Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 52-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correspondence Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)

Tang Huijuan,Zang Gonggu,Cheng Chaohua,Tang Qing,Li Yujun,Zhao Lining   

  1. Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, Hunan, China
  • Received:2017-09-25 Revised:2018-02-06 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-08-27

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

141

Abstract:

The correspondence analysis was applied to analyze the yield traits and fiber quality traits. The results showed that the major traits which affect the fiber yield of industrial hemp were the fresh stalk weight and the dry fiber weight; and the major traits which affect the fiber quality of industrial hemp were the fiber count, breaking energy and the ratio of fiber glue; the minor traits which affect the fiber quality were the breaking strength and breaking elongation. The Fenma No.3 had the traits of high fiber yield and high fiber count compared with other three varieties.

Key words: Industrial hemp, Yield traits, Quality traits, Correspondence analysis

Table 1

Soil nutrient content at research site"

土层(cm)
Soil layer		 pH 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 全氮(g/kg)
Total nitrogen		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Available nitrogen		 全磷(g/kg)
Total phosphorus		 速效磷(mg/kg)
Rapid available phosphorus		 全钾(g/kg)
Total potassium		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Rapidly available potassium
0~10 5.15 25.30 1.83 131.11 0.95 63.77 14.53 113.60
10~20 5.07 22.29 1.71 108.93 0.81 52.82 13.12 72.96
20~30 4.95 20.84 1.66 65.41 0.73 39.72 12.85 59.61

Table 2

Yield traits of different industrial hemp varieties"

编号
No.		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎粗(mm)
Stem diameter		 分枝高(cm)
Branching height		 鲜茎重(kg)
Fresh stem weight		 鲜皮重(kg/hm2)
Fresh fiber weight		 干皮重(kg/hm2)
Dry fiber weight
T4 349.11±8.67a 12.94±1.01ab 233.08±18.23a 5.10±0.99a 24.75±6.20a 6.50±1.11a
T6 327.43±7.06b 13.97±2.30a 229.08±24.86ab 4.53±0.59ab 25.47±3.29a 5.88±0.52ab
T8 325.89±15.32b 13.17±1.55ab 218.36±11.60ab 4.42±1.38ab 24.31±6.70a 5.86±1.55ab
CK 310.13±6.63c 11.65±0.64b 212.67±10.27b 3.85±0.59b 19.61±1.06b 4.78±0.91b

Table 3

Quality traits of different industrial hemp varieties"

编号
No.		 纤维支数(m/g)
Fiber count		 断裂强度(cN/tex)
Breaking strength		 断裂伸长率(%)
Breaking elongation		 断裂功(mJ/tex)
Fracture energy		 含胶率(%)
Rubber content
T4 440.78±34.71c 11.30±2.16a 5.28±0.56a 0.18±0.04a 44.72±3.37a
T6 535.22±69.93a 11.63±3.40a 5.36±0.55a 0.19±0.07a 44.60±2.57a
T8 512.67±44.46ab 11.56±1.96a 5.61±0.32a 0.19±0.02a 45.17±2.71a
CK 480.67±38.86bc 11.73±0.79a 5.29±0.57a 0.21±0.04a 46.91±2.38a

Table 4

Inertia and chi-square decomposition of the correspondence analysis"

特征值
Singular
value		 主要惯量
Principal
inertia		 卡方值
Chi-square		 贡献率(%)
Percent		 累计贡献率(%)
Cumulative percent
0.04611 0.00213 9.5736 93.01 93.01
0.01155 0.00013 0.6008 5.84 98.85
0.00513 0.00003 0.1186 1.15 100.00
总和Total 0.00302 15.2713 100.00 -

Table 5

R factor loading of the correspondence analysis"

第一维度
Dimension 1		 第二维度
Dimension 2
株高Plant height 0.0488 -0.0008
茎粗Stem diameter 0.0049 -0.0379
分枝高Branching height 0.0360 -0.0031
鲜茎重Fresh stem weight 0.0860 -0.0454
鲜皮重Fresh fiber weight 0.0295 -0.0706
干皮重Dry fiber weight 0.0753 -0.0576
纤维支数Fiber count -0.0510 -0.0016
断裂强度Breaking strength 0.0034 0.0320
断裂伸长率Breaking elongation 0.0037 0.0192
断裂功Fracture energy -0.0113 0.0517
含胶率Rubber content 0.0107 0.0459

Fig.1

Correspondence analysis based on yield and quality correlated traits"

[1] 王殿奎, 关凤芝 . 黑龙江省大麻生产现状及发展对策. 中国麻业科学, 2005,27(2):98-101.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3532.2005.02.011
[2] 郭丽, 王明泽, 王殿奎 , 等. 工业大麻综合利用研究进展与前景展望. 黑龙江农业科学, 2014(8):132-134.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2014.08.037
[3] 陈璇, 杨明, 郭鸿彦 . 大麻植物中大麻素成分研究进展. 植物学报, 2011,46(2):197-205.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2011.00197
[4] 李中涛 . 对应分析在学科发展中的应用. 长春:吉林大学, 2010.
[5] 韩路, 贾志宽, 韩清芳 , 等. 紫花苜蓿主要性状的对应分析. 中国草地学报, 2003,25(5):38-42.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2003.05.007
[6] 陈荣江, 赵晖, 朱明哲 , 等. 小麦产量性状与品质性状的对应分析及偏相关分析. 土壤与作物, 2012,1(1):21-26.
[7] 王增信, 梁正兰 . 棉花种间杂种后代主要经济性状的对应分析. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1997(6):56-60.
[8] 胡俊 . 水稻卷叶性状研究及相关基因的效应分析. 扬州:扬州大学, 2003.
doi: 10.7666/d.y564645
[9] 孙小寅, 管映亭, 温桂清 , 等. 大麻纤维的性能及其应用研究. 纺织学报, 2001,22(4):34-36.
[10] 康红梅, 赵铭森, 孔佳茜 , 等. 工业大麻隔离制种技术研究. 山西农业科学, 2014,42(7):708-710.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2014.07.17
[11] 杨明, 郭鸿彦, 文郭松 , 等. 大麻新品种云麻1号的选育及其栽培技术. 中国麻业, 2003,25(1):1-3.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3532.2003.01.001
[12] 房郁妍 . 大麻栽培技术研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010(6):38-39.
[13] 梁晓红 . 大麻的生物学特性及用途 . 农艺学, 2014( 13): 48, 50.
[14] 陈建华, 臧巩固, 赵立宁 , 等. 大麻化学成分研究进展与开发我国大麻资源的探讨. 中国麻业, 2003(6):266-271.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3532.2003.06.002
[15] 陈其本 . 大麻的综合利用. 中国麻作, 1990(1):40-42.
[1] Limin Sang,Jing Xu,Xiaoqing Zhao,Yuanzhang Guo,Jiali Jian,Xiaoyu Hao,Jiulin Guo,Yonghai Gao,Jianguo Han,Guizhen Xu. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching on Agronomic Traits for Different Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 140-146.
[2] Ying Jiang,Yufeng Sun,Dongmei Pan,Qiuzhi Li. EMS Mutant Screening and RAPD Analysis on Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 50-54.
[3] Jizhen Yu,Rui Wang,Pengjie Zhan,Jun'ai Ping,Fuyao Zhang. Diversity of Agronomic and Quality Traits of Major Sorghum Hybrids in China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 49-54.
[4] Haitao Cheng,Zhaohui Ma,Guilin Liu,Ping Cao,Wenyan Lü. Canonical Correlation Analysis between RVA Profile Characteristics and Quality Traits of Japonica Rice Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 59-66.
[5] Bing Duan,Qingshan Liu,Du Liang,Fengxia Yan,Qi Guo. Analysis on the Combining Ability of Quality Traits in Forage Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 51-55.
[6] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 93-95.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .