Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 178-184.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.03.027

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Planting Density on Membrane Lipid Peroxidation Characteristics and Quality of Cigar Tobacco Leaves

Li Jin’ao1(), Zhang Siwei1, Liu Boyuan1, Zhong Qiu2, Qin Yanqing2, Zou Yuhang2, Zhao Mingqin1()   

  1. 1College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2Deyang City Company of Sichuan Tobacco Company, Deyang 618400, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2020-07-24 Revised:2020-08-21 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-22
  • Contact: Zhao Mingqin E-mail:Lijinao8023@163.com;zhaomingqin@heanu.edu.cn

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

224

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different planting densities on the physiological and biochemical characteristics and quality of cigar tobacco leaves, determine the appropriate planting density for cigar tobacco planting in Sichuan, Dexue No. 1 was used as the test material to determine the field microclimate, the degree of peroxidation of membrane lipid of tobacco leaves, the activities of related antioxidant enzymes, and the yield and quality of tobacco leaves during the mature period. The results showed that with the increase of planting density, the temperature and humidity of tobacco fields increased, and the light intensity of tobacco leaves decreased. There was a significant positive correlation between the temperature and the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation of tobacco leaves at the maturity stage, and the correlation coefficient was 0.52-0.85. During the same period, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content of tobacco leaves first decreased and then increased with the increase of planting density, and the antioxidant enzyme activity first increased and then decreased. Among them, the antioxidant enzyme activity was the highest when the planting density was 21 000 plants/ha, and the POD and CAT activities reached the highest on day 28 after topping, which were 61.6U/(gFW·min) and 123.0U/(mg·min), respectively. SOD activity was the highest (755.8U/g) on day 21 after topping, the MDA content was 25.3mmol/g on day 35 after topping, and the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation was the lowest. After modulation, the total sugar content of the tobacco leaves increased to 1.86%, the nicotine content was 3.02%, the potassium-chloride ratio was as high as 9.21, the chemical composition was more coordinated, and the sensory evaluation score was the highest. The ratio of tobacco leaf output and wrapper tobacco was increased by 9000yuan/ha and 7% respectively, compared with the conventional planting density of 24 000 plants/ha. In summary, compared with the conventional planting density of 24 000 plants/ha, 21 000 plants/ha was a suitable planting density of Sichuan cigar tobacco.

Key words: Cigar tobacco, Planting density, Membrane lipid peroxidation, Tobacco leaf quality, Field microclimate

Table 1

Cigar sensory quality score weight"

指标
Index		 劲头
Vigor		 浓度
Concentration		 香气质
Aroma quality		 香气量
Aroma amount		 余味
Afterstaste		 杂气
Miscellaneous gas		 刺激性
Irritating		 甜度
Sweetness		 灰色
Ash color
权重Weight 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Table 2

Effects of planting density on field microclimate"

指标Index 处理
Treatment		 打顶后天数Days after topping
7d 14d 21d 28d 35d
温度Air temperature (℃) T1 30.73c 32.43c 31.93c 35.43c 36.27c
T2 31.70bc 33.97b 31.97c 36.97b 37.60b
T3 31.57bc 34.23b 32.43b 37.27ab 37.23b
T4 31.77b 34.17b 36.53a 37.43a 37.60b
T5 32.10a 34.60a 36.23a 37.53a 38.90a
相对湿度Relative humidity (%) T1 54.10a 56.37c 58.43c 55.30d 54.63d
T2 54.30a 56.20c 59.03b 58.37c 56.77c
T3 54.03a 56.03c 59.33b 59.43b 57.33b
T4 54.10a 57.00b 62.10a 59.53b 57.63b
T5 54.27a 57.47a 61.93a 60.73a 63.20a
光照强度Light intensity [μmol/(m2·s)] T1 2633.4a 2707.2a 2768.4a 2721.6a 3182.4a
T2 2269.8ab 2548.8a 2646.0a 2811.6a 2847.6b
T3 2008.8bc 2413.8ab 2464.2a 2354.4b 2644.2b
T4 1850.4bc 2125.8bc 2298.6ab 2174.4b 2134.8c
T5 1717.2c 2005.2c 2109.6b 2322.0b 1947.6c

Fig.1

Effects of planting density on MDA content in cigars"

Table 3

Correlation coefficient between MDA contents of cigars leaves and temperature,humidity and light intensity in the field"

MDA含量
MDA content		 温度
Air temperature		 湿度
Relative humidity		 光照强度
Light intensity
T1 0.85** -0.51 0.76**
T2 0.79** 0.04 0.42
T3 0.83** 0.43 0.51
T4 0.76** 0.18 0.14
T5 0.52* 0.39 -0.10

Fig.2

Effects of planting density on activities of POD, CAT, and SOD in cigars"

Table 4

Effects of planting density on the chemical composition of cigar after airing"

处理
Treatment		 总糖
Total sugar
(%)		 烟碱
Nicotine
(%)		 总氮
Total nitrogen
(%)		 钾
Potassium
(%)		 氯
Chlorine
(%)		 还原糖
Reducing sugar
(%)		 钾氯比
Potassium/
chlorine		 糖碱比
Sugar/nicotine
T1 1.28b 3.46a 4.02c 3.65a 0.42a 0.61b 8.69a 0.37b
T2 1.85a 3.25ab 4.24bc 2.24b 0.42a 0.67a 5.33b 0.57ab
T3 1.86a 3.02ab 4.45ab 3.50a 0.38a 0.67a 9.21a 0.62a
T4 1.27b 3.07ab 4.64a 2.35b 0.43a 0.67a 5.47b 0.41b
T5 1.21b 2.71b 4.04c 2.29b 0.42a 0.61b 5.45b 0.44b

Table 5

Effects of planting density on sensory quality of cigar tobacco leaves"

处理
Treatment		 香韵
Odor		 劲头
Strength		 浓度
Density		 香气质
Aroma quality		 香气量
Aroma amount		 余味
Aftertaste		 杂气
Miscellaneous gas		 刺激性
Irritating		 甜度
Sweetness		 灰色
Ash color		 总分
Total score
9-0
T1 木香 5.5 6.0 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 8.0 5.50
T2 木香 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 5.65
T3 木香 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 8.0 5.65
T4 木香 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 7.5 5.40
T5 木香 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 7.5 5.40

Table 6

The effects of planting density on the economic characteristics of cigar tobacco"

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)		 均价 (元/kg)
Average price
(yuan/kg)		 产值 (万元/hm2)
Value
(×104yuan/hm2)		 茄衣比例
Wrapper
ratio (%)
T1 1404.0b 34.3b 4.8c 21b
T2 1462.5b 37.3ab 5.5b 22b
T3 1587.0ab 39.7a 6.2a 26a
T4 1640.0a 35.7b 5.9a 22b
T5 1557.5ab 33.3b 5.3b 19b
[1] 李爱军, 秦艳青, 代惠娟 , 等. 国产雪茄烟叶科学发展刍议. 中国烟草学报, 2012,18(1):112-114.
[2] 王瑞, 刘国顺, 倪国仕 , 等. 种植密度对烤烟不同部位叶片光合特性及其同化物积累的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35(12):2288-2295.
[3] 时向东, 张晓娟, 王卫武 , 等. 栽培密度对雪茄外包皮烟叶片化学成分和物理特性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2005,11(2):40-42.
[4] 刘会杰, 赵铭钦, 闻刚 , 等. 种植密度和施钾量对烤烟品质的影响. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(2):653-658.
[5] 戴冕 . 烟草根系的形成与发展. 中国烟草, 1982(1):43-49,39.
[6] 黄国文, 陈良碧 . 高温对烟叶品质的影响. 生命科学研究, 2002(4):362-366.
[7] Berry J, Bjorkman O . Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1980,31:491-543.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.002423
[8] 杨利云, 段胜智, 李军营 , 等. 不同温度对烟草生长发育及光合作用的影响. 西北植物学报, 2017,37(2):330-338.
[9] 谷萌萌, 王子腾, 倪新程 , 等. 湘南烤烟高温逼熟现象发生的生态因素分析. 烟草科技, 2020,53(5):26-32.
[10] 卢素萍, 赵铭钦, 刘鹏飞 , 等. 光质对烤烟叶片衰老过程中内源激素含量和膜脂过氧化的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2016,18(6):44-51.
[11] 王志恒, 黄思麒, 邹芳 , 等. 温度与NaCl处理对甜高粱种子萌发及幼苗抗氧化酶活性的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2020(9):42-51.
[12] 许长成, 邹琦, 程炳嵩 . 硫代巴比妥酸(TBA)法检测脂质过氧化水平的探讨. 植物生理学通讯, 1989(6):58-60.
[13] 徐朗莱, 叶茂炳 . 过氧化物酶活力连续记录测定法. 南京农业大学学报, 1989(3):82-83.
[14] 李仕飞, 刘世同, 周建平 , 等. 分光光度法测定植物过氧化氢酶活性的研究. 安徽农学通报, 2007(2):72-73.
[15] 曲敏, 秦丽楠, 刘羽佳 , 等. 两种检测SOD酶活性方法的比较. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2014,5(10):3318-3323.
[16] 程传玲, 唐琦, 汪文良 , 等. 烤烟常规化学成分与感官质量的典型相关分析. 贵州农业科学, 2011,39(1):59-61.
[17] 赵瑞, 章存勇, 徐云进 . 国内外不同雪茄茄芯原料主要化学成分与感官品质分析. 南方农业, 2015,9(30):252-253.
[18] 李军华, 唐杰, 梁坤 , 等. 印尼与国内雪茄烟叶主要化学成分差异分析. 浙江农业科学, 2015,56(7):1080-1083.
[19] 赵松超, 赵喆, 李一凡 , 等. 植烟密度对烤烟“高温逼熟”现象的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(7):145-154.
[20] 穰中文, 李思纯, 刘佳 , 等. 种植密度与施氮量对烟田小气候及烟株光合特性的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,45(3):258-263.
[21] 杜秀敏, 殷文璇, 赵彦修 , 等. 植物中活性氧的产生及清除机制. 生物工程学报, 2001(2):121-125.
[22] Yasemin E, Deniz T, Beycan A . Effects of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetic activities in leaves of two maize cultivars. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2008,165(6):600-611.
pmid: 17728009
[23] Gao J J, Li T, Yu X C . Gene expression and activities of sod in cucumber seedlings were related with concentration of Mn2+, Cu2+ or Zn2+ under low temperature stress. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2009,8(6):678-684.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60264-3
[24] 朱大恒, 张闪闪, 莫骏坚 , 等. 光强对湘南烟草生育后期光合及生理特性的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(8):81-84.
[25] 李美茹, 王以柔, 刘鸿先 , 等. 光照强度调控4种亚热带森林植物叶片的抗氧化能力. 植物生态学报, 2001(4):460-464.
[26] 曹阳, 文国宇, 李茂军 , 等. 种植密度对烤烟光合特性日变化及其主要化学成分的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2019,42(4):641-647.
[27] 朱命阳 . 种植密度对贵阳烤烟生理生态指标及其品质效应的影响研究. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2012.
[1] Zhang Jiawen, Lu Shaohao, Zhao Mingqin, Zhong Qiu, Wang Jun, Yi Kai, Xiang Huan. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Quality of Cigar Leaves in Sichuan [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 159-165.
[2] Zhao Xuanwei, Zhao Yajie, Tian Zhendong, Hu Shuping, Zhao Rong, Ren Yaning, Bao Haizhu, Gao Julin. Response of Dry Matter Transportion and Yield to Sowing Date and Planting Density on Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 185-189.
[3] Li Jie, Zhang Xiaoning, Jin Fansheng, Han Yanlong, Li Haijin. Response of Kidney Bean Growth and Yield to Planting Density in the Dry Year [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 140-146.
[4] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[5] Liu Zhenxing, Zhou Guimei, Ya Xiuxiu, Chen Jian, Meng Qingxiang, He Guoqing. Effects of Different Sowing Densities on the Morphological Traits and Yields of Three Adzuki Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 137-142.
[6] Qin Hongde, Rong Yihua, Huang Xiaoli, Hu Aibing, Zhou Jiahua, Yan Xianhui, Li Wei, Zhang Xianhong, Li Hongju, Yang Guozheng. Responses of Cotton to Planting Densities and Nitrogen Rates under Direct Seeding in Summer with Simplified Fertilization [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 127-134.
[7] Chai Fangmei, Gao Tiantian, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Song Yali, Lu Qinglin. Effects of Planting Density on Wheat Yield Formation in Different Ecological Regions of Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 154-160.
[8] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[9] Yang Zhichang,Shen Tao,Luo Zhuo,Peng Zhi,Hu Yuqian,Zi Tao,Xiong Tinghao,Song Haixing. Effects of Low Nitrogen Rate Combined with High Planting Density on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Machine-Transplanted Double Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 71-81.
[10] Chen Zongpei,Xue Jiaxin,Li Ben,Wang Guiyan. Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Canopy Micro-Environment to Planting Density and Row Spacing of Maize (Zea Mays L.) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 179-186.
[11] Wang Yan,Wang Shulin,Zhang Qian,Feng Guoyi,Lei Xiaopeng,Liang Qinglong,Qi Hong. Correlation Analysis between Main Agronomic Traits and Density in Mechanical Harvest Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 66-70.
[12] Li Hu,Chen Chuanhua,Liu Guanglin,Wu Zishuai,Huang Qiuyao,Luo Qunchang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate and Planting Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Guiyu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 99-103.
[13] Yan Wei,Li Guolong,Li Zhi,Cao Yang,Zhang Shaoying. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density Interaction on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Root Yield of Sugar Beet under Full-Film Mulching in Arid Regions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 100-106.
[14] Xixi Dai,Heming Zhan,Xinghong Cui,Yinyue Zhao,Dandan Shan,Liang Zhang,Tiejun Wang. A Mathematical Model of Density Coupling and Its Optimization in Maize-Soybean Intercropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 128-135.
[15] Wang Lezheng,Hua Fangjing,Cao Pengpeng,Tian Yixin,Gao Fengju. Effects of Sowing Date and Planting Density on Yield and Related Traits in Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 83-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!