Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 132-137.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.04.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Inoculating Rhizobium on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Black Soybean

Sun Qingsheng(), Yuan Cheng, Zhang Yuxian()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2021-04-28 Revised:2021-05-26 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-08-22
  • Contact: Zhang Yuxian E-mail:qshengsun@163.com;zyx_lxy@126.com

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

211

Abstract:

In order to clarify the effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and Rhizobium inoculation on the plant morphology, photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield of black soybean, the randomized block was designed using the main variety “Qingrenwu No.1” in Nenjiang, Heilongjiang province as material. The settings were as follows: local N fertilizer application rate (100%), half of the local N fertilizer application rate (50%), no N fertilizer application rate (0).There were two treatments of inoculating rhizobia and non inoculating rhizobia in each nitrogen application rate. The 100% N fertilizer application rate+non inoculating rhizobia treatment was the control. The results showed reduced nitrogen treatment considerably raised the chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, dry matter accumulation, and yield of black soybean. Rhizobium inoculation greatly increased the chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity, dry matter accumulation, and yield of black soybean. The best results were the treatment of half of the local N fertilizer reduction inoculated with Rhizobium, which increased by 7.77% compared to the CK treatment.

Key words: Black soybean, Reducing nitrogen application, Seed dressing with Rhizobium, Photosynthetic characteristics, Dry matter accumulation, Yield

Fig.1

Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilizer and inoculating Rhizobium on leaf area and plant height of black soybean Different lowercase letters indicate different treatment at the corresponding period significant difference at P < 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilizer and inoculating Rhizobium on photosynthetic characteristics of black soybean"

Fig.3

Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilizer and inoculating Rhizobium on chlorophyll content of black soybean"

Table 1

Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilizer and inoculating Rhizobium on dry matter accumulation of black soybean g"

生育期Growth period 处理Treatment 叶Leaf 茎柄Stem and petiole 荚皮Pod 籽粒Seed
苗期Seedling CK 2.59±0.03b 3.50±0.02b – –
T1 3.11±0.05a 3.65±0.07a – –
T2 2.13±0.05c 2.33±0.04d – –
T3 2.51±0.07b 3.35±0.04c – –
T4 1.82±0.16d 2.10±0.02f – –
T5 2.11±0.03c 2.24±0.03e – –
花期Flowering CK 6.73±0.16c 5.49±0.04b – –
T1 8.14±0.14a 6.12±0.09a – –
T2 6.55±0.12c 5.14±0.08c – –
T3 7.74±0.08b 6.00± 0.08a – –
T4 5.48±0.11e 4.66±0.08e – –
T5 6.20±0.08d 4.99±0.07d – –
荚期Podding CK 7.67±0.13c 8.25±0.06c 4.80±0.09a –
T1 9.37±0.17b 9.31±0.16b 5.18±0.10b –
T2 6.72±0.09d 7.78±0.58d 4.56±0.11c –
T3 9.91±0.24a 10.35±0.13a 5.38±0.11a –
T4 5.75±0.13f 7.12±0.09f 4.15±0.06f –
T5 6.53±0.08e 7.62±0.08e 4.22±0.08e –
鼓粒期Seed-filling CK 10.17±0.67c 10.22±0.14c 6.68±0.15c 4.48±0.41c
T1 10.82±1.27b 10.70±0.17b 7.02±0.13b 5.37±0.20b
T2 10.16±0.11c 9.89±0.04d 6.46±0.17d 3.85±0.37d
T3 11.70±0.27a 12.49±0.15a 7.61±0.23a 6.18±0.39a
T4 9.24±0.17d 9.25±0.06f 5.47±0.08f 3.20±0.16f
T5 9.86±0.10c 9.62±0.10e 6.12±0.16e 3.60±0.24e

Table 2

Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilizer and inoculating Rhizobium on yield and its compositions of black soybean"

处理
Treatment		 有效荚数
Number of effective pods		 无效荚数
Number of invalid pods		 单株粒重
Grain weight per plant (g)		 百粒重
100-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
CK 18.5±8.71bc 2.4±2.17a 6.56±1.88abc 12.60±0.19bc 1732.71±196.88abc
T1 21.3±5.46ab 3.5±2.72a 6.92±1.45ab 12.90±0.40ab 1825.59±144.50ab
T2 17.2±3.68bc 2.4±2.51a 5.72±1.05abc 12.33±0.10bc 1480.46±142.32bc
T3 24.9±10.33a 2.4±1.26a 7.07±3.03a 13.27±0.59a 1867.41±209.69a
T4 13.0±3.80c 3.2±1.40a 4.92±1.81bc 12.12±0.10c 1320.66±321.90c
T5 15.1±2.60bc 1.7±1.70a 5.26±0.59c 12.26±0.13c 1389.33±181.63c
[1] 陈慧. 钾素营养对大豆钾素吸收与产量的影响. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2013.
[2] 王海艳. 优化施肥对大豆氮磷钾吸收与分配的影响. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2011.
[3] La Menza N C, Monzon J P, Specht J E, et al. Is soybean yield limited by nitrogen supply. Field Crop Research, 2017(213):204-212.
[4] Kong L G, Xie Y, Hu L, et al. Excessive nitrogen application dampens antioxidant capacity and grain filling in wheat as revealed by metabolic and physiological analyses. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:43363.
doi: 10.1038/srep43363
[5] 姬月梅, 罗瑞萍, 赵志刚, 等. 不同施氮量及施氮方式对大豆根瘤生长及产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(6):887-893.
[6] 孟庆英, 韩旭东, 张春峰, 等. 根瘤菌与微肥对大豆生理及产量的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(2):51-54.
[7] 刘文钰, 雍太文, 刘小明, 等. 减量施氮对玉米―大豆套作体系中大豆根瘤固氮及氮素吸收利用的影响. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(5):705-712.
[8] 邸伟, 金喜军, 马春梅, 等. 施氮水平对大豆氮素积累与产量影响的研究. 核农学报, 2010, 24(3):612-617.
[9] 雍太文, 董茜, 刘小明, 等. 施肥方式对玉米―大豆套作体系氮素吸收利用效率的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(1):84-91.
[10] 王树起, 韩晓增, 乔云发, 等. 施氮对大豆根瘤生长和结瘤固氮的影响. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(2):176-179.
[11] 刘文钰, 雍太文, 刘小明, 等. 减量施氮对玉米―大豆套作体系中大豆根瘤固氮及氮素吸收利用的影响. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(5):705-712.
[12] 赵念力, 谷维, 张俐俐, 等. 俄罗斯高效大豆根瘤菌肥对大豆主要性状及产量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(1):72-73.
[13] 李艳杰. 快生型根瘤菌(BB-32)对大豆黑交96-1525的增产效果. 土壤肥料, 2004(2):49-51.
[14] 李继存, 赵云, 赵恩海, 等. 根瘤菌拌种对大豆主要性状及其产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2011(7):92-93.
[15] 乔小全, 任广跃, 段续, 等. 黄菊超微粉碎辅助提取黑豆皮水溶性膳食纤维及其特性研究. 中国粮油学报, 2018(11):100-106.
[16] 张文修. 黑大豆高产栽培技术. 现代化农业, 2013(6):2-3.
[17] 黄建国. 植物营养学. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004:106-107.
[18] Zhou X J, Liang Y, Chen H, et al. Effects of rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen fertilization on photosynthetic physiology of soybean. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44(4):530-535.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-006-0066-x
[19] 关兴照, 李成泰, 张朝清, 等. 大豆施氮肥接种根瘤菌效果研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2000(4):20-21.
[20] 周相娟, 梁宇, 沈世华, 等. 接种根瘤菌和遮光对大豆固氮和光合作用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(3):478-484.
[21] Bambara S, Ndakidemi P. Effects of Rhizobium innoculation,lime and molybdenum on nitrogen fixation of nodulated Phaseolus vulgaris L.. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2010, 4(9):682-696.
[22] 关兴照, 李成泰, 张朝清, 等. 大豆施氮肥接种根瘤菌效果研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2000(4):20-21.
[23] 梁福琴, 关大伟, 党蓓蕾, 等. 根瘤菌和氮素对大豆植株特性及产量的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(8):28-31.
[24] 高阳, 傅积海, 章建新, 等. 施氮量对滴灌高产春大豆干物质积累及转运特性的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(12):21-30.
[25] 姬月梅, 赵志刚, 罗瑞萍, 等. 不同施氮量条件下大豆品种接种根瘤菌筛选. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(23):80-83.
[26] 郑浩宇, 黄炳林, 王孟雪, 等. 氮肥减施与接种根瘤菌对大豆光合与产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2019(3):83-90.
[27] 万玉萍, 向往, 万勇. 根瘤菌肥在大豆栽培中的应用效果初报. 湖南农业科学, 2015(6):56-57.
[1] Chen Shiyong, Wang Rui, Chen Zhiqing, Zhang Haipeng, Wang Juanjuan, Shan Yuhua, Yang Yanju. Effects of Nano-Zinc and Ion-Zinc on Rice Yield Formation and Grain Zinc Content [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 107-114.
[2] Tang Jianpeng, Chen Jingdu, Wen Kai, Zhang Mingwei, Xie Chenglin, Lu Peiling, Min Sigui, Wang Qiluan, Cheng Jiemin. Study on Material Production and Yield Characteristics of Japonica Rice with Good Eating Quality in Rice-Crayfish Farming System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 115-123.
[3] Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua, Liu Yongqiang, Tang Dejing, Zhu Yongyong, Hu Xinyuan. Effects of Basal Zinc Fertilizer on Activities of Disease Resistance-Related Enzymes, Soil Borne Diseases and Yield of Potato under Long-Term Continuous Cropping [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 154-159.
[4] Li Zujun, Jiang Xue, Yang Tonglian, Wu Chaoxin, Zhang Xichun, Jiang Xuehai, Long Wuhua, Zhang Yushan, Zhu Susong. Effects of Different Fertilizer Ratios on Yield and Taste Quality of Guizhouhe Goudang No.1 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 160-166.
[5] Ma Ke, Feng Lei, Zhao Xiatong, Zhang Liguang, Yuan Xiangyang, Dong Shuqi, Guo Pingyi, Song Xi’e. Effects of Sowing Distance and Sowing Amount on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Zhangzagu 10 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 172-178.
[6] Zhao Shifeng, Cao Lixia, Shi Bihong, Liu Wenting, Zhao Xuefeng, Liu Junxin, Zhang Lixia, Li Jiahao. Dry Matter Accumulation and Productivity Potential Evaluation of Main Forage Oat Varieties in China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 179-186.
[7] Yu Guoyi, Kong Lingcong, Zhang Liang, Wei Zhi, Wang Yongjiu, Wang Zhi, Du Xiangbei. Effects of Different New Type Fertilizers on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics, Canopy Structure and Yield [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 193-198.
[8] Zhou Jihong, Wang Junying, Meng Fanyu, Tong Guoxiang, Mei Li, Liu Guoming, Wang Yan, Luo Jun, Xie Chunyuan. Effects of Tillage Methods on Sowing Quality, Yield and Benefit of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 199-204.
[9] Zhou Wuxian, Li Mengge, Tan Xuhui, Wang Youyuan, Wang Hua, Jiang Xiaogang, Duan Yuanyuan, Zhang Meide. Effects of Sowing Density on Growth, Nutritional Quality and Soil Enzyme Activity of Pinellia ternata in Different Seasons [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 205-213.
[10] Qiao Yujia, Wei Ling, Xiao Junhong, Liu Bo, Yang Haifeng, Duan Xueyan. Analysis on the Yield Differences of Huanghuaihai Summer Soybeans in Different Years and Locations [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 221-226.
[11] Liang Weiqin, Jia Li, Guo Liming, Li Yinglan, Hu Yafeng, Chen Xiaohua, Ma Xufeng, Li Jing. Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen Transport of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 242-248.
[12] Zheng Minna, Liang Xiuzhi, Kang Jiahui, Li Yinfan, Wang Hui, Han Zhishun, Chen Yanni. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Nitrogen Photosynthetic Utilization Efficiency of Fed Oats [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 249-254.
[13] Zhang Haipeng, Chen Zhiqing, Wang Rui, Lu Hao, Cui Peiyuan, Yang Yanju, Zhang Hongcheng. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Nano-Magnesium on Rice Yield, Grain Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 255-261.
[14] Wang Xiaochun, Zhu Dexin, Yang Tianhui, Wang Chuan, Yang Weidi, Gao Ting, Liang Xiaojun. Correlation Analysis of Main Agronomic Characteristics of Different Alfalfa Varieties and Comparison of Hay Yield in Yellow River Irrigation Area of Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 32-36.
[15] Ma Yihu, He Xianbiao, Qi Wen, Wang Xuhui, Chen Jian, Zhou Cui, Zhang Zhongxi. Effects of Application of Agricultural Waste Materials and Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer on Grain Yield and Quality of Double Cropping Late Rice and Soil Fertility [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 115-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!