Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 105-110.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.06.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Reduced Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Main Agronomic Traits of Ratoon Sugarcane under Conditions of Returning Green Mung Bean/Black Bean into Field

Su Lirong1(), Tan Yumo1, Qin Fang1, Li Qin1, Zeng Chengcheng1, Li Zhongyi1, Wei Caihui1, Dong Wenbin1, Liang Jun2, He Tieguang1()   

  1. 1Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
    2Guangxi Yipu Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2021-07-28 Revised:2021-09-25 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-21
  • Contact: He Tieguang E-mail:lirongsu126@126.com;tghe118@163.com

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

228

Abstract:

The impact of intercropping green manure returning to the field on the growth of ratoon sugarcane and the substitution of chemical fertilizer were further discussed under the condition of reducing the application of chemical fertilizer on the basis of new sugarcane intercropping mung bean/black bean. Conventional fertilization (CK) was the control, and the other five treatments lowered chemical fertilizer by 25% and substitution in other ways substitution by 12% nutrient element equivalent from green mung bean and 13% nutrient element equivalent from organic fertilizer (H-LY), substitution by full amount of green mung bean returning to the field (H-LQ), substitution by 25% nutrient element equivalent from organic fertilizer (H-Y), substitution by 25% nutrient element equivalent from green black bean returned to the field (H-HD) and substitution by full amount of green black bean returning to the field (H-HQ). The results showed that there were no significant effects on sugarcane plant height, number of productive tiller, weight of single stem compared with CK treatment. There was no significant difference in cane yield between all treatments. It indicated that intercropping with green manure between ratoon sugarcane line and returned it to the field combined with nutrient element equivalent from organic fertilizer could substitute 25% of sugarcane chemical fertilizer.

Key words: Ratoon sugarcane, Intercropping, Fertilizer reduction, Green manure, Green manure returning to field

Table 1

Dosages of N, P2O5 and K2O in treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 N，P2O5和K2O总施肥量
Total content of N, P2O5 and K2O fertilizer		 施肥种类及用量Kinds and amount of fertilizers
尿素
Urea		 钙镁磷肥
Calcium magnesium phosphate		 氯化钾
Potassium chloride		 5%有机肥
Organic fertilizer
N P2O5 K2O
CK 330.0 255.00 360 717 1417 600
H-LY 247.5 191.25 270 538 1063 450 2363
H-LQ 247.5 191.25 270 538 1063 450
H-Y 247.5 191.25 270 538 1063 450 4725
H-HD 247.5 191.25 270 538 1063 450
H-HQ 247.5 191.25 270 538 1063 450

Table 2

Yield and nutrient content of green manure in different intercropping modes kg/hm2"

间作组合
Intercropping mode		 绿肥产量
Yield of green manure		 绿肥养分含量Nutrient content of green manure
N P2O5 K2O
宿根甘蔗间作绿豆绿肥Ratoon sugarcane intercropping mung bean 12 578.40±694.90b 55.60±3.10b 14.50±0.80b 67.60±3.70b
宿根甘蔗间作黑豆绿肥Ratoon sugarcane intercropping black bean 19 045.40±2500.90a 88.90±11.70a 20.00±2.60a 107.10±14.10a

Table 3

Emergence and tillering of ratoon sugarcane in different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 甘蔗发株数
Emergence number
(×104/hm2)		 分蘖数
Tiller number
(×103)		 拔节前总苗数
Total seedlings before
jointing (×104/hm2)
CK 8.82±0.27a 9.33±4.41a 9.76±0.59a
H-LY 9.49±0.65a 7.71±3.31a 10.21±0.71a
H-LQ 9.11±0.39a 12.83±7.68a 10.39±0.65a
H-Y 9.46±0.76a 9.72±4.19a 10.43±0.43a
H-HD 8.22±0.30a 10.33±4.77a 9.25±0.75a
H-HQ 8.37±0.21a 12.39±0.15a 9.61±0.20a

Fig.1

Variation of height of ratoon sugarcane in different treatments Difference small letters represent the significant difference at P < 0.05 level"

Table 4

Characteristics of sugarcane harvest period in different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 茎径
Stalk diameter
(mm)		 有效茎数
Number of productive
tillers (×104 stalk/hm2)		 单茎重
Stalk weight
(kg)		 成茎率
Effective stem
rate (%)		 蔗茎产量
Cane yield
(t/hm2)		 锤度
Brix
CK 27.85±0.34ab 6.74±0.49a 1.76±0.10a 69.43±5.33a 117.90±5.2ab 19.55±0.42a
H-LY 27.09±0.36b 5.98±0.65b 2.01±0.21a 58.51±4.68a 117.50±3.20ab 19.65±0.48a
H-LQ 28.05±0.46ab 6.26±0.37a 1.99±0.12a 60.70±5.26a 123.90±5.70ab 19.74±0.54a
H-Y 26.73±0.40b 7.07±0.38a 1.80±0.12a 69.62±6.58a 126.10±5.00a 19.99±0.61a
H-HD 29.42±1.40a 6.01±0.16a 1.85±0.02a 65.54±3.69a 111.00±4.20b 18.79±0.28a
H-HQ 28.75±0.34ab 6.15±0.19a 1.82±0.08a 64.07±1.27a 111.60±6.90b 18.96±0.52a

Table 5

Analysis of economic benefits in different treatments ×104 yuan/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 蔗茎产值
Cane output		 肥料投入
Fertilizer costs		 种子投入
Seed costs		 人工投入
Labor costs		 总投入
Total costs		 利润
Profits		 产投比
Output to costs ratio
CK 6.13±0.27ab 0.43 0.00 1.73±0.06ab 2.16±0.06b 3.97±0.20a 2.84±0.04bc
H-LY 6.11±0.10ab 0.51 0.01 1.73±0.02ab 2.24±0.02b 3.87±0.08a 2.73±0.02c
H-LQ 6.44±0.30ab 0.32 0.01 1.80±0.07ab 2.12±0.07bc 4.32±0.23a 3.03±0.04a
H-Y 6.56±0.14a 0.70 0.00 1.83±0.04a 2.53±0.04a 4.03±0.12a 2.59±0.02d
H-HD 5.77±0.22b 0.32 0.03 1.65±0.05b 1.97±0.05c 3.80±0.17a 2.93±0.04ab
H-HQ 5.81±0.20b 0.32 0.03 1.66±0.05b 1.98±0.05c 3.83±0.22a 2.94±0.90ab
[1] 谢金兰, 李长宁, 何为中, 等. 甘蔗化肥减量增效的栽培技术. 中国糖料, 2017, 39(1):38-41.
[2] 尚怀国, 李莉, 王克健, 等. 甘蔗生产化肥农药减施增效技术研究进展. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(1):211-216.
[3] 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 谢如林, 等. 甘蔗实现减量施肥的理论与实践. 广西糖业, 2014(6):9-11.
[4] 黄国勤, 王兴祥, 钱海燕, 等. 施用化肥对农业生态环境的负面影响及对策. 生态环境学报, 2004(4):656-660.
[5] Himmelbauer M L, Vateva V, Lozanova L, et al. Site effects on root characteristics and soil protection capability of two cover crops in South Bulgaria. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 2013, 61(1):30-38.
doi: 10.2478/johh-2013-0005
[6] Yu Y, Xue L, Yang L. Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss,and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 34(3):633-640.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0173-6
[7] Kaspar T C, Jaynes D B, Parkin T B, et al. Effectiveness of oat and rye cover crops in reducing nitrate losses in drainage water. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 110(7):25-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.010
[8] 苏利荣, 谭裕模, 何铁光, 等. 新植蔗间作不同绿肥压青还田的试验研究及经济效益分析. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(3):747-753.
[9] Radicetti E, Mancinelli R, Campiglia E. Impact of managing cover crop residues on the floristic composition and species diversity of the weed community of pepper crop (Capsicum annuum L.). Crop Protection, 2013, 44:109-119.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.017
[10] 苏利荣, 何铁光, 苏天明, 等. 不同时期绿豆与甘蔗套种及秸秆还田模式研究. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(11):2461-2467.
[11] 丘立杭, 范业赓, 周慧文, 等. 合理密植下强分蘖甘蔗品种性状及产量分析. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6):1075-1082.
[12] 郭佳欢, 潘存德, 冯会丽, 等. 枣麦间作系统中冬小麦的冠层光分布特征及产量研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(2):183-191.
[13] 彭绍光. 甘蔗育种学. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
[14] 杨文亭, 李志贤, 赖健宁, 等. 甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(3):556-562.
[15] 范业赓, 陈荣发, 周慧文, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂浸种对甘蔗分蘖及产量性状的影响. 中国糖料, 2019, 41(2):23-27.
[16] 吴才文, 杨洪昌, 陈学宽, 等. 苗期间种黄豆对甘蔗生长及产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2004(5):645-650.
[17] 李宏图, 罗建新, 彭德元, 等. 绿肥翻压还土的生态效应及其对土壤主要物理性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(5):172-175.
[18] 潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 刘威, 等. 不同种类绿肥翻压对土壤肥力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(6):1359-1364.
[1] Xie Huimin, Wu Ke, Liu Wenqi, Wei Guoliang, Lu Xian, Li Zhuanglin, Wei Shanqing, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of Partial Substitution of Seaweed Fertilizers and Microbial Inoculant for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 161-166.
[2] Wu Xinyu, Liu Zhenyang, Li Haiye, Zheng Yi, Tang Li, Xiao Jingxiu. Effects of Nitrogen Application and Intercropping on Nodule Formation and Nitrogen Uptake and Accumulation in Faba Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 120-127.
[3] Hu Qiguo, Liu Yajun, Wang Wenjing, Wang Qi, Wang Honggang, Chu Fengli. Effects of Sweet Potato Rotation and Intercropping on the Microbial Community of Rhizosphere Soil [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 153-159.
[4] Tang Hongqin, Li Zhongyi, Dong Wenbin, Wei Caihui, He Tieguang, Meng Yancheng, Tang Hailing, Mo Yongcheng. Effects of Different Intercropping Modes of Green Manure Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Traits and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 184-190.
[5] Wang Yizhen, Su Gang, Cao Lixia, Li Ze, Ge Junzhu, Zang Fengyan, Li Zifang, Wang Jinlong, Wu Xidong. Study on Decomposition and Nutrient Release Rule of Green Manure Returned in Spring Maize Field [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 120-125.
[6] Xiong Tinghao, Zi Tao, Zhang Ai, Hu Yuqian, Peng Zhi, Song Haixing. Effects of Different Organic Fertilizer Dosages on Nutrient Utilization and Yield of Rapeseed under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 133-139.
[7] Xie Jinlan, Lin Li, Li Changning, Luo Ting, Mo Zhanghong. Effects of Intercropping Mungbean Straw Returning on Sugarcane Growth and Nitrogen Metabolism under Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 164-169.
[8] Xixi Dai,Heming Zhan,Xinghong Cui,Yinyue Zhao,Dandan Shan,Liang Zhang,Tiejun Wang. A Mathematical Model of Density Coupling and Its Optimization in Maize-Soybean Intercropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 128-135.
[9] Wenlian Bai,Yi Zheng,Jingxiu Xiao. Below-Ground Biotic Mechanisms of Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Improved by Cereal and Legume Intercropping-A Review [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 20-27.
[10] Jianghui Cui,Fuzhu Cui,Jianfu Xue,Jianping Hao,Tianqing Du,Longxiang Sun. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction on Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregates Based on Wheat-Sorghum System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 126-132.
[11] Hong Li,Mengjiao Li,Yuchao Wang,Ruijun Wang,Xuli Zhang. Study on the Pattern of Maize/Brassica juncea var. integlifolia Intercropping in Alpine Regions [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 120-125.
[12] Li Song,Wanyou Liao,Yejun Wang,Youjian Su,Yongli Zhang,Yi Luo,Jun Liao,Weiguo Wu. Research Progress in Intercropping Upland Crops with Green Manure [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 7-11.
[13] Xiaoling She,Zijin Nie,Jing Zhao,Lin Li. Row Intercropping System of Purple Sweetpotato with Different Density’s Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 79-82.
[14] Min Hu,Jianwei Lu,Zhen Wang,Qiuxiang You. Study on the Appropriate Seeding Rate of Late Sowing Oilseed Rape as Green Manure [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 120-123.
[15] Chunming Zhang,Xueyin Zhao,Hubin Yan,Huijun Zhu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Photosynthetic Characteristics of Different Adzuki Cultivars under Intercropping Patterns [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 67-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!