Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 108-115.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Film Mulching Modes and Population Density on Photosynthesis Characteristics and Yield of Mung Bean in Arid Land

Zhang Chunming,Zhao Xueying,Yan Hubin,Zhu Huijun,Zhang Zeyan,Zhang Yaowen   

  1. Crop Science Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2018-01-04 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

109

Abstract:

The double-factor completely random design and the variety of mung bean Jinlüdou 8 were used in the experiment to study the effects of film mulching modes on leaf area index (LAI), relative chlorophyll content (SPAD), photosynthetic rate (Pn), yield and its components of mung bean in arid land. The results showed that during the whole growing period of mung bean, along with the density increased, the SPAD, LAI, Pn increased, but transpiration rate (Tr) decreased. Compared with film dibble and traditional planting, the pattern of film side dibble made the SPAD increased by 4.15% and 9.40%, and LAI increased by 13.1% and 24.5%. During the whole growing period, Pn increased by 10.15% and 9.93%,and Tr increased by 7.5% and 11.2%. From branching stage to the beginning of maturity,water use efficiency in leaf (LWUE) was increased by 3.98% and 4.73%。Compared with traditional planting, the plastic film mulching could increase mung bean plant height, branch number, number of pods per plant. With the increase of population density, the number of pods per plant and yields were increased significantly. Grain yield of film side dibble and lateral film dibbling were increased by 24.2% and 19.9% respectively. Among them, the pattern of film side dibble (population density 165 000 plants/hm 2) was favorable for improving yield of mung bean in arid land.

Key words: Film mulching modes, Mung bean, Photosynthetic rate, Population density, Yield

Table 1

Field experiments design"

编号
Numbering		 A覆膜方式
Mulching method		 B密度
(×104plants/hm2)
Density		 处理
Treatment
1 膜上穴播A1 B1(14.25) A1B1
2 Film dibble B2(16.50) A1B2
3 B3(18.75) A1B3
4 膜侧穴播A2 B1(14.25) A2B1
5 Film side dibble B2(16.50) A2B2
6 B3(18.75) A2B3
7 露地条播A3(CK) B1(14.25) A3B1
8 Traditional planting B2(16.50) A3B2
9 B3(18.75) A3B3

Fig.1

SPAD of mung bean under different treatments"

Table 2

Significant difference analysis of SPAD under different treatments"

处理Treatment 分枝期Branching period 始花期Beginning flowering 盛花期Full bloom 始熟期Beginning mature 成熟期Mature period
A1B1 35.2aA 43.3abcA 47.5abA 45.3abA 42.1abA
A1B2 34.8aA 46.1abcA 48.2abA 46.2abA 44.6abA
A1B3 35.0aA 44.5abcA 48.6abA 46.0abA 40.8abA
A2B1 35.1aA 45.8abaA 49.5abA 47.3abA 43.1abA
A2B2 35.8aA 46.7abA 50.2aA 48.5abA 44.5abA
A2B3 36.5aA 47.0aA 50.8aA 49.6aA 45.9aA
A3B1 32.1aA 42.3abcA 44.9bA 46.1abA 40.9abA
A3B2 31.3aA 40.9cA 46.9abA 45.3abA 41.0abA
A3B3 31.9aA 41.2bcA 46.0abA 42.9bA 39.0bA

Fig.2

LAI of mung bean under different treatments"

Table 3

Significant difference analysis of mung bean LAI under different treatments"

处理Treatment 分枝期Branching period 始花期Beginning flowering 盛花期Full bloom 始熟期Beginning mature 成熟期Mature period
A1B1 0.94aA 1.76bcAB 3.07bcBC 2.58bAB 2.08abAB
A1B2 0.86aA 1.88bcAB 2.77cBCD 2.75abAB 2.25abAB
A1B3 1.02aA 2.21abAB 3.29bcBC 2.88abAB 2.58abA
A2B1 1.12aA 1.92abcAB 3.06bcBC 2.76abAB 2.46abA
A2B2 1.36aA 2.52aA 4.25aA 3.28aA 2.78abA
A2B3 1.04aA 2.05abcAB 3.68abAB 2.65bAB 2.89aA
A3B1 0.95aA 1.56cB 2.64cdCD 2.79abAB 1.29cB
A3B2 1.11aA 1.69bcAB 2.03dD 2.54bAB 2.04bAB
A3B3 0.86aA 1.54cB 2.89cBCD 2.33bB 2.33abAB

