Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 38-43.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.007

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening on Indexes of Nitrogen Efficient Maize Varieties

Cui Wenfang,Gao Julin,Yu Xiaofang,Wang Zhigang,Sun Jiying,Hu Shuping,Su Zhijun,Xie Min   

  1. Agricultural College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2016-09-07 Revised:2016-11-01 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

13

PDF (PC)

359

Abstract:

Using nine super-high-yield maize varieties as materials, under nitrogen and no-nitrogen applied conditions, high efficient varieties were screened by using yield and indexes in nitrogen conditions, and screening indexes were analyzed. The results showed that Zhengdan 958, Jinshan 27 and Zhengdan 17 were nitrogen-efficient high-yield varieties. The accumulation ability of vegetative organs of nitrogen-efficient high-yield maize varieties was stronger than those of low-yield inefficient varieties from silking stage to filling stage, and the SPAD values of the silking stage had significant advantage.

Key words: Maize, High-yield, Nitrogen use efficiency, Screening indexes

Table 1

The variance analysis of NUE and related indicators of super-high-yield maize hybrids under different nitrogen application"

变异来源
Variation source		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 氮利用
效率
NUE		 成熟期全株总氮
Total nitrogen of mature period		 吐丝期茎叶总氮
Total nitrogen of stems and leaves at silking stage		 灌浆期茎叶总氮
Total nitrogen of stems and leaves at filling stage		 成熟期茎叶总氮
Total nitrogen of stems and leaves at mature period
氮水平Nitrogen level 1 ** ** ** ** **
品种Variety 8 ** ** ** ** **
氮水平×品种
Nitrogen level×Variety		 8 ** ** ** ** **
变异来源
Variation source		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 子粒吸
氮量
N of grain		 灌浆期SPAD值
SPAD value of silking stage		 穗位叶叶面积
Area of ear leaf		 硝态氮
Nitrate nitrogen		 氨基酸
Amino acid content
氮水平Nitrogen level 1 ** ** ** * *
品种Variety 8 ** ** ** * *
氮水平×品种
Nitrogen level×variety		 8 ** ** ** * *

Table 2

The correlation analysis of NUE and nitrogen accumulation of maize hybrids under different nitrogen application"

氮水平
Nitrogen level		 指标Index 氮效率
NUE		 茎叶总氮Total nitrogen of stems and leaves 植株氮积累量
N accumulation
of plant		 子粒吸氮量
Amount of nitrogen
absorption of grain
吐丝期
Silking stage		 灌浆期
Filling stage		 成熟期
Maturation stage
施氮肥
Nitrogen		 吐丝期茎叶总氮 0.8932*
灌浆期茎叶总氮 0.2311 0.5479
成熟期茎叶总氮 0.1966 -0.1609 -0.1488
植株氮积累量 0.5444 0.3342 -0.1369 0.4694
子粒吸氮量 -0.0575 0.1440 -0.2296 -0.8920* -0.1815
氮收获指数 -0.3988 -0.1319 -0.0501 -0.8728 -0.7904 0.7458
不施氮肥
No nitrogen		 吐丝期茎叶总氮 -0.3280
灌浆期茎叶总氮 0.9352* -0.1276
成熟期茎叶总氮 -0.8426 0.6654 -0.7556
植株氮积累量 0.5406 0.9581* -0.3458 0.8432
子粒吸氮量 -0.2316 0.8383 -0.1655 0.7114 0.8551
氮收获指数 0.3709 0.2250 0.2384 0.1201 0.1928 0.6716

Fig.1

Screening of high yield and nitrogen efficient maize hybrids"

Table 3

The correlation analysis of NUE physical signs of super-high-yield maize hybrids under different nitrogen application"

氮水平
Nitrogen level		 指标Index 氮利用效率
NUE		 穗位叶叶面积
Area of ear leaf		 吐丝期SPAD值
SPAD value of silking stage		 灌浆期SPAD值
SPAD value of filling stage		 硝态氮浓度
Nitrate nitrogen
施氮肥 Nitrogen 穗位叶叶面积 0.1752
吐丝期叶绿素SPAD 0.5844 0.5143
灌浆期叶绿素SPAD 0.4205 0.1159 0.8344
硝态氮浓度 0.2926 0.8791 0.3592 -0.1863
氨基酸浓度 0.8793* 0.2197 0.4863 0.5379 0.0826
不施氮肥
No nitrogen		 穗位叶叶面积 0.4081
吐丝期叶绿素SPAD 0.8820* 0.6782
灌浆期叶绿素SPAD -0.0334 0.4096 -0.0728
硝态氮浓度 0.6283 0.5338 0.4088 0.3471
氨基酸浓度 -0.8903* -0.0815 -0.7579 0.5703 -0.2358

Table 4

The screening index comparison of two super-high-yield maize hybrids"

氮水平 Nitrogen level 类型 Type 杂交种Hybrid 氮效率(kg/kg)
NUE		 吐丝期茎叶总氮(g/株)
Total N of stems and
leaves at silking stage		 灌浆期茎叶总氮(g/株)
Total N of stems and leaves at filling stage		 吐丝期SPAD值
SPAD value of silking stage		 氨基酸浓度(μg/mL)
Amino acid content
施氮肥
Nitrogen		 高产氮高效型 郑单958 23.08 3.10 3.42 57.05 0.054
金山27 22.99 2.98 3.92 56.63 0.023
郑单17 21.02 2.88 4.60 55.95 0.016
均值 22.36 2.99 3.98 56.54 0.031
低产氮低效型 内单314 20.39 2.77 3.43 57.35 0.011
京单28 19.82 2.44 2.86 52.40 0.015
均值 20.11 2.61 3.15 54.88 0.013
不施氮
No nitrogen		 高产氮高效型 郑单958 258.23 2.10 2.91 56.40 0.056
金山27 245.21 2.44 2.95 57.40 0.064
郑单17 244.04 2.46 2.74 55.05 0.065
均值 249.16 2.33 2.87 56.28 0.062
低产氮低效型 内单314 103.37 2.72 2.84 53.45 0.136
京单28 118.38 2.16 2.40 54.05 0.080
均值 110.88 2.44 2.62 53.75 0.108
[1] 吴永升, 周瑞阳, 韦新兴 , 等. 广西主要玉米自交系氮利用效率评价. 西南农业学报, 2012,43(9):1330-1335.
[2] 吕鹏, 张吉旺, 刘伟 , 等. 施氮时期对超高产夏玉米产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(5):1099-1107.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0489
[3] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y , et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010,327(5968):1008-1010.
doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447
[4] 张维理, 武淑霞, 冀宏杰 . 中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策I.21世纪初期中国农业面源污染的形势估计. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(7):1008-1017.
[5] 孙志梅, 武志杰, 陈利军 , 等. 农业生产中的氮肥施用现状及其环境效应研究进展. 土壤通报, 2006,37(4):782-786.
[6] 刘建安, 米国华, 张福锁 . 不同基因型玉米氮效率差异的比较研究. 农业生物技术学报, 1999,7(3):248-254.
[7] 刘建安, 米国华, 陈范骏 , 等. 玉米杂交种氮效率基因型差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(3):276-281.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.03.004
[8] Presterl T, Groh S, Landbeck M , et al. Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of European maize hybrids developed under conditions of low and high nitrogen input. Plant Breed, 2002,121:480-486.
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00770.x
[9] 陈范骏, 米国华, 刘向生 , 等. 玉米氮效率性状的配合力分析. 中国农业科学, 2003,36(2):134-139.
[10] 汤继华, 谢惠玲, 黄绍敏 , 等. 缺氮条件下玉米自交系叶绿素含量与光合效率的变化. 华北农学报, 2005,20(5):10-12.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2005.05.002
[11] Ma B L, Dwyer L M . Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant Soil, 1998,199:283-291.
doi: 10.1023/A:1004397219723
[12] 春亮, 陈范骏, 张福锁 , 等. 不同氮效率玉米杂交种的根系生长、氮素吸收与产量形成. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11(5):615-619.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2005.05.008
[13] Subedi K D, Ma B L . Effects of N-deficiency and timing of N supply on the recovery and distribution of labeled 15N in contrasting maize hybrids . Plant Soil, 2005,273:189-202.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-7540-7
[14] 颜军, 杨德光 . 4个玉米品种氮素利用效率的比较研究. 玉米科学, 2010,18(2):91-95.
[15] 陈国平, 杨国航, 赵明 , 等. 玉米小面积超高产创建及配套栽培技术研究. 玉米科学, 2008,16(4):1-4.
[16] 陈国平, 高聚林, 赵明 , 等. 近年我国玉米超高产田的分布、产量构成及关键技术. 作物学报, 2012,38(1):80-85.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00080
[17] 李少昆, 王克如, 谢瑞芝 , 等. 实施密植高产机械化生产,实现玉米高产高效协同.作物杂志, 2016(4):1-6.
[18] 李合生 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京: 高等教育出版社,2005:23-25, 35-37.
[19] Moll R H, Kamprath E J, Jackson W A . Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal, 1982,74:562-568.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400030037x
[20] 米国华, 陈范骏, 春亮 , 等. 玉米氮高效品种的生物学特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(1):155-159.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2007.01.026
[21] 黄高宝, 张恩和, 胡恒觉 . 不同玉米品种氮素营养效率差异的生态生理机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001,7(3):293-297.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0308
[22] Lafitte H R, Edmeades G O . Association between traits in tropical maize inbred lines and their hybrids under high and low soil nitrogen. Maydica, 1995,40:259-267.
[23] 陈范骏, 米国华, 张福锁 . 玉米氮高效组合杂种优势分析. 玉米科学, 2006,14(4):125-128.
[24] 张兴华, 薛吉全, 刘万峰 , 等. 不同玉米品种耐低氮能力鉴定与评价. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(8):65-68.
[25] 冯学民, 向春阳, 田秀萍 , 等. 黑龙江省几个玉米杂交种氮效率差异的分析. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2004,16(1):1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2004.01.001
[26] 王康, 沈荣开, 唐友生 . 用叶绿素测值(SPAD)评估夏玉米氮素状况的实验研究. 灌溉排水学报, 2002,21(4):1-12.
[27] Laffitte H R, Edmeades G O . Improvement for tolerance to soil nitrogen in tropical maize.Ⅲ.Variation in yield across environment. Field Crops Research, 1994,39:27-38.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(94)90068-X
[28] 陈范骏, 米国华, 春亮 . 玉米氮效率的杂种优势分析. 作物学报, 2004,30(10):1014-1018.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[5] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[6] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[7] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[8] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[9] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[10] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[11] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Quality of Mechanical Harvesting Maize Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 162-167.
[12] Lei Shi,Guohong Wang,Yanbo Wang,Dawei Wang,Haiyan Zhao. Preliminary Study on Grain Dehydration Rate of Maize Hybrids and Their Parents [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 84-89.
[13] Keru Wang,Shaokun Li,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. Screening Maize Varieties Suitable for Mechanical Harvesting Grain in the Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 97-102.
[14] Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Bo Ming,Peng Hou,Shaokun Li. Effects of Peeling Husk on Grain Dehydration of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 114-117.
[15] Shaohui Huang,Yunma Yang,Ketong Liu,Yanming Sun,Junfang Yang,Liangliang Jia. Yield Potential, Yield Gap and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Gap of Winter Wheat in Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 118-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .