Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 162-167.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Quality of Mechanical Harvesting Maize Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Central Liaoning Province

Li Shaokun1,Wang Keru1,Wang Yanbo2,Zhao Haiyan2,Shen Yuzhong3,Cai Dandan4,Xiao Wanxin2,Jiang Wenye3,Huang Zhaofu1,Zhai Lichao1,Xie Ruizhi1,Hou Peng1,Ming Bo1   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Beijing 100081, China
    2 Corn Research Institute, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
    3 Tieling County Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Tieling 112600, Liaoning, China
    4 Liaoning Branch of China Sinochem Fertilizer Holdings Limited Company, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2018-03-29 Revised:2018-05-20 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

152

Abstract:

Studying and defining the factors restricting the quality of mechanical harvesting maize grain is of great significance for the promotion and transformation of mechanical harvesting maize grain technology in Liaoning Province. From 2015 to 2017, five sets of mechanical harvesting maize grain technology tests and demonstrations were conducted at Tieling, Shenbei and Haicheng in Liaoning Province, with the evaluation of 57 samples from 41 cultivars. The results showed that: (1) The average grain broken rate was 11.38%, all the results of five sets of experiments were higher than the national standard (≤5%), which was the main problem of mechanical harvesting maize grain in Liaoning Province; (2) The average yield loss rate was 3.93%, with a large variation (0.78%-12.60%) between different sets; (3) The correlation coefficients of grain moisture content and grain broken rate, and impurity rate were 0.596 and 0.454 which reached a extremly significant difference level. High grain moisture content was the main reason resulting in high grain broken rate and high impurity rate; (4) Yield loss mainly came from the ear loss, accounting for 63.2%-92.5% of the total yield loss, ear loss was closely related to lodging rate; (5) When harvested at middle to late October (13th to 21st, October), the grain moisture content of the 87.2% of the testing cultivars could drop to below 25%, which is in the suitable moisture content for mechanical harvesting grain. The present study showed that the heat resources was rich in central Liaoning Province and it had a long suitable harvesting period, the grain moisture content was not the key factor that restricts mechanical grain harvest. The keys to popularize maize mechanical grain harvest is to breed cultivars which has a slow stem senescence and high tolerance to stem rot and Ostrinia nubilalis, controlling lodging and ear loss.

Key words: Central Liaoning, Maize, Mechanical harvesting grain, Grain moisture content, Plant lodging, Yield loss

Table 1

Information of the experiments"

年份
Year		 试验地点
Site		 品种
Cultivar		 品种数
Number of cultivars		 播种时间(月-日)
Sowing date (Month-Day)		 收获时间(月-日)
Harvest date (Month-Day)
2015 铁岭蔡牛 联创808,先玉027,MC812,真金308,MC278,中单909,登海618,中科玉505,农华205,安玉579,东单1451,裕丰303,迪卡159,迪卡517 14 5-15 10-14
沈北黄家村 迪卡159,登海618,联创808,中科玉505,裕丰303,先玉335,真金308,真
金318,辽单588,辽单527		 10 4-24 9-27
海城耿庄 先玉027,飞天358,美联178,良玉99 4 5-17 10-13
2016 铁岭蔡牛 翔玉998,辽单588,辽单502,东单1501,陕单636,丰垦139,真金318,迪卡159,辽单565,飞天358,辽单575,军玉535 12 4-29 10-21
2017 铁岭蔡牛 京科968,辽单575,迪卡159,京科728,华美1号,翔玉998,优迪919,东单913,陕单636,吉单66,泽玉8911,泽玉501,中迪710,中迪702,东单1331,铁研388,丰垦139 17 4-28 10-20

Table 2

Quality of mechanical grain harvest"

年份Year 试验地点Site 项目Item 破碎率Broken rate (%) 杂质率Impurity rate (%) 损失量Yield loss (kg/hm2) 产量损失率Yield loss rate (%)
2015 铁岭蔡牛 平均值 09.76±2.37 0.21±0.11 179.4±46.5 1.39±0.40
极差 06.79~14.12 0.04~0.41 104.1~256.4 0.86~2.19
沈北黄家村 平均值 21.35±5.29 1.87±1.25 245.4±151.5 2.96±2.05
极值 10.40~28.60 0.80~5.10 53.6~462.2 0.55~6.35
海城耿庄 平均值 06.47±0.75 0.36±0.07 222.8±57.0 1.93±0.38
极值 05.60~7.43 0.26~0.41 161.1~289.2 1.51~2.40
2016 铁岭蔡牛 平均值 10.76±1.98 0.25±0.15 1 137.0±750.2 12.60±8.15
极值 09.04~14.02 0.05~0.51 242.1~2 504.6 3.30~29.18
2017 铁岭蔡牛 平均值 08.58±2.02 0.81±0.66 74.4±28.4 0.78±0.29
极值 04.13~11.35 0.11~2.74 26.0~133.5 0.25~1.23

Fig.1

Grain loss and ear loss of mechanical grain harvest at Shenbei in 2015 and Tieling in 2016"

Table 3

Grain moisture content of different cultivars at harvest stage"

铁岭蔡牛(2015)
Cainiu, Tieling		 沈北黄家村(2015)
Huangjiacun, Shenbei		 海城耿庄(2015)
Gengzhuang, Haicheng		 铁岭蔡牛(2016)
Cainiu, Tieling		 铁岭蔡牛(2017)
Cainiu, Tieling
品种
Cultivar		 含水率(%)
Moisture
content		 品种
Cultivar		 含水率(%)
Moisture
content		 品种
Cultivar		 含水率(%)
Moisture
content		 品种
Cultivar		 含水率(%)
Moisture
content		 品种
Cultivar		 含水率(%)
Moisture
content
迪卡517 18.4 中科玉505 24.1 飞天358 23.1 丰垦139 18.4 中迪702 17.3
真金308 19.0 真金308 24.4 先玉027 23.2 迪卡159 18.7 丰垦139 18.1
农华205 19.8 先玉335 26.0 良玉99 26.0 真金318 19.9 华美1号 18.1
中科玉505 19.9 裕丰303 26.7 美联178 27.1 陕单636 20.1 泽玉501 19.4
迪卡159 20.6 真金318 26.8 飞天358 20.7 京科728 19.4
MC278 21.3 登海618 27.7 军玉535 22.4 迪卡159 19.8
联创808 21.6 联创808 27.9 辽单575 22.5 吉单66 20.1
先玉027 22.0 迪卡159 28.2 翔玉998 22.8 东单913 20.3
裕丰303 22.2 辽单527 34.8 辽单502 24.0 泽玉8911 20.5
登海618 22.7 辽单588 35.4 辽单565 24.6 辽单575 20.7
MC812 22.8 东单1501 25.1 中迪710 21.1
安玉579 22.9 辽单588 26.3 陕单636 21.4
东单1451 26.5 铁研388 21.7
中单909 29.8 翔玉998 21.8
优迪919 22.7
京科968 23.4
东单1331 24.9
平均值±S Mean 22.1±3.0 28.2±3.9 24.8±2.0 22.1±2.6 20.6±2.0
变幅Range 18.4~29.8 24.1~35.4 23.1~27.1 18.4~26.3 17.3~24.9
含水率低于25%品种占比(%)
Percentage of cultivars (grain moisture content lower than 25%)		 86 20 50 83 100

Table 4

The relationship between grain moisture content and quality of mechanical harvest"

试验地点Site 年份Year 样本量Sample 破碎率Broken rate 杂质率Impurity rate 损失量Yield loss 产量损失率Yield loss rate
铁岭蔡牛Cainiu, Tieling 2015 14 -0.139NS 0.192NS -0.547* -0.412NS
沈北黄家村Huangjiacun, Shenbei 2015 10 0.448NS 0.244NS 0.015NS 0.096NS
海城耿庄Gengzhuang, Haicheng 2015 4 -0.678NS -0.605NS 0.192NS 0.254NS
铁岭蔡牛Cainiu, Tieling 2016 12 0.475NS 0.557* -0.435NS -0.402NS
铁岭蔡牛Cainiu, Tieling 2017 17 -0.335NS 0.232NS -0.325NS -0.278NS
总体 Total 57 0.596** 0.454** -0.101NS -0.069NS

Fig.2

The relationship between broken rate and grain moisture content"

Fig.3

The relationship between impurity rate and grain moisture content"

Table 5

The relationship between lodging rate and yield loss of mechanical grain harvest"

试验地点
Site		 年份
Year		 样本量
Sample		 落粒重
Lossing grain weight		 落穗子粒重
Grain weight of lossing ear		 损失量
Yield loss		 落粒率
Grain loss rate		 落穗率
Ear loss rate		 产量损失率
Yield loss rate
沈北黄家村Huangjiacun, Shenbei 2015 10 -0.220NS 0.667* 0.604* -0.110NS 0.600* 0.543NS
铁岭蔡牛Cainiu, Tieling 2016 12 -0.317NS 0.721** 0.709** -0.251NS 0.818** 0.815**

Fig.4

The relationship between lodging rate and yield loss at Shenbei in 2015"

Fig.5

The relationship between lodging rate and yield loss at Tieling in 2016"

[1] 李少昆 . 玉米机械粒收质量影响因素及粒收技术发展方向. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,35(3):265-272.
doi: 10.13880/j.cnki.65-1174/n.2017.03.001
[2] 李少昆, 王克如, 谢瑞芝 , 等. 实施密植高产机械化生产实现玉米高产高效协同. 作物杂志, 2016(4):1-6.
[3] 柳枫贺, 王克如, 李健 , 等. 影响玉米机械收粒质量因素的分析. 作物杂志, 2013(4):116-119.
[4] 谢瑞芝, 雷晓鹏, 王克如 , 等. 黄淮海夏玉米子粒机械收获研究初报. 作物杂志, 2014(2):76-79.
[5] Plett S . Corn kernel breakage as a function of grain moisture at harvest in a prairie environment. Canada Journal Plant Science, 1994,74(3):543-544.
doi: 10.1007/BF02849101
[6] Chowdhury M H, Buchele W F . The nature of corn kernel damage inflicted in the shelling crescent of grain combines. Transactions of the ASAE, 1978: 610-614.
doi: 10.13031/2013.35353
[7] 柴宗文, 王克如, 郭银巧 , 等. 玉米机械粒收质量现状及其与含水率的关系. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):2036-2043.
[8] 宋卫堂, 封俊, 胡鸿烈 . 北京地区夏玉米联合收获的试验研究. 农业机械学报, 2005,36(5):45-48.
[9] 王克如, 李少昆 . 玉米机械粒收破碎率研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):2018-2026.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.007
[10] 王克如, 李璐璐, 郭银巧 , 等. 不同机械作业对玉米子粒收获质量的影响. 玉米科学, 2016(1):114-116.
[11] 李璐璐, 谢瑞芝, 王克如 , 等. 黄淮海夏玉米生理成熟期子粒含水率研究. 作物杂志, 2017(2):88-92.
[12] 李璐璐, 雷晓鹏, 谢瑞芝 , 等. 夏玉米机械粒收质量影响因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):2044-2051.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.010
[13] 王克如, 李少昆 . 玉米籽粒脱水速率影响因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(11):2027-2035.
[14] 李少昆, 王克如, 谢瑞芝 , 等. 玉米籽粒机械收获破碎率研究. 作物杂志, 2017(2):76-80.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[5] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[6] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[7] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[8] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[9] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[10] Lei Shi,Guohong Wang,Yanbo Wang,Dawei Wang,Haiyan Zhao. Preliminary Study on Grain Dehydration Rate of Maize Hybrids and Their Parents [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 84-89.
[11] Keru Wang,Shaokun Li,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. Screening Maize Varieties Suitable for Mechanical Harvesting Grain in the Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 97-102.
[12] Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Bo Ming,Peng Hou,Shaokun Li. Effects of Peeling Husk on Grain Dehydration of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 114-117.
[13] Rui Li,Jianrong Bai,Xiuhong Wang,Congzhuo Zhang,Xiaomei Zhang,Lei Yan,Ruijuan Yang. Population Genetic Diversity of 144 Sweet Maizes [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 17-24.
[14] Zhongnan Li,Yueren Wang,Shenghui Wu,Haitao Qu,Zhengxue Xu,Guangfa Li. Factor Analysis on GCA Effect Value of Main Traits of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 25-29.
[15] Songtao Liu,Guo Liu,Tinashe Zenda,Hongyu Jin,Xuan Wang,Huijun Duan. Screening of High Yield and Stable Varieties of Summer Maize in Different Ecological of Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 56-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .