作物杂志,2024, 第4期: 194–202 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.04.025

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

酿酒专用糯红高粱内生细菌多样性分析及功能菌株筛选

胡连清1,2(), 陈露1,2, 刘雯雯1,2, 周万海1,2(), 冯瑞章1,2, 魏琴1,2, 赵鑫1,2, 舒豪1, 陈玲妹1, 陈雨薇3   

  1. 1宜宾学院农林与食品工程学部,644000,四川宜宾
    2香料植物资源开发与利用四川省高校重点实验室,644000,四川宜宾
    3简阳市农业技术推广中心,641400,四川简阳
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-26 修回日期:2023-11-10 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-08-14
  • 通讯作者: 周万海,主要从事微生物多样性与功能鉴定等工作,E-mail:wanhaizhou@126.com
  • 作者简介:胡连清,主要从事农业资源利用与开发等工作,E-mail:120726584@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省自然科学基金(2022NSFSC0176);四川省科技厅项目(2018JY0495);四川省油樟工程技术研究中心2021年度开放基金(21YZY06)

Investigation on the Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria and Screening of Functional Strains in Waxy Sorghum for Brewing

Hu Lianqing1,2(), Chen Lu1,2, Liu Wenwen1,2, Zhou Wanhai1,2(), Feng Ruizhang1,2, Wei Qin1,2, Zhao Xin1,2, Shu Hao1, Chen Lingmei1, Chen Yuwei3   

  1. 1Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, Sichuan, China
    2Key Laboratory of Aromatic Plant Resources Exploitation and Utilization in Sichuan Higher Education, Yibin 644000, Sichuan, China
    3Jianyang Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Jianyang 641400, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2023-06-26 Revised:2023-11-10 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-08-14

摘要:

为分析糯红高粱不同品种、不同组织及不同物候期内生细菌群落结构及功能特点,利用纯培养法对四川宜宾地区酿酒专用糯红高粱内生细菌多样性及群落结构进行探究与分析,并通过选择培养基筛选其中的功能菌。结果表明,从杂交品种金糯粱1号和地方品种青壳洋中分离得到183株内生细菌,隶属于2门5纲17属39种,优势门为变形菌门(Proteobacteria),占85.79%,优势纲为γ-变形菌纲,占70.49%,优势属为假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas),占43.72%,优势种为Pseudomonas sp.,占33.33%。由此可知,糯红高粱内生细菌种类多样、功能丰富,不同品种的糯红高粱以及糯红高粱的不同组织、不同生育期独有内生细菌种群组成存在较大的差异。

关键词: 酿酒高粱, 糯红高粱, 内生细菌, 群落结构, 多样性

Abstract:

The diversity and community structure of endophytic bacteria in waxy sorghum for brewing were examined and analyzed using pure culture in order to examine the functional traits and community structure of endophytic bacteria of various varieties and tissues from waxy sorghum for brewing during different phenological periods and the choice of culture medium was used to filter the functioning bacteria. The results showed that 183 bacteria were isolated from the hybrid Jinnuoliang 1 and the local variety Qingkeyang, belonging to two phyla, five classes and 17 genera and 39 species. The dominant phyla was Proteobacteria, accounting for 85.79%, and the dominant class was γ-Protea, accounting for 70.49%, the dominant genus was Pseudomonas, accounting for 43.72%, and the dominant species was Pseudomonas sp., accounting for 33.33%. Therefore, endophytic bacteria from waxy sorghum were diverse in varieties and rich in functions. These research indicated that there are significant differences in the composition of unique endophytic bacterial populations among different varieties and tissues from waxy sorghum for brewing during different phenological periods.

Key words: Brewing sorghum, Waxy sorghum, Endophytic bacteria, Community structure, Diversity

表1

糯红高粱各组织中内生细菌定殖率及分离率

植物组织Plant tissue 品种Variety 生育期Growth stage 定殖率Colonization rate 分离率Separation rate
根Root 金糯粱1号 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 25.33 21.33
青壳洋 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 33.33 37.33
茎Stem 金糯粱1号 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 8.00 26.67
青壳洋 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 18.67 24.00
叶Leaf 金糯粱1号 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 4.00 5.33
青壳洋 苗期、花期、蜡熟期 3.33 2.00
花Flower 金糯粱1号 花期 6.00 6.00
青壳洋 花期 6.00 10.00

表2

糯红高粱内生细菌组成

相似性最高菌株
The most similar strain
金糯梁1号Jinnuoliang 1 青壳洋Qingkeyang
苗期
Seedling stage
花期
Florescence stage
蜡熟期
Waxy stage
苗期
Seedling stage
花期
Florescence stage
蜡熟期
Waxy stage

Root

Stem

Leaf

Root

Stem

Leaf

Flower

Root

Stem

Leaf

Root

Stem

Leaf

Root

Stem

Leaf

Flower

Root

Stem

Leaf
醋酸钙不动杆菌
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -
不动杆菌Acinetobacter sp. - 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
活不动杆菌Acinetobacter vivianii - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - -
堀越氏芽胞杆菌Bacillus horneckiae - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -
同温层芽孢杆菌Bacillus stratosphericus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
Bacterium - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1
Bakterija - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -
唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德氏菌
Burkholderia gladioli
- - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 2 -
伯克霍尔德氏菌Burkholderia sp. - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 1
热带伯克霍尔德氏菌
Burkholderia tropica
- - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 -
柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter sp. - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 1
贪铜杆菌Cupriavidus sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -
阿氏肠杆菌Enterobacter asburiae - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
阴沟肠杆菌Enterobacter cloacae - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -
霍氏肠杆菌Enterobacter hormaechei - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - 1 2 -
科贝肠杆菌Enterobacter kobei - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 -
罗根肠杆菌
Enterobacter roggenkampii
- - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - 10 7 -
肠棒杆菌Enterobacter sp. - - - - - - - 1 1 1 - - - 4 - - - - 4 -
香坊肠杆菌
Enterobacter xiangfangensis
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 -
γ蛋白细菌
Gamma proteobacterium symbiont
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
内生固氮菌
Herbaspirillum frisingense
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
哈特草螺菌Herbaspirillum huttiense - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - 1 - - -
乌头内生菌Herbaspirillum sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - -
Hrizaobakterijum sp. - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
肺炎克雷伯菌Klebsiella pneumoniae - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 -
克雷伯氏菌Klebsiella sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - -
Komamonas aquatica - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Metilobakterijum sp. - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Nekulturna bakterija - - - 2 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Nekulturna beta proteobakterijum - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - 2 - - -
Nekulturni Citrobacter sp. - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - -
叶杆菌
Phyllobacterium brassicacearum
- - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
绿针假单胞菌
Pseudomonas chlororaphis
- - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
荧光假单胞菌
Pseudomonas fluorescens
- - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
湖南假单胞菌
Pseudomonas hunanensis
- - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
浅黄色假单胞菌Pseudomonas lurida - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
蒙氏假单胞菌Pseudomonas monteilii - - - - 1 - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
变形假单胞菌
Pseudomonas plecoglossicida
- - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas putida - - 1 - 4 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 1 -
假单胞菌Pseudomonas sp. - 12 3 6 10 1 - 3 - - 3 2 - 13 3 - 2 1 - -
葡萄牙根瘤菌Rhizobium lusitanum 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - -
根瘤菌Rhizobium sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - -
鞘氨醇单胞菌Sphingomonas echinoides - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Uncultured bacterium - 1 - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - 1 2 -

表3

糯红高粱不同品种、不同组织以及不同生育期内生细菌的丰富度指数、香农指数与优势度指数

项目
Item
品种Variety 组织Tissue 生育期Growth stage
金糯粱1号
Jinnuoliang 1
青壳洋
Qingkeyang

Root

Stem

Leaf

Flower
苗期
Seedling stage
花期
Florescence stage
蜡熟期
Waxy stage
丰富度指数Abundance degree (S) 23 27 36 21 6 6 5 22 18
香农指数Shannon-Wiener index (H) 2.2249 2.6459 2.5629 2.3943 1.5811 1.7481 0.9321 2.4410 2.5648
优势度指数Dominance degree (D) 0.7529 0.8822 0.8590 0.8386 0.7407 0.8200 0.4400 0.8160 0.8728

图1

糯红高粱不同品种、不同组织以及不同生育期内生细菌的相似性系数

图2

不同品种、不同组织以及不同时期OTU数量的Venn图

表4

糯红高粱功能内生细菌筛选

菌株
Bacterial strain
产淀粉酶
Amylase
production
产蛋白酶
Protease
production
产脂肪酶
Lipase
production
产果胶酶
Pectinase
production
产纤维素酶
Cellulase
production
产酯酶
Esterase
production
固氮能力
Nitrogen
fixation
溶磷能力
Phosphate
solubilization
不动杆菌Acinetobacter sp. - - + - - - - -
活不动杆菌Acinetobacter vivianii - - + - - - - -
唐菖蒲伯克霍尔德氏菌Burkholderia gladioli + - + - + - - -
伯克霍尔德氏菌Burkholderia sp. - - - - - + - -
热带伯克霍尔德氏菌Burkholderia tropica - - + - - + - -
柠檬酸杆菌Citrobacter sp. - - - - - - - +
贪铜杆菌Cupriavidus sp. + - + - - - - -
阿氏肠杆菌Enterobacter asburiae - - - - - - + -
科贝肠杆菌Enterobacter kobei + - - - - - - -
罗根肠杆菌Enterobacter roggenkampii - + - + - + + -
肠棒杆菌Enterobacter sp. + - - - - - - -
香坊肠杆菌Enterobacter xiangfangensis - - + - - + - -
肺炎克雷伯菌Klebsiella pneumoniae - - - - - - - +
Komamonas aquatica + - - - - - - -
Metilobakterijum sp. + - + - - - - -
浅黄色假单胞菌Pseudomonas lurida + - + - - + - -
蒙氏假单胞菌Pseudomonas mosselii - + - + - - - -
恶臭假单胞菌Pseudomonas putida - + + + - - - -
假单胞菌Pseudomonas sp. + + - + - + + -
根瘤菌Rhizobium sp. - - - - - - + -
[1] Yan K, He L M, Zhou W H, et al. Determination of the community structure and diversity of endophytic bacteria from Alpinia zerumbet seeds. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2020, 24(3):420-428.
[2] 顾美英, 古丽尼沙·沙依木, 张志东, 等. 黑果枸杞不同组织内生细菌群落多样. 微生物学报, 2021, 61(1):152-166.
[3] Mendes R, Kruijt M, De B I, et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science, 2011, 332:1097-1100.
doi: 10.1126/science.1203980 pmid: 21551032
[4] Xu W F, Ren H S, Ou T, et al. Genomic and functional characterization of the endophytic Bacillus subtilis 7PJ-16 strain, a potential biocontrol agent of mulberry fruit sclerotiniose. Microbial Ecology, 2019, 77:651-663.
[5] Emami S, Alikhani H A, Pourbabaei A A, et al. Effect of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria with multiple plant growth promoting traits on wheat growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26(19):19804-19813.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05284-x pmid: 31090003
[6] Zhu Y L. Isolation and identification of Ammodendron bifolium endophytic bacteria and the action mechanism of selected isolates- induced seed germination and their effects on host osmotic-stress tolerance. Archives of Microbiology, 2019, 201(4):431-442.
[7] Panddey P K, Samanta R, Yadav R N S. Inside the plant: addressing bacterial endophytes in biotic stress alleviation. Archives of Microbiology, 2019, 201(4):415-429.
doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01642-y pmid: 30834947
[8] 杨敬敬, 韩烁, 王霞, 等. 三倍体毛白杨不同组织内生细菌多样性分析. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(8):3021-3036.
[9] Ou T, Xu W F, Wang F, et al. A microbiome study reveals seasonal variation in endophytic bacteria among different mulberry cultivars. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17:1091-1100.
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.07.018 pmid: 31452862
[10] Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos M C, et al. Structure, variation,and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 112(8):911-920.
[11] Ullah A, Akbar A, Luo Q Q, et al. Microbiome diversity in cotton rhizosphere under normal and drought conditions. Microbial Ecology, 2018, 77:429-439.
[12] 杨娜, 杨波. 蕙兰根部内生细菌多样性及季节动态变化. 植物科学学报, 2011, 29(2):156-163.
[13] 古丽尼沙·沙依木, 张志东, 杨波, 等. 不同品种苹果树内生细菌群落多样性及功能. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(2):500-511.
[14] Nassar A H, El-tarabilY K A, Sivasithamparam K. Promotion of plant growth by an auxinproducing isolate of the yeast Williopsis saturnus endophytic in maize (Zea mays L.) roots. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2005, 42(2):97-108.
[15] Manjunatha B S, Paul S, Aggarwal C, et al. Diversity and tissue preference of osmotolerant bacterial endophytes associated with pearl millet genotypes having differential drought susceptibilities. Microbial Ecology, 2019, 77(3):676-688.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1257-2 pmid: 30209586
[16] 胡连清, 刘雯雯, 刘婉茹, 等. 糯红高粱中产蛋白酶内生酵母筛选鉴定及发酵特性研究. 食品与发酵工业, 2023, 49(5):74-80.
doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.033899
[17] 四川省(宜宾市)地方标准. 地理标志产品,宜宾糯红高粱生产技术和质量规范:DB 511500/T 50—2014. 宜宾: 四川省宜宾质量技术监督局, 2014.
[18] 殷勇, 张林, 毛思根, 等. 宜宾糯红高粱绿色生产技术规程. 大麦与谷类科学, 2021, 38(4):43-46.
[19] 何诚, 丁海龙, 杨平, 等. 南北酿酒高粱蒸煮品质研究. 酿酒科技, 2012(8):68-70.
[20] 戴奕杰, 李宗军, 田志强. 酱香型白酒大曲和糟醅的细菌多样性分析. 食品科学, 2019, 40(4):152-159.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180228-251
[21] 唐佳代, 邱树毅, 王春晓, 等. 贵州地区酿酒小曲细菌多样性比较分析. 中国酿造, 2019, 38(10):55-59.
[22] Liu Z B, Wang Z Y, Lv X C, et al. Comparison study of the volatile profilesand microbial communities of Wuyi Qu and Gutian Qu,two major types oftraditional fermentation starters of Hong Qu glutinous rice wine. Food Microbiology, 2018, 69:105-115.
[23] Cai H Y, Zhang T, Zhang Q, et al. Microbial diversity and chemicalanalysis of the starters used in traditional Chinese sweet rice wine. Food Microbiology, 2018, 73:319-326.
[24] 肖蓓. 酱香大曲中细菌类群关系研究与功能细菌筛选. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2015.
[25] 应恒, 殷勇, 张林, 等. 施氮量对酿酒糯红高粱宜糯红4号的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2022(6):129-132.
[26] 高菲, 李欣, 刘紫薇, 等. 4种高粱淀粉理化性质的比较分析. 中国粱油学报, 2023, 38(1):71-79.
[27] 刘晓静, 朱静, 楚敏, 等. 库车小白杏采后内生细菌群落代谢特征及结构组成的变化. 食品科学, 2018, 39(22):141-146.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201822022
[28] 徐祥林, 骆海玉, 颜小捷, 等. 罗汉果内生真菌多样性研究. 广西植物, 2020, 40(5):618-627.
[29] 燕平梅, 邢勇, 李娜, 等. 非培养方法研究榨菜中酵母菌的多样性. 中国调味品, 2019, 32(7):58-61.
[30] 王梦亮, 贾岩, 崔晋龙, 等. 锁阳及其寄主白刺内生真菌的生态分布及遗传关系. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(3):815-820.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.008
[31] 陈丽莹, 方荣祥, 吴建祥, 等. 植物内生细菌测定方法的研究进展. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(3):1105-1119.
[32] 沙月霞. 不同水稻组织内生细菌的群落多样性. 微生物学报, 2018, 58(12):2216-2228.
[33] 林标声, 宋昭昭, 张丽丽, 等. 巨菌草不同生长时期根、茎、叶内生细菌组成的多样性及差异. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 47(3):352-360.
[34] Kiani T, Khan S A, Noureen N, et al. Isolation and characterization of culturable endophytic bacterial community of stripe rust-resistant and stripe rust-susceptible Pakistani wheat cultivars. International Microbiology, 2019, 22(2):191-201.
doi: 10.1007/s10123-018-00039-z pmid: 30810983
[35] 王颜波, 张伟溪, 丁昌俊, 等. 不同生态环境下银中杨内生菌群落结构及生态位变异. 林业科学, 2020, 56(2):48-60.
[36] Zhang Y, Yu X X, Zhang W J, et al. Interactions between endophytes and plants: beneficial effect of endophytes to ameliorate biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Biology, 2019, 62(1):1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s12374-018-0274-5
[37] 宋兆齐, 王莉, 刘秀花, 等. 云南4处酸性热泉中的变形菌门细菌多样性. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(3):376-382.
[38] Nassal D, Spohn M, Eltlbany N, et al. Effects of phosphorus- mobilizing bacteria on tomato growth and soil microbial activity. Plant and Soil, 2018, 427:17-37.
[39] Liu Y P, Tan H M, Cao L X, et al. Rice sprout endophytic Enterobacter sp. SE-5 could improve tolerance of mature rice plants to salt or Cd2+ in soils. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2018, 66(7):873-883.
[40] Kruasuwan W, Thamchaipenet A. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylate (ACC) Deaminase-Producing endophytic diazotrophic Enterobacter sp EN-21 modulates salt-stress response in sugarcane. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2018, 37(3):849-858.
[41] Beaumont M. Flavouring composition prepared by fermentation with Bacillus spp.. International Jourmal of Food Microbiology, 2002, 75(3):189-196.
[42] 范文来, 徐岩. 白酒功能因子与品质安全问题. 酿酒科技, 2012, 2(3):7-12.
[43] 施小明, 徐岩, 崔凤元, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌在白酒生产中的应用. 酿酒科技, 2012(2):49-53.
[44] Zhi Y, Wu Q, Du H, et al. Biocontrol of geosmin-producing Streptomyces spp.by two Bacillus strains from Chinese liquor. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2016, 231:1-9.
[45] 刘丹, 陈杰, 罗惠波, 等. 浓香型大曲中的枯草芽孢杆菌对固态混菌发酵体系的扰动效应. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(11):38-44.
doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027067
[46] Eteszmi H, Alkhani H A. Bacillus species as the most promising bacterial biocontrol agents in rhizosphere and endorhiza of plants grown in rotation with each other. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2018, 150:497-506.
[47] Shen X M, Hu H B, Peng H S, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14(1):262-271.
[48] 马荣琴, 曹毅, 周俊雄, 等. 番茄根内生假单胞菌的分离与鉴定. 生物技术, 2015, 25(6):564-568,580.
[49] Tian B Y, Yang J K, Zhang K Q. Bacteria used in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: populations, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 61(2):197-213.
pmid: 17651135
[1] 袁迪, 智慧, 王海岗, 张慧, 姚琦, 梁红凯, 王君杰, 陈凌, 刁现民, 贾冠清. 我国谷子登记品种遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (4): 14–23
[2] 李清超, 张登峰, 李春辉, 杨珊, 刘建新, 吴迅. 西南地区玉米地方种质资源遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (4): 24–32
[3] 代涵, 申铁, 石桃雄, 黎瑞源. 油茶基因组SSR位点挖掘及遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (3): 23–31
[4] 马红珍, 许海涛, 王月, 冯晓曦, 许波, 张军刚, 郭海斌, 王友华. 基于苞叶表型性状的玉米自交系遗传多样性及遗传距离分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (3): 54–63
[5] 全成哲, 李淑芳, 李鹤南, 于维, 金京花. 吉林省73份审定水稻品种的表型性状遗传多样性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (3): 64–75
[6] 杨恩泽, 谢锐, 韩平安, 张永虎, 刘锦川, 牛素清, 温蕊, 王春勇, 金晓蕾. 内蒙古162份苦荞资源表型性状的遗传多样性及综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (2): 15–22
[7] 陈林, 姚晓华, 姚有华, 白羿雄, 吴昆仑. 青藏高原青稞品种籽粒外观和品质性状的多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (2): 213–220
[8] 杨彦明, 周祎, 张子健, 赵洋, 李雅剑, 庞雅祺, 王亚迅, 韩雯毓, 刘景辉. 腐殖酸与不同耕作措施对盐碱土碳库和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (1): 157–165
[9] 刘丹, 王嘉宇, 冯章丽, 冯博, 陈温福. 辽宁省粳稻品种的遗传多样性与群体结构分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (1): 40–47
[10] 孙远涛, 龙文靖, 李元, 刘天朋, 赵甘霖, 丁国祥, 倪先林. 45份糯高粱种质资源主要农艺性状和SSR标记的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (1): 57–64
[11] 王月影, 范保杰, 曹志敏, 王彦, 苏秋竹, 张志肖, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 程须珍, 刘长友, 田静. 利用EST-SSR标记分析绿豆农家种及育成品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (1): 73–79
[12] 敖金成, 王政, 杨启港, 李智, 韦建玉. 土壤细菌群落结构及功能多样性对烤烟连作的响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 127–134
[13] 赵锋, 包奇军, 潘永东, 柳小宁, 张华瑜, 牛小霞. 70份大麦种质资源遗传多样性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 54–61
[14] 杨恩泽, 王树彦, 刘瑞香, 石丰源, 张锦豪, 李佳娜, 李志伟, 郭占斌. 基于SRAP的藜麦种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 79–85
[15] 朱文娟, 任月梅, 杨忠, 郭瑞锋, 张绶, 任广兵. 谷子土壤微生物群落结构及功能预测分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 170–178
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!