大穗型水稻品种7-37的光合特性及子粒灌浆特性研究

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了揭示高光效水稻品种大穗7-37的光合特性及子粒灌浆特性,以穗大生育期短的7-37、穗小生育期短的R122和穗大生育期长的R1126水稻品种为试验材料进行田间试验,结果表明大穗7-37在光合特性方面优势明显,尤其是胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i,花后25d前在3个品种中一直处于较低水平,剑叶一生中同化的CO₂ LSC是小穗R122的1.96倍,甚至比大穗R1126还多20%。在灌浆特性方面,大穗7-37在起始长势GR₀上就见有明显优势,虽然平均灌浆速率V_a略低于小穗R122,但明显高于大穗R1126,有效灌浆时间也比大穗R1126短。同时大穗7-37的穗长、每穗总粒数和着粒密度跟大穗R1126无显著差异,但都显著高于小穗R122。将一次枝梗和二次枝梗分开来看,大穗7-37在二次枝梗穗粒数的数量上有明显的优势,但千粒重与小穗R122、大穗R1126无显著差异,说明二次枝梗对叶源物质存在比较激烈的竞争,但仍可正常充实。由本试验可知较高的叶源量、较短的有效灌浆时间和丰富的二次枝梗穗粒数是大穗7-37具有高光效特性的主要原因。

关键词: 水稻, 光合特性, 子粒灌浆特性, 高光效

Abstract:

In order to reveal the photosynthetic and grain filling characteristics of high efficiency variety 7-37, large panicle 7-37 with short growth period, small panicle R122 with short growth period and large panicle R1126 with long growth period were used as the tested materials in the field experiment. The results showed that large panicle 7-37 had obvious advantages in photosynthetic characteristics, especially the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration C_i, always with lowest position in the three varieties before the 25d after flowering. Leaf source capacity ( LSC) of flag was 1.96 times higher than R122 and 20% higher than R1126. In grain filling characteristics, the 7-37 had obvious advantages in GR₀, although the V_a was a little lower than R122, significantly higher than R1126, and the effective filling time was also shorter than R1126. At the same time, the spike length, total number of kernels and grain density of 7-37 were no obvious difference with R1126, but significantly higher than R122. The primary branch and secondary branch were analyzed separately, which the secondary branch of 7-37 had obvious advantages on the total number of spike grain number, but there was no significant difference to R122 and R1126, which secondary branch to cytopathology substances existed more fierce competition, but still could be normal full. The tests indicated that the main reasons for large spike 7-37 with high photosynthetic efficiency were the higher leaf source capacity, the shorter effective filling time and the total number of secondary branch grains.

Key words: Rice, Photosynthesis characteristics, Grain filling characteristics, High efficiency

孙惠敏,郑树文,郑伟,王安萍,冯关萍,段世华,郑卓. 大穗型水稻品种7-37的光合特性及子粒灌浆特性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016 (5): 38–43

Huimin Sun,Shuwen Zheng,Wei Zheng,Anping Wang,Guanping Feng,Shihua Duan,Zhuo Zheng. Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Grain Filling Characteristics of Large Panicle Type Rice Variety 7-37[J]. Crops, 2016(5): 38–43

图/表 4

图1

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 27

[1]	张军, 覃志豪, 李文娟 . 1949-2009年中国粮食生产发展与空间分布演变研究. 中国农学通报, 2011(24):56-65.
[2]	程勇翔, 王秀珍, 郭建平 , 等. 中国水稻生产的时空动态分析. 中国农业科学, 2012(17):200-108.
[3]	尹海庆 . 不同生态区播期对机插水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(6):113-121.
[4]	霍中洋, 张洪程 . 播期对不同类型品种直播稻生长特性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2010,29(11):2131-2138.
[5]	Gendua P A, Yamamoto Y, Miyazaki A , et al. Responses of yielding ability,sink size and percentage of filled grains to thecultivation practices in a Chinese large-panicle-type rice cultivar,Yangdao 4. Plant Production Science, 2008,12(2):243-256.
[6]	Gendua P A, Yamamoto Y, Miyazaki A , et al. Effects of the tillering nodes on the main stem of a Chinese large-panicle-type rice cultivar,Yangdao 4,on the growth and yield-related characteristics in relation to cropping season. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2009,12(2):257-266.
[7]	Yang L X, Huang J Y, Yang H J , et al. The impact of free-air CO₂ enrichment (FACE) and N supply on yield formation of rice crops with large panicle. Field Crops Research, 2006,98:141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.12.014
[8]	Li M, Tang D, Wang K J , et al. Mutations in the F-box gene larger panicle improve the panicle architecture and enhance the grain yield in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2011,9(9):1002-1013. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2011.9.issue-9
[9]	程旺大, 张国平, 姚海根 , 等. 密穗型水稻品种的籽粒灌浆特性研究. 作物学报, 2003,29(6):841-846.
[10]	刘晓龙, 徐晨, 徐克章 , 等. 盐胁迫对水稻叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2014(2):88-92.
[11]	李合生 . 植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 123-124.
[12]	顾世梁, 朱庆森, 杨建昌 , 等. 不同水稻材料籽粒灌浆特性的分析. 作物学报, 2001,27(1):7-14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2001.01.002
[13]	应存山 . 中国稻种资源.北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1993: 530-531.
[14]	赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰 , 等. 水稻光合作用研究进展及其影响因素分析. 北方水稻, 2014,44(5):66-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6737.2014.05.025
[15]	剧成欣, 陶进, 钱希旸 , 等. 不同年代中籼水稻品种的叶片光合性状. 作物学报, 2016,42(3):415-426. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00415
[16]	杨建昌, 朱庆森, 王志琴 , 等. 亚种间杂交稻光合特性及物质积累与运转的研究. 作物学报, 1997,23(1):82-88.
[17]	翟虎渠, 曹树青, 万建民 , 等. 超高产杂交稻灌浆期光合功能与产量的关系. 中国科学, 2002,32(1):211-217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7232.2002.03.003
[18]	唐塘, 吕冰, 梁建生 . 不同水稻品种组合籽粒灌浆特性的比较. 扬州大学学报, 2009,30(1):78-83.
[19]	杨建昌 . 水稻弱势粒灌浆机理与调控途径. 作物学报, 2010,36(12):2011-2019. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.02011
[20]	朱庆森, 曹显祖, 骆亦其 . 水稻籽粒灌浆的生长分析. 作物学报, 1988,14(3):182-192.
[21]	王复标, 黄福灯, 程方民 , 等. 水稻生育后期叶片早衰突变体的光合特性与叶绿体超微结构观察. 作物学报, 2012,38(5):871-879. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00871
[22]	李敏, 张洪程, 杨雄 , 等. 高产氮高效型粳稻品种的叶片光合及衰老特性研究. 中国水稻科学, 2013(27):168-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2013.02.009
[23]	Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A , et al. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nature Genetics, 2010,42(6):545-550. doi: 10.1038/ng.592 pmid: 20495564
[24]	Terao T, Nagata K, Morino K , et al. A gene controlling the number of primary rachis branches also controls the vascular bundle formation and hence is responsible to increase the harvest index and grain yield in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010,120:875-893. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1218-8
[25]	Weng X Y, Wang L, Wang J , et al. Grain number,plant height,and heading date7 is a central regulator of growth,development,and stress response. Plant Physiology, 2014,164(2):735-747. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.231308
[26]	Wei X J, Xu J F, Guo H N , et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice,influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiology, 2010,153(4):1747-1758. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156943
[27]	蔡耀辉, 李永辉, 邱健 . 水稻高光效育种研究进展及展望. 江西农业学报, 2009,21(12):26-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2009.12.008

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

品种 Cultivar	叶面积Leaf area(cm²)		LSC （mmolCO₂）
品种 Cultivar	均值Mean	变幅Range	LSC （mmolCO₂）
7-37	111.04	99.28~125.17	143.91
R122	56.59	53.20~60.18	73.34
R1126	91.92	80.42~100.35	120.42

品种Cultivar	粒位Position	GR₀(g/1000 grain)	V_max[g/(1000 grain·d)]	t-V_max(d)	T₉₉(d)	V_a[g/(1000 grain·d)]
7-37	S1	0.488	2.916	18.78	27.14	0.877
	S2	0.543	2.526	17.32	36.53	0.658
	Z1	0.530	3.028	20.51	31.26	0.824
	Z2	0.434	1.605	23.88	37.57	0.714
	X1	0.498	1.831	21.12	29.60	0.967
	X2	0.407	1.565	24.79	37.32	0.504
R122	S1	0.494	3.318	15.56	26.04	0.901
	S2	0.412	2.084	16.15	30.92	0.786
	Z1	0.478	3.532	15.31	29.10	0.983
	Z2	0.383	1.821	17.28	38.00	0.817
	X1	0.292	3.100	18.29	28.17	0.806
	X2	0.347	1.776	25.06	32.66	0.653
R1126	S1	0.378	2.350	16.02	35.15	0.786
	S2	0.352	2.065	19.15	41.75	0.798
	Z1	0.373	2.222	19.74	39.48	0.700
	Z2	0.320	1.895	21.11	45.85	0.551
	X1	0.367	2.032	19.52	38.78	0.591
	X2	0.336	1.534	21.31	46.53	0.431

品种Cultivar	PL(cm)	GNP	GD(grains/cm²)	PBN	GNPB	TGWPB(g)	SBN	GNSB	TGWSB(g)
7-37	32.17±2.26Aa	398.69±37.87Aa	12.39±2.88Aa	17.81±5.38Ab	90.27±11.03Ab	25.58±4.25Aa	47.75±8.00Aa	308.42±64.84Aa	24.00±5.73Aa
R122	24.08±1.57ABb	247.24±23.48Ab	10.26±0.75Ab	16.07±1.66Ab	84.45±11.24Ab	26.23±2.25Aa	45.42±11.60Aa	162.79±25.77Bc	24.65±0.92Aa
R1126	30.44±1.54Aa	349.97±46.23Aa	11.48±2.45Aa	22.22±3.67Aa	132.08±26.85Aa	24.68±2.88Aa	54.53±5.59Aa	217.89±20.69Bb	23.46±4.44Aa