率为8.29%,均与CK差异显著。生产中推荐45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂应用于小麦生产的最佳用量为600g/100kg包衣。

关键词: 冬小麦, 45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪;, 生长发育, 病虫害

Abstract:

The effect of fenaminstrobin-difenoconazole-thiamethoxam 45% FSC on winter wheat emergence, plant quality, the main diseases and insect pests control effect and yield was studied in field experiment with Zhoumai 27 as tested variety. In order to determine the optimal dose, the related research was carried out with 30% thiamethoxam FS 240mL+30g/L difenoconazole FS 200mL per 100kg seed as control agents, setting up three different mass ratio of pesticide to seeds (400g/100kg, 600g/100kg, 800g/100kg). The results showed that: All medicament treatment on wheat did not produce the toxicity, emergence safety, mature security and could significantly improve the germination rate, enhance the quality of wheat plant. There was no significant difference in the disease index (100 strains of aphid) between the chemical treatment and the control agents on main diseases and insect pests of wheat, but the control effect was different. In addition to the 400g/100kg coating control effect on the wireworm and sheath blight was significantly lower than that of control agents, the control effect of rest treatment were no significant difference with the control agent. Wheat yield increase rate of 400, 600, 800g/100kg coating and contrast agent was 6.71%, 8.16% ,9.07% and 8.29% respectively, and were significantly different from CK. The best recommended dosage of fenaminstrobin-difenoconazole-thiamethoxam 45% applied to wheat was 600g/100kg coating in the production.

Key words: Winter wheat, Fenaminstrobin-difenoconazole-thiamethoxam 45%, Growth and development, Diseases and insect pests

王绍敏,国淑梅,牛贞福,张鹤. 45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对冬小麦生长发育的影响和主要病虫害的防控研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016 (4): 167–171

Shaomin Wang,Shumei Guo,Zhenfu Niu,He Zhang. Effects of Fenaminstrobin-Difenoconazole-Thiamethoxam 45% FSC on Growth,Development,Main Diseases and Insect Pests in Winter Wheat[J]. Crops, 2016(4): 167–171

图/表 5

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 13

[1]	季书勤, 郭瑞, 赵淑章 , 等. 氮磷钾、灌水、喷洒杀菌剂对强筋小麦产量和品质的影响. 华北农学报, 2006,21(4):82-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2006.04.021
[2]	杨继远, 汪洋, 张慎举 . 杀菌剂对强筋小麦产量和品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(13):5906-5907.
[3]	张会云, 陈荣振, 冯国华 , 等. 中国小麦纹枯病研究现状与展望. 麦类作物学报, 2007,27(6):1150-1153. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2007.06.270
[4]	孙炳剑, 雷小天, 袁虹霞 , 等. 小麦纹枯病化学防治药剂的筛选. 麦类作物学报, 2007,27(5):914-918. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2007.05.220
[5]	孙炳剑, 袁虹霞, 邢小萍 , 等. 不同种子处理剂对小麦全蚀病的防治效果. 麦类作物学报, 2008,28(4):709-712.
[6]	程水明, 宋家永, 夏国军 , 等. 复方适乐时拌种防治小麦纹枯病和全蚀病的试验研究. 麦类作物学报, 2002,22(1):76-79. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2002.01.019
[7]	王汉芳, 季书琴, 李向东 , 等. 10.4%吡虫啉·烯唑醇悬浮种衣剂对小麦蚜虫和纹枯病的防治效果. 麦类作物学报, 2012,32(4):799-804. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2012.04.037
[8]	茹李军, 郑雪松, 丑靖宇 , 等. 45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对小麦纹枯病和蚜虫的防治效果. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36(2):251-256.
[9]	张自启, 王利霞, 刘长营 , 等.不同小麦种衣剂对冬小麦生长及产量的影响.作物杂志,2011(6):119-121.
[10]	陈春利, 王绍敏, 杨慧 , 等. 氟唑菌酰胺及其混剂防治辣椒灰霉病药效分析. 农药, 2014,53(9):685-687.
[11]	中华人民共和国农业部. GB/T 17980.1-17980.53-2000农药田间药效试验准则.北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[12]	赵晓华, 张冬青, 李文娟 . 2014 年成武县小麦病虫害发生实况及原因分析. 现代农业科技,2014(22):127-128.
[13]	杨慧, 王绍敏, 赵鑫 , 等. 咯菌腈·精甲霜灵·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对棉花玉米病虫害的田间防效. 农药, 2015,54(11):852-854.

相关文章 15

[1]	王汉霞单福华田立平马巧云赵昌平张风廷. 北部冬麦区冬小麦区试品种（系）的#br# 稳定性和适应性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 40–44
[2]	安霞张海军蒋方山吕连杰陈军. 播期播量对不同穗型冬小麦群体及子粒产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 132–136
[3]	陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121–125
[4]	宋敏,张海鹏,路兴涛,吴翠霞,张勇. 不同除草剂对冬小麦田宝盖草的防除效果[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 161–165
[5]	马瑞琦,亓振,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,杨玉双,冯金凤,孙敏,赵广才. 化控剂对冬小麦植株性状及产量品质的调节效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 133–140
[6]	曹嘉晨,郑有飞,赵辉,徐静馨. 开顶式气室对冬小麦的生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 88–95
[7]	高雪,强远华,梁社往,陶宏征,许云玉,杨宝菊,刘雅婷. 魔芋病虫害及绿色防控研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 26–30
[8]	黄少辉,杨军芳,贾良良,杨云马,杨文方,孙彦铭. 脲甲醛对冬小麦产量及土壤中硝态氮分布的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (3): 110–114
[9]	刘丽杰,张东向,金忠民,林立东,任艳波,赵婧佟,苍晶. 外源水杨酸对低温下寒地冬小麦细胞超微结构的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (3): 60–68
[10]	田艺心,高凤菊. 高蛋白大豆生长发育及干物质积累分配对密度的响应研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 121–125
[11]	赵振杰,梁太波,陈千思,胡利伟,张艳玲,尹启生. 碳纳米材料对植物生长发育的调节作用[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 7–13
[12]	谢连杰,李娜娜,裴艳婷,宋建霞,赵磊,李志强,丁汉凤. 山东省近60年主推冬小麦品种对土壤矿质元素吸收特性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 56–60
[13]	王连喜,刘畅,李琪,吴东丽,王清,成威. 气候变暖背景下京津冀地区冬小麦种植北界变化[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 61–67
[14]	王俊英,周吉红,孟范玉,毛思帅,杨建国,张金良,刘亚佳,李小龙. 北京市冬小麦节水节肥节药轻简栽培技术体系研究与应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (6): 99–106
[15]	刘丽华,庞斌双,李宏博,刘阳娜,福德平,王娜,赵昌平. 2009-2015年北京市冬小麦区域试验品系的DNA指纹分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (5): 13–18

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

处理 Treatments	出苗率Emergency rate(%)
处理 Treatments	播后6d 6 days after sowing	播后7d 7 days after sowing	播后15d 15 days after sowing
T1	15.33±1.53a	56.00±2.65a	83.67±1.53a
T2	14.00±1.00a	56.00±1.00a	82.67±1.53a
T3	14.33±0.58a	54.67±2.52a	82.33±1.53a
T0	14.67±1.53a	54.67±3.06a	83.00±2.00a
CK	13.67±1.53a	58.33±2.08a	79.00±1.00b

处理Treatments	株高Plant height(cm)	根长Root length(cm)	单株根数Number of root per plant	单株根鲜重Root fresh weight per plant(g)
T1	11.52±0.52a	6.57±0.08b	9.59±0.20a	1.41±0.05c
T2	11.85±0.12a	7.10±0.08a	9.73±0.11a	1.52±0.04b
T3	11.70±0.13a	7.21±0.11a	9.69±0.09a	1.57±0.04ab
T0	11.77±0.09a	7.14±0.10a	9.71±0.12a	1.62±0.06a
CK	10.80±0.11b	5.99±0.13c	8.45±0.23b	1.01±0.03d

处理Treatments	金针虫Elateridae		蚜虫Macrosiphum avenae
处理Treatments	被害株率Disease index	防效Control effect(%)	百株蚜量Number of aphid per 100 plant	防效Control effect(%)
T1	0.90+0.118b	73.10±1.24c	480.67±19.86b	44.54±3.27a
T2	0.77±0.126b	77.15±0.25b	456.67±11.06b	47.19±4.96a
T3	0.64±0.051b	80.76±1.89a	450.33±12.66b	47.99±3.76a
T0	0.72±0.126b	78.69±0.07ab	463.00±25.06b	46.62±2.45a
CK	3.36±0.590a	-	870.00±86.54a	-

处理 Treatments	纹枯病Rhizotonia cerealia		白粉病Blumeria graminis		叶锈病Puccinia recondita
处理 Treatments	病情指数 Disease index	防效(%) Control effect	病情指数 Disease index	防效(%) Control effect	病情指数 Disease index	防效(%) Control effect
T1	2.33±0.30b	72.27±0.77c	1.95±0.19b	83.75±0.67c	1.56±0.06b	89.57±0.68a
T2	1.95±0.22b	76.76±0.81b	1.79±0.19b	85.09±0.77b	1.54±0.12b	89.64±1.15a
T3	1.52±0.08b	81.75±1.79a	1.65±0.17b	86.23±0.31a	1.46±0.06b	90.22±0.76a
T0	2.10±0.22b	75.04±1.06b	1.83±0.15b	84.77±0.49bc	1.43±0.15b	90.42±0.74a
CK	8.42±1.22a	-	12.03±1.32a	-	14.98±1.55a	-

处理 Treatments	有效穗数(穗/m²) Number of spike	穗粒数 Number of spike	千粒重(g) 1000-grain weight	产量(kg/667m²) Yield	增产率(%) Increase rate
T1	608.81±1.31a	32.33±0.28a	41.23±0.19b	541.03±5.93a	6.71±0.31b
T2	610.01±1.39a	32.48±0.27a	41.51±0.16ab	548.33±5.25a	8.16±0.82a
T3	610.32±0.66a	32.57±0.20a	41.72±0.27a	553.00±7.04a	9.07±0.22a
T0	610.23±1.17a	32.39±0.23a	41.67±0.26ab	549.03±8.04a	8.29±0.51a
CK	609.54±1.76a	30.90±0.17b	40.37±0.35c	507.03±6.79b	-