Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 89-94.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.016

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Drought Stress at Jointing Stage on Yield and Drought Resistance in Spring Maize

Liu Huatao1,2,Huang Xuefang1,Huang Mingjing1,Chi Baoliang1,Zheng Xiuqing2,Chen Junfeng2   

  1. 1 College of Water Resources Science and Engineering,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024,Shanxi,China
    2 Arid Farming Research Center,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Taiyuan 030031,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2015-10-19 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Baoliang Chi

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

191

Abstract:

In the field of arid zones, the mainly planted and high density-resistant maize varieties of current production were selected to be studied the relationship between yield components and drought resistance at jointing stage. The results showed that there was significant positive correlation between 100-grain weight and yield under different degrees drought stress. With the increase of drought stress, the grain number per kernel played a direct effect on yield, while grain number per kernel and grain number per row had positive correlation each other. The 100-grain weight was the primary factor to decide yield, followed by grain number per kernel, but grain number per kernel was determined by grain number per row. Evaluation of drought resistance showed that Dafeng 30 could get a better yield but drought resistance was general, Fuyou 968 had a strong drought resistance, but with a low yield, and both yield and drought resistance of Luyu 36 were poor.

Key words: Maize, Jointing stage, Drought, Yield components, Drought resistance

Fig.1

Rainfall data of experimental field in 2014"

Fig.2

Change of 0-160cm soil water storage under drought stress in jointing stage"

Table 1

Correlation analysis of yield characters and yield of different maize varieties under different drought stress"

灌溉量Irrigation amount 相关系数
Index of correlation		 穗行数
Rows per ear
(RPE)		 行粒数
Kernels per row
(KPR)		 穗长
Ear length
(EL)		 穗粗
Ear diameter
(ED)		 穗粒数
Kernels per ear
(KPE)		 百粒重
Hundred kernel weight
(HKW)		 产量
Yield
正常供水
Normal water supply		 穗行数RPE 1
行粒数KPR -0.22 1
穗长EL -0.61* 0.24 1
穗粗ED 0.68** -0.11 -0.49 1
穗粒数KPE 0.43 0.51* -0.27 0.18 1
百粒重HKW 0.28 0.10 0.20 0.31 0.40 1
产量Yield 0.41 0.33 0.03 0.54* 0.61* 0.84** 1
中度干旱胁迫
Moderate drought stress		 穗行数RPE 1
行粒数KPR 0.07 1
穗长EL -0.03 0.71** 1
穗粗ED 0.55* 0.30 -0.14 1
穗粒数KPE 0.49 0.80** 0.61* 0.46 1
百粒重HKW 0.32 0.19 0.27 0.48 0.50 1
产量Yield 0.55* 0.58* 0.49 0.66** 0.84** 0.83** 1
重度干旱胁迫
Severe drought stress		 穗行数RPE 1
行粒数KPR 0.08 1
穗长EL -0.08 0.61* 1
穗粗ED 0.60* 0.06 -0.08 1
穗粒数KPE 0.58* 0.76** 0.43 0.48 1
百粒重HKW 0.43 -0.20 -0.35 0.63** 0.11 1
产量Yield 0.60* 0.38 0.10 0.75** 0.70** 0.76** 1

Table 2

Path analysis of yield characters and yield of maize varieties under normal water supply"

因子Factor 直接效应Direct effect 穗长Ear lenght(EL) 穗粗Ear diameter(ED) 穗粒数Kernels per ear(KPE) 百粒重Hundred kernel weight(HKW)
穗长EL 0.2619 -0.2195 -0.1113 0.0954
穗粗ED 0.4448 -0.1293 0.0723 0.1492
穗粒数KPE 0.4123 -0.0707 0.0780 0.1942
百粒重HKW 0.4837 0.0517 0.1372 0.1656
决定系数=0.90433 剩余通径系数=0.30931

Table 3

Path analysis of yield characters and yield of maize varieties under moderate drought stress"

因子
Factor		 直接效应
Direct effect		 穗行数
Rows per ear(RPE)		 穗长
Ear length(EL)		 穗粒数
Kernels per ear(KPE)		 百粒重
Hundred kernel weight(HKW)
穗行数RPE 0.1165 -0.0072 0.1369 0.1457
穗长EL 0.2432 -0.0035 0.1718 0.1216
穗粒数KPE 0.2804 0.0569 0.1490 0.2242
百粒重HKW 0.4513 0.0376 0.0655 0.1393
决定系数=0.98182 剩余通径系数=0.13485

Table 4

Path analysis of yield characters and yield of maize varieties under severe drought stress"

因子Factor 直接效应Direct effect 穗长Ear length(EL) 穗粒数Kernels per ear(KPE) 百粒重Hundred kernel weight(HKW)
穗长EL 0.1136 0.2453 -0.2561
穗粒数KPE 0.5684 0.0490 0.0802
百粒重HKW 0.7407 -0.0393 0.0616
决定系数=0.97330 剩余通径系数=0.16341

Fig.3

Difference analysis of yield of maize varieties under drought stress at jointing stage"

Table 5

Yield reduction range of different maize varieties under drought stress at jointing stage %"

胁迫处理Stress treatment 康地4574 Kangdi 4574 大丰30Dafeng 30 京科968Jingke 968 潞玉36Luyu 36 富友968Fuyou 968
中度干旱胁迫Moderate drought stress 8.2 0.5 4.3 11.4 8.7
重度干旱胁迫Severe drought stress 12.5 17.7 14.6 27.0 10.0
重度干旱胁迫较中度干旱胁迫
Compare to moderate drought stress		 4.6
 17.3
 10.7
 17.6
 1.4

Fig.4

Analysis of drought resistance and tolerance index of maize varieties under drought stress at jointing stage"

[1] 池宝亮 . 山西旱地农业发展的水问题分析. 山西农业科学, 2010,38(1):31-34.
[2] 王娟玲 . 破解大面积旱地玉米增产难题是山西省粮食安全的重要保障. 山西农业科学, 2009,37(4):3-5.
[3] 降云峰, 马宏斌, 刘永忠 , 等. 玉米抗旱性鉴定指标研究现状与进展. 山西农业科学, 2012,40(7):800-803.
[4] 姚艳荣, 贾秀领, 马瑞昆 , 等. 一种新型玉米苗期反复干旱存活率鉴定试验设计及效果研究. 华北农学报, 2010,25(S):148-151.
[5] 赵美令 . 玉米各生育时期抗旱性鉴定指标的研究. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(12):66-68.
[6] 韩金龙 . 玉米抗旱机理及抗旱性鉴定指标研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(21):142-146.
[7] 刘文平, 郭慕萍, 张爱芝 . 山西省降水特征和玉米产量变化分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(17):7176-7179.
[8] 兰巨生, 胡福顺, 张景瑞 , 等. 作物抗旱指数的概念和统计方法. 华北农学报, 1990,5(2):20-25.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1990.02.004
[9] 黎裕, 王天宇, 刘成 , 等. 玉米抗旱品种的筛选指标研究.植物遗传资源学报, 2004(5):210-215.
[10] 杨国航, 王卫红, 宋慧欣 , 等. 玉米品种抗旱性分析及在雨养旱作中的作用.作物杂志, 2009(5):78-81.
[11] Banziger M, Edmeades G O, Lafitte H R . Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields over a range of N levels. Crop Science, 1999,39:1035-1040.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040012x
[12] 张丽华, 赵洪祥, 潭国波 , 等. 不同玉米杂交种抗旱性比较研究. 玉米科学, 2012,20(3):29-33.
[13] 徐蕊, 王启柏, 王滨 , 等. 玉米品种抗旱性评价体系研究. 玉米科学, 2009,17(2):102-107.
[14] 孙彩霞, 武志杰, 张振平 , 等. 玉米抗旱性评价指标的系统分析. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2004,2(20):43-47.
[15] 赵洪兵, 黄亚群 . 不同玉米杂交种抗旱性比较及抗旱性鉴定指标的研究. 华北农学报, 2007,22(S):66-70.
[16] 赫福霞, 李柱刚, 阎秀峰 , 等. 渗透胁迫条件下玉米萌芽期抗旱性研究.作物杂志, 2014(5):144-147.
[17] 唐怀君, 刘成, 孙宝成 , 等. 干旱胁迫后玉米杂交种产量性状与抗旱性的关系研究. 新疆农业科学, 2012,49(10):1773-1778.
[18] 周旭梅, 高旭东, 何晶 . 75个春玉米杂交组合主要农艺性状与产量的相关和通径分析. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(5):48-52.
[19] 谭静, 陈洪梅, 韩学莉 , 等. 玉米杂交种产量与产量构成因素的相关和通径分析. 华北农学报, 2009,24(S):155-158.
[20] 李国强, 周吉, 路小芳 , 等. 雨养条件下玉米穗位叶与产量关系研究.作物杂志, 2013(3):25-28.
[21] 于永涛, 刘成, 吕玲 , 等. 玉米品种耐旱性评价及相关鉴定指标的研究.作物杂志, 2008(4):55-58.
[1] Wu Ruixiang, Yang Jianchun, Wang Liqin, Guo Xiujuan. Evaluation of the Adaptability of Flax Drought#br# Resistance Based on Multiple Statistics Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 10-16.
[2] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[3] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[4] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[5] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[8] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[9] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[10] Jiao Zhang,Qi Wu,Yufei Zhou,Yitao Wang,Ruidong Zhang,Ruidong Huang. Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 148-154.
[11] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[12] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Quality of Mechanical Harvesting Maize Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 162-167.
[13] Chendan Liu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Identification of Drought Tolerance in Bud Stage of Different Genotypes of Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 77-83.
[14] Lei Shi,Guohong Wang,Yanbo Wang,Dawei Wang,Haiyan Zhao. Preliminary Study on Grain Dehydration Rate of Maize Hybrids and Their Parents [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 84-89.
[15] Keru Wang,Shaokun Li,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. Screening Maize Varieties Suitable for Mechanical Harvesting Grain in the Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 97-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .