Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 71-76.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.01.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Variety Analysis of Northern Rice Regional Trials in Recent 15 Years

Wang Jie1,Zeng Bo2,Lei Cailin1,Zhao Zhichao1,Wang Jiulin1,Cheng Zhijun1   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081, China
    2 National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China
  • Received:2017-09-22 Revised:2017-11-27 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-08-24

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

160

Abstract:

Rice regional trial is a test platform and showcase for new rice varieties. Rice breeding progress can be seen from the performance of rice varieties in regional trials. Based on the data from national rice regional trials in northern China from 2001 to 2015, we analyzed the difference of main agronomic traits among years and groups. The results showed that: the number of testing variety has been increasing steadily. The average yield increased by 11.3%,from 9.08t/hm 2 in 2001 to 10.11t/hm 2 in 2015. In order to get higher yield in northern China, it is strongly recommended to maintain certain number of effective panicles, at the same time coordinating the relationship among grain numbers per panicle, seed setting rate and 1000-grain weight. On the whole, grain quality in northern China was good, with the high quality variety rate more than 60%. Rice quality of early maturity mid-early japonica and medium maturity mid-early japonica were relatively better than that of Huang-huai japonica and late maturity mid-early japonica. The head rice rate and amylose content were relatively ideal, while chalky rice rate and chalkiness degree were the main factors that affected the rice quality in norther China. Each year rice varieties with mid-resistance to rice blast accounted for 37%, while another 40% of rice varieties were eliminated due to susceptible to rice blast. Moreover, the rate of resistant varieties was unstable annually. It was important to make more efforts to enhance the rice blast resistance in northern China.

Key words: Rice breeding, Rice blast, Grain quality, Regional trail, Yield component

Fig.1

Number of rice varieties in northern rice regional trials of China from 2001 to 2015"

Fig.2

Average yield of rice varieties in northern rice regional trails of China from 2001 to 2015"

Table 1

Yield and its components of different groups"

组别Group 产量(t/hm2)
Yield
 有效穗(×104/hm2)
Panicle number		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 穗长(cm)
Panicle length		 每穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
黄淮粳稻HJR 8.99b 313.5d 104.7b 17.9bc 148.2a 83.4b 25.5a
京津唐粳稻JJR 9.21b 331.5cd 110.9a 18.7a 142.6a 87.1a 25.5a
晚熟中早粳LMJR 9.17b 361.5c 105.1b 18.3ab 132.2b 86.8a 25.3a
中熟中早粳MMJR 9.86a 495.0a 98.9c 16.9d 109.9c 82.5b 24.5b
早熟中早粳EMJR 9.32b 453.0b 101.9bc 17.7c 109.1c 87.2a 25.0ab

Fig.3

High quality rate of rice varieties and major quality traits in northern rice regional trials of China from 2001 to 2015"

Table 2

Rice qualities of different groups in northern rice regional of China"

组别
Group		 优质率(%)
High quality
rate		 整精米率(%)
Head rice rate		 垩白粒率(%)
Chalky rice rate		 垩白度(%)
Chalkiness degree		 直链淀粉含量(%)
Amylose content
平均值
Average		 优质率
High quality rate		 平均值
Average		 优质率
High quality rate		 平均值
Average		 优质率
High quality rate		 平均值
Average		 优质率
High quality rate
黄淮粳稻HJR 50.9 66.3±3.1 90.3 29.8±7.3 58.5 3.7±1.7 76.1 16.4±0.7 94.1
京津唐粳稻JJR 60.0 66.6±3.3 83.3 26.1±11.4 66.0 3.6±2.0 75.3 15.9±1.1 92.7
晚熟中早粳LMJR 52.2 66.5±3.4 87.3 27.3±9.2 63.1 3.7±1.5 79.6 15.9±0.6 87.3
中熟中早粳MMJR 67.5 65.9±1.7 86.9 22.1±7.5 81.3 2.4±0.9 92.5 16.6±0.8 95.0
早熟中早粳EMJR 74.1 66.1±2.2 88.6 19.5±4.9 88.0 2.4±0.7 93.4 16.5±0.7 92.8

Table 3

Blast resistant rate of rice varieties in northern rice regional trials of China from 2008 to 2015 %"

年份
Year		 依据穗颈瘟损失率最高级
By the highest loss rate of panicle neck blast		 依据稻瘟病综合抗性指数
By index of rice blast comprehensive resistance
≤1 ≤3 ≤5 ≤2.0 ≤4.0 ≤5.0
2008 6.7 30.0 66.7 5.0 43.3 70.0
2009 4.5 32.8 56.7 7.5 40.0 60.0
2010 7.5 43.3 64.2 7.5 45.0 81.7
2011 28.6 68.3 81.0 15.9 68.3 81.7
2012 10.4 28.4 68.7 11.9 71.7 91.7
2013 5.9 29.4 55.9 14.7 73.3 81.7
2014 1.3 13.0 35.1 10.4 51.7 70.0
2015 1.3 16.7 51.3 6.4 53.3 85.0
平均Average 8.3 32.7 59.9 9.9 55.8 77.7
[1] 中国种植业信息网-农作物数据库,
[2] 万建民 . 中国水稻遗传育种与品种系谱. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009.
[3] 熊振民, 蔡洪法 . 中国水稻. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1992.
[4] 杨士华, 程本义, 沈伟峰 . 我国南方稻区杂交水稻育种进展. 杂交水稻, 2004,19(5):1-5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3956.2004.05.001
[5] 杨仕华, 程本义, 沈伟峰 , 等. 我国长江流域籼稻品种选育进展及改良策略. 中国水稻科学, 2004,18(2):89-93.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2004.02.001
[6] 张红林, 刘海平, 张瑞祥 , 等. 我国南方水稻育种进展. 江西农业学报, 2007,19(5):35-39.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2007.05.011
[7] 王怀昕, 王玮, 刘杰 , 等. 近10年国家水稻区试遵义点产量及农艺性状分析. 种子, 2015,34(5):92-95.
[8] 王远征, 王晓菁, 李源 , 等. 北方粳稻产量与品质性状及其相互关系分析. 作物学报, 2015,41(6):910-918.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00910
[9] 郭晓莉, 刘晓梅, 李莉 , 等. 2006-2010年吉林省水稻区域试验品种(系)对稻瘟病的抗性评价. 吉林农业科学, 2011,36(5):44-46.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8701.2011.05.014
[10] 张其蓉, 宋发菊, 田进山 , 等. 2006-2011年湖北省水稻区域试验品种(系)抗稻瘟病鉴定与评价. 湖北农业科学, 2013,52(22):5490-5492.
[11] 杨洁, 汪莲爱 . 2006-2008年湖北省水稻区域试验稻米品质分析与评价. 湖北农业科学, 2009,48(10):2551-2552.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2009.10.070
[12] 中华人民共和国农业行业标准, 《农作物品种区域试验技术规范-水稻》(NY/T 1300-2007).
[13] 中华人民共和国国家标准,《优质稻谷》(GB/T 17891—1999).
[14] 王才林, 张亚东, 朱镇 , 等. 水稻条纹叶枯病抗性育种研究. 作物学报, 2008,34(3):530-533.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00530
[15] 杨荣晋, 陆建康 . 江苏粳稻抗条纹叶枯病育种现状和展望. 农业科技通讯, 2009(10):115-117.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2009.10.059
[16] 高良艳, 周鸿飞 . 水稻产量构成因素与产量的分析. 辽宁农业科学, 2007(1):26-28.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2007.01.009
[17] 甘涛, 陈大超 . 水稻产量与构成因素间的相关性研究. 南方农业, 2008,2(3):17-20.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-890X.2008.03.006
[18] 谭酬志, 邹小云, 熊春梅 , 等. 籼型三系杂交水稻产量性状的相关及通径分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(29):12629-12631.
[19] 刘伟明 . 籼粳亚种间杂交水稻产量性状与产量的相关、回归及通径分析. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(1):70-72.
[20] 郭丽颖, 赵宏伟, 王敬国 , 等. 粳稻单株产量及其构成因素的关联分析. 作物杂志, 2015(5):25-30.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.05.005
[21] 王成瑷, 张文香, 寇洪萍 , 等. 吉林省水稻主推品种产量与品质的相关分析. 吉林农业大学学报, 2004,26(5):480-487.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5684.2004.05.003
[22] 刘海, 黄文, 杨银阁 , 等. 优质水稻品种产量性状与品质性状的相关性分析. 现代农业科技, 2010(19):46-47.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.19.022
[1] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[2] Ying Chen,Manli Zhang,Xianping Liu,Guijin Dai,Shougui Hou. Effects of Biochar on Chlorophyll Fluorescence at Full Heading Stage and Yield Components of Rice [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 94-98.
[3] Huatao Liu,Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Baoliang Chi,Xiuqing Zheng,Junfeng Chen. Effects of Drought Stress at Jointing Stage on Yield and Drought Resistance in Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 89-94.
[4] Xiaoli Gao. Effects of Phosphorus on Pea Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 125-128.
[5] Xianghao Meng,Yumei Zhang,Yuansai Xue,Yiguo Liu,Hongsheng Zhang,Qi Lin,Ping Mu. Analysis of Soluble Substances, Filling Rate and Yield of Wheat under the Coastal Saline at Post Floral Stage [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 135-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .