Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 106-111.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Yield Benefit of Maize Planting Mode with Ditching and Pitting and Polythene Mulch Intercropping with Potato

An Tongxin,Chen Mengli,Zhou Feng,Lu Jing,Wu Bozhi,Zhang Lian'gen   

  1. Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,Yunnan,China
  • Received:2016-06-01 Revised:2016-08-26 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Lian'gen Zhang

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

131

Abstract: Aim

ed at the intensified drought problems on agricultural production in Yunnan province, this experiments working on maize intercropping potato, drought resistance and cultivation technology of rainwater harvesting were carried out in agricultural technology demonstration bases of Xuanwei city. The results showed that the maize drought resistance+ditching or hole pitting+polythene mulch and intercropping potato technology integration measures could increase the soil moisture. The soil moisture of maize ditching intercropping and pitting intercropping were higher than maize flat ridge to 28.32% and to 25.16% than potato. In the early growth stage of maize, the integrated measures of maize drought resistance+ditching or hole pitting+polythene mulch and intercropping potato technology could promote maize and potato growth and development. Plant height and leaf area index were better than maize flat ridge planting and maize monoculture. Maize plant height of ditching and hole pitting were increased more by 31.94% and 26.33% than flat ridge, and the leaf area index (LAI) were increased 49.56% and 25.29%, respectively. The theory of maize yield and economic factor based on integration technology was better than the flat ridge intercropping and maize monoculture. The technique could significantly increase the yield of maize, the composite yield and the land equivalent ratio (LER=1.20), which was higher than the flat ridge, and its production benefit was remarkable. So the integration technology measures can make effective use of water resources, improve the system for crop drought resistance, and has important significance for food security and stable agricultural income.

Key words: Maize, Potato, Intercropping, Drought resistance cultivation, Yield benefit

Table 1

ANOVA analysis of maize soil moisture (0~7.6cm) of different treatment %"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
Pvalue
A B C D
6-04 48.80a 46.97a 37.33b 38.03b 5.414* 0.025
6-26 29.32 29.72 29.33 24.59 0.580 0.644
7-18 12.24 12.19 12.98 9.97 1.955 0.199
8-09 21.53 19.41 18.84 22.68 2.860 0.100
8-29 20.07 18.58 17.44 21.79 2.709 0.115
9-20 22.61 22.08 20.92 19.76 3.100 0.089
10-12 16.87 15.47 15.46 14.74 0.805 0.525

Table 2

ANOVA analysis of potato soil moisture (0~7.6cm) of different treatment %"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
Pvalue
A B C E
6-04 38.27 40.30 37.33 32.43 1.292 0.342
6-26 29.54 32.00 26.89 24.88 2.734 0.114
7-18 17.99a 13.73b 13.80b 11.33b 5.470* 0.024
8-09 12.64 14.10 12.16 14.59 2.430 0.140
9-20 23.60a 20.50ab 19.00ab 16.40b 6.207* 0.017
10-12 15.80a 13.60ab 10.46b 10.50b 5.357* 0.026

Table 3

ANOVA analysis of maize plant height of different treatment cm"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
Pvalue
A B C D
6-04 73.70aA 70.57aA 55.86bB 61.29bB 14.972** <0.001
6-26 181.57aA 170.14bA 150.29cB 169.86bA 13.831** <0.001
7-18 249.86a 241.57ab 233.43a 246.00a 3.441* 0.033
8-09 252.61 240.86 239.36 246.50 1.873 0.161
8-29 253.29 238.79 239.93 246.71 2.227 0.111
9-20 253.21 238.71 240.94 246.50 1.642 0.206
10-12 245.71abA 225.14cB 232.57abAB 248.43aA 5.219** 0.006

Table 4

ANOVA analysis of maize LAI of different treatment"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
Pvalue
A B C D
6-04 1.90bcAB 2.13aA 1.70cB 2.03bcA 11.485** 0.003
6-26 3.60bB 4.03bB 3.43bB 5.30aA 10.874** 0.003
7-18 5.23 5.10 4.70 5.13 2.390 0.144
8-09 6.47 6.67 6.07 6.20 1.187 0.374
8-29 5.13aA 4.83abAB 3.43cC 4.07bB 9.197** 0.006
9-20 2.92 2.90 2.95 2.97 0.060 0.980
10-12 3.48 2.77 3.55 3.23 2.300 0.154

Table 5

ANOVA analysis of potato plant height of different treatment cm"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
Pvalue
A B C E
6-04 31.43 28.57 27.43 29.80 0.513 0.677
6-26 55.86 58.43 54.14 49.10 2.359 0.094
7-18 81.00bA 91.86aA 86.71abA 63.91cB 18.949** <0.001
8-09 87.86bcAB 105.86aA 93.14abAB 72.40cB 6.451** 0.002

Table 7

ANOVA analysis of maize yield factors of different treatment"

项目Item 处理Treatment F值
F value		 P值
P value
A B C D
穗位高Ear height(cm) 99.56 95.89 104.50 101.35 2.690 0.062
茎粗Stem diameter(cm) 6.71 6.79 11.42 7.41 0.804 0.501
穗长Ear length(cm) 21.41 22.78 20.08 21.38 2.671 0.064
穗粗Ear diameter(cm) 17.68 17.99 17.31 17.82 1.432 0.251
穗行数Rows per ear 15.11 16.00 14.67 14.80 2.546 0.073
秃顶长度Bald length(cm) 2.37 2.07 2.21 2.68 0.734 0.539
穗相对行粒数Grains per row 77.44 76.67 74.56 76.90 0.281 0.839
千粒重1000-grain weight(g) 303.41 284.50 304.39 281.46 2.715 0.091
理论产量Theoretical yield(t/hm2) 16.73 16.69 14.91 15.94 0.949 0.428
经济系数Economic coefficient(%) 59.79 61.46 59.24 57.95 2.085 0.121

Table 6

ANOVA analysis of potato LAI of different treatment"

日期
Date		 处理Treatment F值
Fvalue		 P值
Pvalue
A B C E
6-04 1.43 1.77 1.33 1.40 3.387 0.074
6-26 6.27 6.63 4.33 3.63 2.733 0.114
7-18 5.07 5.00 4.80 4.33 3.164 0.086
8-09 3.87 4.87 4.73 4.37 0.792 0.532

Table 8

ANOVA analysis of output and benefit of different treatment"

处理
Treatment		 玉米产量(t/hm2)
Maize yield		 马铃薯产量(t/hm2)
Potato yield		 产值(万元/hm2)
Output value		 复合产量(t/hm2)
Compound yield		 土地当量比(LER)
Land equivalent ratio
A 10.99a 5.20abAB 3.34abB 12.03abAB 1.17aA
B 11.55a 4.85bB 3.93aA 12.52aA 1.20bB
C 10.45a 4.39bB 3.29bB 11.33bB 1.09aA
D 12.07ab — 2.90cB 12.07abAB —
E — 19.98aA 3.20bB 4.00cC —
F值F value 4.44* 141.61** 9.97** 124.97** 13.70**
P值P value 0.041 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 0.006
[1] 肖军, 赵景波 . 陕西省54a来农业干旱灾害特征研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2006,20(5):201-204.
[2] 李茂松, 李章成, 王道龙 , 等. 50年来我国自然灾害变化对粮食产量的影响. 自然灾害学报, 2005,14(2):55-60.
[3] 何艳芬, 张柏, 刘志明 . 农业旱灾及其指标系统研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008,26(5):239-244.
[4] 童彦, 潘玉君, 朱海燕 . 农业干旱灾害影响粮食产能安全的机理分析. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(2):520-522.
[5] Dong H Z, Li W J, Tang W , et al. Early plastic mulching increases stand establishment and lint yield of cotton in saline fields. Field Crops Research, 2009,111(3):269-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.01.001
[6] 梁馨文, 任瑞丽, 张丽清 . 马铃薯地膜覆盖技术的应用与推广方式探讨. 现代农业科技, 2009(23):143-144.
[7] 李凤民, 王静, 赵松岭 , 半干早黄土高原集水高效旱地农业的发展. 生态学报, 1999,19(2):259-264.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1999.02.019
[8] 陈明昌, 吴惠琼 . 宣威市玉米少(免)耕“窝塘式”抗旱集雨节水栽培集成技术. 云南农业科技, 2013(6):38-39.
[9] 周绍松, 周敏, 李永梅 , 等. 大麦/蚕豆间作对土壤含水量的影响研究. 云南农业大学学报, 2008,93(4):532-535.
[10] 孟平, 张劲松 . 梨麦间作系统水分效应与土地利用效应的研究. 林业科学研究, 2004,17(2):167-171.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2004.02.005
[11] 闫根海, 杨晓军, 王斌 , 等. 地膜覆盖对玉米产量及其土壤状况的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(12):6405-6413.
[12] 张淑芳, 柴守玺, 蔺艳春 , 等. 冬小麦地膜覆盖的水分效应. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2011,46(2):45-52.
[13] Liao W, Bi H, Zhao Y , et al. Distribution of soil moisture in malus pumila and glycine max intercropping system and its impact on the soybean growth. Science of Soil & Water Conservation, 2014,12(1):24-28.
[14] 付克勤, 孙俊, 齐旭峰 . 干旱区坡地马铃薯-地膜玉米间作栽培技术要点. 农业科技与信息, 2009,( 15):24-25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6997.2009.15.013
[15] 王菊芬, 吴伯志 . 间作系统中土壤水分研究进展. 云南农业大学学报, 2009,24(2):286-291.
[16] 叶优良, 肖焱波, 黄玉芳 , 等. 小麦/玉米和蚕豆/玉米对水分利用的影响. 中国农学通报, 2008,24(3):445-449.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[8] Ying Chai,Yongqing Xu,Yao Fu,Xiuyu Li,Fumeng He,Yingqi Han,Zhe Feng,Fenglan Li. Characteristics of Cell Wall Degradation Enzyme Produced by Main Pathogenic Fusarium spp. in Potato Dry Rot [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 154-160.
[9] Wenlian Bai,Yi Zheng,Jingxiu Xiao. Below-Ground Biotic Mechanisms of Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Improved by Cereal and Legume Intercropping-A Review [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 20-27.
[10] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[11] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[12] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9" [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89-94.
[13] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[14] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[15] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .