Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 219-223.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.031

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Land Productivity and Interspecific Competition of Sunflower and Millet Intercropping in Arid Areas

Yi Bing(), Liu Jingang, Song Dianxiu, Wang Dexing, Zhao Mingzhu, Liu Xiaohong, Sun Enyu, Cui Liangji()   

  1. Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2022-10-21 Revised:2023-02-13 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

148

Abstract:

In the arid areas of Fuxin and Chaoyang in western Liaoning, the intercropping experiment was carried out with the drought-tolerant crops of sunflower and millet, and the sunflower and millet monoculture (SCK、MCK) and seven row proportions of 2:2, 2:4, 2:6, 4:4, 4:6 were set to explore the land productivity and interspecific competition ability of sunflower and millet intercropping and the best intercropping mode. The results showed that, the grain yield per plant of sunflower increased with the reduction of the intercropping row ratio (two rows > four rows > SCK); the grain yield per plant of millet decreased with the reduction of the number of rows (MCK > six rows > four rows > two rows). The intercropping of sunflower and millet had the advantages of yield and economic benefit. The 4:4 intercropping in Chaoyang had the strongest advantage, the yield was increased by 195.3kg/ha, and the economic benefit was increased by 13.24%. The economic benefits of 2:4 intercropping in Fuxin and Chaoyang areas increased by 6.53% and 11.65%, respectively. The land equivalent ratio of 2:4 intercropping in Fuxin areas was the highest (1.07); the 2:4 and 4:4 intercropping in Chaoyang were 1.09 and 1.12, respectively. The actual yield loss and relative crowding coefficient also indicated that 2:4 and 4:4 intercropping had higher land productivity than monoculture. To sum up, the 2:4 and 4:4 intercropping of sunflower and millet had the advantages of increasing yield and improving economic benefits, and could be popularized and applied in the arid areas in western Liaoning.

Key words: Sunflower-millet intercropping, Yield, Land equivalent ratio, Interspecific competition

Table 1

The difference in grain yield per plant of each crop in the sunflower-millet intercropping system with different treatments"

地点
Location		 间作行比
Row proportion		 均一化种植密度（株/m2）HDi (plant/m2) 单株产量（g/株）PYi (g/plant)
向日葵Sunflower 谷子Millet 向日葵Sunflower 谷子Millet
阜新Fuxin 2:2 1.39 27.78 66.21bA 4.39cB
2:4 0.93 37.04 74.55aA 5.84bA
2:6 0.69 41.67 70.04aA 5.49bA
SCK 2.78 － 55.68cB －
MCK － 55.56 － 6.29aA
朝阳Chaoyang 2:4 0.75 32.84 173.3aA 8.11a
2:6 0.56 36.95 175.0aA 7.98a
4:4 1.12 24.63 145.3bB 8.76a
4:6 0.90 29.56 141.7bB 8.29a
SCK 2.24 － 110.7cC －
MCK － 49.26 － 9.55a

Table 2

The average estimation yield and economic benefit of each crop in the sunflower-millet intercropping system with different treatments"

地点
Location		 间作行比
Row proportion		 均一化产量Average estimation yield (kg/hm2) 间作优势
Intercropping advantage (kg/hm2)		 经济效益（元/hm2）
Economic benefit (yuan/hm2)
Yis Yim
阜新Fuxin 2:2 919.5bB 1218.3cC -382.6 13 149
2:4 690.3cC 2164.4bB 9.5 14 870
2:6 486.4dD 2286.6bB -234.5 13 524
SCK 1546.5aA － － 13 919
MCK － 3494.4aA － 13 978
朝阳Chaoyang 2:4 1293.7cC 2665.0bB -2.8 22 303
2:6 979.6dD 2948.1bB -219.2 20 609
4:4 1627.1bB 2158.8bB 195.3 23 279
4:6 1268.8cC 2451.0bB -93.3 21 224
SCK 2478.0aA － － 22 302
MCK － 4703.3aA － 18 813

Table 3

Differences in land productivity of sunflower-millet intercropping system with different treatments"

地点
Location		 间作行比
Row proportion		 LER 实际产量损失Actual loss yield 相对拥挤系数
K
AYL AYLs AYLm
阜新Fuxin 2:2 0.94bB -0.11 0.19 -0.30 0.78
2:4 1.07aA 0.27 0.34 -0.07 1.31
2:6 0.97bB 0.13 0.26 -0.13 0.87
朝阳Chaoyang 2:4 1.09bB 0.42 0.57 -0.15 1.43
2:6 1.02dC 0.42 0.58 -0.16 1.10
4:4 1.12aA 0.23 0.31 -0.08 1.62
4:6 1.03cC 0.15 0.28 -0.13 1.14

Table 4

Competitiveness between sunflower and millet under different treatments"

地点
Location		 间作行比
Row
proportion		 竞争比率CR 侵占力A
CRs CRm As Am
阜新
Fuxin		 2:2 1.71 0.59 0.49 -0.49
2:4 1.44 0.69 0.41 -0.41
2:6 1.44 0.69 0.39 -0.39
朝阳
Chaoyang		 2:4 1.84 0.54 0.72 -0.72
2:6 1.89 0.53 0.75 -0.75
4:4 1.43 0.70 0.40 -0.40
4:6 1.47 0.68 0.41 -0.41
[1] 张春明, 赵雪英, 闫虎斌, 等. 间作栽培模式下不同小豆品种的光合特性研究. 作物杂志, 2016(6):67-72.
[2] 王一帆, 殷文, 胡发龙, 等. 间作小麦光合性能对地上地下互作强度的响应. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5):929-941.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01047
[3] Nawar A I, Salama H S A, Khalil H E. Additive intercropping of sunflower and soybean to improve yield and land use efficiency: Effect of thinning interval and nitrogen fertilization. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2020, 80(2):142-152.
doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392020000200142
[4] Fan Y, Wang Z, Liao D, et al. Uptake and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as related to yield advantage in maize-soybean intercropping under different row configurations. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):1-10.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4
[5] 高砚亮, 孙占祥, 白伟, 等. 辽西半干旱区玉米与花生间作对土地生产力和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50 (19):3702-3713.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.19.007
[6] Ouda S, Hefny Y A A, Abdel-Wahab T I, et al. Intercropping systems of sunflower and peanut under different irrigation regimes and potassium fertilizer levels. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 2018, 40:85-104.
[7] 宋莉, 廖万有, 王烨军, 等. 旱地作物间作绿肥研究进展. 作物杂志, 2017(6):7-11.
[8] Elba B, Suárez S A, Lenardis A E, et al. Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2014, 70:47-52.
[9] Olowe V I O, Adeyemo A Y. Enhanced crop productivity and compatibility through intercropping of sesame and sunflower varieties. Annals of Applied Biology, 2009, 155(2):285-291.
doi: 10.1111/aab.2009.155.issue-2
[10] 白伟, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 东北风沙半干旱区仁用杏作物间作对作物产量和土地生产力的影响. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36 (9):2521-2528.
[11] 任媛媛, 张莉, 郁耀闯, 等. 大豆种植密度对玉米/大豆间作系统产量形成的竞争效应分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10):1978-1987.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04226
[12] 蔡倩, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 辽西半干旱区玉米大豆间作模式对作物干物质积累分配、产量及土地生产力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5):909-920.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.05.004
[13] 梁晓红, 曹雄, 张瑞栋, 等. 不同高粱大豆间作模式对产量及水分养分利用的影响. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(3):174-184.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191700
[14] 吴鑫雨, 刘振洋, 李海叶, 等. 施氮和间作对蚕豆根瘤形成及氮素吸收累积的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(5):120-127.
[15] 殷文, 赵财, 于爱忠, 等. 秸秆还田后少耕对小麦/玉米间作系统中种间竞争和互补的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(4):633-641.
[16] Qian X, Zang H, Xu H, et al. Relay strip intercropping of oat with maize, sunflower and mung bean in semi-arid regions of Northeast China: yield advantages and economic benefits. Field Crops Research, 2018, 223:33-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.004
[17] 李艳红. 玉米花生间作体系产量效应分析及其生理基础研究. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2019.
[18] 李国瑜, 丛新军, 李国清, 等. 谷子播期对谷子/花生间作系统生产力的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36(5):1008-1016.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.05.1008
[19] Mourad K A, El-Mehy A A. Effect of sowing date and intercropping system of sunflower with sugar beet on the productivity of both crops. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 2021, 48(1):19-35.
doi: 10.21608/zjar.2021.165647
[20] 党科, 宫香伟, 吕思明, 等. 糜子/绿豆间作模式下施氮量对绿豆叶片光合特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6):1175-1187.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04148
[21] 王雅梅, 许彦骁, 王亚露, 等. 玉米-大豆不同宽幅间作对大豆光合特性及群体产量的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(11):2587-2595.
[22] 焦念元, 宁堂原, 杨萌珂, 等. 玉米花生间作对玉米光合特性及产量形成的影响. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14):4324-4330.
[23] 宫香伟, 党科, 李境, 等. 糜子绿豆间作模式下糜子光合物质生产及水分利用效率. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22):4139-4153.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.018
[24] 冯晓敏, 杨永, 任长忠, 等. 豆科-燕麦间作对作物光合特性及籽粒产量的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(9):1426-1434.
[25] 王甜, 庞婷, 杜青, 等. 田间配置对间作大豆光合特性、干物质积累及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(2):107-116.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190359
[26] 张金丹, 范虹, 杜进勇, 等. 小麦玉米同步增密有利于优化种间关系而提高间作产量. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12):2481-2489.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01090
[1] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[2] Liu Yan, Qu Hang, Xing Yuehua, Wang Xiaohui, Gong Liang. Effects of New Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Growth, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 110-116.
[3] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
[4] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[5] Zhang Rong, Chen Xiaowen, Lu Ping, You Yanrong, Zhou Delu, Li Deming. Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Temperature and Yield of Potato in Dry Land [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 145-150.
[6] Wu Xueqin, Liu Kaiyu, Han Chunhua, Alimujiang·Kelaimu , Cui Yannan, Li Jiangyu, Ma Chunmei, Zhong Wenfan, Zhao Qiang. Effects of 14% Thiobenzene-Dioxalon on Defoliation Ripening, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 164-169.
[7] Guan Qinglin, Piao Shengyuan, Zhang Siwei, Wang Jun, Lei Yunkang, Zhong Qiu, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Combined Application of Medium-Trace Elements on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism, Yield and Quality of Cigar Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 187-196.
[8] Tian Xiaoqin, Wang Dan, Li Zhuo, Liu Yonghong, Li Wei. Effects of Ridge and Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 204-211.
[9] Zhao Weizhe, Du Chunfang, Sun Xuan, Yao Lin, Xian Shuanshi, Zhang Gaoyang. Effects of Stalk Picking on Economic Characteristics and Yield of Oilseed and Vegetable Rape [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 224-230.
[10] Liu Hui, Long Xueyi, Jiao Yan, Wang Lihong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 238-248.
[11] Cao Qingjun, Li Gang, Yang Hao, Lou Yuyong, Yang Fentuan, Kong Fanli, Li Xinbei, Zhao Xinkai, Jiang Xiaoli. The Effects of Different Tillage Practices on Seedbed Quality and Its Relationships with Seedling Population Construction and Grain Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 249-254.
[12] Zhang Dongxu, Hu Danzhu, Yan Jinlong, Feng Liyun, Wu Zhiyuan, Zhang Junling, Li Yanhua. Effects of Spraying Streptomyces on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Late-Sown Wheat under Different Crop Rotations [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 255-263.
[13] Zhang Shangpei, Yang Junxue, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Zhang Xiaojuan, Cheng Bingwen. Genetic Diversity and Yielding Ability Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 37-42.
[14] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[15] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!