Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 27-32.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.05.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area

Zhao Xin1,Chen Shaofeng2,Wang Hui3,Liu Sancai4,Yang Xiushi4,Zhang Baolin1   

  1. 1 Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
    2 Grassland Institute of Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, China
    3 High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Datong 037008, Shanxi, China
    4 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2018-03-23 Revised:2018-06-20 Online:2018-10-15 Published:2018-10-12
  • Contact: Baolin Zhang

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

204

Abstract:

To screen the intrinsic relationship between the high-yield and good-quality tartary buckwheat varieties in the Northern Shanxi area and to explore the inner links between yield and nutrient quality, 14 varieties were used as materials to analyze the differences of agronomic traits, yield and major quality traits. The results showed that the top four varieties were Yunqiao No.2, Jinkuqiao No.2, Xiqiao No.5 and Jinkuqiao No.6, which increased by 25.5%, 23.6%, 15.3% and 12.2% higher than the average yield of the fourteen varieties, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation (P<0.05) between yield and grain numbers per plant, 1000-grain weight, the number of stem node and the number of branches. There was a significant positive correlation (P<0.05) between yield and protein and starch content. There was no significant (r=-0.227) and negative correlation between yield and flavones content. The varieties with relatively higher yield (Yunqiao No.2 and Yangpingzaoshuqiao) were of relatively lower quality, while the varieties with the highest protein and flavones content were at relatively lower yield. The results of comprehensive analyze of the yield and quality showed that Jinkuqiao No.2 achieved the relatively higher level of yield and the highest level of protein yield and flavones yield. It is a variety with high yield and good quality suitable for cultivation in the Northern Shanxi area.

Key words: Tatary buckwheat, Variety, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Name and origin of tartary buckwheat varieties"

编号No. 品种Variety 来源Origin
1 晋苦荞2号Jinkuqiao No.2 山西
2 晋苦荞6号Jinkuqiao No.6 山西
3 广灵苦荞2号Guanglingkuqiao No.2 山西
4 羊坪早熟荞Yangpingzaoshuqiao 云南
5 格务Gewu 云南
6 云荞1号Yunqiao No.1 云南
7 云荞2号Yunqiao No.2 云南
8 六苦04号Liuku No.04 贵州
9 黔苦5号Qianku No.5 贵州
10 黔苦6号Qianku No.6 贵州
11 川荞3号Chuanqiao No.3 四川
12 西荞5号Xiqiao No.5 四川
13 酉苦1号Youku No.1 重庆
14 三亚18 Sanya 18 海南

Table 2

Agronomic traits of different tartary buckwheat varieties"

品种Variety 生育期(d)
Growth
period		 株高(cm)
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Node number
of main stem		 分枝数
Branch
number		 单株粒重(g)
Grain weight
per plant		 单株粒数
Grain number
per plant		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain
weight
晋苦荞2号Jinkuqiao No.2 110 103.2cd 21.0b 5.9b 3.6a 166.2bc 21.5a
晋苦荞6号Jinkuqiao No.6 105 104.2cd 20.8b 5.5bc 3.1bc 154.5de 20.0bc
羊坪早熟荞Yangpingzaoshuqiao 116 99.1d 23.1a 5.4bc 3.3b 170.2b 19.4c
格务Gewu 116 110.2ab 23.9a 3.6f 2.5de 126.6gh 19.9bc
六苦04号Liuku No.04 91 100.0d 17.7de 4.0e 2.4e 119.3h 18.1de
云荞1号Yunqiao No.1 91 100.7cd 20.1bc 6.7a 2.5de 149.7e 18.6d
云荞2号Yunqiao No.2 91 93.1e 17.2e 5.8b 3.1bc 185.3a 17.8ef
酉苦1号Youku No.1 105 103.3cd 19.1cd 4.4d 2.5de 130.8fg 18.7d
川荞3号Chuanqiao No.3 105 91.7e 17.7de 5.0c 2.6de 134.2f 19.4c
黔苦5号Qianku No.5 105 111.4a 20.2bc 4.6cd 2.7d 143.2ef 18.7d
黔苦6号Qianku No.6 105 103.3cd 18.4cde 4.5cd 3.0c 147.4ef 20.2b
三亚18 Sanya 18 91 99.4d 18.9cde 5.6b 2.3e 115.6h 17.4f
西荞5号Xiqiao No.5 110 105.9bc 20.1bc 5.6b 3.3b 160.5cd 20.3b
广灵苦荞2号Guanglingkuqiao No.2 105 90.1e 19.4bcd 4.7cd 2.7d 135.9f 19.5c
平均Average 103 101.1 19.7 4.9 2.8 145.7 19.3
变异系数Variable coefficient (%) 8.6 6.2 9.9 18.5 14.2 13.9 5.8
变异范围Variable range 91~116 90.1~111.4 17.2~23.9 3.6~6.7 2.3~3.6 115.6~185.3 17.4~21.5

Fig.1

Comparison of the yield of different tartary buckwheat varieties"

Table 3

Correlation analysis of yield and agronomy traits"

相关系数
Correlation
coefficient		 产量
Yield		 生育期
Growth
period		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Node number
of main stem		 分枝数
Branch
number		 单株粒重
Grain weight
per plant		 单株粒数
Grain number
per plant		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight
产量Yield 1 0.264 0.007 0.391* 0.380* 0.860** 0.897** 0.537**
生育期Growth period 1 0.344* 0.432** -0.148 0.452** -0.068 0.720**
株高Plant height 1 0.492** -0.236 0.045 -0.054 0.257
主茎节数Node number of main stem 1 0.185 0.361* 0.351* 0.332*
分枝数Branch number 1 0.345* 0.395* -0.013
单株粒重Grain weight per plant 1 0.805** 0.642**
单株粒数Grain number per plant 1 0.319*
千粒重1000-grain weight 1

Table 4

Nutrient contents and yields of different varieties"

品种Variety 蛋白质Protein 淀粉Starch 脂肪Fat 黄酮Flavone
含量(%)
Content		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 含量(%)
Content		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 含量(%)
Content		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 含量(%)
Content		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
晋苦荞2号Jinkuqiao No.2 17.2bc 369.2a 64.0cd 1 372.8b 3.78e 81.1a 2.02de 43.3a
晋苦荞6号Jinkuqiao No.6 16.8cde 326.7cd 64.6bc 1 257.8c 3.24g 63.0d 2.12c 41.3b
羊坪早熟荞Yangpingzaoshuqiao 15.9gh 306.3f 65.4ab 1 263.5c 3.98c 76.9b 1.96ef 37.8e
格务Gewu 17.0cd 269.6g 62.9e 998.1fg 3.50f 55.5g 2.22b 35.3f
六苦04号Liuku No.04 16.1fg 217.0j 64.1cd 861.4h 4.32a 58.1f 2.22b 29.8i
云荞1号Yunqiao No.1 17.9a 321.3de 63.4de 1 137.9e 4.19b 75.2b 2.21bc 39.6c
云荞2号Yunqiao No.2 15.2h 331.5c 67.0a 1 458.5a 3.75e 81.6a 1.94ef 42.3ab
酉苦1号Youku No.1 16.5ef 241.4i 65.0bc 953.3g 4.13b 60.6e 2.46a 36.1f
川荞3号Chuanqiao No.3 17.3bc 256.3h 65.7ab 975.3g 3.27g 48.5h 2.16bc 32.1h
黔苦5号Qianku No.5 16.2fg 253.3h 65.5ab 1 026.5f 4.12b 64.5d 2.15bc 33.7g
黔苦6号Qianku No.6 17.0cd 318.6e 64.3cd 1 206.0d 3.91cd 73.3c 2.04d 38.3de
三亚18 Sanya 18 16.7de 208.8k 64.6bc 808.6i 3.85de 48.1h 1.71h 21.4j
西荞5号Xiqiao No.5 17.5ab 350.1b 63.7de 1 274.5c 3.79e 75.8b 1.95ef 39.0cd
广灵苦荞2号Guanglingkuqiao No.2 15.5h 264.9g 65.9ab 1 126.6e 3.42f 58.5f 1.93g 32.9gh
平均Average 16.6 288.2 64.7 1 122.9 3.80 65.8 2.08 35.9
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 4.64 17.42 1.72 17.21 8.99 17.51 8.78 16.10
变异范围Range of variation 15.2~17.5 208.8~369.2 62.9~67.0 808.6~1458.5 3.24~4.32 48.1~81.6 1.71~2.46 21.4~43.3
F 24.6** 426.2** 7.8** 294.4** 107.8** 408.7** 46.0** 243.6**

