Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 174-179.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.05.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Characteristics of Water Loss and Pigment Degradation of Xiangyan No.7 Tobacco Leaves during Curing Process

Zhu Lin1(), Cao Xiang1, Deng Xiaohua1,2(), Hu Risheng2, Pei Xiaodong3, Xiang Shipeng3, Xiao Zhijun4, Wang Weimin4, Zhang Cheng4, Jiang Zhimin4   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    2China Tobacco Mid-South Agricultural Experimental Station, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China
    3Hunan Tobacco Company Changsha Branch, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China
    4China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310008, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2021-06-28 Revised:2022-04-27 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2022-10-19

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

194

Abstract:

In order to explore the characteristics of water loss and pigment degradation during curing process of flue-cured tobacco of Xiangyan No.7, using Yunyan 87 as control (CK), the water loss characteristics of leaves and veins and the degradation characteristics of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids were studied by electric-heated flue-curing barn. The results showed the water loss peak of Xiangyan No.7 was earlier than CK. The easy curing potential of middle and lower leaves were better than CK, while the upper leaf showed the opposite trend. In the early yellowing (24h), the degradation rate of chlorophyll a was significantly lower than that of CK, while the chlorophyll b showed a opposite trend. No significant difference in chlorophyll degradation existed between Xiangyan No.7 and CK. The carotenoid degradation rate and quantity of Xiangyan No.7 were significantly lower than CK. The characteristics of water loss and pigment degradation of leaves of Xiangyan No.7 during curing were unique. In order to develop the full quality potential of Xiangyan No.7, the curing technique should be formulated according to the curing characteristics of the variety.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Water loss characteristics, Pigment degradation characteristics, Xiangyan No.7, Curing characteristics

Table 1

The water loss characteristics of leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 水分含量Water content (g/kg) 失水速率Water loss rate [g/(kg·h)]
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 0~48h 48~96h 96~144h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 970.0a 724.7a 506.7a 146.0b 38.8b 31.7b 21.2a 9.65a 9.75a 0.37b
云烟87 747.7b 735.1a 561.6a 310.3a 88.9a 54.1a 15.3a 3.88b 9.85a 1.53a
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 834.5a 783.9a 202.2b 59.9b 35.2b 23.5b 18.3a 13.17a 3.48b 0.35b
云烟87 841.5a 752.4a 422.7a 153.1a 113.8a 36.0a 22.4a 8.73b 6.44a 1.90a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 811.3a 754.0a 206.2a 22.1b 14.6b 9.5b 6.3b 12.61a 3.99a 0.17b
云烟87 838.9a 818.8a 201.3a 87.0a 72.1a 38.0a 24.7a 13.28a 2.69b 0.99a

Table 2

The water loss characteristics of vein during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 水分含量Water content (g/kg) 失水速率Water loss rate [g/(kg·h)]
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 0~48h 48~96h 96~144h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 889.6a 847.1a 807.2a 735.4a 725.5a 220.5b 30.3a 1.72a 1.70b 14.48a
云烟87 886.4a 859.9a 806.1a 670.1b 584.5b 389.5a 30.0a 1.67a 4.62a 11.55b
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 897.7a 894.30a 769.7a 721.0a 539.7a 24.7a 11.9a 2.67a 4.79a 11.00a
云烟87 903.8a 858.5a 805.0a 701.5a 578.1a 20.1a 12.6a 2.06b 4.73a 11.78a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 925.9a 866.0a 835.5a 728.2a 422.9a 38.6a 19.2a 1.88a 8.60b 8.41a
云烟87 911.0a 885.3a 838.4a 716.8a 173.0b 30.6b 17.8a 1.51b 13.86a 3.23b

Table 3

The water loss characteristics of tobacco leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 水分含量
Water content (g/kg)		 失水速率
Water loss rate [g/(kg·h)]		 失水均衡性
Balance of water loss
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 0~48h 48~96h 96~144h ≤72h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 935.8a 725.6b 643.6b 462.0a 399.7b 93.8b 24.6a 6.09a 5.08a 7.81b 0.80a
云烟87 811.3b 795.3a 686.4a 433.2b 426.8a 216.3a 20.0b 2.60b 5.41a 8.48a 0.25b
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 866.8a 853.2a 603.1b 529.9a 307.6b 24.2b 15.8b 5.49a 6.16a 6.08b 1.80a
云烟87 870.7a 805.3b 705.9a 456.0b 383.9a 100.0a 23.9a 3.43b 6.71a 7.50a 0.33b
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 906.2a 828.9a 715.9a 543.4a 273.7a 24.0b 12.7b 3.96a 9.21b 5.44a 0.55a
云烟87 876.8a 857.8a 734.3a 527.0a 120.3b 34.6a 27.3a 2.97b 12.79a 1.94b 0.34b

Table 4

The chlorophyll a degradation characteristics of tobacco leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 叶绿素a含量
Chlorophyll a content (g/100kg)		 降解比例
Degradation proportion (%)		 降解速率
Degradation rate (%/h)
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 24h 48h 72h 24h 48h 72h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 231.9a 92.5a 64.2a 34.8a 30.4a 26.9a 22.4a 60.11b 72.32a 85.01a 2.51b 1.51a 1.18a
云烟87 217.8a 74.0b 56.4b 28.1b 25.4b 23.2b 18.3b 66.03a 74.09a 87.08a 2.75a 1.54a 1.21a
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 414.3a 157.1a 106.5a 53.9a 46.1a 39.9a 31.9a 62.09b 74.30a 86.99a 2.59b 1.55a 1.21a
云烟87 349.5b 112.2b 84.0b 38.6b 34.2b 30.7b 22.9b 67.89a 75.95a 88.95a 2.83a 1.58a 1.24a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 68.3b 25.1a 16.7a 8.0a 6.8a 5.7a 4.4a 63.32b 75.53a 88.22a 2.64b 1.57a 1.23a
云烟87 85.8a 26.4a 19.5a 8.3a 7.2a 6.4a 4.5a 69.22a 77.28a 90.27a 2.88a 1.61a 1.25a

Table 5

The chlorophyll b degradation characteristics of tobacco leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 叶绿素b含量
Chlorophyll b content (g/100kg)		 降解比例
Degradation proportion (%)		 降解速率
Degradation rate (%/h)
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 24h 48h 72h 24h 48h 72h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 174.3a 85.3a 53.6a 22.0a 19.1a 15.1a 12.2a 51.03a 69.23a 87.36a 2.13a 1.44a 1.21a
云烟87 165.3a 85.4a 47.3b 21.4a 19.8a 16.5a 9.9b 48.33b 71.36a 87.03a 2.01b 1.49a 1.21a
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 43.3a 20.3a 12.5a 4.6a 3.9a 2.9a 2.2a 53.02a 71.22a 89.35a 2.21a 1.48a 1.24a
云烟87 36.3b 18.1a 9.7b 4.0a 3.7a 3.0a 1.5b 50.19b 73.23a 88.90a 2.09b 1.53a 1.24a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 103.5a 47.4a 28.5a 9.8a 8.0a 5.7a 3.9a 54.25a 72.45a 90.58a 2.26a 1.51a 1.26a
云烟87 23.9b 11.6b 6.1b 2.3b 2.1b 1.6b 0.7b 51.51b 74.55a 90.22a 2.15b 1.55a 1.25a

Table 6

The total chlorophyll degradation characteristics of tobacco leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 叶绿素总量
Chlorophyll content (g/100kg)		 降解比例
Degradation proportion (%)		 降解速率
Degradation rate (%/h)
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 24h 48h 72h 24h 48h 72h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 284.7a 115.7a 48.0a 19.0a 6.2b 5.6a 4.2a 59.36a 83.15a 93.31a 2.47a 1.73a 1.30a
云烟87 252.1b 109.7b 51.4a 20.2a 9.5a 5.5a 3.8a 56.51b 79.60a 91.98a 2.36b 1.66a 1.28a
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 488.4a 307.8a 35.8a 22.7a 14.4a 9.2a 1.2b 36.97b 92.67a 95.35a 1.54b 1.93a 1.32a
云烟87 435.1b 248.4b 35.1a 14.7b 10.2b 8.6a 8.2a 42.92a 91.94a 96.63a 1.79a 1.92a 1.34a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 187.3a 50.4b 18.5b 15.2a 11.0a 7.3a 0.5a 73.07a 90.11a 91.86a 3.04a 1.88a 1.28a
云烟87 164.4b 63.5a 31.4a 12.7a 10.1a 3.8b 0.8a 61.41b 80.90b 92.26a 2.56b 1.69b 1.28a

Table 7

The carotenoid degradation characteristics of tobacco leaves during curing process"

部位
Position		 品种
Cultivar		 类胡萝卜素含量
Carotenoid content (g/100kg)		 降解比例
Degradation proportion (%)		 降解速率
Degradation rate (%/h)
0h 24h 48h 72h 96h 120h 144h 24h 48h 72h 24h 48h 72h
上部
Upper		 湘烟7号 87.4b 67.6a 58.8a 50.5a 46.0b 43.6a 36.2a 22.65b 32.65b 42.15b 0.94b 0.68b 0.59b
云烟87 102.6a 65.4a 54.3b 47.6b 49.2a 42.9a 33.8b 36.22a 47.03a 53.62a 1.51a 0.98a 0.75a
中部
Middle		 湘烟7号 79.5a 59.9a 51.9a 44.4a 40.2a 38.1a 31.3a 24.64b 34.64b 44.14b 1.03b 0.72b 0.61b
云烟87 56.1b 34.7b 28.7b 25.0b 25.8b 22.4b 17.4b 38.08a 48.90a 55.49a 1.59a 1.02a 0.77a
下部
Lower		 湘烟7号 20.1a 14.9a 12.9a 11.0a 9.9a 9.4a 7.7a 25.87b 35.87b 45.37b 1.08b 0.75b 0.63b
云烟87 18.4a 11.1b 9.1b 7.9b 7.7b 7.1b 5.5b 39.40a 50.22a 56.81a 1.64a 1.05a 0.79a
[1] 宫长荣, 王能如, 汪耀富, 等. 烟叶烘烤原理. 北京: 科学技术出版社, 1994.
[2] 张佳佳, 过伟民, 段卫东, 等. 上6片烟叶烘烤过程中水分与颜色及化学成分的协同变化. 烟草科技, 2021, 54(3):17-23,57.
[3] 李峥, 邱坤, 方明, 等. 基于形态学和色度学的烘烤过程中烟叶水分含量变化的模型. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(19):209-214.
[4] 景延秋, 张豹林, 李广良, 等. 不同品种烤烟表面颜色量化与质体色素的关系研究. 河南农业大学学报, 2014, 48(6):689-694.
[5] 曹想, 裴晓东, 陈梦思, 等. 烤烟新品种HN2146烘烤特性研究. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(3):464-469.
[6] 江智敏, 曹想, 裴晓东, 等. 烤烟HN2146和K326下部烟叶烘烤特性比较. 作物研究, 2020, 34(6):550-556.
[7] 仙立国, 黄一兰, 王松峰, 等. 翠碧一号鲜烟叶素质及烘烤特性研究. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(3):66-73.
[8] 肖志君, 裴晓东, 邓小华, 等. 南方稻作烟区不同品种上部烟叶烘烤特性差异. 核农学报, 2017, 31(11):2213-2220.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.11.2213
[9] 田兰, 谢勇, 张远盖, 等. 特色品种中烟103与云烟203和K326烘烤对比试验. 农业灾害研究, 2018, 8(2):71-74,78.
[10] 王行, 周亮, 柯油松, 等. 不同烤烟品种上部烟叶烘烤特性研究. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2014, 29(4):619-622.
[11] 朱峰, 沈始权, 孙福山, 等. 安康烤烟的烘烤特性及适宜成熟度研究. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(2):145-149.
[12] 邓小华, 文伟, 裴晓东, 等. 稻作烟区不同素质上部鲜烟叶烘烤特性研究. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 43(6):620-625.
[13] 武圣江, 甘家洪, 张琳鋆, 等. 贵州烤烟上部叶烘烤特性研究. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2015, 30(3):433-439.
[14] 江智敏, 曹想, 裴晓东, 等. 烤烟HN2146和K326下部烟叶烘烤特性比较. 作物研究, 2020, 34(6):550-556.
[15] 国家烟草专卖局. GB/T 23219-2008烤烟烘烤技术规程. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[16] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 311-2009烤烟品种烘烤特性评价. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[17] 姚恒, 王亚辉, 曾建敏. 云南与津巴布韦烟叶烘烤理化特性的比较. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(23):14353-14356.
[18] 张希, 李芳芳, 李洪臣, 等. 驻马店烟区不同烤烟品种上部叶的烘烤特性研究. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(3):470-475.
[19] 杨树勋, 孟刚, 荣翔麟. 烟叶烘烤过程中主脉和叶片失水特点研究. 作物研究, 2017, 31(4):426-428,436.
[20] 宋朝鹏, 武圣江, 高远, 等. 烤烟密集烘烤变黄期类胡萝卜素及其降解香气成分的变化. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(20):4246-4254.
[21] 范志勇, 罗锐, 户艳霞, 等. 四种烤烟品种烘烤特性比较. 天津农业科学, 2020, 26(11):80-86.
[22] 董淑君, 黄明迪, 王耀锋, 等. 密集烤房与普通烤房烘烤中烟叶色素和多酚含量的变化分析. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(1):90-95.
[23] Weeks W W. Chemistry of tobacco constituents influencing flavor and aroma. Recent Advance of Tobacco Science, 1985, 11:175-200.
[24] Roberts D L, Rohde W A. Isolation and identification of flavor components of burley tobacco. Tobacco Science, 1972, 16:107112.
[25] 杨伟祖, 谢刚, 王保兴, 等. 烟草中β-胡萝卜素的热裂解产物的研究. 色谱, 2006, 24(6):611-614.
[1] Chen Yan, Chen Qiang, He Yi, Yu Huiping, Gao Junyi, Zhao Erwei, Lu Yingang. Effects of Tobacco Planting Ecoregions, Varieties and Their Interactions on Polyphenol Content and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 132-138.
[2] Zhang Mingfa, Zhang Sheng, Teng Kai, Chen Qianfeng, Tian Minghui, Jiang Zhimin, Chao Jin, Jian Panfeng, Deng Xiaohua. Effects of Fertilizing with Straw Biochar on Soil pH and Root Growth of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Huayuan, Hunan [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 193-200.
[3] Jia Guotao, Zhang Junling, Wei Zhuangzhuang, Yuan Qishan, Wang Baolin, Wang Xiaoyu, Ma Shengtao, Yang Xinling, Zhang Ziying, Zhang Shiying, Jia Shiwei, Chen Yang, Liu Huimin. Research on the Regional Characteristics of Contents of Free Amino Acids in Flue-Cured Tobacco Based on Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 208-214.
[4] Sun Kai, Liang Long, Li Zhongbai. Sustainability Evaluation of the Red Rice and Flue-Cured Tobacco Crop System Based on the Improved Emergy Model——A Case Study of Panzhou City, Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 146-153.
[5] Liu Xinya, Chen Xiaolong, Feng Yake, Liu Yang, Duan Weidong, An Xueqiang, Chen Fayuan, Cao Xingbing, Zhao Yuanyuan, Shi Hongzhi. Study on the Suitable Harvest Date of High Availability Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southwestern Guizhou [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 227-235.
[6] Wei Xiaokai, Jing Yanqiu, He Jixian, Gu Huizhan, Lei Qiang, Yu Shikang, Zhang Qili, Li Junju. Alleviating Effect of Exogenous Spermidine on Flue-Cured Tobacco Seedlings under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 143-148.
[7] Yang Yingyue, Liu Hui, Wang Longfei, Zhao Zhe, Feng Xiaohu, Lai Miao, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Different Fertilizer Types on Tobacco Planting Soil and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 187-193.
[8] Zhang Xiaoquan, Jia Zhenyu, Li Juxu, Li Hongchen, Wang Baoxiang, Wang Jian, Shi Gang, Wang Chuan, Wu Yunjie. Effects of Different Root-Promoting Practices on Potassium Metabolism at Mature Stage of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Anhui [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 205-210.
[9] Yun Fei, Ren Tianbao, Yin Quanyu, Jin Shuangzhen, Zheng Cong, Jin Lei, Li Jingjing, Liu Guoshun, Yang Xitian. Effects of Calcium by Foliage Spraying on Photosynthesis Physiology Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco under Light Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 143-152.
[10] Wang Chuliang, Song Wenfeng, Guan Luohao, Xie Jin, Huang Hao, Li Wangyang, Wang Wei. Effects of Film Mulching Method and Transplanting Seedling Age on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Honghe [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 95-100.
[11] Liu Wenlong, Ning Shanghui, Cao Mingfeng, Zhu Li, Gao Yuzhen, Zhang Xuewei, Wen Zixiang, Jiang Baodi, Jing Yanqiu, Deng Yong. Correlation Analysis of Soil Micronutrient and Chemical Components of Tobacco Leaves in Taoyuan County [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 176-180.
[12] Zhang Jiuquan, Yu Xiangwen, Ling Aifen, Wang Yong, Li Leilei, Dong Jianxin. Optimal Specification of Tobacco Seedling Tray for Small Seedling Transplanting under Plastic Film [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 123-129.
[13] Wang Kun, Wei Yuewei, Ji Xiaoming, Yun Fei, Zou Kai, Long Zhun. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar-Based Fertilizer and Trichoderma harzianum on the Qualities of Flue-Cured Tobacco and Tobacco-Growing Soil [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 106-113.
[14] Wang Huifang, Zhang Xi, Feng Xiaohu, Li Yifan, Zhang Hong, Zhao Songchao, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 173-177.
[15] Feng Xinwei, Huang Ying, Wu Guili, Gou Jianyu, Peng Yulong. Effects of Different Calcium Concentrations on Growth and Magnesium Absorption of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 190-194.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[4] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[5] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .
[6] Wenlian Bai,Yi Zheng,Jingxiu Xiao. Below-Ground Biotic Mechanisms of Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Improved by Cereal and Legume Intercropping-A Review[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 20 -27 .
[7] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42 -47 .
[8] Xiaoyu Liang, Chunyu Lin, Shumei Ma, Yang Wang. Mining Elite Alleles for Germination Ability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Salt and Alkaline Stress[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 48 -52 .
[9] Haibin Luo, Shengli Jiang, Chengmei Huang, Huiqing Cao, Zhinian Deng, Kaichao Wu, Lin Xu, Zhen Lu, Yuanwen Wei. Cloning and Expression of ScHAK10 Gene in Sugarcane[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 53 -61 .
[10] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62 -68 .