Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 31-37.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.04.005

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Transcriptomic Analysis to Reveal Lodging Resistance Genes and Metabolism Pathways in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Liu Songtao1(), Tian Zaimin1, Liu Zigang1, Gao Zhijia2, Zhang Jing2, He Donggang3, Huang Zhihong1, Lan Xin1   

  1. 1Hebei North University/Key Laboratory of Hebei Province Agricultural Products Food Quality and Safety Analysis and Testing, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
    2Hebei Universe Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
    3Hebei Zhaoyu Seed Industry Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2022-01-02 Revised:2022-04-02 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15

Abstract:

Lodging is one of the important factors affecting maize production. In this study, three maize varieties with different lodging resistance [Jingnongke 728 with high lodging resistance (H), Jinnong 738 with medium lodging resistance (M) and Xianyu 335 with low lodging resistance (L)] were used for transcriptome analysis to explore the genes related to maize lodging resistance. The results showed that a total of 10093 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the three comparison groups, and the most DEGs of 7779 were identified in Xianyu 335 and Jingnongke 728 groups. GO functional enrichment analysis showed that the different lodging resistance of the three maize varieties may be related to the different number of DEGs enriched into the same GO terms. Metabolic pathway enrichment analysis showed that L-vs-H, M-vs-H were significantly enriched in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis, while L-vs-M was significantly enriched in photosynthesis antenna protein and plant-pathogen interaction pathways. The stem microstructure showed that Xianyu 335 had the smallest single vascular bundle area and the thinnest stem epidermal cell thickness, while Jingnongke 728 had the largest single vascular bundle area and the thickest epidermal cell thickness. The results of this study further clarified the genes and metabolic pathways related to lodging resistance in maize, which laid a foundation for directional cloning, and also provided a foundation for molecular design breeding of new lodging resistant varieties.

Key words: Maize, RNA-seq, Microscopic structure, Differentially expressed genes, Lodging-resistant

Table1

The primer sequence of RT-qPCR"

基因名称Gene name 前引物Forward primer 后引物Reverse primer 产物长度Product size (bp)
LOC100281532 GGAGGAGATGATGGGCAGC CTCGATCTTCACCAGGGGC 79
LOC100273579 AGAAGTCGCTGAGCCTGAAC TCTGCATCAGCGGGTAGTTG 141
LOC100272756 AGGAGGACAAGTCCGTGGAG TATCGATCTTGTCGAGGCCG 174
LOC541914 CCGTTAACCTGTCGAGGCTT GTCTCCAACCTTCCAGCTCC 123
LOC100272970 ATCAGCGTACATCGCGTCC AACTGAGGTGGGCTCTGTGT 94
LOC100194371 CGGTTCTGCTTCAAGACGAT CGGTAGTAGCTCCTTGGGTG 113
LOC100281042 TGGTGGAGGAGTACAGGAGG GTGCCGTTCATCATGCTGTC 172
LOC100282047 GTCGAACAGCGAGGAGTACC GTCGAACCAGAGGTGGAACC 163
LOC100283318 CTACTTCATCTCGGAGGGGC GAGTAGGTGTGGAAGTCGGC 177
LOC100284765 CCACCATCAGTAGCGGTCG GCCCGTGATGTTGCTGGA 168

Table 2

The summary of RNA-Seq data"

样品名称
Sample name
原始数据
Raw read
有效数据
Clean read
碱基所占百分比
Q30(%)
GC含量
GC content(%)
单一比对率
Unique mapped
多比对率
Multi mapped
JNK728-1 46743554 44778802 94.64 53.21 38131199(85.15%) 2833048(3.58%)
JNK728-2 42213792 40278042 93.90 53.24 34173234(84.84%) 2543399(3.56%)
JNK728-3 45140086 42175780 94.60 53.16 35820137(84.93%) 2740012(3.64%)
JN738-1 45628206 43858376 94.36 53.69 38079538(86.82%) 2519952(3.37%)
JN738-2 49113472 46927518 94.46 53.78 40671536(86.67%) 2782255(3.41%)
JN738-3 47537856 45732776 93.90 53.72 39628836(86.65%) 2690579(3.43%)
XY335-1 45920308 44134008 94.30 54.57 38518679(87.28%) 2222552(3.04%)
XY335-2 44670476 42529790 94.55 54.84 37079717(87.19%) 2186084(3.04%)
XY335-3 46723572 44596496 94.02 55.08 38796470(86.99%) 2319389(3.06%)

Fig.1

Principal componentanalysis of samples used for transcriptome sequencing"

Table 3

Statistics of differentially expressed genes"

分组
Group
DEGs数量
DEGs number
下调
Down-regulated
上调
Up-regulated
L-vs-H 7779 4411 3368
L-vs-M 5373 2896 2477
M-vs-H 4905 2831 2074

Fig.2

Venn diagram analysis of DEGs observed in comparison groups"

Fig.3

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEGs The colorgradient (orange to red)corresponds to the level of significance (lower to higher; P<0.05) of enrichment of the corresponding GO terms"

Fig.4

Metabolic pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs"

Fig.5

Microstructure of the stems of the three maize varieties (a) number of stem vascular bundles within the microscope visual scope; (b)single vascular bundle area; (c)stem epidermal cell thickness"

Fig.6

Microstructures of the stalk of the three maize varieties Different letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05)"

Fig.7

The qRT-PCR validation of the RNA-seq data for the ten DEGs"

[1] 王聪, 马青美, 郭新梅, 等. 玉米茎秆抗倒伏相关性状的遗传效应分析. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(4):9-17.
[2] 丰光, 黄长玲, 邢锦丰. 玉米抗倒伏的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2008(4):12-14.
[3] 王夏青, 宋伟, 张如养, 等. 玉米茎秆抗倒伏遗传的研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11):2261-2272.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.002
[4] 马天军. 玉米倒伏种类及防治对策研究. 新农业, 2021(21):14.
[5] 李妍妍, 景希强, 丰光, 等. 玉米倒伏的主要相关因素研究进展. 辽宁农业科学, 2013(4):47-51.
[6] 徐天成, 周富亮, 黄联润, 等. 玉米抗倒伏性相关研究进展. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(11):29-32.
[7] Cloninger FR, Zuber MS. Methods for evaluating stalk quality in corn. Phytopathology, 1970, 60:295-300.
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-60-295
[8] 冯素伟, 姜小苓, 胡铁柱, 等. 不同小麦品种茎秆显微结构与抗倒强度关系研究. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(36):57-62.
[9] LivakKJ, SchmittgenTD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR andthe 2-∆∆CT method. Methods, 2001, 25:402-408.
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 pmid: 11846609
[10] 殷静. 大豆茎倒伏突变体基因定位、转录组测序及2个木质素合成基因的克隆研究.南京:南京农业大学, 2013.
[11] 杨硕, 郑云霄, 黄亚群, 等. 不同玉米自交系茎秆上部维管束数目的差异分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(2):466-475.
[12] 张巫军, 段秀建, 姚雄, 等. 烯效唑对遮阴下重穗型水稻渝香203茎秆形态结构和抗倒伏性的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2019, 37(6):755-761.
[13] 胡丹. 甜荞抗倒伏相关性状的遗传分析及木质素合成特征. 重庆:西南大学, 2016.
[14] 刘丹. 木质素相关基因表达调控对油菜木质素合成及抗菌核病和抗倒伏性的影响. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008.
[1] Zhou Wenli, Hao Miaoyi, Zhang Renhe. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Maize Root Growth and Nitrogen Metabolism under High-Density Planting [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 125-132.
[2] Ma Xiaoming, Qi Xiangkun, Tan Xue, Shi Mengyu, Wang Yufeng, Fu Jian, Yang Kejun. Effects of No-tillage with Straw Mulching on Soil Aggregate Stability and Maize Yield in Semi-Arid Region [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 152-159.
[3] Wang Zhi, Zhou Wenli, Zhao Yao, Liu Zheng, Li Congfeng, Zhang Renhe. Effects of New Chemical Control Combinations on Photosynthetic Performance and Yield Improvement of Maize [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 112-120.
[4] Liu Songtao, Jiang Chao, Shi Hanbo, Yan Linan, Zhao Haichao, Lu Haibo, Li Hui, Huang Zhihong. Cloning, Bioinformatics Analysis, and Functional Validation of ZmPOD Gene in Maize [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 37-44.
[5] Zhou Tingfang, Li Ran, Liu Qianqian, Zhang Ze, Wang Zhenhua, Ma Baoxin, Lu Ming, Zhang Lin, Han Yehui, Yang Bo, Li Mingshun, Zhang Degui, Weng Jianfeng, Yong Hongjun, Xu Jingyu, Han Jienan, Li Xinhai. Analysis of Salt Tolerance at Germination Stage of 118 Maize Hybrids in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 1-10.
[6] Yang Ke, Lai Shangkun, Jin Qian, Wang Weijun, Ding Yidong, Liu Xiaofei. Study on the Mining and Transcriptional Regulation Mechanism of Genes Related to Linoleic Acid Synthesis in Maize [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 102-112.
[7] Wang Changliang, Yan Lihui, Chang Jianzhi, Zhang Guohe, Wang Jing, Wang Fenxia, Huang Lihua. Breeding and Innovative Idea of Maize New Variety Xundan 168 [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 142-146.
[8] Li Zhehao, Ji Miyuan, Lü Meng, Ming Bo, Li Shaokun, Zhang Haiyan, Xie Ruizhi. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies on the Root and Shoot Development of Spring Maize under Long-Term Positioning Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 135-141.
[9] Wang Xingya, Chen Yuhan, Zhang Mengwen, Sun Linlin, Chen Lirong, Guo Yuqiu, Gong Kuijie. The Effects of ABA Application at Different Stages on Maize Grain Filling and Dehydration [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 173-180.
[10] He Xinchun, Du Hewei, Huang Min. Cloning and Expression Analysis of Maize ZmCaM1 Gene [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 19-28.
[11] Shi Yaxing, Liu Junling, Zhu Guichuan, He Zhongyou, Liu Hui, Fan Yanli, Xu Li, Lu Baishan, Zhao Jiuran, Luo Meijie. Cloning of the du1 Novel Allelic Variant and the Development of Its Molecular Markers [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 41-48.
[12] Hou Yue, Wang Hongliang, Li Jie, Li Chunjie, Chen Fanjun. Research Advances on the Effects of Cereal/Legume Forage Intercropping on Forage Quality and Nitrogen Uptake [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 1-10.
[13] Jin Zihao, Zhao Wenqing, Wang Fang, Wang Wei, Peng Yunling, Chang Fangguo. Effects of Three Exogenous Plant Growth Regulators on the Cold Tolerance of Maize Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 125-132.
[14] Wang Yi, Ren Yongfu, Zhang Zhengpeng, Ding Defang, Zhang Jing, Liu Yihong, Sun Duoxin, Chen Guangrong. The Effects of Different Covering Materials on Soil Environment and Maize Yield in Hexi Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 149-155.
[15] Hou Nan, Wu Fengjie, Qi Xiangkun, Wang Yufeng, Yang Kejun, Fu Jian. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Carbon Metabolism of Waxy Maize during Filling Period in Black Soil Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 178-184.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!