Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 142-146.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Chemical Regulator of Yuhuangjin on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Spring Maize

Liu Zigang(), Lu Haibo, Wu Minhua, Zhao Haichao, Wei Dong, Huang Zhihong()   

  1. Hebei North University/Hebei Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Analysis-Testing for Agro-Products and Food, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2021-01-20 Revised:2021-07-08 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16
  • Contact: Huang Zhihong E-mail:liuzigang2004@163.com;hbnuhzh@163.com

Abstract:

The effect of the chemical regulator of Yuhuangjin on the lodging resistance traits and yield of spring maize (Jingnongke 728 and Jinnong 738) under three planting densities were examined. The results indicated that Yuhuangjin could shorten plant height, ear height and internodal length, improve puncture strength and compressive strength to improve stability than controls treated with clear water. Compared with the clear water treatment, with the increasing of planting density, the yields of Jingnongke 728 were increased by 12.54%, 11.24%, and 8.81%, respectively, the yields of Jinnong 738 were increased by 4.39%, 4.05% and 7.00%, respectively. This provided the references for realizing high yields and mechanization of spring maize.

Key words: Spring maize, Yuhuangjin, Lodging resistance, Agronomic trait, Yield

Table 1

Effects of Yuhuangjin on growth indexes of maize"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
密度(株/hm2
Density (plant/hm2)
株高
Plant height (cm)
穗位高
Ear height (cm)
茎粗
Stem diameter (cm)
重心高度
Center of gravity (cm)
京农科728 玉黄金 67 500 183.23±9.65b 75.33±3.05d 3.45±0.92a 88.00±3.02b
Jingnongke 728 82 500 198.45±3.65b 87.67±0.98c 2.68±0.34c 91.11±2.32ab
97 500 223.32±5.02a 103.33±3.53b 2.13±0.20d 93.00±4.34ab
清水 67 500 198.22±9.52b 86.54±1.34c 3.08±0.65b 92.00±4.23ab
82 500 223.25±21.45a 102.23±0.77b 2.43±0.09d 95.56±5.32a
97 500 236.38±5.18a 112.67±3.11a 2.03±0.09e 96.89±4.35a
金农738 玉黄金 67 500 223.18±9.02e 87.17±5.13d 3.37±0.17a 87.00±5.23a
Jinnong 738 82 500 233.23±3.17d 95.83±2.60c 2.25±0.17c 90.33±3.36a
97 500 245.33±0.37bc 100.00±2.30c 1.89±0.34d 93.67±2.30a
清水 67 500 240.88±2.48cd 97.50±1.28c 2.88±0.54b 95.67±1.28a
82 500 251.73±1.97b 105.17±2.03b 2.12±0.21d 97.78±3.02a
97 500 261.38±7.02a 112.50±1.80a 2.01±0.14e 98.22±2.80a

Table 2

Effects of Yuhuangjin on maize stem mechanics indexes N/mm2"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
密度
(株/hm2
Density
(plant/hm2)
吐丝期
Silking stage
花后6d
Six days after pollination
花后15d
15 days after pollination
穿刺强度
Puncture
strength
压碎强度
Compressive
strength
穿刺强度
Puncture
strength
压碎强度
Compressive
strength
穿刺强度
Puncture
strength
压碎强度
Compressive
strength
京农科728 玉黄金 67 500 36.43±1.25a 237.90±2.90a 59.03±4.47a 378.13±13.13a 66.17±2.67a 447.32±26.32a
Jingnongke 728 82 500 28.45±2.41b 223.93±5.93b 45.95±4.35b 331.55±12.55b 48.23±2.07bc 367.23±19.23b
97 500 24.18±1.70c 203.05±12.50d 34.00±3.40c 326.25±13.25b 32.57±1.97d 341.62±18.62b
清水 67 500 24.35±1.67c 213.53±14.70c 45.55±5.32b 346.23±10.77b 54.00±2.23b 376.55±15.55a
82 500 20.35±1.99d 200.58±25.80d 38.88±3.67bc 321.90±12.10b 44.40±9.19c 296.37±15.63c
97 500 19.10±2.98d 180.00±20.00e 35.55±4.35c 296.83±18.17c 28.70±2.50d 249.52±17.48d
金农738 玉黄金 67 500 34.13±0.79a 231.18±31.80a 56.75±4.55a 365.83±10.83a 63.33±11.13a 435.57±17.43a
Jinnong 738 82 500 25.10±0.55b 216.98±14.90bc 43.45±2.95b 327.20±17.20b 54.37±2.87ab 350.47±30.47b
97 500 20.65±1.15cd 207.18±21.80c 33.93±2.53c 319.78±11.78b 48.50±6.10bc 334.00±26.00b
清水 67 500 22.23±1.23c 219.93±24.80ab 46.45±1.95b 326.45±12.45b 53.50±9.00ab 367.48±33.48b
82 500 19.45±2.22de 187.58±25.80d 32.53±1.93c 307.75±9.75bc 43.70±3.10bc 256.93±41.07c
97 500 17.25±1.01e 170.13±18.30e 24.20±2.90d 291.35±12.65c 38.17±5.87c 239.72±23.12c

Table 3

Effects of Yuhuangjin on internode length and root bleeding"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
密度(株/hm2
Density
(plant/hm2)
根伤流
Root bleeding
(g)
第3节长
The 3rd internode
length (cm)
第4节长
The 4th internode
length (cm)
第5节长
The 5th internode
length (cm)
京农科728 玉黄金 67 500 55.27±8.06a 10.3±0.9c 13.6±1.2d 17.8±0.8d
Jingnongke 728 82 500 45.63±2.23ab 11.8±1.3bc 15.6±0.7c 18.9±0.3bcd
97 500 37.27±1.30bc 12.5±0.6ab 16.3±0.9bc 19.1±0.2abc
清水 67 500 49.23±3.21a 11.0±1.2bc 16.5±0.3bc 18.1±0.1cd
82 500 32.70±3.36c 12.2±1.0ab 17.0±0.4b 19.6±0.1ab
97 500 29.13±3.01c 13.8±0.3a 18.5±0.4a 20.1±1.2a
金农738 玉黄金 67 500 55.60±2.26a 11.0±1.1d 15.1±1.0d 18.6±0.7c
Jinnong 738 82 500 40.70±2.95b 12.5±0.8cd 16.0±0.9cd 19.1±0.7c
97 500 30.50±2.00bc 13.7±0.4abc 17.6±0.7b 20.8±0.1b
清水 67 500 42.90±0.50ab 13.0±1.2bc 16.6±0.2bc 19.0±0.1c
82 500 35.00±1.77bc 14.3±0.9ab 17.8±0.2ab 20.5±0.8b
97 500 24.57±0.67c 15.0±0.2a 19.0±0.9a 22.0±0.5a

Table 4

Effects of Yuhuangjin on panicle traits and yield"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
密度(株/hm2
Density
(plant/hm2)
穗长
Ear length
(cm)
穗粗
Ear diameter
(cm)
穗重
Ear weight
(g)
穗行数
Rows
per ear
行粒数
Kernels
per row
容重
Bulk density
(g/cm3)
产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)
京农科728 玉黄金 67 500 20.02±0.42a 15.67±0.07a 268.88±12.2a 17.56±0.04a 41.33±1.12a 1.28±0.01a 13 372.75±194.25a
Jingnongke 728 82 500 18.28±0.08c 15.63±0.43a 239.22±3.78b 17.41±0.21a 34.17±1.03c 1.24±0.04ab 13 700.85±184.15a
97 500 16.25±0.20e 15.00±0.45b 212.66±2.34d 17.67±0.22a 37.33±0.12b 1.18±0.01cd 11 765.19±247.81c
清水 67 500 18.75±0.25b 15.00±0.50b 258.98±3.02a 15.44±0.06b 37.22±1.72b 1.26±0.02a 11 882.14±110.55c
82 500 17.67±0.22d 14.78±0.11b 225.63±2.37c 14.22±0.67c 34.78±0.11c 1.21±0.02bc 12 316.05±259.95b
97 500 15.67±0.19f 13.83±0.03c 203.24±5.24d 14.75±0.11c 35.00±0.14c 1.16±0.02d 10 812.90±155.10d
金农738 玉黄金 67 500 18.67±0.25a 15.74±0.18a 246.58±8.58a 18.33±0.59a 39.56±0.64a 1.32±0.04a 12 373.49±374.51b
Jinnong 738 82 500 18.50±0.60a 14.53±0.43b 223.90±8.90b 18.22±0.12a 37.56±0.54bc 1.29±0.65ab 12 989.36±102.36a
97 500 15.39±0.06c 14.33±0.12b 198.96±2.96c 17.72±0.27ab 36.00±1.45b 1.28±0.01abc 11 853.75±97.75c
清水 67 500 17.83±0.30b 14.93±0.80b 225.66±2.66b 17.67±0.54ab 37.17±0.04b 1.27±0.01abc 11 852.55±75.55c
82 500 17.33±0.13b 13.38±0.08c 218.02±9.02b 17.21±0.25b 36.44±1.02bc 1.23±0.03bc 12 483.65±182.35b
97 500 15.10±0.32c 13.14±0.89c 187.07±2.07d 16.33±0.09c 35.00±1.42c 1.21±0.04c 11 078.05±120.05d

Table 5

Correlation analysis between stem agronomic indicators and maize lodging capacity"

项目
Item
株高
Plant height
穗位高
Ear height
茎粗
Stem diameter
节间长
Internode length
根伤流
Root bleeding
穿刺强度
Puncture strength
压碎强度
Compressive strength
株高Plant height 1
穗位高Ear height 0.843** 1
茎粗Stem diameter -0.904** -0.765** 1
节间长Internode 0.572* 0.820** -0.757** 1
根伤流Root bleeding -0.691* -0.828** 0.858** -0.676* 1
穿刺强度Puncture strength -0.637* -0.798** 0.827** -0.767** 0.841** 1
压碎强度Compressive strength -0.875** -0.843** 0.898** -0.672* 0.648* 0.648* 1
[1] 李树岩, 马玮, 彭记永, 等. 大喇叭口及灌浆期倒伏对夏玉米产量损失的研究. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19):3952-3964.
[2] 王亮, 丰光, 李妍妍, 等. 玉米倒伏与植株农艺性状和病虫害发生关系的研究. 作物杂志, 2016(2):83-88.
[3] 明博, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 等. 2005-2016年中国玉米种植密度变化分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):1960-1972.
[4] 蒋迁, 李磊, 吴瑞娟, 等. 植物生长调节剂对夏玉米茎秆冗余调控及产量形成的影响. 华北农学报, 2016, 31(增刊):276-281.
[5] 焦浏, 董志强, 高娇, 等. 双重化控对春玉米不同密度群体冠层结构的影响. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(6):51-58.
[6] 刘见, 孙彬, 张伟强, 等. 夏玉米粒收质量及水分利用效率的化学调控效应研究. 作物杂志, 2020(3):161-168.
[7] 樊海潮, 顾万荣, 杨德光, 等. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6):909-919.
[8] 董学会, 段留生, 孟繁林, 等. 30%己乙水剂对玉米产量和茎秆质量的影响. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(1):138-140.
[9] 蒋傲男, 闫静琦, 卢海博, 等. 不同春玉米品种茎秆显微结构对抗折强度的响应. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5):53-59.
[10] 卢海博, 闫静琦, 蒋傲男, 等. 寒旱区春玉米机械化籽粒直收品种筛选. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 35(1):35-38.
[11] 田晓东. 乙烯利对夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响研究. 保定:河北农业大学, 2014.
[12] Norberg O S, Mason S C, Lowry S R. Ethephon influence on harvest able yield,grain quality,and lodging of corn. Agronomy Journal, 1988, 80:768-772.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000050015x
[13] Andrade F H, Calvino P, Cirilo A, et al. Yield response to narrow rows depends on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94:975-980.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.0975
[14] 曹彩云, 李伟, 党红凯, 等. 不同种植密度对夏玉米产量、产量性状及群体光合特性的影响研究. 华北农学报, 2013, 28(增刊):161-166.
[15] 郭书磊, 陈娜娜, 齐建双, 等. 不同密度下玉米倒伏相关性状与产量的研究. 作物杂志, 2018(5):71-77.
[16] 勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10):1688-1695.
[17] 魏湜, 杨振芳, 顾万荣, 等. 化控剂玉黄金对玉米品种东农253穗部和抗倒性影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2015, 46(12):1-7.
[18] 刘志铭, 盖旭东, 李宝玉, 等. 化控对高密度春玉米抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(6):1-5.
[19] 拉民. “玉黄金”拌种对春玉米生长发育的调控作用. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2013.
[20] 董志强, 马兴林, 王庆祥, 等. 喷施玉黄金对玉米产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(2):91-93.
[1] Shi Xionggao, Pei Xuexia, Dang Jianyou, Zhang Dingyi. Research Progress on High-Yield, High-Quality, High-Efficiency and Ecology Cultivation of Wheat Micro-Sprinkling and Drip Fertigation [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 1-10.
[2] Liu Menghong, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Zhao Haicheng, Lü Yandong. Effects of Fertilization Method and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 102-109.
[3] He Yuxuan, Li Yajuan, Zhou Mingzhuo, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Calcium Peroxide Application on Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Full-Rate Straw Returning in a Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 116-123.
[4] Cui Shiyou, Zhang Yang, Zhai Caijiao, Dong Shiqi, Zhang Jiao, Chen Pengjun, Han Jijun, Dai Qigen. Performance of Yield and Quality of Japonica Rice under Brackish Water Irrigation on the Reclaimed Tidal Flat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 137-141.
[5] Jin Dan, Feng Naijie, Zheng Dianfeng, Wang Shiya. Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Carbon Metabolism and Yield of Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 147-153.
[6] Xie Huimin, Wu Ke, Liu Wenqi, Wei Guoliang, Lu Xian, Li Zhuanglin, Wei Shanqing, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of Partial Substitution of Seaweed Fertilizers and Microbial Inoculant for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 161-166.
[7] Bai Junbing, Wang Yanjie, Wang Demei, Yang Yushuang, Wang Yujiao, Guo Dandan, Liu Zhewen, Chang Xuhong, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Yield and Quality of Strong Gluten Wheat to Different Soil Conditions and Nitrogen Levels [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 167-173.
[8] Du Xin, Li Bo, Mao Luxiao, Chen Wei, Zhang Yuxian, Cao Liang. Effects of Melatonin on Yield and AsA-GSH Cycle in Soybean under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 174-178.
[9] Yan Feng. Effects of Spraying Paclobutrazol on Growth and Photosynthetic Characters of Broomcorn Millet [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 179-183.
[10] Wang Qingbin, Lu Jiechun, Peng Chun’e, Meng Hui, Liu Zhiguo, Wang Hongfeng, Zhang Min. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates Combined with Extracts of Paecilomyces variotii (ZNC) on Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Pakchoi [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 190-195.
[11] Yang Zhinan, Huang Jinwen, Han Fanxiang, Li Yawei, Ma Jiantao, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Yang Delong, Chang Lei. Effects of Straw Strip Mulching on Soil Temperature and Yield of Potato Field in Rain-Fed Region in Northwest China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 196-204.
[12] Li Runqing, Shen Yong, Zhu Kuanyu, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on the Grain Yield, Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Super Rice Nanjing 9108 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 205-212.
[13] Feng Sufen, Liu Yuanjian, Xu Ruiqi, Zhang Wei. Analysis on Main Traits of Fresh Corn Varieties Recently Approved in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 220-226.
[14] Zhang Shengquan, Ye Zhijie, Ren Liping, Gao Xinhuan, Wang Zheng, Yang Yongli, Mu Lei, Dong Yanhua, Chen Zhaobo. Analysis of Authorized Hybrid Wheat Varieties in China since The Tenth Five-Year Plan [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 38-43.
[15] Song Quanhao, Jin Yan, Song Jiajing, Bai Dong, Zhao Lishang, Chen Jie, Zhu Tongquan. Evaluation the Breeding Utilizability of Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat in Huang-Huai Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 56-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!