Table4

Significant difference analysis of mung bean Pn and Tr under different treatments [μmol/(m2·s)]"

指标
Indice		 处理
Treatment		 分枝期
Branching period		 始花期
Beginning flowering		 盛花期
Full bloom		 始熟期
Beginning mature		 成熟期
Mature period
Pn A1B1 5.12cdBC 5.54efCD 9.13dE 8.17cdBCD 5.42bB
A1B2 6.13abA 6.15cdC 10.25cD 7.42efDE 2.98dE
A1B3 6.57aA 7.56bAB 11.21bBC 8.35bcBC 3.98cD
A2B1 5.79bcAB 6.38cC 9.96cDE 6.95fE 5.41bB
A2B2 6.22abA 8.22aA 13.68aA 8.76bAB 4.21cCD
A2B3 6.46abA 7.29bB 11.65bB 9.48aA 5.27bB
A3B1 4.20eC 4.96fD 10.36cCD 8.31bcBC 4.88bBC
A3B2 4.93dBC 5.23efD 9.68cdDE 8.26bcBC 5.52bB
A3B3 5.77bcAB 5.77deCD 11.38bB 7.66deCDE 7.31aA
Tr A1B1 2.63cdBC 2.76bcdABC 2.98bcABC 2.55bA 2.79bcdBCD
A1B2 2.76bcABC 3.08abA 2.75bcdBCD 2.47bA 2.49deCD
A1B3 2.42dCD 2.89abcAB 2.88bcdBC 2.79abA 2.71bcdeBCD
A2B1 3.12aA 2.92abAB 2.76bcdBC 2.96aA 3.29aA
A2B2 2.69cdABC 3.12aA 3.48aA 3.02aA 3.04abAB
A2B3 3.04abAB 2.75bcdABC 2.65cdeBCD 2.48bA 2.96abcABC
A3B1 2.75bcABC 2.56cdeBC 3.14abAB 2.97aA 2.88bcABC
A3B2 2.11eD 2.39eC 2.54deCD 2.73abA 2.67cdeBCD
A3B3 2.63cdBC 2.54deBC 2.33eD 2.69abA 2.39eD

Fig.3

Pn and Tr of mung bean under different treatments"

Fig.4

LWUE of mung bean under different treatments"

Table 5

Effects of film mulching modes on yield and agronomic traits of mung bean"

处理
Treatment		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 分枝数
Branches		 单株荚数
Pods per plant		 单荚粒数
Seeds per pod		 百粒重(g)
100-grain weight		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
A1B1 51.2abcAB 3.2aA 17.0abA 6.3abA 6.1aA 1 564.9abcdABC
A1B2 53.8abA 3.0abA 18.1abA 6.2abA 5.9aAB 1 668.6abcABC
A1B3 56.3aA 2.9abA 19.3abA 5.3abA 6.3aA 1 896.7aAB
A2B1 53.8abA 3.1abA 18.6abA 6.4abA 6.1aA 1 657.6abcABC
A2B2 54.5abA 3.1abA 21.7abA 8.2aA 6.1aA 1 923.1aA
A2B3 51.6abAB 3.1abA 22.3aA 7.9aA 5.9aAB 1 839.5abAB
A3B1 46.5cB 2.8abA 18.9abA 7.3abA 5.4bBC 1 258.6dC
A3B2 49.6bcAB 2.6bA 18.1abA 6.1abA 5.3bBC 1 366.8cdBC
A3B3 51.0bcAB 3.1abA 16.4bA 4.8bA 5.1bC 1 479.5bcdABC
[1] 王丽侠, 程须珍, 王素华 . 绿豆种质资源、育种及遗传研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(5):1519-1527.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.05.003
[2] 刘慧 . 我国绿豆生产现状与发展前景. 农业展望, 2012(6):36-39.
[3] 贾志宽, 任小龙, 丁瑞霞 , 等. 旱作农田根域集水种植技术研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[4] 降云峰, 马宏斌, 刘永忠 , 等. 玉米抗旱性鉴定指标研究现状与进展. 山西农业科学, 2012,40(7):800-803.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2012.07.28
[5] 张盼盼, 陈凌, 王君杰 , 等. 覆膜方式对旱地糜子光合特性及产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(6):149-153.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.06.025
[6] 纪晓玲, 岳鹏鹏, 张静 . 不同覆盖方式对绿豆水分利用效率的影响. 水土保持通报, 2011(3):168-170.
[7] 徐宗贵, 孙磊, 王浩 , 等. 种植密度对旱地不同株型春玉米品种光合特性与产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(13):2463-2475.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.006
[8] 王创云, 邓妍, 赵丽 , 等. 不同覆膜栽培方式对玉米光合特性及产量形成的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(30):62-67.
[9] 王立明, 陈光荣, 张国宏 , 等. 黄土塬区旱作大豆覆膜保水技术效果研究. 作物杂志, 2011(6):95-98.
[10] 包开花, 蒙美莲, 陈有君 , 等. 覆膜方式和保水剂对旱作马铃薯土壤水热效应及出苗的影响. 作物杂志, 2015(4):102-108.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.04.023
[11] 姜净卫, 董宝娣, 司福艳 , 等. 地膜覆盖对杂交谷子光合特性、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(6):154-158,194.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.06.026
[12] 苏旺, 屈洋, 冯佰利 , 等. 沟垄覆膜集水模式提高糜子光合作用和产量. 农业工程学报, 2014,30(13):137-145.
[13] 梁杰, 尹智超, 王英杰 , 等. 不同密度和施肥条件对绿豆产量的影响. 园艺与种苗, 2011(6):81-83.
[14] 孔庆全, 赵存虎, 贺小勇 , 等. 绿豆地膜覆盖栽培密度研究. 内蒙古农业科技, 2013(4):33-34,40.
[15] 陈振武, 孙桂华, 赵阳 . 不同氮磷配比量及密度对春播绿豆产量的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2004(6):13-16.
[16] 程须珍 . 绿豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[17] 张春明, 赵雪英, 闫虎斌 , 等. 间作栽培模式下不同小豆品种的光合特性研究. 作物杂志, 2016(6):67-72.
[18] 麻雪艳, 周广胜 . 春玉米最大叶面积指数的确定方法及其应用. 生态学报, 2013,33(8):2596-2603.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201206040808
[19] 宋世佳, 任晓利, 魏志敏 , 等. 覆膜对夏播谷子生长发育与产量的影响机制及其相关性分析. 华北农学报, 2016,31(s1):25-30.
[20] 桑丹丹, 高聚林, 王志刚 , 等. 不同覆膜方式下超高产春玉米花粒期叶片衰老特性研究. 玉米科学, 2009,17(5):77-81.
[21] 高小丽, 孙健敏, 高金锋 , 等. 不同基因型绿豆叶片衰老与活性氧代谢研究. 中国农业科学, 2008,41(9):2873-2880.
[22] 赵雪英, 卢成达, 张泽燕 , 等. 绿豆覆膜栽培效应研究. 农学学报, 2014,4(12):1-3,47.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7774.2014.12.001
[23] 孙梦媛, 刘景辉, 杨彦明 . 全膜单垄垄上微沟播种栽培方式对旱作马铃薯生长及产量的影响. 作物杂 . 2016,(5):101-105.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.017
[24] 高玉红, 牛俊义, 徐锐 , 等. 不同覆膜方式对玉米叶片光合、蒸腾及水分利用效率的影响. 草业学报, 2012,21(5):178-184.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120522
[25] 陈剑, 葛维德 . 高密度种植对不同绿豆株型品种农艺性状及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2013(6):104-109.
[26] 王桂梅, 冯高, 邢宝龙 , 等. 西北区绿豆抗旱高产栽培技术研究. 安徽农学通报, 2013,19(s1):28-29.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[12] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[15] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .