Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 182-187.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.05.027

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Studies on Physiological Characteristics and Main Agronomic Traits of Five Cassava Varieties

Luo Xinglu1,2(), Huang Xiaofeng3, Wu Meiyan1, Liu Shanqian1, Zhao Bowei1   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, Guangxi, China
    2State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agricultural Biological Resources, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
    3Chongzuo Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530215, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2020-02-15 Revised:2020-03-27 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-12

RichHTML

11

PDF (PC)

254

Abstract:

The physiological characteristics and main agronomic traits of cassava varieties Xixuan 07, Guiken 09-11, Fuxuan 01, Nanzhi 199 and Huanan 205 were studied. The results showed that the contents of chlorophyll, sucrose, soluble sugar in leaves, yield and starch contents of different cassava varieties were significantly different. Xixuan 07 had the highest root tuber yield, followed by Guiken 09-11 and Fuxuan 01. Nanzhi 199 had the highest starch content, followed by Fuxuan 01 and Xixuan 07; Xixuan 07 had the highest starch yield, followed by Fuxuan 01 and Guiken 09-11. The root tuber numbers, length, diameter and the root tuber weight per plant of Xixuan 07 were the highest in all cassava varieties used in the test. Nanzhi 199 had the highest contents of sucrose and soluble sugar in leaves, followed by Xixuan 07 and Fuxuan 01. There were significant positive correlations between the content of sucrose and soluble sugar in leaves, and the content of starch in root tubers. The contents of sucrose and soluble sugar could be used as physiological indexes for evaluation of high starch cassava cultivars. The starch yield was a comprehensive index reflecting the capacity of cassava starch production. It is more scientific and reasonable that the starch yield is used as a quality evaluation index of cassava varieties. The starch yield can reflect the comprehensive ability of cassava starch production, and it can be used as an index to evaluate the quality of cassava varieties.

Key words: Cassava varieties, Physiological characteristics, Agronomic trait, Yield, Starch content

Table 1

Chlorophyll content of different cassava varieties in different periods mg/g"

品种
Variety		 苗期
Seedling stage		 块根形成期
Root tuber formation stage		 块根膨大期
Root tuber bulking stage		 块根成熟期
Root tuber maturity stage
西选07 Xixuan 07 2.98±0.18aA 4.22±0.25aA 4.31±0.65aA 4.16±0.83aA
辐选01 Fuxuan 01 2.89±0.17aA 3.54±0.08bA 4.28±0.67aA 4.12±0.81aA
桂垦09-11 Guiken 09-11 2.16±0.31bAB 4.18±0.33aA 3.68±0.44aA 2.73±1.24bA
南植199 Nanzhi 199 2.87±0.30aA 4.12±0.40aA 3.89±0.72aA 3.66±0.41abA
华南205 Huanan 205 1.96±0.20cB 3.84±0.08bA 3.96±0.27aA 3.62±1.43abA

Table 2

Contents of sucrose and total soluble sugar in leaves of different cassava varieties %"

品种
Variety		 苗期
Seedling stage		 块根形成期
Root tuber formation stage		 块根膨大期
Root tuber bulking stage		 块根成熟期
Root tuber maturity stage
蔗糖
Sucrose		 可溶性总糖
Soluble sugar		 蔗糖
Sucrose		 可溶性总糖
Soluble sugar		 蔗糖
Sucrose		 可溶性总糖
Soluble sugar		 蔗糖
Sucrose		 可溶性总糖
Soluble sugar
西选07 Xixuan 07 4.68±0.62aA 8.93±0.88aA 5.42±0.03aA 9.29±0.25aA 5.83±0.23aA 9.84±0.38aA 4.90±0.37aA 8.24±0.58aA
辐选01 Fuxuan 01 4.46±0.81aA 8.92±0.06aA 5.87±0.56aA 9.27±0.55aA 5.98±0.36aA 9.97±0.57aA 4.88±0.47aA 8.17±0.54aA
桂垦09-11 Guiken 09-11 3.11±0.72bA 7.16±0.95bA 4.22±0.42bA 7.17±0.63bA 4.13±0.51bA 7.22±0.66bA 3.43±0.54bA 6.04±0.65bA
南植199 Nanzhi 199 4.73±0.69aA 8.97±1.27aA 5.95±0.52aA 9.63±0.57aA 5.99±0.43aA 9.98±0.45aA 4.92±0.46aA 8.38±0.45aA
华南205 Huanan 205 3.35±0.75bA 7.37±0.18bA 4.66±0.48bA 7.46±0.63bA 4.83±0.47bA 7.66±0.72bA 3.86±0.43bA 6.58±0.72bA

Table 3

Plant height and stem diameter of different cassava varieties cm"

品种
Variety		 苗期
Seedling stage		 块根形成期
Root tuber formation stage		 块根膨大期
Root tuber bulking stage		 块根成熟期
Root tuber maturity stage
株高
Plant height		 茎径
Stem diameter		 株高
Plant height		 茎径
Stem diameter		 株高
Plant height		 茎径
Stem diameter		 株高
Plant height		 茎径
Stem diameter
西选07 Xixuan 07 62.2±5.6aA 1.5±0.8aA 167.3±7.6aA 2.7±0.8aA 285.2±5.8aA 3.1±0.8aA 365.2±5.9aA 4.1±0.8aA
辐选01 Fuxuan 01 61.2±9.3aA 1.4±0.4aA 166.5±7.8aA 2.8±0.4aA 283.2±9.5aA 3.1±0.4aA 363.2±9.4aA 3.8±0.6aA
桂垦09-11 Guiken 09-11 66.0±10.7aA 1.8±0.9aA 170.6±8.6aA 2.9±0.8aA 298.7±10.2aA 3.4±0.9aA 374.7±10.6aA 4.3±0.9aA
南植199 Nanzhi 199 44.9±3.3bB 0.8±0.5bB 113.5±8.6bB 1.8±0.9bB 154.9±4.3bB 2.1±0.5bB 174.9±4.6bB 2.8±0.8bB
华南205 Huanan 205 48.1±4.5bB 0.9±0.8bB 115.8±8.4bB 1.9±0.7bB 164.1±6.5bB 2.3±0.8bB 188.1±6.8bB 2.9±0.7bB

Table 4

Main economic characters of different cassava varieties"

品种
Variety		 块根数
Number of root tubers
 块根长
Root tuber length (cm)		 块根粗
Root tuber diameter (cm)		 块根重(kg/株)
Root tuber weight (kg/plant)
西选07 Xixuan 07 9.4±0.3aA 45.2±4.2aA 6.2±0.6aA 4.9±0.8aA
辐选01 Fuxuan 01 8.9±0.7aA 44.8±5.8aA 5.9±0.4aA 4.6±0.7aA
桂垦09-11 Guiken 09-11 9.2±0.4aA 42.9±2.6aA 5.8±0.6aA 4.7±0.6aA
南植199 Nanzhi 199 7.2±0.8bB 34.9±1.3bB 5.2±0.8bB 3.2±0.8bB
华南205 Huanan 205 7.6±0.6bB 35.8±2.4bB 5.4±0.9bB 3.4±0.5bB

Table 5

Yield and starch content of root tuber of different cassava varieties"

品种Variety 块根产量Root tuber yield (kg/hm2) 块根淀粉含量Starch content of root tuber (%) 淀粉产量Starch yield (kg/hm2)
西选07 Xixuan 07 58 863.4±1 025.3aA 32.0±2.6aA 18 836.3±1 024.2aA
辐选01 Fuxuan 01 55 264.5±978.7bA 32.1±3.2aA 17 739.9±1 168.9bA
桂垦09-11 Guiken 09-11 56 458.9±1 054.6bA 29.4±2.9bA 16 598.9±1 057.4cB
南植199 Nanzhi 199 38 458.6±986.4dC 33.8±2.6aA 12 999.0±998.7dC
华南205 Huanan 205 43 836.4±894.7cB 30.7±3.8bA 13 457.8±1 057.4dC

Table 6

Correlation coefficient between sucrose and soluble sugar content in leaves and starch content of root tuber of cassava"

指标Index 蔗糖含量
Sucrose content		 可溶性糖含量
Soluble sugar content		 块根淀粉含量
Starch content of root tuber
蔗糖含量Sucrose content 1
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content 0.762* 1
块根淀粉含量Starch content of root tuber 0.912** 0.904** 1
[1] 李开棉, 林雄, 黄洁. 国内外木薯科研发展概况. 热带农业科学, 2001(2):56-60.
[2] 罗兴录, 潘晓璐, 朱艳梅. 木薯内源ABA含量与块根淀粉积累关系研究. 热带作物学报, 2018,39(3):472-479.
[3] 刘珊廷, 罗兴录, 吴美艳, 等. 连作与轮作下木薯产量及土壤微生物特征比较. 热带作物学报, 2019,40(8):1468-1473.
[4] 单忠英, 罗兴录, 韦丽梅, 等. 木薯MeCPN20基因的克隆及其干旱胁迫下的表达分析. 分子植物育种, 2019,17(23):7676-7682.
[5] 韦婉羚, 罗兴录, 潘晓璐, 等. 木薯不同品种朱砂叶螨抗性与其叶片内含物的关系. 中国农业大学学报, 2020,25(5):13-21.
[6] 黄堂伟, 罗兴录, 单忠英, 等. 不同木薯品种生理特性及产量比较研究. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(8):64-69.
[7] 陶林, 罗兴录. 土壤调理剂对土壤肥力和木薯产量的影响. 广东农业科学, 2018,45(2):61-67.
[8] 罗兴录, 劳天源. 木薯品种生长发育及淀粉积累特性研究. 中国农学通报, 2001,17(4):22-27.
[9] 罗兴录, 王艳, 肖世云, 等. 不同木薯品种生理及块根淀粉积累特性研究. 中国农学通报, 2008,24(4):240-244.
[10] 陈冠喜, 李开绵, 叶剑秋, 等. 6个木薯品种生长发育及产量性状的初步研究. 热带农业科学, 2009,29(6):26-29.
[11] 林洪鑫, 袁展汽, 刘仁根, 等. 江西红壤旱地木薯农艺性状与产量的关系初步研究. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(27):204-208.
[12] 陈会鲜, 罗兴录, 袁圣勇, 等. 不同木薯品种茎叶可溶性糖与块根淀粉积累特性研究. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(6):972-979.
[13] 张宪政. 作物生理研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.
[14] 薛应龙. 植物生理学实验手册. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1985.
[15] 何照范. 粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术. 北京: 农业出版社, 1985.
[16] 刘光华. 云南木薯高效栽培技术. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2010.
[17] 罗兴录. 木薯主要农艺性状的相关与通径分析. 中国农学通报, 2001,17(3):36-37.
[18] 杨守臻, 陈怀珠, 李初英, 等. 木薯主要农艺性状的遗传变异、相关性和主成分分析. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(7):232-234.
[19] 罗兴录, 池敏青, 黄小凤, 等. 木薯叶片可溶性糖含量与块根淀粉积累的关系. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(8):289-291.
[20] 池敏青. 木薯块根淀粉积累过程生理生化特性研究. 南宁:广西大学, 2007.
[21] 黄堂伟, 罗兴录, 樊吴静, 等. 不同木薯品种苗期长势及叶片生理特性比较. 南方农业学报, 2017(1):51-56.
[22] 罗兴录, 岑忠用, 谢和霞, 等. 不同木薯品种抗衰老生理与淀粉积累特性研究. 作物学报, 2007,33(6):1018-1024.
[23] Sarah A, Morag F, Steve R, et al. Information resoureces for cassava research and breeding. Tropical Plant Biology, 2012,5:140-151.
doi: 10.1007/s12042-012-9093-x
[24] Ceballos H, Igleas A C, Perez J C, et al. Cassava breeding:opportunities and challenges. Plant Molecular Biology, 2004,56:506-516.
[25] El-sharkawy M A. International research on cassava photosynthesis,productivity,eco-physiology,and responses to environmental streses in the tropics. Photosynthetica, 2006,44(4):481-512.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-006-0063-0
[26] 岑忠用, 罗兴录, 谢和霞, 等. 不同木薯品种抗衰老生理特性研究. 西南农业学报, 2004(5):609-612.
[27] 姜太玲, 刘光华, 周迎春, 等. 不同品种木薯的主要品质特征与综合评价. 食品工业科技, 2019,40(20):251-255,261.
[28] 单忠英, 罗兴录, 樊吴静, 等. 干旱胁迫对木薯苗生理特性影响研究. 热带作物学报, 2015,36(2):339-343.
[29] 林洪鑫, 袁展汽, 刘仁根, 等. 江西红壤旱地木薯农艺性状与产量的关系初步研究. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(27):204-208.
[30] 刘倩, 刘光华, 宋记明, 等. 6个木薯品种在云南不同地区的适应性研究初报. 西部林业科学, 2018,47(1):39-46.
[31] 李罡, 邓国军, 赵大伟. 木薯新品种(系)鉴定试验总结. 南方农业, 2018,12(18):186-187.
[1] Cao Xiaochuang, Li Yefeng, Wu Longlong, Zhu Chunquan, Zhu Lianfeng, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu. Effects of Organic Soluble Fertilizer on the Accumulation and Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 110-118.
[2] Sun Qi, Geng Yanqiu, Jin Feng, Liu Lixin, Zheng Huantong, Guo Liying, Shao Xiwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield, Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocationin Organs after Anthesis of Direct Seeding Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 119-126.
[3] Hao Xiyu, Xiao Huanyu, Liang Jie, Wang Yingjie, Guo Wenyun. Effects and Optimum Rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer for Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 127-132.
[4] Luo Yuqiong, Yan Bo, Wu Ke, Xie Huimin, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of No-Tillage and Straw Returning on Soil Fertility and Rice Yield in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 133-139.
[5] Ding Kaixin, Shan Ying, Feng Naijie, Zheng Dianfeng, Liang Xilong, Wu Qiong, Huang Wenting. Effects of DTA-6 on Physiological Metabolism and Yield of Two Edible Legumes [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 148-153.
[6] Kang Kai, Liu Lihua, Qin Meng, Zheng Guiping, Zhang Xuesong, Bai Chongyang, Zhao Shuang, Gao Xiaohui. Effects of Ridge Tillage of Double Depth and Planting Space on Photosynthesis, Yield and Panicle Traits of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 164-169.
[7] Zhou Haitao, Zhao Mengyuan, Zhang Xinjun, Li Tianliang, Liu Wenting, Liu Zhenning, Yang Xiaohong, Yuan Huifu. Effects of Mepiquat Chloride and Chlorocholine Chloride on the Growth and Yield of Oat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 188-193.
[8] Jia Suqing, He Lu, Du Yanwei. Effects of Different Tillage Methods on Root Development,Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Millet in Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 194-198.
[9] Zheng Di, Wen Chunyan, Shen Xianhua, Hu Biaolin, Che Jüqin, Xiong Yunhua, Wang Zhiquan, Wu Yanshou. Analysis on Variation in Rice Yield Components and Quality at Different Altitudes in Tibet [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 199-203.
[10] Wang Furong, Zhang Jianxue, Guo Minjiang, Zhang Yahong, Fan Tiping, Wang Yahong, Zhang Yan, Pei Guoping, Lei Jianming. Effects of Post-Emergence Herbicide Spraying at Different Stages on Weed Control, and Yield and Quality of Winter Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 204-208.
[11] Yang Xuele, Zhang Lu, Li Zhiqing, He Luqiu. Diversity Analysis of Tartary Buckwheat Germplasms Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 53-58.
[12] Sun Daowang, Wang Yanqing, Hong Bo, Lu Wenjie, Yin Guifang, Wang Lihua. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Winter Sowing Oats in Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 80-87.
[13] Yang Haifeng, Duan Xueyan, Wei Ling, Liu Bo. The Genetic Study of Yield Traits in Edible Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 93-97.
[14] Zhang Xiaoyan, Wang Xiaonan, Cao Kun, Sun Yufeng. Correlation Analysis of Fiber Yield and Yield Components in Five Industrial Hemp Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 121-126.
[15] Qin Hongde, Rong Yihua, Huang Xiaoli, Hu Aibing, Zhou Jiahua, Yan Xianhui, Li Wei, Zhang Xianhong, Li Hongju, Yang Guozheng. Responses of Cotton to Planting Densities and Nitrogen Rates under Direct Seeding in Summer with Simplified Fertilization [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 127-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!