作物杂志,2026, 第4期: 278–284 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.04.033

• 种子科技 • 上一篇    

恒定转速下不同粉液比处理对结球白菜丸化种子质量指标的影响

李向春(), 胡兴照, 吴育石, 刘山, 周春婕, 彭科琴, 杨成楼, 罗昌敬, 王江龙, Bilquees Bozdar, 曹国璠, 李振华()   

  1. 贵州大学农学院/水稻产业研究院/贵州省粮油作物分子育种重点实验室/贵州省高等学校功能农业重点实验室, 550025, 贵州贵阳
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-09 修回日期:2025-06-07 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 李振华
  • 作者简介:李向春,主要从事种子包衣丸粒化技术研究,E-mail:1909353212@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省重大科技成果转化项目(黔科合中引地[2024]027);贵州省优秀青年科技人才计划项目(黔科合平台人才YQK[2023]004);2025年科技成果转化联合基金项目(黔科合成果LH[2025]重点007);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑[2024]一般094);从江梯田湿地生态系统贵州省野外科学观测研究站项目(黔科合平台YWZ[2024]004);贵州省喀斯特山地水稻作物学科技创新人才团队建设(黔科合平台人才-BQW[2024]001);贵州省粮油作物优质高效增产全省重点实验室(黔科合平台ZSYS[2025]037)

Effects of Different Powder-to-Liquid Ratios under Constant Rotational Speed on the Quality Indices of Pelleted Seeds of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis)

Li Xiangchun(), Hu Xingzhao, Wu Yushi, Liu Shan, Zhou Chunjie, Peng Keqin, Yang Chenglou, Luo Changjing, Wang Jianglong, Bilquees Bozdar, Cao Guofan, Li Zhenhua()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Guizhou University / Rice Industry Research Institute / Guizhou Key Laboratory of Molecular Breeding for Grain and Oil Crops / Guizhou Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture in Higher Education Institutions, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2025-05-09 Revised:2025-06-07 Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-08-11
  • Contact: Li Zhenhua

摘要: 以“黔白2号”结球白菜(Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis)种子为试验材料,探讨了恒定转速下不同粉液比处理对结球白菜丸化种子质量指标的影响。结果表明,随着粉液比的增加,丸化种子的千粒重、抗压强度和裂解时间逐步上升,破碎率持续下降。随着粉液比的变化,丸化结球白菜种子的发芽指标呈现出先增后减的正态分布特点。其中在粉液比为300:95时,种子表现出最高的单籽率和最低的多籽率,结球白菜丸化种子具有最高的发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数和活力指数,幼苗生长指标也展现出正态分布趋势。300:95粉液比丸化处理的结球白菜丸化种子在发芽第7天时,幼苗的根长、芽长、干重和鲜重均达到最高值。

关键词: 结球白菜, 种子, 恒定转速, 粉液比, 丸化种子质量, 发芽势

Abstract:

Using the seeds of “Qianbai No.2” Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) as experimental materials, the effects of different powder-to-liquid ratios under constant rotation speed on the quality indices of pelleted Chinese cabbage seeds were explored. The results showed that with the increase of the powder-to-liquid ratio, the 1000-seed weight, compressive strength, and cracking time of the pelleted seeds gradually increased, while the breakage rate continuously decreased. As the powder-to-liquid ratio changed, the germination indices of the pelleted Chinese cabbage seeds showed a normal distribution characteristic of increasing first and then decreasing. When the powder-to-liquid ratio was 300:95, the seeds exhibited the highest single-seed rate and the lowest multi-seed rate. The pelleted Chinese cabbage seeds had the highest germination rate, germination potential, germination index, and vigor index, and the seedling growth indices also showed a normal distribution trend. For the pelleted Chinese cabbage seeds treated with the powder-to-liquid ratio of 300:95, on the seventh day after germination, root length, shoot length, dry weight, and fresh weight of the seedlings all reached the maximum values.

Key words: Chinese cabbage, Seed, Constant rotation speed, Powder-to-liquid ratio, Pelleted seed quality, Germination potential

表1

不同粉液比处理后丸粒化结球白菜种子的千粒重等表征参数比较

处理
Treatment
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
粒长
Grain length (mm)
粒宽
Grain width (mm)
长宽比
Length-width ratio
周长
Circumference (mm)
面积
Area (mm2)
CK 2.60±0.04g 1.80±0.21b 1.70±0.15b 1.12±0.14a 5.69±0.54b 2.23±0.35b
T1 12.42±0.29f 2.77±0.24a 2.55±0.13a 1.07±0.04a 8.58±0.58a 5.11±0.59a
T2 13.02±0.07e 2.85±0.29a 2.59±0.18a 1.10±0.04a 8.78±0.73a 5.36±0.80a
T3 13.51±0.19d 2.89±0.32a 2.60±0.18a 1.11±0.05a 8.84±0.75a 5.44±0.83a
T4 14.35±0.28c 2.95±0.31a 2.62±0.13a 1.12±0.07a 9.04±0.86a 5.67±0.96a
T5 15.51±0.09b 2.96±0.38a 2.69±0.12a 1.10±0.10a 9.10±0.69a 5.80±0.79a
T6 16.34±0.39a 2.99±0.34a 2.72±0.18a 1.10±0.05a 9.20±0.79a 5.92±0.92a

表2

不同粉液比处理后丸粒化结球白菜种子的抗压强度、破碎率、裂解时间、有籽率、单籽率和多籽率

处理
Treatment
抗压强度
Compressive strength (N)
破碎率
Breakage rate (%)
裂解时间
Cracking time (s)
有籽率
Seed-containing rate (%)
单籽率
Single-seed rate (%)
多籽率
Multi-seed rate (%)
CK
T1 2.56±0.15e 5.00±2.00a 10.73±0.70e 99.87±0.11a 81.02±0.67d 18.85±0.74a
T2 2.67±0.15de 3.33±1.53ab 12.65±0.30d 99.94±0.06a 84.38±2.03c 15.56±2.37bc
T3 2.76±0.16cd 1.33±0.58bc 13.20±0.37d 99.97±0.05a 88.02±1.13b 11.95±1.31d
T4 2.89±0.22c 1.00±1.00c 14.07±0.33c 99.99±0.02a 90.76±1.30a 9.23±1.52e
T5 3.20±0.11b 0.67±0.58c 14.96±0.61b 99.98±0.04a 85.73±1.88c 14.25±2.20cd
T6 3.95±0.27a 0.33±0.58c 16.85±0.68a 99.96±0.04a 82.14±1.69d 17.81±1.96ab

图1

不同粉液比下丸粒化结球白菜种子的发芽指标 不同小写字母表示在P < 0.05水平上差异显著,下同。

图2

不同粉液比下丸粒化白菜种子发芽7 d后的幼苗品质

图3

粉液比与丸化种子物理特性指标、发芽品质及幼苗生长指标的相关性分析 BR:破碎率,MSR:多籽率,GL:粒长,CF:周长,AR:面积,CS:抗压强度,CT:裂解时间,TGW:千粒重,GW:粒宽,RL:根长,SL:芽长,SCR:有籽率,LWR:长宽比,SSR:单籽率,FW:鲜重,GR:发芽率,GP:发芽势,DW:干重,GI:发芽指数,VI:活力指数。

[1] 刘玄. 结球白菜种植技术与病虫害防治方法实践分析. 河北农机, 2023(23):82-84.
[2] 谢锦, 韩立朴. 我国种子丸粒化研究现状及展望. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(4):605-615.
[3] 赵海新, 徐令旗, 陈书强, 等. 国内外种子丸粒化技术研究进展. 作物杂志, 2024(6):18-25.
[4] 胡建平, 綦春晖. 磁粉包衣丸粒化蔬菜种子活力性能试验. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9):120-123.
[5] Arvind G, Eevera T, Kumaran S, et al. Seeds of excellence: review on impact of seed quality enhancement on babygreens biomass production. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2025,19:101597.
[6] 张帅扬, 吕程序, 白圣贺, 等. 油菜种子甩盘式丸化加工试验与参数优化. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(增2):131-140.
[7] Ran W H, Xu F S, Zhang Y, et al. Development of acid-resistant seed pelletization formula and its effects on improving rapeseed growth in acidic soil. Plant Soil, 2024, 504(1/2):147-165.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-024-06654-2
[8] Xu J, Sun S L, Li X T, et al. Research on the population flow and mixing characteristics of pelleted vegetable seeds based on the bonded-particle model. Agriculture, 2024, 14(5):752.
doi: 10.3390/agriculture14050752
[9] Hill H J. Seed pelleting-history and modern fundamentals. HortScience, 1994, 29(12):1408.
[10] 任亚玲, 罗天, 薛森武, 等. 饲用甜高粱种子萌发的抗逆性研究. 饲料研究, 2025, 48(2):144-149.
[11] Javed T, Afzal I. Impact of seed pelleting on germination potential, seedling growth and storage of tomato seed. Acta Horticulturae, 2020,1273:417-424.
[12] Teldjoun M, Mendas M, Mzali S, et al. Reciprocating sliding wear behavior of talc-filled polypropylene: effect of talc proportion. Tribology International, 2024,200:110074.
[13] Fernández M D, Fernández M J. Vermiculite/poly (lactic acid) composites: effect of nature of vermiculite on hydrolytic degradation in alkaline medium. Applied Clay Science, 2017,143:29-38.
[14] Abdullaevich Y S, Ergashovich Y K, Abdukhalilovich S A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of sodium‐carboxymethylcellulose from cotton, powder, microcrystalline and nanocellulose. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2022,62:677-686.
[15] 张民, 杨阳, 伍雨, 等. 引发和丸化处理及储藏温度对烟草种子生活力的影响. 中国种业, 2021(5):73-76.
[16] Ma X J, Liu M, Hou Z F, et al. Optimization of process parameters for Trifolium pratense L. seed granulation coating using GA-BP neural network. Heliyon, 2024, 10(18):e38003.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38003
[17] Lü Y Y, He X Q, Hu X W, et al. The seed semipermeable layer and its relation to seed quality assessment in four grass species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:1175.
[18] 马英明, 李斌. 选种对烟草种子萌发及烟苗生长的影响. 烟草科技, 2000(2):45-46.
[19] Alimova F A, Saidova M T, Sh Primkulov B.Pneumatic feed mechanism for accurate sowing of bare cotton seeds. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023,12:1231.
[20] Abdukerim R, Xiang S, Shi Y X, et al. Seed pelleting with gum arabic-encapsulated biocontrol bacteria for effective control of clubroot disease in pak choi. Plants, 2023, 12(21):3702.
doi: 10.3390/plants12213702
[1] 李奕葶, 陈芸, 张菁, 高青云, 班立桐. 泰山灵芝与蛹虫草胞外粗多糖对小麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (4): 199–206
[2] 黄新元, 张英, 陶迎梅, 江青山, 魏丕伟. 水稻OsDOG1-like基因家族突变体种子的萌发势及其GA敏感性的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (4): 36–45
[3] 展慧, 吴擎, 李丽君. 机器视觉光谱成像技术在玉米种子质量检测中的应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (4): 8–16
[4] 拜伟俊, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 刘文瑜, 柴继宽, 杨发荣, 李小雨. 藜麦种子丸粒化配方的筛选及效果验证[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (2): 253–258
[5] 孙娟, 王新栋, 郄彦敏, 牛雪婧, 王丽娜, 耿立格. 引发处理对低发芽力小麦种子萌发和生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (2): 259–264
[6] 高艳梅, 冯鹏睿, 陈薇薇, 张萌, 张永清. 抗旱性藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2026, (1): 182–188
[7] 李瑛, 赵永伟, 陈英, 马伟明, 李文珍, 张海杰. 化学诱变对胡麻“定亚23号”种子萌发和M1代主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (5): 155–164
[8] 杜含梅, 谭露, 李声春, 王清海, 徐洲, 吴丹丹, 王安虎. 苦荞萌芽期镉耐受性及对幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (5): 209–220
[9] 王兖薇, 武俊喜, 汪艳, 牟涛, 朗卓玛, 苗彦军. 盐碱胁迫对异株荨麻种子萌发的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (5): 67–73
[10] 黄明, 付鑫鑫, 张振旺, 张军, 李友军. 种子大小对旱地小麦种子萌发、幼苗特性和抗旱性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (3): 255–262
[11] 景茂雅, 张子玉, 张萌, 合佳敏, 严翻翻, 高艳梅, 张永清. 水杨酸浸种对盐胁迫藜麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025, (1): 194–201
[12] 赵海新, 徐令旗, 陈书强, 蔡永盛, 杜晓东, 杨丽敏, 黄晓群, 薛菁芳. 国内外种子丸粒化技术研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (6): 18–25
[13] 鄂利锋, 徐金崇, 陈修斌, 权建华, 华军, 尹丽娟, 王舜奇, 赵文勤. 外源硅对盐胁迫下娃娃菜种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (6): 212–217
[14] 韩小伟, 周江明, 高英波, 田雪慧, 李明军, 郝延杰, 李伟, 李树兵, 刘树泽. 基于机器视觉技术的玉米种子精选方法研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (6): 242–248
[15] 李诗晴, 张鹏, 公丹, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆新品种的芽期耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, (4): 188–193
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!