Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 140-146.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Plastic Film Mulching on Agronomic Traits for Different Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Varieties

Sang Limin1,Xu Jing2,Zhao Xiaoqing3,Guo Yuanzhang2,Jian Jiali2,Hao Xiaoyu2,Guo Jiulin1,Gao Yonghai1,Han Jianguo1,Xu Guizhen2   

  1. 1Chende Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences,Chengde 067000,Hebei,China
    2Institution of Cereal and Oil Crops,Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Shijiazhuang 050035,Hebei,China
    3Chende Pesticide Supervision and Management Station,Chengde 067000,Hebei,China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Revised:2017-09-08 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Guizhen Xu

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

319

Abstract:

In order to illustrate the effects of plastic film mulching on agronomic traits for different sesame varieties, three varieties, Jihangzhi No.1, Jihangzhi No.2 and Jihangzhi No.3 were used as materials in this study. The yield, agronomic traits, disease resistance, and economic benefit were compared between the open field culture model and plastic film mulching culture model. The results showed that plant height, stem diameter, effective fruit axial length, number of fruit nodes per plant were significantly increased by mulching culture, while the height of first capsule was decreased. Meanwhile, mulching culture was helpful to the root growth, due to the main root length, the number of lateral roots and the range of roots were increased. The effect of plastic mulching on sesame disease was not obvious. The ability of lodging resistance was enhanced by plastic film mulching. Lodging percentage of Jihangzhi No.1, Jihangzhi No.2 and Jihangzhi No.3 in open field were 3.5, 2.8 and 3.0 times of the plastic film mulching cultivation respectively. Correlation analysis and partial correlation analysis showed that the effects of stem diameter and plant height on the lodging percentage were significant (P<0.01). Variety and cultivation mode had very significant impact on plot yield, yield per plant, 1000-grain weight and capsule number per plant; and the interaction between them had very significant impact on yield per plant and capsule number per plant, which had significant impact on plot yield, and had no significant on 1000-grain weight. Plastic film mulching could substantially increase net income and cost-profit ratio of cultivated sesame, and Jihangzhi No.2 planted with plastic film mulching achieved maximum economic benefits, the cost-profit ratio reached 126.57%.

Key words: Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), Plastic film mulching, Yield traits, Economic benefits

Fig.1

The influence of different cultivation on agricultural traits of sesame varieties Different lower case letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among treatments, the same below"

Fig.2

The influence of different cultivation on lodging resistance and disease resistance of sesame varieties"

Table 1

Correlation and partial correlation coefficient of lodging percentage with agricultural traits"

倒伏率
Lodging percentage		 茎粗
Stem diameter		 主根长度
Main root length		 侧根条数
Lateral root number		 根系分布范围
The range of roots		 株高
Plant height
倒伏率Lodging percentage 1 -0.852** 0.486 0.195 -0.515 -0.914**
茎粗Stem diameter -0.904** 1 0.237 0.442 -0.209 -0.805**
主根长度Main root length -0.736** 0.719** 1 0.537* 0.375 0.373
侧根条数Lateral root number -0.893** 0.849** 0.920** 1 0.191 0.451
根系分布范围The range of roots -0.750** 0.824** 0.697** 0.751** 1 -0.563*
株高Plant height -0.902** 0.696** 0.790** 0.890** 0.552* 1

Table 2

Variance analysis of yield and yield components of sesame under different varieties and different cultivation patterns"

因素与互作
Factors and interactions		 小区产量(kg)
Plot yield		 单株生产力(g)
Yield per plant		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 单株蒴数
Capsule number per plant
A1 3.3567b 12.7967b 2.85483b 85.5000c
A2 3.9600a 13.7600a 3.04617a 98.0000a
A3 3.4050b 11.8250c 3.05700a 90.0000b
B1 3.0800b 11.4589b 2.93320b 77.6667b
B2 4.0678a 14.1289a 3.03880a 104.6667a
A1B1 2.9567c 12.5500bc 2.80667a 75.6667e
A1B2 3.7567b 13.0433b 2.90300a 95.3333c
A2B1 3.1900bc 11.0833cd 2.98067a 83.6667d
A2B2 4.7300a 16.4367a 3.11167a 112.3333a
A3B1 3.0933bc 10.7433d 3.01233a 73.6667e
A3B2 3.7167b 12.9067b 3.10167a 106.3333b
品种Variety ** ** ** **
栽培模式Cultivation pattern ** ** ** **
品种×栽培模式Variety×Cultivation pattern * ** NS **

Table 3

Economic benefit analysis of different sesame varieties under different cultivation modes"

处理
Treatment		 成本(元/hm2) Cost (yuan/hm2) 小区产量(kg)
Plot yield		 单位面积产量(kg/hm2)
Yield in hectare		 毛收入
(元/hm2)
Income
(yuan/hm2)		 净收入
(元/hm2)
Net income
(yuan/hm2)		 成本利润率(%)
Cost-profit ratio
肥料
Fertilizer		 农药
Pesticide		 地膜
Film		 人工
Labour		 总成本
Total cost
A1B1 1 560.00 183.00 0 10 500.00 12 243.00 2.9567 1 369.53 16 434.32 4 191.32 34.23
A1B2 1 560.00 183.00 860.70 9 000.00 11 603.70 3.7567 1 740.08 20 880.99 9 277.29 79.95
A2B1 1 560.00 183.00 0 10 500.00 12 243.00 3.1900 1 477.59 17 731.08 5 488.08 44.83
A2B2 1 560.00 183.00 860.70 9 000.00 11 603.70 4.7300 2 190.91 26 290.92 14 687.22 126.57
A3B1 1 560.00 183.00 0 10 500.00 12 243.00 3.0933 1 432.80 17 193.59 4 950.59 40.44
A3B2 1 560.00 183.00 860.70 9 000.00 11 603.70 3.7167 1 721.55 20 658.66 9 054.96 78.04
[1] 颜小文, 乐美旺, 饶月亮 , 等. 播种期对芝麻生育期及产量性状的影响. 作物研究, 2011,25(1):22-25.
[2] 徐桂真, 张京慧, 和剑涵 , 等. 恢复和发展河北省芝麻生产的对策. 河北农业科学, 2010,14(6):109-110,154.
[3] Bedigian D, Harlan J R . Evidence for cultivation of sesame in the ancient world. Economic Botany, 1986,40:137-154.
doi: 10.1007/BF02859136
[4] Zhang H Y, Miao H M, Li C , et al. Ultra-dense SNP genetic map construction and identification of SiDt gene controlling the determinate growth habit in Sesamumindicum L. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:31556; doi: 10.1038/srep31556.
doi: 10.1038/srep31556
[5] 吴建军 . 花生地膜覆盖增产栽培技术研究与实践. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(16):39-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2008.16.022
[6] 康树立, 詹海燕, 金焱 , 等. 覆膜栽培对抗氧化花生的影响研究. 杂粮作物, 2006,26(3):229-231.
[7] 王冀川, 万素梅, 张爱华 . 地膜油葵的生长规律与密度效应的研究. 西北农业学报, 2004,13(2):149-152,157.
[8] 刘文萍, 卫双玲, 任果香 , 等. 不同播种技术对芝麻品种汾芝2号的影响.农村科技通讯, 2012(8):115-117.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2012.08.038
[9] 刘文萍, 王勇, 张超美 , 等. 地膜覆盖在春芝麻栽培中的增产效应研究.甘肃农业科技, 2003(6):22-23.
[10] 王瑾, 周立杰, 李玉荣 , 等. 不同栽培模式对芝麻农艺性状及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2011,26(增刊):253-256.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.s2.053
[11] 王艳春, 刘秋颖 . 芝麻地膜覆盖栽培技术.农民致富之友, 2012(10):32.
[12] 梁金平 . 地膜覆盖栽培对夏薯‘龙薯24号’增产因素的探讨. 福建农业学报, 2013,28(4):324-329.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.04.005
[13] 杨桂平, 贾淑贤, 张振连 , 等 .冀西北旱地地膜西瓜优质高产栽培技术 .现代农业科技, 2011( 2): 145, 148.
[14] 孙宝 . 土豆地膜覆盖栽培技术.吉林农业, 2016(21):94.
doi: 10.14025/j.cnki.jlny.2016.21.050
[15] 孙梦媛, 刘景辉, 杨彦明 . 全膜单垄垄上微沟播种栽培方式对旱作马铃薯生长及产量的影响.作物杂志, 2016(5):101-105.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.017
[16] 安曈昕, 陈梦丽, 周锋 . 玉米沟塘覆膜模式间作马铃薯产量效益研究.作物杂志, 2016(5):106-111.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.018
[17] 汪磊, 谭美莲, 叶春雷 , 等. 胡麻覆膜种植对产量、水分利用和经济效益的影响. 中国油料作物, 2016,38(4):460-466.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2016.04.008
[18] 于爱忠, 柴强 . 供水与地膜覆盖对干旱灌区玉米产量的影响. 作物学报, 2015,41(5):778-786.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00778
[19] Li F M, Guo A H, Wei H . Effects of clear plastic film mulch on yield of spring wheat. Field Crops Research, 1999,63:79-86.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00027-1
[20] Niu J Y, Gan Y T, Zhang J W , et al. Postanthesis dry matter accumulation and redistribution in spring wheat mulched with plastic film. Crop Science, 1998,38:1562-1568.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060026x
[21] Qin S H, Zhang J L, Dai H L , et al. Effect of ridge-furrow and plastic-mulching planting patterns on yield formation and water movement of potato in a semi-arid area. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,131:87-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.09.015
[22] Dong B D, Liu M Y, Jiang J W , et al. Growth,grain yield,and water use efficiency of rain-fed spring hybrid millet (Setaria italica) in plastic-mulched and unmulched fields. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,143(9):93-101.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.011
[23] Li R, Hou X Q, Jia Z K , et al. Effects on soil temperature,moisture,and maize yield of cultivation with ridge and furrow mulching in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau,China. Agricultural Water Management, 2013,116:101-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.001
[24] Zhou L M, Li F M, Jin S L , et al. How two ridges and the furrow mulched with plastic film affect soil water,soil temperature and yield of maize on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Research, 2009,113:41-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.005
[25] Zhu L, Liu J L, Luo S S , et al. Soil mulchingcan mitigate soil water deficiency impacts on rainfed maize production in semiarid environments. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2015,14:58-66.
[26] 樊俊华, 郝建平, 宋晓丽 . 旱地冬小麦渗水地膜覆盖下温度及产量效应研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2006,26(3):242-244,287.
[27] 高亮, 张维宏, 杜雄 , 等. 覆膜和补灌对杂交谷子产量形成与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2017,43(1):122-132.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00122
[1] Huijuan Tang,Gonggu Zang,Chaohua Cheng,Qing Tang,Yujun Li,Lining Zhao. Correspondence Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 52-55.
[2] Hong Li,Mengjiao Li,Yuchao Wang,Ruijun Wang,Xuli Zhang. Study on the Pattern of Maize/Brassica juncea var. integlifolia Intercropping in Alpine Regions [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 120-125.
[3] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 71-74.
[4] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 93-95.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .