Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 138-143.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.06.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of a New Soil Ameliorants on Soil Physical Properties and Yield of Rice in Saline Meadow Soil

Zhao Jinxing1,Zhou Wei2,Zhan Yingce1,Li Yongjie2,Gao Hongbo2,He Songyu1,Zhang Yuxian1,Zhang Mingcong1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
    2 Daqing Qilong Agricultural Science and Technology Limited Company, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2018-06-15 Revised:2018-08-27 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2018-12-06

RichHTML

9

PDF (PC)

235

Abstract:

The effects of saline meadow soil modifier on soil physical properties and yield of rice were studied by both pot and field experiment. The results of pot test were compared, the irrigation improver treatment (T2) significantly increased the electrical conductivity of soil, reduced soil exchangeable sodium content, pH and soil moisture content than that of the pouring water treatment (T1). T2 also increased the mass percentage and organic carbon content of water stable aggregates of different grain size in soil. The field contrast test showed that the application of modifier in 4 test sites could significantly increase the green returning rate of rice, the number of grains per ear and yield per hectare, increases were 83.7%-87.4% (P<0.01), 40.4%-98.3% (P<0.01) and 293.0%-411.2% (P<0.01), respectively, compared with irrigation treatment.Based on the above analyses, the application of soil improver could improve the physical properties of saline meadow soil, increase the rice yield and thereby increase the income for growers.

Key words: Saline meadow soil, Soil ameliorants, Rice, Yield, Physical properties

Table 1

Soil foundation fertility of 0~20cm"

地点
Test site		 速效磷(mg/kg)
Olsen-P		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available K		 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 pH 电导率(μs/cm)
Electrical conductivity
校内盆栽基地Pot base on campus 17.8 135.3 22.6 9.07 1 651
杜蒙县敖林西伯乡Aolinxibo, Dumeng 25.1 148.2 19.1 9.25 1 856
杜蒙县新兴村Xinxing, Dumeng 23.2 155.1 17.9 9.36 1 791
大同区双榆树乡Shuangyushu, Datong 12.6 101.3 18.5 9.23 1 781
白城市通榆县Tongyu, Baicheng 15.4 99.8 23.4 9.09 1 661

Fig.1

Effects of soil modifier on soil electrical conductivity Different uppercase represent significant difference at 0.01 level. The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of soil modifier on soil exchangeable sodium content"

Fig.3

Effects of soil modifier on soil pH"

Fig.4

Effects of soil modifier on soil moisture content"

Table 2

Effects of soil modifier on soil water stable aggregate content"

返青后天数(d)
Days after regreening		 处理
Treatment		 各粒级水稳性团聚体的质量百分比Proportion of different water stable aggregate size (%)
>5.00mm 2.01~5.00mm 1.01~2.00mm 0.51~1.00mm 0.25~0.50mm ≥0.25mm
10 T1 1.27 2.45 2.26 2.21 1.80 9.98
T2 21.92 4.05 15.85 14.00 19.36 75.19
20 T1 1.84 2.14 2.10 2.38 8.02 16.48
T2 17.79 10.96 20.55 11.00 19.26 79.56
30 T1 2.67 3.91 5.85 3.39 3.04 18.86
T2 12.80 7.38 11.13 8.22 19.02 58.55
40 T1 2.62 5.72 7.00 5.11 3.90 24.35
T2 10.20 6.61 14.37 5.35 18.63 55.16

Table 3

Effects of soil modifier on organic carbon content of soil aggregates"

返青后天数(d)
Days after regreening		 处理
Treatment		 土壤有机碳含量Soil organic carbon content (g/kg)
>5.00mm 2.01~5.00mm 1.01~2.00mm 0.51~1.00mm 0.25~0.50mm
10 T1 3.70 2.99 6.56 6.42 5.23
T2 4.18 3.11 7.70 7.33 6.29
20 T1 4.92 1.38 5.62 6.36 9.48
T2 5.24 3.54 7.14 7.57 11.25
30 T1 7.49 5.67 8.55 2.60 8.52
T2 9.83 7.97 10.41 5.07 9.61
40 T1 6.79 1.14 5.14 3.23 8.11
T2 7.23 2.83 10.19 3.79 9.21

Table 4

Effects of soil modifier on rice yield and yield composition of pot culture"

处理
Treatment		 每盆穴数
Hills per pot		 每穴分蘖数
Tillers per hill		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate		 每盆产量(g)
Yield per pot
T1 3Aa 13.9Bb 40.5Bb 19.1Aa 67.1Bb 21.64Bb
T2 3Aa 18.5Aa 56.7Aa 20.4Aa 78.4Aa 50.33Aa

Table 5

Effects of soil modifier on rice yield and yield composition of field culture"

试验地点
Test site		 返青穴数
Turn green hills per m2		 每穴分蘖数
Tillers per hill		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate		 产量(kg/km2)
Yield
对照田CK 13.5Bb 13.5Cc 41.6Cc 19.3Ab 71.2Bc 1 042.4Cc
杜蒙县敖林西伯乡Aolinxibo, Dumeng 24.8Aa 15.1Bb 82.5Aa 21.1Aa 79.2ABb 5 155.6Aa
杜蒙县新兴村Xinxing, Dumeng 24.9Aa 16.6ABb 58.4Bb 21.1Aa 80.4Aab 4 097.1Bb
白城市通榆县Tongyu, Baicheng 25.2Aa 19.2Aa 61.8Bb 20.5Aab 83.5Aa 5 110.9Aa
大同区双榆树乡Shuangyushu, Datong 25.3Aa 18.9Aa 61.7Bb 21.6Aa 83.7Aa 5 329.2Aa

Table 6

Benefit analysis"

试验地点Test site 产量(kg/km2)
Yield		 改良剂投入(元/km2)
Soil modifier input		 增产(kg/km2)
Increase yield		 增效(元/km2)
Increase benefit
对照田CK 1 042.4 — — —
杜蒙县敖林西伯乡Aolinxibo, Dumeng 5 155.6 1 200 4 113.2 11 139.6
杜蒙县新兴村Xinxing, Dumeng 4 097.1 1 200 3 054.7 7 964.1
白城市通榆县Tongyu, Baicheng 5 110.9 1 200 4 068.5 11 060.4
大同区双榆树乡Shuangyushu, Datong 5 329.2 1 200 4 286.8 11 660.4
[1] 王遵亲, 俞仁培, 祝寿泉 . 中国盐渍土. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993.
[2] 张树文, 杨久春, 李颖 , 等. 1950s中期以来东北地区盐碱地时空变化及成因分析. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(3):435-442.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.03.009
[3] Wang J H, Yang Z H, Hu M G , et al. Research of the comprehensive technologies on transformation and utilization of saline land in arid areas. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2001,9(1):64-66.
[4] 刘艳, 李波, 孙文涛 , 等. 生物有机肥对盐碱地春玉米生理特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):98-103.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.017
[5] 王金满, 杨培岭, 张建国 , 等. 脱硫石膏改良碱化土壤过程中的向日葵苗期盐响应研究. 农业工程学报, 2005,21(9):33-37.
[6] 张梅, 王宇, 赵兰坡 . 苏打盐碱土种稻改良的水资源高效利用田间试验研究. 灌溉排水学报, 2014,33(1):132-134.
[7] Abou-Shady A . Reclaiming salt-affected soils using electro remediation technology:PCPSS evaluation. Electrochemical Acta, 2016,190:511-520.
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.036
[8] 刘宝东, 王跃, 梁绮兰 . 土壤改良剂对苏打盐碱土改良效果和对牧草发芽率的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2006,34(3):52-53.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2006.03.020
[9] 龙明杰, 曾繁森 . 高聚物土壤改良剂的研究进展. 土壤通报, 2000,31(5):199-202.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2000.05.016
[10] 王宇, 韩兴, 赵兰坡 . 硫酸铝对苏打盐碱土的改良作用研究. 水土保持学报, 2006,20(4):50-53.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.04.012
[11] Lakhdar A, Hafsi C, Rabhi M . Application of municipal solid waste compost reduces the negative effects of saline water in Hordeum maritimum L. Bioresour Technology, 2008,99(15):7160-7167.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.071 pmid: 18308562
[12] Wallker D, Bernal P . The effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil. Bioresurce Technology, 2008,99(2):396-403.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.006 pmid: 17275292
[13] Cui S Y, Zhang J J, Sun M F , et al. Leaching effectiveness of desalinization by rainfall combined with wheat straw mulching on heavy saline soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2018,64(7):340-365.
doi: 10.1080/03650340.2017.1407871
[14] 李杰, 姬景红, 李玉影 , 等. 施用改良剂对大庆盐碱土的改良效果研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(2):50-54.
[15] 潘世驹 . 寒地水稻耐盐碱资源筛选及产量品质稳定性研究. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2016.
[16] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析(第三版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1981.
[17] 王丽, 李军, 李娟 , 等. 轮耕与施肥对渭北旱作玉米田土壤团聚体和有机碳含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(3):759-768.
[18] 双龙, 妮萨娜, 杜江 , 等. 重铬酸钾氧化-外加热法测定化探土壤样品中有机碳含量. 安徽化工, 2016,42(4):110-112.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-553X.2016.04.041
[19] 程镜润, 陈小华, 刘振鸿 , 等. 脱硫石膏改良滨海盐碱土的脱盐过程与效果实验研究. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(6):1505-1513.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2014.06.020
[20] Rhoades J D, Loveday J . Salinity in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy, 1990,30(1):1089-1142.
[21] 王善仙, 刘宛, 李培军 , 等. 盐碱土植物改良研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(24):1-7.
[22] 刘彩霞, 黄为一 . 耐盐碱细菌与有机物料对盐碱土团聚体形成的影响. 土壤, 2010,42(1):111-116.
[23] 刘建霞, 张晓丹, 王润梅 , 等. 6-BA浸种对盐胁迫下绿豆萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(1):166-172.
[24] 张玉凤, 林海涛, 王江涛 , 等. 盐碱土壤调理剂对玉米生长及土壤的改良效果. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(1):134-138.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170122
[25] 殷厚民, 胡建, 王青青 , 等. 松嫩平原西部盐碱土旱作改良研究进展与展望. 土壤通报, 2017,48(1):236-242.
[1] Duan Junjun,Liu Qingfeng,Ren Chunyuan,Yu Song,Yu Lihe,Guo Wei, ,Liang Haiyun. Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns and Densities on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Common Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 110-115.
[2] Cai Dongfang,Wang Jianping,Zhang Shufen,He Junping,Cao Jinhua,Wen Yancheng,Zhao Lei,Wang Dongguo,Zhu Jiacheng. Effects of N, P and K Fertilization on Rapeseed Yield in Different Rotating Areas of Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 130-137.
[3] Long Suxia,Li Fangfang,Shi Shuya,Zhao Yingjia,Xiao Kai. Effects of Coordinately Application of N, P, and K on Nutrient Contents in Plants and Soils and Wheat Yield [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 96-102.
[4] Cui Yanni,Zhan Junhui,Yan Pengqi,Ke Wenjing,Song Ningyuan,Zhang Zhongnan,Wang Liuhang,Huang Yan,Zhang Jing,Zhao Quanzhi. Effects of Different Application Proportion of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Grain-Filling Characteristics and Yield of Hybrid Indica Rice in Southern Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 103-109.
[5] Wang Lezheng,Hua Fangjing,Cao Pengpeng,Tian Yixin,Gao Fengju. Effects of Sowing Date and Planting Density on Yield and Related Traits in Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 83-88.
[6] Lü Wei,Wen Fei,Han Junmei,Wang Ruopeng,Ren Guoxiang,Liu Wenping,Le Meiwang,Sun Jian. Effects of Insect Pollination on Yield Components of Sesame [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 124-129.
[7] Wang Fuhua,Xue Huazheng,Wang Ya,Wang Shengxuan,Wang Yuetao,Fu Jing,Yang Wenbo,Bai Tao,Li Junzou,Yin Haiqing. Breeding Fragrant Rice Zhengdao19 Using CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Gene Editing Technology [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 36-42.
[8] Ji Shengdong,Li Peng,Li Jiangwei,Song Liumin,Liu Miaomiao,Gao Kuanglong,Yin Haiqing. Analysis of Peroxidase Zymogram and Genetic Effects between Rice Lines and Their Parents During Grain Filling [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 17-20.
[9] Ma Mengli,Zheng Yun,Zhou Xiaomei,Zhang Tingting,Zhang Xiaoqian,Lu Bingyue. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Red Rice from Hani’s Terraced Fields in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 21-26.
[10] Zhao Xin,Chen Shaofeng,Wang Hui,Liu Sancai,Yang Xiushi,Zhang Baolin. Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[11] Wu Ronghua,Zhuang Kezhang,Liu Peng,Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[12] Su Feifei,Zhang Jinghua,Li Yong,Liu Shangwu,Liu Zhenyu,Wang Shaopeng,Wan Shuming,Chen Xi,Gao Yunfei,Hu Linshuang,Dianqiu Lü. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[13] Zhang Ruidong,Cao Xiong,Yue Zhongxiao,Liang Xiaohong,Liu Jing,Huang Minjia. Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[14] Chen Yingying,Wangxu Yiling,Zhu Yuhan,Wu Wei,Liu Tao,Sun Chengming. Hyperspectral Estimation of Nitrogen Content in Rice Panicle [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 116-120.
[15] An Xia,Zhang Haijun,Jiang Fangshan,Lianjie Lü,Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing Densities on the Population Structure and Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!