Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 127-132.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Leaf Ages,Seedling Trays and Hill Distances on Yield and Major Agronomic Traits in Rice

Liu Lihua,Zhou Chanchan,Gao Guangjie,Dong Liqiang,Wang Shu,Jia Baoyan,Huang Yuancai,Wang Yan   

  1. College of Agronomy,Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Northeastern Rice Biology and Genetic Breeding,Ministry of Agriculture,Shenyang 110866,Liaoning,China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Revised:2016-06-21 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Shu Wang

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

145

Abstract:

With rice variety Shendao 47 as entry, the effects of different leaf ages, seedling trays and hill distances on yield and major agronomic traits in rice were studied.The results showed that,at the same leaf age and hill distance, the highest tillers and effective tillers with hole tray were more than those with flat tray, and the stems and tillers of unit area were decreased with the hill distance increasing under the same condition of leaf age and seedling tray. The yield when transplanting at 4.1-leaf age was higher significantly than those at 5.7-leaf age and 2.5-leaf age. The yield with 20cm hill distance was much higher than that with 27cm hill distance, but different insignificantly with that of 13cm hill distance. It was easy to gain more effective panicles with hole tray, but to obtain more grains per panicle, full kernel setting and 1000-grain weight with flat tray, to reach higher yield.Under the condition of 4.1-leaf age and 20cm hill distance both flat tray and hole tray obtained higher yield of 12.90t/hm 2 and 12.58t/hm 2.

Key words: Rice, Leaf age, Seedling tray, Hill distance, Yield

Table 1

The survey of seedling qualities under different trays and different leaf ages"

秧盘
Seedling trays		 叶龄
Leaf age		 播种量(g/盘)
Sowing rates		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎基宽(cm)
Stem width		 百苗地上部干重(g)
Dry weight of 100 above-
ground seedlings		 百苗地下部干重(g)
Dry weight of 100
seedling roots		 充实度(g/cm)
Seedling
plumpness		 根冠比
Root/shoot
ratio
钵盘Hole tray 2.5 57 9.75 0.217 0.90 0.20 0.09 0.22
4.1 57 17.43 0.338 2.08 0.71 0.12 0.34
5.7 57 22.41 0.380 4.10 1.24 0.18 0.30
软盘Flat tray 2.5 92 12.15 0.193 0.75 0.17 0.06 0.23
4.1 92 18.13 0.240 1.91 0.77 0.11 0.40
5.7 92 22.83 0.360 3.69 1.11 0.16 0.30

Fig.1

Number of stems and tillers of different treatments at different key growth and development stages"

Fig.2

Productive panicle rates of different treatments"

Table 2

Variation analysis of important agronomic traits under different treatments (P value)"

变异来源
Source of variation		 株高
Plant
height		 有效穗数
Effective
panicles		 穗粒数
Spikelets
per panicle		 成粒率
Seed-setting
rate		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight		 实际产量
Actual yield
叶龄Leaf age 0.1329 0.0002** 0.0001** 0.0259* 0.0030** 0.0008**
秧盘Seedling tray 0.5493 0.0000** 0.0001** 0.2486 0.0011** 0.0001**
叶龄×秧盘Leaf age×seedling tray 0.3607 0.0423* 0.2057 0.4086 0.2116 0.0210*
穴距Hill distance 0.0001** 0.0000** 0.0000** 0.3675 0.2790 0.0000**
叶龄×穴距Leaf age×hill distance 0.0651 0.1503 0.0000** 0.9494 0.0072** 0.0000**
秧盘×穴距Seedling tray×hill distance 0.1089 0.0002** 0.0000** 0.7146 0.4790 0.0000**
叶龄×秧盘×穴距Leaf age×seedling tray×hill distance 0.7741 0.1114 0.0000** 0.4129 0.4490 0.0755

Table 3

Effects of different leaf ages,seedling trays and hill distances on yields and agronomic traits"

处理
Treatments		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 有效穗数(万穗/hm2)
Effective panicles		 穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 成粒率(%)
Seed-setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 实际产量(t/hm2)
Actual yield
2.5叶龄Leaf age 112.9a 340.9a 163.8c 85.9b 24.2b 11.19c
4.1叶龄Leaf age 112.4a 315.9b 176.9a 89.1ab 25.4a 12.12a
5.7叶龄Leaf age 111.1a 292.3c 170.4b 91.7a 25.6a 11.53b
钵盘Hole tray 111.9a 327.1a 167.7b 88.1a 24.6b 11.43b
软盘Flat tray 112.3a 305.6b 173.1a 89.7a 25.5a 11.79a
13cm 110.9c 338.9a 163.3b 88.5a 24.9a 11.74a
20cm 112.1b 314.8b 174.1a 88.4a 25.1a 11.84a
27cm 113.3a 295.3c 173.8a 89.9a 25.2a 11.26b

Table 4

Effects of different hill distances of different seedling trays at different leaf ages on yield and agronomic traits"

处理
Treatments		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 有效穗数(万穗/hm2)
Effective panicles		 穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 成粒率(%)
Seed-setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 实际产量(t/hm2)
Actual yield
2.5叶龄-钵盘-13cm 111.3abcde 380.4a 155.0gh 86.5bcd 22.8h 11.53ef
2.5叶龄-钵盘-20cm 112.3abcd 353.9b 157.9g 86.7bcd 23.5gh 10.79i
2.5叶龄-钵盘-27cm 113.2abc 311.9def 172.7de 85.6bcd 24.4fg 10.38j
2.5叶龄-软盘-13cm 113.9a 350.4b 163.6f 85.1cd 24.5ef 11.60ef
2.5叶龄-软盘-20cm 112.9abc 331.1c 169.7e 83.2d 24.5ef 11.36fgh
2.5叶龄-软盘-27cm 113.7ab 317.7cde 164.0f 88.2abcd 25.2abcdef 11.46fg
4.1叶龄-钵盘-13cm 110.3bcde 360.7b 172.2e 84.8cd 24.6def 12.27bc
4.1叶龄-钵盘-20cm 112.2abcd 331.1c 178.7bc 87.7abcd 25.0bcdef 12.58ab
4.1叶龄-钵盘-27cm 112.6abcd 302.1fg 171.4e 89.4abcd 25.3abcdef 11.15gh
4.1叶龄-软盘-13cm 111.9abcde 312.8def 171.0e 91.2abc 26.0ab 11.84de
4.1叶龄-软盘-20cm 113.4abc 299.5fg 188.6a 90.4abc 25.8abc 12.90a
4.1叶龄-软盘-27cm 114.0a 288.9gh 179.7b 91.2abc 25.7abc 11.98cd
5.7叶龄-钵盘-13cm 108.5e 323.1cd 154.2h 91.7abc 25.7abc 11.58ef
5.7叶龄-钵盘-20cm 112.2abcd 298.9fg 171.2e 89.7abcd 25.4abcde 11.57ef
5.7叶龄-钵盘-27cm 114.3a 281.9hi 175.9cd 90.7abc 24.9cdef 11.06hi
5.7叶龄-软盘-13cm 109.3de 306.0ef 163.6f 91.6abc 25.9abc 11.63ef
5.7叶龄-软盘-20cm 110.0cde 274.5hi 178.7bc 92.5ab 26.1a 11.82de
5.7叶龄-软盘-27cm 112.1abcd 269.1i 179.1bc 94.0a 25.6abcd 11.54ef
[1] 付景, 杨建昌 .中国水稻栽培理论与技术发展的回顾与展望.作物杂志,2010(5):1-4.
[2] 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅 , 等.氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2014(6):1319-1328.
[3] 吴春赞, 叶定池, 林华 , 等. 不同叶龄移栽对水稻产量及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(3):172-173.
[4] 张凯迪, 陈跃武 , 等.钵形毯状秧苗和常规毯状秧苗机插对水稻产量结构及其产量的影响.安徽农业科学,2014(5):1558-1560.
[5] 袁隆平 .水稻强化栽培体系. 杂交水稻, 2001,16(4):1-3.
[6] 俞爱英, 朱贵平, 陈东莲 , 等. 水稻强化栽培体系不同秧龄移栽对产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2004,19(2):53-55.
[7] 郑小东, 金再欣, 刘小丽 , 等.杂交水稻中浙优1号的秧龄适应性试验.浙江农业科学,2009(2):332-333.
[8] Kewat M L, Agrawal S B, Agrawal K K , et al. Effect of divergent plant spacings and age of seedlings on yield and economics of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 2002,47(3):367-371.
[9] Khatun A , Mollah M I U,Rashid I H,et al.Seasonal effect of seedling age on the yield of rice. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2002,5(1):40-42.
doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.40.42
[10] 余康宁, 陶诗顺, 张荣萍 , 等.栽植密度和施肥量对长龄秧迟栽油茬杂交稻生长和产量的影响.作物杂志,2016(2):1-4.
[11] 齐春艳 .不同密度和叶龄移栽对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2005.
[12] 陈俊岩 . 水稻钵育苗摆栽机械化技术试验分析. 湖南农机, 1999,(6):25-27
[13] 张洪程, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋 , 等.钵苗机插水稻产量形成优势及主要生理生态特点.农业工程学报,2013(21):50-59.
[14] 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙 , 等, 钵苗机插水稻群体动态特征及高产形成机制的探讨.中国农业科学,2014(5):865-879.
[15] 李华, 陆亚琴, 祝志刚 , 等. 水稻钵苗机插与毯苗机插生产力比较研究. 中国稻米, 2013,19(6):60-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2013.06.018
[16] 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅 , 等.氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2014(6):1319-1328.
[17] 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆 , 等.氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2015(3):763-772.
[18] 李木英, 石庆华, 王涛 , 等. 种植密度对双季超级稻群体发育和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2009,24(2):72-77.
[19] 张荣萍, 戴红燕, 蔡光泽 , 等. 不同栽插密度对有色稻产量和群体质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(16):123-127.
[20] 朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫 , 等. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(1):122-133.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00122
[21] 付立东, 隋鑫, 任海 , 等. 不同取秧量与穴距对机插水稻产量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2014,42(12):70-72.
[1] Ji Shengdong, Li Peng, Li Jiangwei, Song Liumin, . Analysis of Peroxidase Zymogram and Genetic#br# Effects between Rice Lines and Their#br# Parents During Grain Filling [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 17-20.
[2] Ma Mengli, Zheng Yun, Zhou Xiaomei, . Genetic Diversity Analysis of Red Rice from#br# Hani’s Terraced Fields in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 21-26.
[3] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[4] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[5] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[6] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[7] Chen Yingying, Wangxu Yiling, Zhu Yuhan, . Hyperspectral Estimation of Nitrogen#br# Content in Rice Panicle [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 116-120.
[8] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[9] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[10] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[11] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[12] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[13] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[14] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[15] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!