Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 130-137.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.06.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of N, P and K Fertilization on Rapeseed Yield in Different Rotating Areas of Henan Province

Cai Dongfang,Wang Jianping,Zhang Shufen,He Junping,Cao Jinhua,Wen Yancheng,Zhao Lei,Wang Dongguo,Zhu Jiacheng   

  1. Industrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Genetic Improvement in Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2018-04-27 Revised:2018-08-16 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2018-12-06

RichHTML

7

PDF (PC)

169

Abstract:

A “3414” fertilizer experiment was developed to determine the optimum fertilization proportions in various rotating areas of Henan Province. Winter rape variety Fengyou No.10 was used to investigate the N, P and K fertilizer effects on rapeseed yield, agronomy efficiency (AE), nutrient productivity and economic benefit. We then analyzed the recommended optimum fertilizer amounts in various rotating areas by the fertilizer efficiency models. In two rice-rape rotation regions in Huangchuan, the fertilizer formula N2P2K3 produced the highest yield and economic benefit which averaged 3 204.15kg/hm 2 and 13 485.5yuan/hm 2, respectively. The yield was increased by an average of 15.33, 22.20 and 22.17kg corresponding to per kilogram of N, P and K fertilizers, respectively. Therefore, N2P2K3 were the optimum fertilization rates in rice-rape rotation regions in Huangchuan. The fertilizer formula of the highest economic benefit in maize-rape rotation regions in Nanyang was N1P1K2 which produced an economic benefit of 12 599.4yuan/hm 2 and a yield of 2 801.4kg/hm 2. Compared with the highest yield fertilizer formula N2P3K2, the output value of N1P1K2 decreased by 875.3yuan/hm 2, but the economic benefit increased by 472.4yuan/hm 2. The yield was increased by an average of 4.05, 6.07 and 5.87kg corresponding to per kilogram of N, P and K fertilizers, respectively. In conclusion, the optimum fertilization rates in maize-rape rotation regions in Nanyang was N1P1K2. These two fertilization rates would bring about high yields and greate conomic benefit.

Key words: Brassi canapus, N,P and K fertilizer, Yield, Economic benefits

Table 1

Main physical and chemical properties of the soils in three trial points"

试验点
Trial point		 碱解氮
Available N
(mg/kg)		 速效磷
Available P
(mg/kg)		 速效钾
Available K
(mg/kg)		 有机质
Organic matter
(g/kg)
潢川1
Huangchuan 1		 133.50 12.89 58.44 20.35
潢川2
Huangchuan 2		 138.79 3.33 49.62 21.76
南阳
Nanyang		 125.57 42.86 142.23 20.50

Table 2

Designs of the “3414” fertilizer experiment kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 施氮量
N application rate		 施磷量
P2O5application rate		 施钾量
K2O application rate
N0P0K0 0 0 0
N0P2K2 0 120 120
N1P2K2 90 120 120
N2P0K2 180 0 120
N2P1K2 180 60 120
N2P2K2 180 120 120
N2P3K2 180 180 120
N2P2K0 180 120 0
N2P2K1 180 120 60
N2P2K3 180 120 180
N3P2K2 270 120 120
N1P1K2 90 60 120
N1P2K1 90 120 60
N2P1K1 180 60 60

Table 3

Effects of different N, P and K treatments on yield in Brassica napus"

处理
Treatment		 潢川1 Huangchuan 1 潢川2 Huangchuan 2 潢川平均值Average of Huangchuan 南阳Nanyang
产量Yield
(kg/hm2)		 增产率(%)
Increase rate		 产量Yield
(kg/hm2)		 增产率(%)
Increase rate		 产量Yield
(kg/hm2)		 增产率(%)
Increase rate		 产量Yield
(kg/hm2)		 增产率(%)
Increase rate
N0P0K0 265.20d - 200.10f - 232.65f - 1 875.90e -
N0P2K2 780.45d 194.29 690.30e 244.98 735.38e 216.09 1 951.05e 4.01
N1P2K2 2 646.30abc 897.85 1 975.95d 887.48 2 311.13d 893.39 2 051.10de 9.34
N2P0K2 825.45d 211.26 800.40e 300.00 812.93e 249.42 2 126.10cde 13.34
N2P1K2 2 846.40abc 973.30 2 681.40ab 1 240.03 2 763.90abcd 1 088.01 2 201.10bcde 17.34
N2P2K2 3 156.60ab 1 090.27 2 726.40ab 1 262.52 2 941.50ab 1 164.35 2 701.35abc 44.00
N2P3K2 3 256.65ab 1 128.00 2 816.40ab 1 307.50 3 036.53a 1 205.19 2 976.45a 58.67
N2P2K0 2 521.20bc 850.68 2 436.15cbd 1 117.47 2 478.68bcd 965.41 2 376.15abcde 26.67
N2P2K1 3 081.60ab 1 061.99 2 656.35abc 1 227.51 2 868.98abc 1 133.17 2 451.30abcde 30.67
N2P2K3 3 361.65a 1 167.59 3 046.65a 1 422.56 3 204.15a 1 277.24 2 626.35abcd 40.00
N3P2K2 3 266.70ab 1 131.79 2 776.35ab 1 287.48 3 021.53a 1 198.74 2 701.35abc 44.00
N1P1K2 2 551.35bc 862.05 1 990.95d 894.98 2 271.15d 876.21 2 801.40ab 49.34
N1P2K1 2 731.35abc 929.92 2 151.15cd 975.04 2 441.25cd 949.32 2 401.20abcde 28.00
N2P1K1 2 101.05c 692.25 2 591.25abc 1 194.98 2 346.15d 908.45 2 501.25abcde 33.34
平均Average 2 385.15 - 2 110.05 - 2 247.56 - 2 410.20 -

Table 4

The agronomic efficiency in different fertilizer treatments kg/kg"

处理
Treatment		 潢川1 Huangchuan 1 潢川2 Huangchuan 2 潢川平均值Average of Huangchuan 南阳Nanyang
N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O
N0P0K0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
N0P2K2 - 4.29 4.29 - 4.09 4.09 - 4.19 4.19 - 0.63 0.63
N1P2K2 26.46 19.84 19.84 19.73 14.80 14.80 23.09 17.32 17.32 1.95 1.46 1.46
N2P0K2 3.11 - 4.67 3.34 - 5.00 3.22 - 4.84 1.39 - 2.09
N2P1K2 14.34 43.02 21.51 13.79 41.36 20.68 14.06 42.19 21.09 1.81 5.42 2.71
N2P2K2 16.06 24.10 24.10 14.04 21.05 21.05 15.05 22.57 22.57 4.59 6.88 6.88
N2P3K2 16.62 16.62 24.93 14.54 14.54 21.80 15.58 15.58 23.37 6.11 6.11 9.17
N2P2K0 12.53 18.80 - 12.42 18.63 - 12.48 18.72 - 2.78 4.17 -
N2P2K1 15.65 23.47 46.94 13.65 20.47 40.94 14.65 21.97 43.94 3.20 4.80 9.59
N2P2K3 17.20 25.80 17.20 15.81 23.72 15.81 16.51 24.76 16.51 4.17 6.25 4.17
N3P2K2 11.12 25.01 25.01 9.54 21.47 21.47 10.33 23.24 23.24 3.06 6.88 6.88
N1P1K2 25.40 38.10 19.05 19.90 29.85 14.92 22.65 33.98 16.99 10.28 15.43 7.71
N1P2K1 27.40 20.55 41.10 16.26 16.26 32.52 24.54 18.41 36.81 5.84 4.38 8.76
N2P1K1 10.20 30.60 30.60 13.28 39.85 39.85 11.74 35.23 35.23 3.47 10.42 10.42
平均Average 16.34 24.18 23.27 13.86 22.17 21.08 15.33 22.20 22.17 4.05 6.07 5.87

Fig.1

Trends of yield increase with different N treatments in Brassica napus"

Fig.2

Trends of yield increase with different P treatments in Brassica napus"

Fig.3

Trends of yield increase with different K treatments in Brassica napus"

Table 5

The nutrient productivity of yields in different fertilizer treatments"

处理
Treatment		 养分投入量(kg/hm2)
Nutrient input		 单位养分生产力Nutrient productivity (kg/kg) N:P2O5:K20
潢川1 Huangchuan 1 潢川2 Huangchuan 2 潢川平均值Average of Huangchuan 南阳Nanyang
N0P0K0 0 - - - - -
N0P2K2 240 3.3 2.9 3.1 8.1 0:1:1
N1P2K2 330 8.0 6.0 7.0 6.2 1:1.3:1.3
N2P0K2 300 2.8 2.7 2.7 7.1 1:0:0.67
N2P1K2 360 7.9 7.4 7.7 6.1 1:0.3:0.75
N2P2K2 420 7.5 6.5 7.0 6.4 1:0.67:0.67
N2P3K2 480 6.8 5.9 6.3 6.2 1:1:0.67
N2P2K0 300 8.4 8.1 8.3 7.9 1:0.67:0
N2P2K1 360 8.6 7.4 8.0 6.8 1:0.67:0.33
N2P2K3 480 7.0 6.3 6.7 5.5 1:0.67:1
N3P2K2 510 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.3 1:0.44:0.44
N1P1K2 270 9.4 7.4 8.4 10.4 1:0.67:1.33
N1P2K1 270 10.1 8.0 9.0 8.9 1:1.33:0.67
N2P1K1 300 7.0 8.6 7.8 8.3 1:0.33:0.33

"

处理Treatment 养分投入Nutrient input 油菜产值Output value 经济效益Economic benefit
潢川1 Huangchuan 1 潢川2 Huangchuan 2 潢川平均值
Average of Huangchuan		 南阳Nanyang 潢川1 Huangchuan 1 潢川2 Huangchuan 2 潢川平均值
Average of Huangchuan		 南阳Nanyang
N0P0K0 0 1 326.0 1 000.5 1 163.3 9 379.5 1 326.0 1 000.5 1 163.3 9 379.5
N0P2K2 1 560.0 3 902.3 3 451.5 3 676.9 9 755.3 2 342.3 1 891.5 2 116.9 8 195.3
N1P2K2 1 907.6 13 231.5 9 879.8 11 555.7 10 255.5 11 323.9 7 972.1 9 648.0 8 347.9
N2P0K2 1 255.3 4 127.3 4 002.0 4 064.7 10 630.5 2 872.0 2 746.7 2 809.4 9 375.2
N2P1K2 1 755.3 14 232.0 13 407.0 13 819.5 11 005.5 12 476.7 11 651.7 12 064.2 9 250.2
N2P2K2 2 255.3 15 783.0 13 632.0 14 707.5 13 506.8 13 527.7 11 376.7 12 452.2 11 251.5
N2P3K2 2 755.3 16 283.3 14 082.0 15 182.7 14 882.3 13 528.0 11 326.7 12 427.4 12 127.0
N2P2K0 1 695.3 12 606.0 12 180.8 12 393.4 11 880.8 10 910.7 10 485.5 10 698.1 10 185.5
N2P2K1 1 975.3 15 408.0 13 281.8 14 344.9 12 256.5 13 432.7 11 306.5 12 369.6 10 281.2
N2P2K3 2 535.3 16 808.3 15 233.3 16 020.8 13 131.8 14 273.0 12 698.0 13 485.5 10 596.5
N3P2K2 2 602.9 16 333.5 13 881.8 15 107.7 13 506.8 13 730.6 11 278.8 12 504.7 10 903.8
N1P1K2 1 407.6 12 756.8 9 954.8 11 355.8 14 007.0 11 349.1 8 547.1 9 948.1 12 599.4
N1P2K1 1 627.6 13 656.8 10 755.8 12 206.3 12 006.0 12 029.1 9 128.1 10 578.6 10 378.4
N2P1K1 1 475.3 10 505.3 12 956.3 11 730.8 12 506.3 9 030.0 11 481.0 10 255.5 11 031.0
[1] 张书芬, 朱家成, 王建平 , 等. 河南省油菜遗传育种研究进展与主要成效. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(6):34-39.
[2] 邹娟, 鲁剑巍, 陈防 , 等. 氮磷钾硼肥施用对长江流域油菜产量及经济效益的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35(1):87-92.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00087
[3] 杨勇, 刘强, 宋海星 , 等. 不同氮磷钾配比对冬油菜生长和产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(4):70-75.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2011.04.015
[4] 彭建伟, 田昌, 宋海星 , 等. 氮磷钾配比与用量对湘杂油763产量和经济效益的影响. 生态学杂志, 2012,31(4):856-861.
[5] 李慧, 马常宝, 鲁剑魏 , 等. 中国不同区域油菜氮磷钾肥增产效果. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(9):1837-1847.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.09.011
[6] 李银水, 鲁剑巍, 邹娟 , 等. 湖北省油菜氮肥效应及推荐用量研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2008,30(2):218-223.
[7] 李银水, 鲁剑巍, 邹娟 , 等. 湖北省油菜钾肥效应及推荐用量研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2008,30(4):469-475.
[8] 李银水, 鲁剑巍, 邹娟 , 等. 湖北省油菜磷肥效应及推荐用量研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2009,31(1):44-50.
[9] 邹小云, 陈伦林, 李书宇 , 等. 氮、磷、钾、硼肥施用对甘蓝型杂交油菜产量及经济效益的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(5):917-924.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.05.007
[10] 王圣瑞, 陈新平, 高祥照 , 等. “3414”肥料试验模型拟合的探讨. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(4):409-413.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2002.04.006
[11] 陈新平, 张福锁 . 通过“3414”试验建立测土配方施肥技术指标体系. 中国农技推广, 2006,22(4):36-39.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-381X.2006.04.026
[12] 章明清, 李娟, 孔庆波 , 等. 作物肥料效应函数模型研究进展与展望. 土壤学报, 2016,53(6):1343-1356.
[13] 孙义祥, 郭跃升, 于舜帐 , 等. 应用“3414”试验建立冬小麦测土配方施肥指标体系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009,15(1):197-203.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.01.029
[14] 朱桂玉, 区惠平, 何佳 , 等. 免耕水稻在“3414”试验方案中氮磷钾配施的肥料效应研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(5):48-52.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20110509
[15] 王寅, 汪洋, 鲁剑巍 , 等. 直播和移栽冬油菜生长和产量形成对氮磷钾肥的响应差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(1):132-142.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.14430
[16] 邹敏 . 不同配比氮磷钾对油菜产量的影响. 农技服务, 2013,30(10):1059-1060,1062.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8421.2013.10.014
[17] 邹娟, 朱建强, 吴启侠 , 等. 氮磷钾施用对薹花期受渍油菜产量及养分吸收的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2015,54(20):4956-4959.
doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2015.20.009
[18] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰 , 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):915-924.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018
[19] 刘芬, 同延安, 王小英 , 等. 渭北旱塬小麦施肥效果及肥料利用效率研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(3):552-558.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0304
[20] 邹娟, 鲁剑巍, 陈防 , 等. 长江流域油菜氮磷钾肥料利用率现状研究. 作物学报, 2011,37(4):729-734.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00723
[21] 介晓磊, 韩燕来, 谭金芳 , 等. 不同肥力和土壤质地条件下麦田氮肥利用率的研究. 作物学报, 1998,24(6):884-888.
[22] 白苇, 杨素梅, 尹海峰 , 等. 冀西北地区施用氮磷钾肥对食葵产量和经济效益的影响. 作物杂志, 2016(5):131-134.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.022
[23] 代小冬, 徐心志, 朱灿灿 , 等. 谷子氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究. 作物杂志, 2016(5):147-151.
[1] Cui Yanni,Zhan Junhui,Yan Pengqi,Ke Wenjing,Song Ningyuan,Zhang Zhongnan,Wang Liuhang,Huang Yan,Zhang Jing,Zhao Quanzhi. Effects of Different Application Proportion of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Grain-Filling Characteristics and Yield of Hybrid Indica Rice in Southern Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 103-109.
[2] Duan Junjun,Liu Qingfeng,Ren Chunyuan,Yu Song,Yu Lihe,Guo Wei, ,Liang Haiyun. Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns and Densities on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Common Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 110-115.
[3] Lü Wei,Wen Fei,Han Junmei,Wang Ruopeng,Ren Guoxiang,Liu Wenping,Le Meiwang,Sun Jian. Effects of Insect Pollination on Yield Components of Sesame [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 124-129.
[4] Zhao Jinxing,Zhou Wei,Zhan Yingce,Li Yongjie,Gao Hongbo,He Songyu,Zhang Yuxian,Zhang Mingcong. Effects of a New Soil Ameliorants on Soil Physical Properties and Yield of Rice in Saline Meadow Soil [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 138-143.
[5] Wang Lezheng,Hua Fangjing,Cao Pengpeng,Tian Yixin,Gao Fengju. Effects of Sowing Date and Planting Density on Yield and Related Traits in Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 83-88.
[6] Long Suxia,Li Fangfang,Shi Shuya,Zhao Yingjia,Xiao Kai. Effects of Coordinately Application of N, P, and K on Nutrient Contents in Plants and Soils and Wheat Yield [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 96-102.
[7] Zhao Xin,Chen Shaofeng,Wang Hui,Liu Sancai,Yang Xiushi,Zhang Baolin. Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[8] Su Feifei,Zhang Jinghua,Li Yong,Liu Shangwu,Liu Zhenyu,Wang Shaopeng,Wan Shuming,Chen Xi,Gao Yunfei,Hu Linshuang,Dianqiu Lü. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[9] Wu Ronghua,Zhuang Kezhang,Liu Peng,Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[10] Zhang Ruidong,Cao Xiong,Yue Zhongxiao,Liang Xiaohong,Liu Jing,Huang Minjia. Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[11] An Xia,Zhang Haijun,Jiang Fangshan,Lianjie Lü,Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing Densities on the Population Structure and Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[12] Gao Wenjun,Yang Guoyi,Gao Xinzhong,Yu Zhu,Xu Qingfang,Yuan Xiangyang,Sun Yaowu. The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[13] Wang Xiaolin,Ji Xiaoling,Zhang Panpan,Zhang Xiong,Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[14] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9" [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89-94.
[15] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Li Yu,Wang Tianyu. Preservation and Researches on Plant Germplasm Resources in the U.S.A.[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 1 -9 .