Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 199-204.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.06.032

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Seed Coating Agent Dosage on Peanut Diseases, Pests and Yield

Liu Weixing(), Fan Xiaoyu, Zhang Fengye, He Qunling, Chen Lei, Li Ke, Wu Jihua()   

  1. Shangqiu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shangqiu 476000, Henan, China
  • Received:2021-01-21 Revised:2021-03-31 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: Wu Jihua E-mail:cotton@sina.cn;wjihua122@163.com

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

297

Abstract:

To clarify the influence of different preceding crops and seed coating agent dosage on soil borne diseases, pests and peanuts yield, a split-plot design was conducted. The main plot was the preceding crop with two levels of garlic stubble (P1) and wheat stubble (P2), and split plot was the seed coating agent dosage with three concentrations as 6 (S6), 3 (S3) and 0mL (S0) per kilogram seed. The occurrence of peanut stem rot, Sclerotium stem rot, wireworms and grubs were investigated from 2019 to 2020, and peanut yield and its components were analyzed. The results showed that in the two years, under the condition of the same seed coating agent dosage, compared with P2 treatment, the disease indexes of peanut stem rot and Sclerotium stem rot of P1 treatment were significantly lower by 37.91% and 30.00% respectively, and the damage indexes of peanut pods of wireworms and grubs were significantly lower by 41.96% and 22.84% respectively, and the 100-pod weight and pod yield were significantly increased. In the two years, with the increment of the seed coating agent dosage, the control efficacy of peanut stem rot and Sclerotium stem rot increased by 13.90%-84.03% under the same preceding crop stubble, and the control efficacy of wireworms and grubs increased by 11.61%-75.30%. The peanut pod yield of P1S3 treatment (5855.29kg/ha) was the highest, followed by P1S6 (5773.92kg/ha) and P2S6 treatments (5556.17kg/ha).

Key words: Peanut, Preceding crop, Seed coating, Soil borne diseases and pests, Yield

Table 1

Climate factors during the test in test area"

年份
Year		 月份
Month		 降雨量
Rainfall (mm)		 最高温
Tmax. (℃)		 最低温
Tmin. (℃)		 平均温度
Tmean. (℃)
2019 6 59.7 37.9 19.5 28.3
7 50.4 38.7 20.5 29.7
8 161.1 34.8 19.6 27.4
9 79.4 32.3 7.2 17.4
2020 6 101.9 38.4 18.1 27.0
7 91.0 36.0 19.0 26.7
8 193.3 35.2 19.9 27.8
9 7.9 35.2 15.3 24.8

Table 2

Effects of different preceding crops and seed coating agent dosage on peanut stem rot and Sclerotium stem rot"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 茎腐病Peanut stem rot 白绢病Sclerotium stem rot
病情指数
Disease index		 发病率
Incidence rate (%)		 防控效果
Control efficacy (%)		 病情指数
Disease index		 发病率
Incidence rate (%)		 防控效果
Control efficacy (%)
2019 P1S6 1.42d 4.67d 84.03a 3.25e 7.33e 69.35a
P1S3 2.17d 5.33d 81.75a 6.17d 12.67d 47.22b
P1S0 10.42b 24.00b 18.52d 10.17b 20.67b 13.90d
平均值Mean 4.67 11.33 6.53 13.56
P2S6 4.17c 10.67c 63.84b 5.83d 13.33d 44.49b
P2S3 5.25c 13.67c 53.74c 8.25c 17.67c 26.24b
P2S0 12.75a 29.67a 11.92a 24.00a
平均值Mean 7.39 18.00 8.67 18.33
F-值F-value
前茬Preceding crop 23.83* 32.43* 5929.00** 1849.00**
种衣剂Seed coating 232.64** 287.64** 365.31** 192.05**
交互作用Interaction 0.35 1.36 1.51 2.39
2020 P1S6 3.00d 6.67de 78.44ab 2.33d 5.67e 73.45a
P1S3 2.08e 5.00e 83.76a 4.17c 9.33d 56.20b
P1S0 9.00b 20.67b 33.50d 7.83b 17.67b 17.10d
平均值Mean 4.69 10.78 4.78 10.89
P2S6 3.42d 8.67d 72.18b 4.75c 10.67d 49.86b
P2S3 6.42c 14.67c 52.56c 7.00b 13.67c 35.93c
P2S0 13.25a 31.00a 10.42a 21.33a
平均值Mean 7.69 18.11 7.39 15.22
F-值F-value
前茬Preceding crop 555.42** 484.00** 51.37* 126.75**
种衣剂Seed coating 515.73** 279.82** 207.38** 149.55**
交互作用Interaction 34.89** 15.24** 0.29 0.49

Table 3

Effects of different preceding crops and seed coating agent dosage on the damage of wireworms and grubs"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 金针虫Wireworm 蛴螬Grub
受害指数
Damage index		 虫害率
Injury rate (%)		 防控效果
Control efficacy (%)		 受害指数
Damage index		 虫害率
Injury rate (%)		 防控效果
Control efficacy (%)
2019 P1S6 3.33de 7.33d 74.58a 5.83e 12.67e 63.18a
P1S3 2.92e 7.00d 75.30a 8.17d 17.33d 49.61b
P1S0 8.67b 19.00b 33.42c 13.75b 30.33b 11.61d
平均值Mean 4.97 11.11 9.25 20.11
P2S6 4.75c 8.67d 69.57a 8.42d 17.00d 50.34b
P2S3 7.08b 15.33c 46.38b 10.17c 21.33c 37.94c
P2S0 13.67a 28.67a 17.92a 34.33a
平均值Mean 8.5 17.56 12.17 24.22
F-值F-value
前茬Preceding crop 645.16** 177.05** 118.55** 105.31**
种衣剂Seed coating 106.54** 131.84** 241.35** 183.90**
交互作用Interaction 6.26* 9.41** 3.66 0.02
2020 P1S6 3.58c 7.67cd 74.03a 4.58e 9.67e 68.52a
P1S3 3.50c 7.33d 75.07a 7.25d 14.67d 51.94b
P1S0 8.58b 18.67b 36.33b 12.00b 25.67b 16.18d
平均值Mean 5.22 11.22 7.94 16.67
P2S6 4.67c 10.33c 64.52a 5.67e 11.67e 61.92a
P2S3 8.83b 18.33b 37.22b 9.00c 19.67c 35.64c
P2S0 13.67a 29.33a 15.75a 30.67a
平均值Mean 9.06 19.33 10.14 20.67
F-值F-value
前茬Preceding crop 132.25** 108.76** 50.33* 61.71*
种衣剂Seed coating 131.72** 163.98** 343.36** 194.28**
交互作用Interaction 14.45** 15.03** 8.36* 1.86

Table 4

Effects of different preceding crops and seed coating agent dosage on pod yield and its components of peanut (2019-2020)"

处理
Treatment		 单株结果枝数
Bearing branch per plant		 单株结果数
Pods per plant		 百果重
100-pod weight (g)		 百仁重
100-seed weight (g)		 出仁率
Shelling percentage (%)		 荚果产量
Pod yield (kg/hm2)
P1S6 8.11a 20.10b 205.27a 79.10a 69.57a 5773.92a
P1S3 8.05a 21.07a 204.80ab 78.43ab 69.17a 5855.29a
P1S0 7.70b 16.07d 197.77c 77.03c 69.03a 4501.65d
平均值Mean 7.95 19.08 202.61 78.19 69.26 5376.95
P2S6 8.03a 19.83b 202.90b 77.70bc 69.47a 5556.17b
P2S3 7.69b 18.40c 193.13d 77.40bc 69.00a 5402.60c
P2S0 7.48c 15.63d 181.03e 75.93d 69.13a 4078.33e
平均值Mean 7.73 17.96 192.36 77.01 69.20 5012.37
F-值F-value
前茬Preceding crop 792.07** 99.03** 851.13** 20.59* 3.51 110.24**
种衣剂Seed coating 128.70** 229.67** 252.51** 19.58** 3.60 2186.08**
交互作用Interaction 11.57** 7.01* 60.33** 0.20 0.18 14.56**
[1] 廖伯寿. 我国花生生产发展现状与潜力分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(2):5-10.
[2] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴-2020, 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.
[3] 焦坤, 陈明娜, 潘丽娟, 等. 长期连作对不同花生品种生长发育、产量与品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(15):44-51.
[4] 胡锐, 邢彩云, 李元杰, 等. 金针虫在郑州市近年上升原因分析及其防控技术. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(2):103-106.
[5] 刘爱芝, 李素娟, 武予清, 等. 河南省蛴螬暴发原因浅析及防治对策. 河南农业科学, 2001, 4(11):19-20.
[6] 杨尚威. 中国小麦生产区域专业化研究. 重庆:西南大学, 2011.
[7] 吴家庆, 马琳娜, 张贺, 等. 大蒜与黄瓜轮作控制黄瓜疫病及其化感作用初探. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6):114-123.
[8] 钏有聪, 张立猛, 焦永鸽, 等. 大蒜与烤烟轮作对烟草黑胫病的防治效果及作用机理初探. 中国烟草学报, 2016, 22(5):55-62.
[9] 姚小东, 李孝刚, 丁昌峰, 等. 连作和轮作模式下花生土壤微生物群落不同微域分布特征. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(4):975-985.
[10] Vargas G S, Haro R, Oddino C, et al. Crop management practices in the control of peanut diseases caused by soilborne fungi. Crop Protection, 2008, 27(1):1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.010
[11] 李梅. 高巧悬浮种衣剂与好力克悬浮剂组合防治花生田病虫害药效试验. 现代农业科技, 2009(23):163-164.
[12] 姚向峰, 姜兴印, 何发林, 等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺与联苯菊酯混配种子处理对花生地下及地上害虫的防治效果. 农药, 2020, 59(2):150-153,156.
[13] Shokes F M, Weber Z, Gorbet D W, et al. Evaluation of peanut genotypes for resistance to southern stem rot using an agar disk technique. Peanut Science, 1998, 25(1):12-17.
doi: 10.3146/i0095-3679-25-1-4
[14] 赵庆雷, 信彩云, 王瑜, 等. 不同轮作模式对花生病虫害及产量的影响. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(6):1321-1327.
[15] 万书波, 张佳蕾. 中国花生产业降本增效新途径探讨. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41(5):657-662.
[16] 黄玉茜. 花生连作障碍的效应及其作用机理研究. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2011.
[17] 封海胜, 张思苏, 万书波, 等. 解除花生连作障碍的对策研究I. 模拟轮作的增产效果. 花生科技, 1996(1):22-24.
[18] 徐文静, 杜茜, 赵洪锟, 等. 大蒜提取液抑菌活性及其稳定性分析. 中国生物防治, 2008, 24(S1):76-80.
[19] 吴绍军, 孟佳丽, 沈虹, 等. 间套作大蒜对大棚连作西瓜生长及土壤生物学特性的影响. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(5):13-20.
[20] 张潇丹, 廖静静, 邓维萍, 等. 镰刀菌对大蒜根系分泌物的敏感性与其致病力相关分析. 植物保护, 2014, 40(6):53-58.
[21] 罗宗秀, 李克斌, 曹雅忠, 等. 河南部分地区花生田地下害虫发生情况调查. 植物保护, 2009, 35(2):104-108.
[22] 徐向龙. 利用大蒜驱避蚜虫的研究. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(35):11506-11507.
[23] 鲁玉杰, 刘凤杰. 大蒜和芦荟提取物防治几种储粮害虫效果的研究. 粮食储藏, 2003, 32(3):14-17.
[24] 刘卫星, 张枫叶, 贺群岭, 等. 我国北方花生品种产量品质性状的综合评价及聚类分析. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(12):103-106.
[25] 王允, 张幸果, 李贺敏, 等. 花生主要农艺性状和产量性状的相关性与灰色关联度分析. 河南农业大学学报, 2014, 48(6):680-683.
[26] 李艳红. 前茬作物对连作花生生理特性、产量和品质的调控作用. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2013.
[27] 樊会丽, 胡锐, 王超. 中国植物病理学会第九届青年学术研讨会论文集:郑州东部沙区花生白绢病的发生与综合防治. 郑州:中国植物病理学会, 2009:299-300.
[28] 马铁山. 濮阳地区花生主要地下害虫发生规律与控制技术研究. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2009.
[29] 丁述举, 邢金修. 金针虫危害花生荚果刍议. 花生学报, 2011, 40(2):16-19.
[30] 陈小姝, 杨富军, 曲明静, 等. 吉林花生有害生物种类调查及发生危害. 花生学报, 2017, 46(2):68-72.
[1] Tang Gang, Liao Ping, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Moldboard Plow Tillage under all Straw Returning in Late Rice Season on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Yield in Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 101-107.
[2] Su Wenping, Wang Huan, Aimulaguli·Kuerban , Zhao Xinlin, Xue Lihua, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Jun, Sun Shiren. Comparison of Growth Characteristics and Yields of Different Wheat Varieties Planted in the Approaching Winter in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 108-114.
[3] Yang Na, Xi Jilong, Wang Ke, Xi Tianyuan, Zhang Jiancheng, Yao Jingzhen, Wang Jian. Effects of Spring Irrigation on Yield and Water Utilization of Late-Sowing Winter Wheat in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 115-121.
[4] Zhou Qiancong, Chen Le, Luo Kang, Liu Mengjie, Song Yongping, Xie Xiaobing, Zeng Yongjun. Effects of Nitrogen Panicle Fertilizer Management on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Late Japonica Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 129-133.
[5] Gao Jia, Wang Jiao, Wang Song, Liu Hongjian, Kang Jia, Shen Hong, Wang Haili, Ren Shaoyong. Effects of Biochar-Based Fertilizer on Soil Urease Activity and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 134-138.
[6] Li Xinhao, Li Jun, Wan Lin, Liu Lixin, Liu Junquan, Ma Ni. Effects of No-Tillage and Drilling on Growth, Root System and Yield of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in Hilly Area [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 139-144.
[7] Wang Qi, Li Meijuan, Zhang Jia’en, Tang Jiaxin, Zeng Wenjing, Zhou Lei, Yang Qingxin, Jiang Mingmin, Wu Jiayuan, Luo Mingzhu. Effects of Rice-Fish Co-Culture on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield in Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 145-151.
[8] Guo Mingming, Wang Kangjun, Zhang Guangxu, Sun Zhongwei, Li Jun, Zhang Yueshu, Dai Dandan, Chen Feng, Fan Jiwei. Regulation of Sowing Date and Row Spacing on Grain Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 152-158.
[9] Zhang Panpan, Zhang Hongpeng, Guo Yaning. Effects of Two Plant Growth Regulators on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Proso Millet [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 159-163.
[10] Li Yang, Yang Xiaolong, Wang Benfu, Zhang Zhisheng, Chen Shaoyu, Li Jinlan, Cheng Jianping. Effects of Main Season Stubble Height on Ratoon Season Yield and Rice Quality [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 164-170.
[11] Wang Xin, Wang Cai. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Seeding Rates on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 182-188.
[12] Cai Lijun, Zhang Jingtao, Liu Jingqi, Gai Zhijia, Guo Zhenhua, Zhao Guifan. Effects of Long-Term No-Tillage Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon and Soybean Yield in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 189-192.
[13] Li Xin, Jin Guanghui, Wang Pengcheng, Wang Ziwen. Analysis of Stability of Potato Varieties (Strains) Starch and Yield Performance [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 51-57.
[14] Gao Tiantian, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Chang Xuhong, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Different Spring Wheat Varieties to Nitrogen Treatment [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 67-71.
[15] Chen Zhongcheng, Jin Xijun, Li He, Zhou Weixin, Qiang Binbin, Liu Jia, Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth, Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield Components of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 88-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!