Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 255-263.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.036

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Spraying Streptomyces on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Late-Sown Wheat under Different Crop Rotations

Zhang Dongxu1,2(), Hu Danzhu1, Yan Jinlong1, Feng Liyun1, Wu Zhiyuan1, Zhang Junling1, Li Yanhua1()   

  1. 1Millet Research Institute of Shanxi Agricultural University, Changzhi 046011, Shanxi, China
    2Ministerial and Provincial Co-Innovation Center for Endemic Crops Production with High Quality and Efficiency Loess Plateau Jointly Build by Provinces and Ministries, Taigu 030800, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2023-02-24 Revised:2023-03-30 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

82

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of spraying streptomyces on the production of late-sown wheat under different crop rotations, streptomyces roche (D74) was used as the test microbial agent, and a split-plot design was adopted, with the main plot consisting of two different crop rotations (previous crop soybean and previous crop maize), and the sub plot consisting of four periods of spraying streptomyces, including CK (spraying water at both jointing and filling stages), JS (spraying D74 at jointing stage and spraying water at filling stage), FS (spraying water at jointing stage and spraying D74 at filling stage), JF (spraying D74 at both jointing and filling stages), respectively. The effects of spraying streptomyces on yield and its components, photosynthetic characteristics and physiological characteristics of late-sown wheat under different crop rotations were studied. The results showed that the average spike number, yield and vegetation index in the filling stage of soybean stubble were higher than those of maize stubble, while the grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of flag leaf in the middle filling stage were lower than those of maize stubble. Streptomyces treatment had significant effects on the grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, yield, Pn of flag leaf at the late filling stage, vegetation index and chlorophyll content at the middle filling stage of late-sown wheat, all of which were JF>FS>JS>CK. The correlation analysis showed that the yield of late-sown wheat under two crop rotations sprayed with streptomyces was significantly positively correlated with grains per spike, 1000-grain weight and Pn of flag leaf, chlorophyll content and vegetation index in the middle and late filling stages (except for the vegetation index in the middle filling stage of soybean stubble). The comprehensive evaluation showed that the evaluation coefficients of each treatment of late-sown wheat under two rotations sprayed with streptomyces were higher than those of CK treatment, and the effects of spraying streptomyces at the filling stage were better than that at the jointing stage, while the both spraying streptomyces at the jointing stage and filling stage performed best.

Key words: Different crop rotations, Late-sown wheat, Spraying streptomyces, Yield, Photosynthetic characteristics

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on plant height of late-sown wheat Different lowercase letters indicate that significant differences between the treatments of the same stubble (P < 0.05). The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on spike number of late-sown wheat"

Fig.3

Effects of different treatments on grains per spike of late-sown wheat"

Fig.4

Effects of different treatments on 1000-grain weight of late-sown wheat"

Fig.5

Effects of different treatments on yield of late-sown wheat"

Fig.6

Effects of different treatments on Pn of late-sown wheat flag leaf"

Fig.7

Effects of different treatments on SPAD of late-sown wheat flag leaf"

Fig.8

Effects of different treatments on NDVI of late-sown wheat"

Table 1

Correlation analysis between yield and traits of late-sown wheat under different stubble"

性状
Trait		 株高
Plant
height		 成穗数
Spike
number		 穗粒数
Grains
per
spike		 千粒重
1000-
grain
weight		 Pn SPAD NDVI 产量
Yield
05-10 05-25 06-10 05-10 05-25 06-10 05-10 05-25 06-10
大豆茬口Soybean stubble
株高Plant height 1.000
成穗数Spike number -0.267 1.000
穗粒数
Grain number per spike		 0.435 0.251 1.000
千粒重
1000-grain weight		 0.509 0.048 0.824** 1.000
Pn 05-10 0.144 0.380 0.507 0.269 1.000
05-25 0.327 0.097 0.923** 0.811** 0.576* 1.000
06-10 0.500 0.016 0.879** 0.920** 0.386 0.897** 1.000
SPAD 05-10 -0.097 0.627* 0.361 0.132 0.343 0.304 0.216 1.000
05-25 0.550 0.205 0.823** 0.879** 0.337 0.700* 0.892** 0.296 1.000
06-10 0.470 0.228 0.962** 0.744** 0.528 0.893** 0.822** 0.514 0.773** 1.000
NDVI
 05-10 0.094 -0.438 -0.006 -0.003 -0.225 0.067 -0.078 -0.578* -0.254 -0.077 1.000
05-25 0.317 0.428 0.485 0.487 0.291 0.450 0.559 0.549 0.559 0.521 -0.648* 1.000
06-10 0.450 0.131 0.898** 0.912** 0.313 0.850** 0.949** 0.387 0.933** 0.870** -0.187 0.594* 1.000
产量Yield 0.389 0.042 0.905** 0.762** 0.243 0.874** 0.812** 0.262 0.675* 0.898** 0.100 0.407 0.855** 1.000
玉米茬口Maize stubble
株高Plant height 1.000
成穗数Spike number 0.322 1.000
穗粒数
Grain number per spike		 0.322 0.171 1.000
千粒重
1000-grain weight		 0.581* 0.040 0.828** 1.000
Pn 05-10 0.256 0.114 0.337 0.502 1.000
05-25 0.418 0.198 0.820** 0.917** 0.624* 1.000
06-10 0.438 0.133 0.857** 0.908** 0.679* 0.908** 1.000
SPAD 05-10 0.417 0.237 0.861** 0.769** 0.358 0.689* 0.795** 1.000
05-25 0.299 -0.306 0.816** 0.882** 0.476 0.805** 0.872** 0.698* 1.000
06-10 0.452 0.192 0.844** 0.876** 0.680* 0.892** 0.935** 0.764** 0.788** 1.000
NDVI 05-10 0.454 0.570 0.139 0.384 0.041 0.383 0.178 0.337 -0.024 0.230 1.000
05-25 0.150 0.310 0.841** 0.651* 0.210 0.713** 0.729** 0.864** 0.621* 0.668* 0.324 1.000
06-10 0.593* 0.334 0.853** 0.864** 0.458 0.850** 0.921** 0.781** 0.735** 0.876** 0.290 0.771** 1.000
产量Yield 0.523 0.200 0.757** 0.853** 0.751** 0.867** 0.955** 0.774** 0.787** 0.875** 0.240 0.656* 0.858** 1.000

Table 2

Comprehensive evaluation of yield and photosynthetic indexes of late-sown wheat under different treatments"

指标
Index		 大豆茬口Soybean stubble 玉米茬口Maize stubble
CK JS FS JF CK JS FS JF
株高Plant height 0.00 0.90 0.32 1.00 0.00 0.68 0.08 1.00
成穗数Spike number 0.00 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.00 0.64 0.73 1.00
穗粒数Grains per spike 0.00 0.32 0.71 1.00 0.00 0.55 0.72 1.00
千粒重1000-grain weight 0.00 0.47 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.52 0.82 1.00
Pn 05-10 0.00 0.07 0.69 1.00 0.00 0.10 0.67 1.00
05-25 0.00 0.42 0.78 1.00 0.00 0.15 0.79 1.00
06-10 0.00 0.46 0.88 1.00 0.00 0.49 0.96 1.00
SPAD 05-10 0.00 0.79 1.00 0.91 0.00 0.54 0.77 1.00
05-25 0.00 0.57 1.00 0.91 0.00 0.76 1.00 0.97
06-10 0.00 0.33 0.77 1.00 0.00 0.33 0.68 1.00
NDVI 05-10 1.00 0.25 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.57 0.52 1.00
05-25 0.00 0.38 0.68 1.00 0.00 0.70 1.00 0.88
06-10 0.00 0.52 0.94 1.00 0.00 0.51 0.66 1.00
产量Yield 0.00 0.55 0.77 1.00 0.00 0.48 0.80 1.00
平均隶属度Average membership 0.07 0.47 0.72 0.96 0.00 0.50 0.73 0.99
排序Ranking 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1
[1] 刘志勇, 王道文, 张爱民, 等. 小麦育种行业创新现状与发展趋势. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(3):430-434.
[2] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.
[3] 张浩. 关于中国小麦生产成本现状分析与展望. 农业与技术, 2021, 41(23):139-143.
[4] Zhu B, Yi L X, Hu Y G, et al. Nitrogen release from incorporated 15N-labelled Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) residue and its dynamics in a double rice cropping system. Plant and Soil, 2014, 374(12):331-344.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1808-8
[5] 陈小容, 雍太文, 杨文钰, 等. 不同种植模式下茬口对小麦季土壤养分和酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(6):20-24.
[6] 张翼, 李庆伟, 张根峰. 茬口、播期对不同筋力型小麦干物质积累与灌浆的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2014(9):1343-1346.
[7] 邵云, 李昊烊, 翁正鹏, 等. 不同茬口对小麦养分利用和产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(3):356-363.
[8] 马爱平, 崔欢虎, 亢秀丽, 等. 不同海拔夏闲期压青茬口对麦田水分及水分利用效率的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):249-255.
[9] 宋晓彦, 孙敏. 播期对不同生态型小麦品种幼穗分化的影响. 山西农业科学, 2009, 37(7):22-25.
[10] 邵庆勤, 闫素辉, 李文阳. 沿淮地区不同小麦品种花后生长差异及其与产量的相关性. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(1):41-50.
[11] Hashem A, Tabassum B, Allah E F. Bacillus subtilis: A plant- growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2019, 26(6):1291-1297.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 pmid: 31516360
[12] Niu X G, Song L C, Xiao Y N, et al. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semi-arid and their potential in alleviating drought stress. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 8(2580):1-11.
[13] Hamdali H, Hafidi M, Virolle M, et al. Rock phosphate- solubilizing Actinomycetes: screening for plant growth-promoting activities. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2008, 24(11):2565-2575.
doi: 10.1007/s11274-008-9817-0
[14] Lata R, Chowdhury S, Gond S K, et al. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2018, 66(4):268-276.
doi: 10.1111/lam.12855 pmid: 29359344
[15] He A L, Niu S Q, Zhao Q, et al. Induced salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass by a novel bacterium strain from the rhizosphere of a desert shrub Haloxylon ammodendron. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(2):469.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19020469
[16] 刘敏君.木霉H18-1-1菌株和解磷青霉QM-6菌株对小麦防病及促生效果分析. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2018.
[17] 刘玉涛, 杨斌, 张凯, 等. 链霉菌剂种子包衣对小麦幼穗分化及生物学特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(8):990-1001.
[18] Kirkegaard J A, Simpeendoreer S, Holland J, et al. Effect of previous crops on crown rot and yield of durum and bread wheat in northern NSW. Crop & Pasture Science, 2004, 55(3):321-334.
[19] 杨佳, 崔福柱, 郭秀卿, 等. 不同耕作方式及前茬作物对冬小麦产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(3):362-365.
[20] 崔欢虎, 王娟玲, 马步州, 等. 茬口和灌水对小麦产量及水分利用效率的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(3):479-483.
[21] 杨勇, 李昆太. 放线菌资源及其活性物质研究概述. 生物灾害科学, 2019, 42(1):7-14.
[22] 宋以玲, 于建, 陈士更, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对棉花生理特性及根际土壤微生物和化学性质的影响. 土壤, 2019, 51(3):477-487.
[23] 李兴昱, 李发康, 李培, 等. 放线菌ZZ-9发酵液与腐植酸钠混施对小麦的促生作用. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(4):5-10.
[24] 刘玉涛, 张凯, 马军妮, 等. 两株链霉菌对小麦幼苗生长及诱导抗性的影响. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(5):658-666.
[25] Yang B, Yan X, Wang H Y, et al. Dynmamic QTL analysis of chlorophyll content during grain filling stage in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Romanian Agricultural Research, 2016, 33:77-85.
[26] 刘秀香. 松嫩平原两种生境芦苇叶片光合色素的时空动态. 长春:东北师范大学, 2013.
[27] 罗姗姗, 曹昀, 纪欣圣, 等. 水深对黑藻叶绿素含量和抗氧化酶活性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(1):221-228.
[1] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[2] Liu Yan, Qu Hang, Xing Yuehua, Wang Xiaohui, Gong Liang. Effects of New Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Growth, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 110-116.
[3] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
[4] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[5] Zhang Rong, Chen Xiaowen, Lu Ping, You Yanrong, Zhou Delu, Li Deming. Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Temperature and Yield of Potato in Dry Land [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 145-150.
[6] Wu Xueqin, Liu Kaiyu, Han Chunhua, Alimujiang·Kelaimu , Cui Yannan, Li Jiangyu, Ma Chunmei, Zhong Wenfan, Zhao Qiang. Effects of 14% Thiobenzene-Dioxalon on Defoliation Ripening, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 164-169.
[7] Guan Qinglin, Piao Shengyuan, Zhang Siwei, Wang Jun, Lei Yunkang, Zhong Qiu, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Combined Application of Medium-Trace Elements on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism, Yield and Quality of Cigar Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 187-196.
[8] Tian Xiaoqin, Wang Dan, Li Zhuo, Liu Yonghong, Li Wei. Effects of Ridge and Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 204-211.
[9] Yi Bing, Liu Jingang, Song Dianxiu, Wang Dexing, Zhao Mingzhu, Liu Xiaohong, Sun Enyu, Cui Liangji. Study on Land Productivity and Interspecific Competition of Sunflower and Millet Intercropping in Arid Areas [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 219-223.
[10] Zhao Weizhe, Du Chunfang, Sun Xuan, Yao Lin, Xian Shuanshi, Zhang Gaoyang. Effects of Stalk Picking on Economic Characteristics and Yield of Oilseed and Vegetable Rape [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 224-230.
[11] Liu Hui, Long Xueyi, Jiao Yan, Wang Lihong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 238-248.
[12] Cao Qingjun, Li Gang, Yang Hao, Lou Yuyong, Yang Fentuan, Kong Fanli, Li Xinbei, Zhao Xinkai, Jiang Xiaoli. The Effects of Different Tillage Practices on Seedbed Quality and Its Relationships with Seedling Population Construction and Grain Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 249-254.
[13] Zhang Shangpei, Yang Junxue, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Zhang Xiaojuan, Cheng Bingwen. Genetic Diversity and Yielding Ability Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 37-42.
[14] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[15] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!