Fig.2

Cluster dendrogram of 14 tartary buckwheat varieties on protein content and flavone content 1-14: Number of the varieties (Table 1)"

Table 5

Correlation analysis of yield and nutrition contents"

相关系数
Correlation coefficient		 产量
Yield		 蛋白质含量
Protein content		 淀粉含量
Starch content		 脂肪含量
Fat content		 黄酮含量
Flavone content
产量Yield 1 0.311* -0.426* -0.195 -0.227
蛋白质含量Protein content 1 -0.750** -0.036 -0.359*
淀粉含量Starch content -1 -0.185 -0.241
脂肪含量Fat content -1 -0.222
黄酮含量Flavone content -1
[1] 任长忠, 赵钢 . 中国荞麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 1.
[2] 张美莉, 胡小松 . 荞麦生物活性物质及其功能研究进展. 杂粮作物, 2004,24(1):26-29.
[3] 王敏, 魏益民, 高锦明 . 苦荞黄酮的抗脂质过氧化和红细胞保护作用研究. 中国食品学报, 2006,6(1):278-283.
[4] Chlopicka J, Pasko P, Gorinstein S , et al. Total phenolic and total flavonoid content,antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of pseudocereal breads. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2012,46:548-555.
[5] 李引平 . 山西省小杂粮生产优势及发展思路. 山西农业科学, 2010,38(2):3-5.
[6] 蔡旭 . 植物遗传育种学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1976: 202-203.
[7] 程晓彬, 向达兵, 赵钢 , 等. 川西高原不同苦荞品种生态适应性研究. 种子, 2017,10(10):63-68.
[8] 王慧, 杨媛, 杨明君 , 等. 晋北地区旱作苦荞麦品种筛选. 山西农业科学, 2013,41(4):321-323.
[9] 尹春, 刘金泉, 张雄杰 , 等. 甜荞种质资源生物学性状分析. 作物杂志, 2009(5):48-50.
[10] 杨玉霞, 吴卫, 郑有良 , 等. 苦荞主要农艺性状与单株籽粒产量的相关和通径分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(16):6719-6721,6746.
[11] 李秀莲, 林如法, 乔爱花 . 苦荞主要性状的相关及通径分析. 国外农学—杂粮作物, 1997(2):25-27.
[12] 杨明君, 郭忠贤, 陈有清 , 等. 苦荞麦主要经济性状遗传参数研究. 内蒙古农业科技, 2005(5):19-20.
[13] 杨修仕, 郭忠贤, 郭慧敏 , 等. 播期和播量对荞麦产量及主要品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(1):88-93.
[14] 李志西, 杜双奎, 于修烛 , 等. 荞麦粉营养品质与加工特性研究. 西北植物学报, 2003,23(5):771-776.
[15] 杜双奎, 李志西, 于修烛 , 等. 荞麦蛋白研究进展. 食品科学, 2004,25(10):409-414.
[1] Su Guihua,Li Chunlei,Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[2] Wu Ronghua,Zhuang Kezhang,Liu Peng,Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei,Zhang Jinghua,Li Yong,Liu Shangwu,Liu Zhenyu,Wang Shaopeng,Wan Shuming,Chen Xi,Gao Yunfei,Hu Linshuang,Dianqiu Lü. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong,Cao Xiong,Yue Zhongxiao,Liang Xiaohong,Liu Jing,Huang Minjia. Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia,Zhang Haijun,Jiang Fangshan,Lianjie Lü,Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing Densities on the Population Structure and Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Li Shaokun,Zhang Wanxu,Wang Keru,Han Dongsheng,Yang Xiaoxia,Chen Yongsheng,Yu Wanbing,Liu Chaowei,Zhang Guoqiang,Liu Fenghe,Chen Jianglu,Yang Jingjing,Li Lulu,Xie Ruizhi,Hou Peng,Ming Bo. Study on Maize Mechanical Grain Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[7] Gao Wenjun,Yang Guoyi,Gao Xinzhong,Yu Zhu,Xu Qingfang,Yuan Xiangyang,Sun Yaowu. The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin,Ji Xiaoling,Zhang Panpan,Zhang Xiong,Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .