Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 38-43.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Filling Characteristics of Large Panicle Type Rice Variety 7-37

Sun Huimin1,Zheng Shuwen1,Zheng Wei2,Wang Anping1,Feng Guanping1,Duan Shihua1,Zheng Zhuo1   

  1. 1 School of Life Sciences,Jinggangshan University,Ji′an 343009,Jiangxi,China;
    2 Agricultural Bureau of Ji'an City,Ji′an 343000,Jiangxi,China;
  • Received:2016-05-22 Revised:2016-08-05 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Zhuo Zheng

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

98

Abstract:

In order to reveal the photosynthetic and grain filling characteristics of high efficiency variety 7-37, large panicle 7-37 with short growth period, small panicle R122 with short growth period and large panicle R1126 with long growth period were used as the tested materials in the field experiment. The results showed that large panicle 7-37 had obvious advantages in photosynthetic characteristics, especially the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration Ci, always with lowest position in the three varieties before the 25d after flowering. Leaf source capacity ( LSC) of flag was 1.96 times higher than R122 and 20% higher than R1126. In grain filling characteristics, the 7-37 had obvious advantages in GR0, although the Va was a little lower than R122, significantly higher than R1126, and the effective filling time was also shorter than R1126. At the same time, the spike length, total number of kernels and grain density of 7-37 were no obvious difference with R1126, but significantly higher than R122. The primary branch and secondary branch were analyzed separately, which the secondary branch of 7-37 had obvious advantages on the total number of spike grain number, but there was no significant difference to R122 and R1126, which secondary branch to cytopathology substances existed more fierce competition, but still could be normal full. The tests indicated that the main reasons for large spike 7-37 with high photosynthetic efficiency were the higher leaf source capacity, the shorter effective filling time and the total number of secondary branch grains.

Key words: Rice, Photosynthesis characteristics, Grain filling characteristics, High efficiency

Fig.1

Comparison of photosynthetic rate in different rice varieties"

Table 1

Comparison of leaf area and leaf source capacity in different rice varieties"

品种
Cultivar		 叶面积Leaf area(cm2) LSC
（mmolCO2）
均值Mean 变幅Range
7-37 111.04 99.28~125.17 143.91
R122 56.59 53.20~60.18 73.34
R1126 91.92 80.42~100.35 120.42

Table 2

The filling parameters for grains on different positions of a panicle in different rice varieties"

品种Cultivar 粒位Position GR0(g/1000 grain) Vmax[g/(1000 grain·d)] t-Vmax(d) T99(d) Va[g/(1000 grain·d)]
7-37 S1 0.488 2.916 18.78 27.14 0.877
S2 0.543 2.526 17.32 36.53 0.658
Z1 0.530 3.028 20.51 31.26 0.824
Z2 0.434 1.605 23.88 37.57 0.714
X1 0.498 1.831 21.12 29.60 0.967
X2 0.407 1.565 24.79 37.32 0.504
R122 S1 0.494 3.318 15.56 26.04 0.901
S2 0.412 2.084 16.15 30.92 0.786
Z1 0.478 3.532 15.31 29.10 0.983
Z2 0.383 1.821 17.28 38.00 0.817
X1 0.292 3.100 18.29 28.17 0.806
X2 0.347 1.776 25.06 32.66 0.653
R1126 S1 0.378 2.350 16.02 35.15 0.786
S2 0.352 2.065 19.15 41.75 0.798
Z1 0.373 2.222 19.74 39.48 0.700
Z2 0.320 1.895 21.11 45.85 0.551
X1 0.367 2.032 19.52 38.78 0.591
X2 0.336 1.534 21.31 46.53 0.431

Table 3

Comparison of panicle traits in different rice varieties"

品种Cultivar PL(cm) GNP GD(grains/cm2) PBN GNPB TGWPB(g) SBN GNSB TGWSB(g)
7-37 32.17±2.26Aa 398.69±37.87Aa 12.39±2.88Aa 17.81±5.38Ab 90.27±11.03Ab 25.58±4.25Aa 47.75±8.00Aa 308.42±64.84Aa 24.00±5.73Aa
R122 24.08±1.57ABb 247.24±23.48Ab 10.26±0.75Ab 16.07±1.66Ab 84.45±11.24Ab 26.23±2.25Aa 45.42±11.60Aa 162.79±25.77Bc 24.65±0.92Aa
R1126 30.44±1.54Aa 349.97±46.23Aa 11.48±2.45Aa 22.22±3.67Aa 132.08±26.85Aa 24.68±2.88Aa 54.53±5.59Aa 217.89±20.69Bb 23.46±4.44Aa
[1] 张军, 覃志豪, 李文娟 . 1949-2009年中国粮食生产发展与空间分布演变研究. 中国农学通报, 2011(24):56-65.
[2] 程勇翔, 王秀珍, 郭建平 , 等. 中国水稻生产的时空动态分析. 中国农业科学, 2012(17):200-108.
[3] 尹海庆 . 不同生态区播期对机插水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(6):113-121.
[4] 霍中洋, 张洪程 . 播期对不同类型品种直播稻生长特性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2010,29(11):2131-2138.
[5] Gendua P A, Yamamoto Y, Miyazaki A , et al. Responses of yielding ability,sink size and percentage of filled grains to thecultivation practices in a Chinese large-panicle-type rice cultivar,Yangdao 4. Plant Production Science, 2008,12(2):243-256.
[6] Gendua P A, Yamamoto Y, Miyazaki A , et al. Effects of the tillering nodes on the main stem of a Chinese large-panicle-type rice cultivar,Yangdao 4,on the growth and yield-related characteristics in relation to cropping season. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2009,12(2):257-266.
[7] Yang L X, Huang J Y, Yang H J , et al. The impact of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and N supply on yield formation of rice crops with large panicle. Field Crops Research, 2006,98:141-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.12.014
[8] Li M, Tang D, Wang K J , et al. Mutations in the F-box gene larger panicle improve the panicle architecture and enhance the grain yield in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2011,9(9):1002-1013.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.2011.9.issue-9
[9] 程旺大, 张国平, 姚海根 , 等. 密穗型水稻品种的籽粒灌浆特性研究. 作物学报, 2003,29(6):841-846.
[10] 刘晓龙, 徐晨, 徐克章 , 等. 盐胁迫对水稻叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2014(2):88-92.
[11] 李合生 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 123-124.
[12] 顾世梁, 朱庆森, 杨建昌 , 等. 不同水稻材料籽粒灌浆特性的分析. 作物学报, 2001,27(1):7-14.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2001.01.002
[13] 应存山 . 中国稻种资源.北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1993: 530-531.
[14] 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰 , 等. 水稻光合作用研究进展及其影响因素分析. 北方水稻, 2014,44(5):66-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6737.2014.05.025
[15] 剧成欣, 陶进, 钱希旸 , 等. 不同年代中籼水稻品种的叶片光合性状. 作物学报, 2016,42(3):415-426.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00415
[16] 杨建昌, 朱庆森, 王志琴 , 等. 亚种间杂交稻光合特性及物质积累与运转的研究. 作物学报, 1997,23(1):82-88.
[17] 翟虎渠, 曹树青, 万建民 , 等. 超高产杂交稻灌浆期光合功能与产量的关系. 中国科学, 2002,32(1):211-217.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7232.2002.03.003
[18] 唐塘, 吕冰, 梁建生 . 不同水稻品种组合籽粒灌浆特性的比较. 扬州大学学报, 2009,30(1):78-83.
[19] 杨建昌 . 水稻弱势粒灌浆机理与调控途径. 作物学报, 2010,36(12):2011-2019.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02011
[20] 朱庆森, 曹显祖, 骆亦其 . 水稻籽粒灌浆的生长分析. 作物学报, 1988,14(3):182-192.
[21] 王复标, 黄福灯, 程方民 , 等. 水稻生育后期叶片早衰突变体的光合特性与叶绿体超微结构观察. 作物学报, 2012,38(5):871-879.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00871
[22] 李敏, 张洪程, 杨雄 , 等. 高产氮高效型粳稻品种的叶片光合及衰老特性研究. 中国水稻科学, 2013(27):168-176.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2013.02.009
[23] Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A , et al. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nature Genetics, 2010,42(6):545-550.
doi: 10.1038/ng.592 pmid: 20495564
[24] Terao T, Nagata K, Morino K , et al. A gene controlling the number of primary rachis branches also controls the vascular bundle formation and hence is responsible to increase the harvest index and grain yield in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010,120:875-893.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1218-8
[25] Weng X Y, Wang L, Wang J , et al. Grain number,plant height,and heading date7 is a central regulator of growth,development,and stress response. Plant Physiology, 2014,164(2):735-747.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.231308
[26] Wei X J, Xu J F, Guo H N , et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice,influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiology, 2010,153(4):1747-1758.
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156943
[27] 蔡耀辉, 李永辉, 邱健 . 水稻高光效育种研究进展及展望. 江西农业学报, 2009,21(12):26-29.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2009.12.008
[1] Ji Shengdong, Li Peng, Li Jiangwei, Song Liumin, . Analysis of Peroxidase Zymogram and Genetic#br# Effects between Rice Lines and Their#br# Parents During Grain Filling [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 17-20.
[2] Ma Mengli, Zheng Yun, Zhou Xiaomei, . Genetic Diversity Analysis of Red Rice from#br# Hani’s Terraced Fields in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 21-26.
[3] Chen Yingying, Wangxu Yiling, Zhu Yuhan, . Hyperspectral Estimation of Nitrogen#br# Content in Rice Panicle [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 116-120.
[4] Xiaoyu Liang, Chunyu Lin, Shumei Ma, Yang Wang. Mining Elite Alleles for Germination Ability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Salt and Alkaline Stress [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 48-52.
[5] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[6] Bo Zeng. Renovation of Main Cultivated Rice Varieties in China in the Past 30 Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 1-7.
[7] Lili Zhang,Yizhou Zhao,Xin Li,Ting Mao,Yan Liu,Zhan Zhang,Shanjun Ni,Fucai Liu. Mutant Analysis on Quality Trait of Different Japonica Rice Progenies Induced by 60Co-γ Ray Irradiation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 51-56.
[8] Li Zhang,Zantang Li,Shiyin Wang,Yanchao Ma,Yang Dongfang,Xueyong Li,Jiang Xu. Physiological and Genetic Analysis of Rice Mutant osnad1 Defective in Nitrogen Absorption [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 68-76.
[9] Chen He,Guiping Zheng,Haicheng Zhao,Liqiang Chen,Hongyu Li,Yandong Lü,Jiang Song. Effects of Increasing Humic Acid but Reducing Fertilization on Panicle Traits and Yield of Rice in Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 129-134.
[10] Yong Cui. The Research Progress of Water-Dry Rotation Methods in Paddy Field [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 8-14.
[11] Zhiqiang Tang,Liqiang Dong,Rui Li,Liying Zhang,Na He,Yuedong Li. Effects of Nitrogen and Soil Type on Seedling Quality and Nutrient Absorption in Rice [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 141-147.
[12] Bo Zeng,Shixian Sun,Jie Wang. Registration of Main Rice Varieties and Its Application in Recent 30 Years in China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 1-5.
[13] Zhibo Zhou,Yake Yi,Guanghui Chen. Effects of Sowing Amount, Medium and Chemical Treatment on Seedling Quality and Yield of High Quality Late-Rice Variety of Yuzhenxiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 129-135.
[14] Ge Qu,Zhengguang Chen,Xue Wang. Identification of Rice Varieties Using NIR Spectroscopy and SIMCA, PLS-DA Methods [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 166-170.
[15] Jianjun Wang,Yongjun Zeng,Yanhong Yi,Qiming Zhang,Qixing Hu,Xueming Tan,Shan Huang,Qingyin Shang,Yanhua Zeng,Qinghua Shi. The Uniformity of Mechanical-Transplanted Early-Season Rice under Different Seeding Rates and Its Effects on the Formation of Grain Yield [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 141-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .