作物杂志,2018, 第1期: 147–151 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.01.023

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

收获期对北方杂交粳稻和常规粳稻品质的影响

杜志敏,杨宇尘,夏原野,宫彦龙,闫志强,徐海   

  1. 沈阳农业大学水稻研究所/农业部东北水稻生物学与遗传育种重点实验室/北方超级粳稻育种教育部重点实验室/辽宁省北方粳稻遗传育种重点实验室,110866,辽宁沈阳
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-20 修回日期:2017-12-04 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2018-08-24
  • 作者简介:杜志敏,硕士研究生,主要从事水稻生理与遗传研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFD0100502);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-01-11);公益性行业(农业)科研专项-东北超级粳稻目标产量高效育种技术集成与示范项目

Effects of Harvest Time on Quality Traits of Hybrid Japonica Rice and Inbred Japonica Rice in Northern China

Du Zhimin,Yang Yuchen,Xia Yuanye,Gong Yanlong,Yan Zhiqiang,Xu Hai   

  1. Institute of Rice Research, Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Northeast Rice Biology and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Super Rice Breeding, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Genetics and Breeding of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2017-08-20 Revised:2017-12-04 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-08-24

摘要:

研究不同收获时期对北方杂交粳稻和常规粳稻米质性状的影响,为今后从栽培措施上改良杂交粳稻和常规粳稻的米质提供理论依据。以2个杂交粳稻和3个常规粳稻为试验材料,从齐穗后30d开始,每7d取样收获1次,共取样收获7次,风干后统一测定米质性状。结果表明,不同收获时期对杂交粳稻和常规粳稻的糙米率、精米率、整精米率影响显著,随着收获时期的延后,糙米率、精米率先逐渐增加,在齐穗后65d达到最大值后显著降低,整精米率在齐穗后65d之前波动较大,无明显规律性,齐穗后65d之后显著下降;杂交粳稻的垩白粒率、垩白度整体呈上升趋势,常规粳稻的垩白粒率、垩白度整体差异不显著,5个品种的白度值整体均呈上升趋势。不同收获时期对蛋白质和直链淀粉含量的影响大多未达显著水平。食味值除丰锦品种在不同收获时期间差异不显著外,其他4个品种随收获时期的推迟整体呈下降趋势,在0.05显著水平上有差异,在0.01显著水平上差异大多不显著。同一收获时期间比较,常规粳稻的加工品质(包括糙米率、精米率和整精米率)显著优于杂交粳稻,杂交粳稻的白度值显著优于常规粳稻。在垩白粒率和垩白度性状的表现上,杂交粳稻和常规粳稻间的差异未达显著水平。杂交粳稻和常规粳稻在直链淀粉含量、蛋白质含量和食味值间并无显著的差异,在最佳收获期上也无显著差异。若要改善加工品质,需适当延后收获,一般在齐穗后58d收获较好;若要改善外观品质,提高食味值,则需适当提前收获,在齐穗后30~37d收获较好。

关键词: 杂交粳稻, 常规粳稻, 收获时期, 品质

Abstract:

The effects of different harvest time on the rice quality of japonica hybrid rice and inbred japonica rice in Northern China were studied to provide the theoretical basis for improving the quality of hybrid japonica rice and inbred japonica rice through adjusting cultivation measures. Two hybrid japonica rice varieties and three inbred japonica rice varieties were used as test materials. Sampled every 7 days after 30 days from the full heading, quality traits were measured after air drying. The results showed that the effects of different harvest time on the brown rice rate, the milled rice rate and head rice rate of hybrid japonica rice and inbred japonica rice were significant. With the delay of harvest time, the brown rice rate and milled rice rate increased gradually and reached a maximum at 65 days after heading stage, and then decreased sharply. The head rice rate fluctuated significantly with no obvious regularity before 65 days after heading, but decreased significantly after 65 days after heading; The chalkiness rate and chalkiness degree of hybrid japonica rice showed an increasing trend. There was no significant difference on chalkiness rate and chalkiness degree in the inbred japonica rice varieties. An increasing trend was found on the whiteness value of the five cultivars. Most of the effects of different harvest time on the protein and amylose content did not reach a significant level. Except for Fengjin was no significant difference in taste value among different harvest time treatments, the other four varieties decreased with the postponement of harvest time and there was a significant difference at the level of 0.05 but no distinctive difference at the level of 0.01.During the same harvesting time, the processing quality (including brown rice rate, milled rice rate and head rice rate) of inbred japonica rice was significantly better than that of hybrid japonica rice, and the whiteness of hybrid japonica rice was significantly better than that of inbred japonica rice. The difference between inbred japonica rice and japonica hybrid rice on chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree was not significant, the same on amylose content, protein content and taste value. There were no significant differences on the best harvest time. The suitable delay of harvest could promote the improvement of processing quality, usually on 58 days after full heading. The suitable advance of harvest could promote the improvement of appearance quality and taste value, preferably from 30 to 37 days after full heading.

Key words: Hybrid japonica rice, Inbred japonica rice, Harvest time, Quality

表1

杂交粳稻与常规粳稻在不同收获时期品质性状的变化"

品种
Cultivar
收获时期
Harvest
time
糙米率(%)
Brown rice
rate
精米率(%)
Milled rice
rate
整精米率(%)
Head rice rate
垩白粒率(%)
Chalky
rice rate
垩白度(%)
Chalky
degree
白度值
Whiteness
value
蛋白质
含量(%)
Protein content
直链淀粉
含量(%)
Amylose content
食味值
Taste
value
辽优9787 30DAH 73.73bcC 62.98cD 55.47aA 1.23dC 0.70dC 40.93cB 6.77aA 19.30cB 68.97aA
Liaoyou 9787 37DAH 73.37cC 62.84cD 51.73abAB 4.27cB 2.27cB 41.50bcAB 6.60aA 19.43bcAB 66.37abABC
44DAH 76.40bcC 66.85bCD 53.44abAB 5.43cAB 2.67bcB 41.80bcAB 6.57aA 19.67abcAB 64.87abABC
51DAH 75.91bBC 66.16bBCD 52.16aAB 6.47abcAB 3.00bcAB 42.20abcAB 6.50aA 20.00aA 67.63abAB
58DAH 80.11aAB 70.42aAB 55.04aA 7.70abA 3.77abAB 42.80abAB 6.40aA 19.97aA 61.07bcABC
65DAH 81.56aA 71.93aA 55.32aA 6.13bcAB 3.03bcAB 42.73abAB 6.87aA 19.83abAB 56.23cC
72DAH 76.64bBC 67.18bBC 48.49bB 8.43aA 4.30aA 43.73aA 6.73aA 19.80abAB 56.93cBC
辽优5206 30DAH 72.43dC 60.76cC 53.11abA 4.07bC 2.27cC 42.50bcAB 7.20aA 19.13aA 60.40aA
Liaoyou 5206 37DAH 75.25cBC 63.25cC 49.58abA 8.13bBC 4.63bcBC 44.23abAB 7.13aA 19.43aA 58.07aAB
44DAH 77.64bcB 67.07bB 51.75abA 15.30aAB 8.07aAB 43.77abcAB 6.97aA 19.73aA 55.37abAB
51DAH 77.30bcB 67.55bB 54.66aA 14.27aAB 7.47abAB 43.30abcAB 7.00aA 19.63aA 53.10abAB
58DAH 82.39aA 72.53aA 54.28aA 14.10aAB 7.30abAB 42.07cB 6.80aA 19.70aA 53.83abAB
65DAH 82.75aA 71.51aA 49.72bA 17.67aA 9.63aA 44.33abAB 7.00aA 19.77aA 45.30bB
72DAH 77.97bB 67.18bB 45.69bA 17.37aA 9.37aA 45.13aA 6.90aA 19.73aA 46.87bAB
沈农9816 30DAH 77.29eC 69.14eD 63.85abcAB 4.07aA 2.47aA 39.63cdBC 6.27abA 19.77bcAB 64.60abA
Shennong 9816
37DAH 79.62dBC 71.77cdBCD 65.25abAB 2.13aA 1.00aA 39.30dC 6.27abA 19.63cB 65.33aA
44DAH 81.95bcB 74.07bAB 67.09aA 3.73aA 1.87aA 40.07bcBC 6.10abA 19.93abcAB 65.83aA
51DAH 80.45bcBC 72.22bAB 61.02bcAB 4.23aA 2.17aA 40.20bcBC 6.50aA 19.80bcAB 58.57bcA
58DAH 82.47bB 74.15bAB 58.84cBC 3.80aA 1.83aA 40.33bB 6.37abA 19.97abAB 57.50cA
65DAH 86.94aA 76.69aA 53.51dCD 4.93aA 2.40aA 42.63aA 6.03bA 19.93abcAB 58.80bcA
72DAH 79.83cdBC 70.02deCD 48.37eD 3.00aA 1.47aA 42.53aA 6.07bA 20.13aA 60.20abcA
沈农9903 30DAH 76.11cC 66.97dC 57.71abAB 9.93aA 5.80aA 39.27cBC 7.37aA 19.10bA 50.53abA
Shennong 9903 37DAH 79.34bB 70.18cB 62.12aA 8.10aA 4.40aA 40.00bcABC 6.80aA 19.33abA 56.03aA
44DAH 80.93bB 72.78bcB 61.56aA 10.93aA 5.33aA 38.53cC 7.13aA 19.50aA 51.13abA
51DAH 79.60bB 70.76cB 56.99abAB 12.33aA 6.20aA 39.30cBC 7.10aA 19.37abA 47.70bA
58DAH 85.02aA 75.45aA 51.62bcBC 11.87aA 6.10aA 38.70cC 7.10aA 19.43abA 45.93bA
65DAH 85.53aA 75.64aA 56.20abAB 10.27aA 5.00aA 41.03abAB 7.10aA 19.60aA 45.63bA
72DAH 80.01bB 69.92cB 46.18cC 12.63aA 6.53aA 41.97aA 7.00aA 19.60aA 48.20 bA
丰锦Fengjin 30DAH 78.18bB 67.77cB 56.64bB 8.90aAB 5.13aA 41.87aA 5.93aA 19.80abA 59.97aA
37DAH 78.84bB 70.17bcB 64.81aAB 3.57bB 2.23bA 38.87bA 6.03aA 19.70bA 63.43aA
44DAH 79.13bB 70.93bcB 61.66abAB 7.93abAB 4.37abA 39.63abA 5.97aA 19.73bA 61.13aA
51DAH 79.48bB 70.73bcB 61.94abAB 9.10aAB 4.70abA 39.37bA 6.00aA 19.90abA 62.47aA
58DAH 86.33aA 77.40aA 65.87aA 9.43aAB 4.80abA 38.97bA 6.07aA 20.13aA 62.87aA
65DAH 86.41aA 77.50aA 62.42abAB 11.73aA 5.83aA 40.47abA 6.07aA 20.13aA 59.50aA
72DAH 80.08bB 71.40bB 56.59bB 8.83aAB 4.43abA 41.20abA 6.10aA 19.97abA 58.60aA

表2

同一时期收获的杂交粳稻与常规粳稻品质性状的差异"

收获时期
Harvest time
品种
Cultivar
糙米率(%)
Brown rice rate
精米率(%)
Milled rice rate
整精米率(%)
Head rice rate
垩白粒率(%)
Chalky rice rate
垩白度(%)
Chalky degree
白度值
Whiteness value
蛋白质
含量(%)
Protein content
直链淀粉
含量(%)
Amylose content
食味值
Taste
value
30DAH 辽优9787 73.73bcBC 62.98bBC 55.47bcB 1.23cB 0.70cB 40.93bAB 6.77abABC 19.30abA 68.97aA
辽优5206 72.43cC 60.76bC 53.11cB 4.07bB 2.27bB 42.50aA 7.20aAB 19.13bA 60.40abAB
沈农9816 77.29abAB 69.14aA 63.85aA 4.07bB 2.47bB 39.63cB 6.27bcBC 19.77aA 64.60abA
沈农9903 76.11abABC 66.97aAB 57.71bB 9.93aA 5.80aA 39.27cB 7.37aA 19.10bA 50.53cB
丰锦 78.18aA 67.75aA 56.64bcB 8.90aA 5.13aA 41.87abA 5.93cC 19.80aA 59.97bAB
37DAH 辽优9787 73.37bB 62.84bB 51.73bBC 4.27abA 2.27abAB 41.50bAB 6.60abcAB 19.43aA 66.37aA
辽优5206 75.25bB 63.25bB 49.58bC 8.13aA 4.63aA 44.23aA 7.13aA 19.43aA 58.07bcAB
沈农9816 79.62aA 71.77aA 65.25aA 2.13bA 1.00bB 39.30cB 6.27bcAB 19.63aA 65.33aA
沈农9903 79.34aA 70.18aA 62.12aAB 8.10aA 4.40aAB 40.00bcB 6.80abAB 19.33aA 56.03cB
丰锦 78.84aA 70.16aA 64.81aA 3.57bA 2.23abAB 38.87cB 6.03cB 19.70aA 63.43abAB
44DAH 辽优9787 76.40dD 66.85cC 53.44cB 5.43cdBC 2.67cdBC 41.80bAB 6.57abA 19.67abA 64.87abAB
辽优5206 77.64bcCD 67.07cC 51.75cB 15.30aA 8.07aA 43.77aA 6.97a 19.73abA 55.37bcAB
沈农9816 81.95aA 74.07aA 67.09aA 3.73dC 1.87dC 40.07cBC 6.10bA 19.93aA 65.83aA
沈农9903 80.93Aab 72.78aAB 61.56bA 10.93bAB 5.33bAB 38.53cC 7.13aA 19.50bA 51.13cB
丰锦 79.13bBC 70.72bB 61.66bA 7.93bcBC 4.37bcBC 39.63cBC 5.97bA 19.73abA 61.13abAB
51DAH 辽优9787 75.91cB 66.16bC 52.16bB 6.47cBC 3.00cBC 42.20aAB 6.50abA 20.00aA 67.63aA
辽优5206 77.30bcAB 67.55bBC 54.66bAB 14.27aA 7.47aA 43.30aA 7.00aA 19.63abA 53.10bcBC
沈农9816 80.45aA 72.22aA 61.02aA 4.23cC 2.17cC 40.20bBC 6.50abA 19.80abA 58.57abABC
沈农9903 79.59abA 70.76aAB 56.99abAB 12.33abAB 6.20abAB 39.30bC 7.10aA 19.37bA 47.70cC
丰锦 79.48abA 70.92aAB 61.94aA 9.10bcABC 4.70bcABC 39.37bC 6.00bA 19.90aA 62.47abAB
58DAH 辽优9787 80.11cB 70.42cC 55.04bcB 7.70bcAB 3.77bcBC 42.80aA 6.40bcAB 19.97abA 61.07abA
辽优5206 82.39bcAB 72.53bcBC 54.28bcB 14.10aA 7.30aA 42.07aAB 6.80abAB 19.70bcAB 53.83bcAB
沈农9816 82.47bcAB 74.15abABC 58.84bAB 3.80cB 1.83cC 40.33bBC 6.37bcAB 19.97abA 57.50abAB
沈农9903 85.02abA 75.45abAB 51.62cB 11.87abA 6.10abAB 38.70cC 7.10aA 19.43cB 45.93cB
丰锦 86.33Aa 77.38aA 65.87aA 9.43abAB 4.80bABC 38.97bcC 6.07cB 20.13aA 62.87aA
65DAH 辽优9787 81.56cB 71.93bB 55.32abAB 6.13cdB 3.03bcB 42.73abAB 6.87abA 19.83abA 56.23aA
辽优5206 82.75bcAB 71.51bB 49.72bB 17.67aA 9.63aA 44.33aA 7.00aA 19.77abA 45.30bB
沈农9816 86.94aA 76.69aA 53.51bAB 4.93dB 2.40cB 42.63abAB 6.03cA 19.93abA 58.80aA
沈农9903 85.53abAB 75.64aAB 56.20abAB 10.27bcB 5.00bcB 41.03bcB 7.10aA 19.60bA 45.63bB
丰锦 86.41aA 77.46aA 62.42aA 11.73bAB 5.83bBC 40.47cB 6.07bcA 20.13aA 59.50aA
72DAH 辽优9787 76.64cB 67.18bB 48.49bB 8.43bcBC 4.30bcBC 43.73abAB 6.73abA 19.80abA 56.93aAB
辽优5206 77.97bcAB 67.18bB 45.69bB 17.37aA 9.37aA 45.13aA 6.90abA 19.73abA 46.87bC
沈农9816 79.83abA 70.02aA 48.37bB 3.00cC 1.47cC 42.53bcBC 6.07bA 20.13aA 60.20aA
沈农9903 80.01aA 69.92aA 46.18bB 12.63abAB 6.53abAB 41.97cBC 7.00aA 19.60bA 48.20bBC
丰锦 80.08aA 71.40aA 56.59aA 8.83bcABC 4.43bcBC 41.20cC 6.10bA 19.97abA 58.60aA

表3

改良杂交粳稻和常规粳稻米质性状的最佳收获时期"

性状
Traits
杂交粳稻Hybrid japonica rice 常规粳稻Inbred japonica rice
辽优9787 Liaoyou 9787 辽优5206 Liaoyou 5206 沈农9816 Shennong 9816 沈农9903 Shennong 9903 丰锦 Fengjin
糙米率Brown rice rate 65DAH 65DAH 65DAH 58DAH 58DAH
精米率Milled rice rate 58DAH 58DAH 65DAH 58DAH 58DAH
整精米率Head rice rate 30DAH 51DAH 51DAH 51DAH 58DAH
垩白度Chalky degree 30DAH 30DAH 37DAH 37DAH 37DAH
垩白粒率Chalky rice rate 30DAH 30DAH 37DAH 37DAH 37DAH
白度值Whiteness value 58DAH 72DAH 65DAH 72DAH 30DAH
食味值Taste value 30DAH 30DAH 44DAH 37DAH 37DAH
[1] 廖伏明, 周坤炉, 阳和华 . 籼型杂交水稻杂种与亲本的稻米品质研究. 中国水稻科学, 2003,17(2):134-140.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2003.02.009
[2] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林 , 等. 杂交中稻在不同地域和施氮水平下米质变异的影响因素及其预测模型. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26(4):438-444.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.04.008
[3] 徐富贤, 洪松 . 环境因素对稻米品质影响的研究进展. 西南农业学报, 1994,7(2):101-105.
[4] 朱振华, 金基永, 袁平荣 , 等. 不同海拔条件下耐冷性粳稻品种的稻米淀粉RVA谱特性. 中国水稻科学, 2010,24(2):51-56.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.02.08
[5] 金正勋, 杨静. 钱春荣 , 等. 灌浆成熟期温度对水稻籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2005,19(4):377-380.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2005.04.017
[6] 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川 , 等, 灌浆期气象因子对杂交中籼稻米碾米品质和外观品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2003,27(1):73-77.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0011
[7] 沈新平, 沈晓燕, 顾丽 , 等. 两优培九稻米垩白在江苏省不同纬度点的播期效应. 中围水稻科学, 2007,21(6):677-680.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2007.06.020
[8] 程方民, 钟连进 . 不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15(3):28-32.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2001.03.006
[9] 程方民, 刘正辉, 张嵩午 . 稻米品质形成的气候生态条件评价及我国地域分布规律. 生态学报, 2002,22(5):636-642.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.05.003
[10] 盛婧, 陶红娟, 陈留根 . 灌浆结实期不同时段温度对水稻结实与稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007,2l(4):396-402.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2007.04.012
[11] 藏云云, 丁艳锋, 刘正辉 , 等. 花后水稻穗部夜间远红外增温处理对稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2009,23(4):414-420.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2009.04.12
[12] 袁玲, 张宣, 杨静 , 等. 不同栽培方式和秸秆还田对水稻产量和营养品质的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39(2):350-359.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00350
[13] 姜萍, 杨占烈, 余显权 , 等. 不同收获时期对稻米品质的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2006,34(1):62-63.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2006.01.022
[14] 王百灵, 张文忠, 商全玉 , 等. 不同收获时期对超级稻沈农014主要稻米品质影响. 北方水稻, 2009,39(3):7-9.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6737.2009.03.004
[15] 程建峰, 潘晓云, 刘宜柏 , 等. 收获期对杂交早稻品质的影响. 江西农业学报, 2001,13(2):31-35.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2001.02.007
[16] 褚庆全, 齐成喜, 杨飞 , 等. 我国杂交粳稻发展现状、问题及其对策. 作物杂志, 2005(1):9-12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2005.01.005
[17] 王小虎, 钟卫国, 胡江 , 等. 江苏省杂交粳稻与常规粳稻新品种主要品质性状和抗病性的比较分析. 杂交水稻, 2014(6):76-80.
[1] 赵 鑫 陈少锋 王 慧 刘三才 杨修仕 张宝林. 晋北地区不同苦荞品种产量和品质研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 27–32
[2] 高文俊 杨国义 高新中 玉 柱 许庆方 原向阳 孙耀武. 氮磷钾肥对青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 144–149
[3] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143–148
[4] 温辉芹,程天灵,裴自友,李雪,张立生,朱玫. 山西省近年审定小麦品种的综合性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 32–36
[5] 张文,逯涛,叶玉霞,刘铨义,冯杨. 新疆奎屯棉花脱叶催熟剂的混用效果研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 103–107
[6] 张丽丽,赵一洲,李鑫,毛艇,刘研,张战,倪善君,刘福才. 60Co-γ射线辐照对不同粳稻品种后代稻米品质性状变异的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 51–56
[7] 唐慧娟,臧巩固,程超华,唐蜻,李育君,赵立宁. 工业大麻产量和品质性状的对应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 52–55
[8] 刘颖慧,郭明,贾树利,尹建国. 影响青贮玉米品质因素研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 6–10
[9] 段门俊,吴芸紫,田玉聪,刘永武,刘章勇,陈阜,金涛. 不同品种再生稻产量及品质比较研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 61–67
[10] 范昱,王红力,何凤,赖弟利,王佳俊,宋月,向达兵. 后熟对苦荞子粒营养品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 96–101
[11] 耿雷跃,张薇,邹拓,郑振宇,耿立格,孙娟,张启星. 河北水稻地方种质品质多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 49–55
[12] 马瑞琦,亓振,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,杨玉双,冯金凤,孙敏,赵广才. 化控剂对冬小麦植株性状及产量品质的调节效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 133–140
[13] 王洁,曾波,雷财林,赵志超,王久林,程治军. 北方国家水稻区域试验近15年参试品种分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 71–76
[14] 朱英杰,常旭虹,王德梅,杨玉双,王雨,吕冰,马瑞琦,刘莹,王玉娇,赵广才,陶志强. 黑土与潮土对不同春小麦营养品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 84–90
[15] 刘倩,侯松,刘庆,李欢,史衍玺. 移栽时期对食用型甘薯品种烟薯25号产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 136–141
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2] 权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3] 黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4] 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5] 赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6] 陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7] 王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8] 朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .