Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 123-129.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.04.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimal Specification of Tobacco Seedling Tray for Small Seedling Transplanting under Plastic Film

Zhang Jiuquan1(), Yu Xiangwen2, Ling Aifen3, Wang Yong3, Li Leilei1, Dong Jianxin1   

  1. 1Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China
    2Sichuan Provincial Tobacco Sciences Institute, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
    3Liangshan Tobacco Company of Sichuan Province, Xichang 615000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-08-26 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-13

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

224

Abstract:

A comparative study on various specifications of seedling trays for small seedling transplanting under plastic film was carried out in the Liangshan tobacco region to identify some key factors of tobacco seedling trays for cost-saving and producing proper seedlings. Six specifications of trays (modified 160, 209, 286, 338, 504, and 595 holes) were selected to test with a regular tray (160 holes) as CK. The results showed that emergence rate and tray depth, root dry weight, plant dry weight, stem and leaf dry weight, seedling cost and hole area whose determine coefficient (R2) were 0.63, 0.92, 0.89, 0.92 and 0.89, respectively. The indexes of seedling depth, root dry weight, stem and leaf dry weight, plant dry weight and seedling cost were linearly related to hole area, the correlation coefficient (r2) were -0.79, 0.96, 0.95, 0.96, 0.94. Emergence rate, seedling height compliance rate, stem height compliance rate, leaf number compliance rate, strong seedling rate showed linear correlation with tray depth, r2 were 0.79, -0.42, -0.51, -0.52, -0.49 (P<0.05). In consideration, hole area, plant density and tray depth were the key indexes to select seedling tray. According to the test results and the regression equation, it was recommended that tray depth was 4.0-5.0cm, hole area was 6-10cm2, plant density was 120-160 plants/m2. The recommended seedling trays were 286 and 338 holes.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Transplanting tobacco seedling under plastic film, Seedling tray specification

Table 1

Specification of seedling trays"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 盘宽
Tray
width
(cm)		 盘长
Tray
length
(cm)		 盘深
Tray
depth
(cm)		 孔穴面积
Hole area
(cm2)		 烟苗密度
(株/cm2)
Plant density
(plant/cm2)
160(CK) 33.3 52.3 6.0 10.88 92
改良160
Improved 160		 33.3 52.3 3.0 10.88 92
209 33.3 52.3 3.0 8.33 120
286 33.3 64.7 4.8 6.09 164
338 33.3 64.7 4.8 6.37 157
504 33.3 48.3 3.4 3.00 313
595 33.3 65.7 3.8 3.68 272

Fig.1

Emergency rate for each specification of seedling trays The different letters indicate 5% significant level among various treatments, the same below"

Table 2

Pearson correlation analysis of specification of seedling tray and different seedling indexes of flue-cured tobacco"

指标Index 盘长Tray length 盘深Tray depth 穴面积Hole area 烟苗密度Plant density
出苗率Emergence rate 0.07(0.7597) 0.79(<0.0001) -0.10(0.6814) -0.06(0.8113)
苗高Seedling height 0.23(0.3260) -0.30(0.1797) -0.38(0.0859) 0.26(0.2557)
茎高Stem height 0.29(0.1979) -0.32(0.1546) -0.79(<0.0001) 0.71(0.0003)
茎围Stem circumstance 0.28(0.1589) 0.19(0.4147) 0.15(0.5268) -0.33(0.1497)
真叶数Number of leaves -0.19(0.3979) -0.12(0.6188) 0.49(0.0253) -0.41(0.0677)
根系体积Root volume -0.23(0.3073) -0.49(0.0233) 0.56(0.0083) -0.63(0.0020)
根干重Root dry weight -0.40(0.0699) 0.10(0.6758) 0.96(<0.0001) -0.89(<0.0001)
茎叶干重Stem and leaf dry weight -0.11(0.6399) 0.16(0.4906) 0.95(<0.0001) -0.89(<0.0001)
整株干重Plant dry weight -0.15(0.5092) 0.15(0.5122) 0.96(<0.0001) -0.90(<0.0001)
茎叶/根Stem and leaf/root 0.83(<0.0001) 0.04(0.8696) -0.52(0.0153) 0.48(0.0274)
叶片叶绿素含量Leaf chlorophyll content 0.17(0.4511) -0.09(0.7064) -0.04(0.8790) 0.16(0.4912)
苗高达标率Seedling height compliance rate 0.09(0.6924) -0.42(0.0555) -0.17(0.4569) 0.12(0.6147)
茎高达标率Stem height compliance rate -0.11(0.6433) -0.51(0.0192) -0.25(0.2741) 0.21(0.3593)
真叶数达标率Leaf number compliance rate 0.20(0.3962) -0.52(0.0155) -0.24(0.2958) 0.24(0.2865)
成苗率Survival seedling rate 0.03(0.8846) -0.38(0.0899) -0.14(0.5540) 0.08(0.7160)
壮苗率Strong seedling rate 0.17(0.4522) -0.49(0.0238) -0.11(0.6419) -0.02(0.9325)
长势Growth 0.33(0.1452) -0.17(0.4726) 0.45(0.0894) -0.39(0.0799)
成本Cost -0.38(0.0897) 0.29(0.1943) 0.94(<0.0001) -0.95(<0.0001)

Table 3

Effects of different seedling tray specification on growth stages of small flue-cured tobacco seedling"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 播种（月-日）
Sowing
(month-day)		 出苗期（月-日）
Emergence
(month-day)		 小十字期（月-日）
Little cross
(month-day)		 大十字期（月-日）
Big cross
(month-day)		 成苗期（月-日）
Survival seedling
(month-day)		 苗床期
Seedling
period (d)
160(CK) 03-07 03-17 03-30 04-07 04-20 44a
改良160 Improved 160 03-07 03-18 03-29 04-06 04-16 40b
209 03-07 03-17 03-29 04-07 04-17 41b
286 03-07 03-17 03-29 04-07 04-16 40b
338 03-07 03-18 03-29 04-06 04-17 41b
504 03-07 03-18 03-29 04-07 04-17 41b
595 03-07 03-18 03-29 04-07 04-17 41b

Table 4

Agronomic traits for each specification of seedling trays (measured on 41d after sowing)"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 苗高
Seedling height
(cm)		 茎高
Stem
height
(cm)		 茎围
Stem circumstance
(cm)		 真叶数
Number
of leaves		 根系体积
Root
volume
(mL)		 根干重
Root
weight
(g)		 茎叶干重
Shoot
weight
(g)		 整株干重
Plant weight
(g)		 茎叶/根
Shoot/
root		 叶片叶绿素含量
Leaf chlorophyll content (mg/g)
160(CK) 4.4b 2.6b 0.91b 4.7b 6.33c 0.56a 3.90a 4.46a 7.02c 0.28ab
改良160
Improved 160		 5.1ab 2.9ab 0.98ab 5.7a 13.73a 0.54a 4.00a 4.54a 7.44abc 0.33a
209 4.9ab 2.9ab 0.98ab 4.3ab 12.00a 0.51a 3.37b 3.88b 6.64c 0.24b
286 5.1ab 3.1a 0.91b 4.9ab 9.97b 0.35b 2.56c 2.91c 7.23bc 0.28ab
338 5.5a 3.2a 1.40a 4.6b 8.33b 0.36b 3.25b 3.61b 8.91ba 0.30ab
504 5.2ab 3.3a 0.84b 4.5b 5.83c 0.29b 2.20c 2.49c 7.64abc 0.30ab
595 4.9ab 3.2a 0.84b 4.5b 6.33c 0.27b 2.46c 2.73c 9.21a 0.30ab

Table 5

Effects of different seedling tray specification on survival seedling rate and strong seedling rate of flue-cured tobacco"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 茎高达标率
Stem height
compliance rate (%)		 真叶数达标率
Number of leaves compliance rate (%)		 成苗率
Survival seedling
rate (%)		 壮苗率
Strong seedling
rate (%)
160 73.3±9.3b 96.7±1.7a 73.3±9.3b 60.0±10.4b
改良160
Improved 160		 95.0±5.0a 100.0±0.0a 95.0±5.0a 91.7±3.3a
209 92.4±1.5ab 100.0±0.0a 87.9±3.0ab 86.4±2.6a
286 89.7±5.6ab 97.4±2.6a 88.5±4.5ab 85.9±3.4a
338 93.6±3.4a 100.0±0.0a 93.6±3.4ab 89.7±1.3a
504 98.1±1.9a 100.0±0.0a 90.7±9.3ab 77.8±3.2ab
595 84.3±8.6ab 100.0±0.0a 84.3±8.6ab 80.4±8.6a

Table 6

Effects of different seedling tray specification on the recovery date and rate of flue-cured tobacco seedling after transplanting to the field"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 移栽日期
（月-日）
Date of transplanting (month-day)		 还苗日期
（月-日）
Date of seedling recovery
(month-day)		 还苗率
Recovery
rate (%)
04-29 05-01
160 04-25 04-26 98.8b 95.3b
改良160
Improved 160		 04-25 04-26 98.7b 96.3b
209 04-25 04-26 100.0a 100.0a
286 04-25 04-26 100.0a 98.8b
338 04-25 04-26 100.0a 100.0a
504 04-25 04-26 100.0a 100.0a
595 04-25 04-26 100.0a 100.0a
常规大苗Conventional plant 04-25 04-28 100.0a 98.8b

Fig.2

Effects of different seedling tray specification on growth score of flue-cured tobacco seedling at growth stage"

Table 7

Seedling cost for specification of seedling trays"

育苗盘规格（孔）
Specification of seedling tray (hole)		 基质（元/盘）
Medium (yuan/tray)		 盘（元/盘）
Tray (yuan/tray)		 装盘播种
Fill and sowing		 间苗补苗
Thin out and replenish		 剪叶
Clipping		 其他管理
Others		 成本小计（元/盘）
Cost subtotal (yuan/tray)		 盘数（盘/hm2）
Number of trays (tray/hm2)		 总成本（元/hm2）
Total cost (yuan/hm2)
160(CK) 2.40 5.0 2.0 1.67 0 2.00 13.07 112.5 1470
改良160
Improved 160		 1.06 4.5 2.0 2.22 0 2.00 11.78 112.5 1325
209 1.06 6.5 2.3 2.67 0 2.00 14.53 90.0 1308
286 2.06 7.0 2.5 2.67 0 2.00 16.23 67.5 1096
338 2.08 7.5 3.0 4.00 0 2.00 18.58 60.0 1115
504 1.38 9.0 3.5 4.56 0 2.00 20.44 37.5 767
595 1.40 10.0 3.8 4.00 0 2.00 21.20 30.0 636
常规大苗
Conventional plant		 2.40 5.0 2.0 1.67 2.00 4.00 17.07 112.5 1920
[1] 帅京彤, 裴晓东, 黎娟, 等. 开沟起垄措施对植烟土壤和烟叶产值的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(6):114-119.
[2] 刘美菊, 李江舟, 计思贵, 等. 生物炭对山坡地烟叶产量和氮肥利用效率的影响效果评价. 作物杂志, 2020(1):89-97.
[3] 刘广玉, 杨举田, 田雷, 等. 小苗膜下移栽对烤烟生长及土壤水温效应的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2012,33(6):27-32.
[4] 钱宇, 蒋旭, 郭群召, 等. 高海拔烟区烤烟小苗膜下早栽对烟叶产干重的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2013,34(5):18-22.
[5] 胡再翠. 文山州烤烟膜下小苗栽培技术. 云南农业科技, 2014(4):31-32.
[6] 祁永琼, 农晓林. 广南县烤烟膜下小苗移栽存在的问题及对策. 现代农业科技, 2017(3):54-55,9.
[7] 赵秀芳. 2015年彝良县烤烟不同规格育苗盘试验结果. 南方农业, 2015,9(27):3-5.
[8] 白岩, 刘好宝, 史万华, 等. 苗盘高度和育苗密度对烟苗生长发育的影响. 核农学报, 2012,26(7):1082-1086.
[9] 喻路, 刘剑金, 王娜, 等. 不同规格育苗盘对膜下小苗烟苗素质及烟叶产量产值的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2017,23(1):57-61.
[10] 徐兴阳, 朱明, 欧阳进, 等. 不同规格育苗盘对烤烟小苗素质的影响研究. 昆明学院学报, 2014(3):21-23.
[11] 张鲁民, 朱文桥. 育苗盘规格对烤烟膜下小苗大田生长及经济性状的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(5):56-57,90.
[12] 肖长东, 朱文桥, 张鲁民, 等. 育苗盘育苗密度对烤烟小苗素质及抗逆性的影响. 现代农业科技, 2016(1):13-14,7.
[13] 牟建梅, 张国芹, 刘凤军, 等. 白菜叶绿素含量的测定方法筛选. 江苏农业科学, 2014,42(9):289-290.
[14] 全国烟草标准化技术委员会农业分技术委员会. 烟草农艺性状调查方法:YC/T 142-2010. 北京:国家烟草专卖局, 2010.
[15] 刘国顺, 杨兴有, 位辉琴, 等. 光照强度对烤烟漂浮育苗成苗素质的影响. 烟草科技, 2006(8):51-54.
[16] 张含笑, 林参, 左青松, 等. 种植密度和施肥量对油菜毯状苗生长的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45(11):1691-1698.
[17] 许娜, 王嘉宇, 李清, 等. 每穴苗数对北方不同穗型粳稻物质生产和抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(8):1506-1512.
[18] 郭仕平, 曾淑华, 成本喜, 等. 烤烟少基质漂浮育苗研究. 中国烟草学报, 2009,15(5):54-57.
[1] Wang Kun, Wei Yuewei, Ji Xiaoming, Yun Fei, Zou Kai, Long Zhun. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar-Based Fertilizer and Trichoderma harzianum on the Qualities of Flue-Cured Tobacco and Tobacco-Growing Soil [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 106-113.
[2] Wang Huifang, Zhang Xi, Feng Xiaohu, Li Yifan, Zhang Hong, Zhao Songchao, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 173-177.
[3] Feng Xinwei, Huang Ying, Wu Guili, Gou Jianyu, Peng Yulong. Effects of Different Calcium Concentrations on Growth and Magnesium Absorption of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 190-194.
[4] Zhang Xi, Wang Huifang, Dai Zhuoyi, Xue Gang, Xu Shixiao, Yang Tiezhao. Effects of Genotype, Nitrogen Application Rate and Their Interactions on Polyphenols in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 84-90.
[5] Zhang Yunping, Guo Shanhu, Zhang Jintao, Xie Yan, Yi Ke, Li Qiang. The Relationship between Trace Elements in Tobacco Leaves and Soil pH in Qujing [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 178-182.
[6] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[7] Huang Dan, Yang Fuwen, Liu Lin, Wang Yue, He Guoqiang, Wang Hongrui, Sun Guangyu, Ao Hong. Effects of Nitrogen and Nitrogen Forms on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Parameters of Chlorophyll in Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 150-159.
[8] Zhou Jiang, Xie Yizhang, Xiang Ping'an. Emergy Analysis of Inputs and Outputs of Major Field Crop Ecosystems in Hunan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 175-181.
[9] Li Diqin, Wang Qing, Hu Yajie, Wang Yan, Wang Yanni, Zhong Yi, Liu Minghui, Ding Chunxia. Study on Tolerance of Xiangyan 5 to Cadmium in Tobacco-Growing Soil [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 182-186.
[10] Guo Xiaoheng, Wei Shuoguo, Wang Xiaoli, Xu Rui, Han Dan, Xu Zicheng. Effects of Different Types of Mulch Film and Irrigation Methods at Seedling Stage on Growth and Development of Tobacco in Xiangyang Mountain Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 154-163.
[11] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[12] Shuai Jingtong,Pei Xiaodong,Li Juan,Zhang Yiyang. Effects of Furrowing and Ridging Measures on the Quality of Tobacco-Planting Soils and Output Value of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 114-119.
[13] Jiang Nan,Gong Zhanwu,Chen Lili,Hu Yajie,Wei Jianyu,Wang Shengcai,Li Diqin. Grey Correlation Analysis Between Soil Nutrients and Three Microorganisms after Application of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 142-149.
[14] Xinling Yang,Qian Yao,Wenli Ping,Yiqiong Ma,Baolin Wang,Guotao Jia,Yongfeng Yang,Hong Cui. Screening of High Aroma Mutants from Progenies of EMS Mutagenized Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 68-74.
[15] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!