Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 38-43.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Yield and Related Traits of Maize Varieties in Different Ecological Regions of Eastern North China

Yang Zhang,Huilin Yu,Yanbo Wang   

  1. Maize Research Institute, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2018-05-31 Revised:2018-09-26 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-02-01
  • Contact: Yanbo Wang

Abstract:

Ten mid-late maturing maize cultivars were used as test materials for planting experiments in five ecological regions in the Eastern North China. Yield, spike traits, agronomic traits, lodging-resistance, and disease-resistance were studied. The results showed that different ecological areas had a great influence on the yield potential of maize (F=13.53), and there were also large differences between varieties (F=22.93). Spike traits were affected by different ecological areas. Correlation coefficient of yield components followed a trend of number of spikes>grain number per spike>100-grain weight, and baldness length>spike grain weight>spike length>row number. Baldness length were the most active spike factor under different ecological conditions, and it had extremely negative correlation with yield. Lodging-resistance changed slightly in different ecological regions. The coefficient of variation of lodging rate (CV) was only 1.24%-2.43%. In terms of maize diseases, Shanxi was a disease-prone region, and there were great differences in the incidence of different diseases in each ecological area. In general, the 10 maize varieties tested in Inner Mongolia and Shanxi were more conducive to the development of productive potential. The weak lodging-resistant varieties were suitable for planting in Inner Mongolia, and those with weak disease-resistance were not suitable for planting in Shanxi. According to the characteristics of temperature, light and rainfall in different ecological regions, rational allocation of sowing date and flowering season is the key to improve the ecological adaptability of maize.

Key words: Ecological region, Maize, Yield, Resistance

Table 1

Climate characteristics of five ecological regions from May to September in 2017"

气候因子Climate factor 生态区
Ecological region
月份Month
5 6 7 8 9 平均或总和Average or sum
平均气温Average temperature (℃) 辽宁 17.5 22.2 24.6 23.8 17.8 21.18
吉林 16.2 21.4 23.5 22.3 16.2 19.92
内蒙古 17.5 22.3 24.5 23.6 17.4 21.06
河北 20.8 25.9 27.1 25.6 21.0 24.08
山西 18.0 22.1 23.8 23.6 18.4 21.18
降水量Rainfall (mm) 辽宁 43.5 48.6 171.3 152.8 68.7 484.9
吉林 48.2 88.1 173.1 123.7 43.1 476.2
内蒙古 38.7 78.7 89.5 72.9 23.2 303.0
河北 40.5 55.3 129.8 134.4 49.6 409.6
山西 36.9 52.4 83.3 87.3 53.8 313.7
日照Sunshine (h)
辽宁 242.3 227.3 191.3 213.9 223.8 1 098.6
吉林 254.2 247.5 219.5 231.7 243.3 1 196.2
内蒙古 263.8 246.8 235.3 254.8 249.5 1 250.2
河北 262.2 220.0 191.1 189.0 170.2 1 032.5
山西 259.1 241.4 230.7 221.6 201.7 1 154.5

Table 2

Comparison of maize variety yields in different ecological regions"

品种
Variety
生态区Ecological region (kg/hm2) 平均产量
(kg/hm2)
Average yield
变异系数(%)
Coefficient
of variation
辽宁
Liaoning
吉林
Jilin
内蒙古
Inner Mongolia
河北
Hebei
山西
Shanxi
辽8702 Liao 8702 12 454 12 612 14 253 12 292 14 128 13 148 3.94
吉单473 Jidan 473 10 235 12 703 13 067 11 205 13 088 12 060 10.79
东1772 Dong 1772 11 801 12 577 12 567 10 482 12 715 12 028 7.60
丹玉487 Danyu 487 11 530 12 489 13 197 11 774 13 044 12 407 5.66
ms1702 12 577 12 256 14 234 12 317 13 397 129 56 10.92
DL1702 10 671 11 312 12 586 10 011 12 674 11 451 13.14
JD4-1 10 958 11 069 13 528 10 457 11 571 11 517 11.30
农单880 Nongdan 880 11 076 11 902 13 384 10 501 12 555 11 883 11.88
DF2010 11 585 12 637 14 065 12 549 14 874 13 142 10.32
ND679 12 141 12 330 13 080 10 280 13 172 12 200 9.85
平均产量Average yield 12 454 12 612 14 253 12 292 14 128 13 148
F值F value 地点Location 13.53**
品种Variety 22.93**
地点×品种Location×variety 0.51ns
与株高相关系数Correlation coefficient with plant height -0.52ns
与穗位高相关系数Correlation coefficient with spike height -0.39ns
与平均温度相关系数Correlation coefficient with average temperature 0.75*
与降水量相关系数Correlation coefficient with rainfall 0.43ns
与日照相关系数Correlation coefficient with sunshine time 0.89**

Table 3

Changes of yield components and spike traits of different varieties in different ecological regions"

生态区
Ecological region
产量构成因素 Yield component 穗部性状 Spike trait
穗数
Spike number
穗粒数
Grain number
百粒重(g)
100-grain weight
穗行数
Spike row number
穗粒重(g)
Spike grain weight
穗长(cm)
Spike length
秃尖长(cm)
Baldness length
辽宁Liaoning 4 425.8 482.3 36.4 16.9 213.2 19.4 1.5
吉林Jilin 4 368.2 513.7 36.2 16.6 218.2 20.4 1.6
内蒙古Inner Mongolia 4 449.3 575.8 34.9 17.2 208.2 19.5 0.8
河北Hebei 4 105.6 457.3 39.7 16.5 192.5 19.1 1.2
山西Shanxi 4 383.7 553.4 36.1 17.2 173.3 20.2 1.1
平均Average 4 346.5 516.5 36.7 16.9 201.1 19.72 1.26
与产量相关性
Correlation efficiency with yield
0.9* 0.8* 0.4ns 0.1ns 0.4ns 0.4ns -0.76*
F值-地点
F value-location
10.2* 8.6* 5.1* 0.9ns 83.3** 15.2** 639.4**

Table 4

Analysis of lodging rates in different ecological regions"

品种
Variety
不同生态区Ecological region (%) 平均
Average
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
辽宁
Liaoning
吉林
Jilin
内蒙古
Inner Mongolia
河北
Hebei
山西
Shanxi
辽8702 Liao 8702 3.36 1.31 0 0.93 0. 1.12 1.24
吉单473 Jidan 473 8.40 0 2.45 0 25.00 7.17 1.58
东1772 Dong 1772 2.50 0 0 0 0 0.5 2.43
丹玉487 Danyu 487 0.83 0 0.40 0 0 0.25 1.57
ms1702 2.85 0.13 0.43 0 25.00 5.68 1.91
DL1702 0.16 0 0 0 0 0.03 2.40
JD4-1 15.00 1.45 0.38 0 0 3.37 2.07
品种
Variety
不同生态区Ecological region (%) 平均
Average
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
辽宁
Liaoning
吉林
Jilin
内蒙古
Inner Mongolia
河北
Hebei
山西
Shanxi
农单880 Nongdan 880 1.04 0 0.73 0 0 0.35 1.51
DF2010 2.23 1.63 0 0.35 0 0.84 1.29
ND679 0.16 0 1.08 0 0 0.25 2.08
平均Average 3.65b 0.45c 0.55c 0.13d 5.00a
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 3.1 8.9 3.8 1.9 7.8 5.1
F值F value 地点Location 2.06ns
品种Variety 39.39**
地点×品种Location×variety 51.15**

Fig.1

Comparison of plant height and ear height in different ecological regions Different small letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05) among different regions, the same below"

Fig.2

Comparison of main diseases of maize in different ecological regions"

[1] 周进宝, 杨国航, 孙世贤 , 等. 黄淮海夏播玉米区玉米生产现状和发展趋势. 作物杂志, 2017(2):4-7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2008.02.002
[2] 易镇邪, 王璞, 张红芳 , 等. 氮肥类型与施用量对华北平原夏玉米源库关系的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(3):294-300.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0302
[3] 王崇桃, 李少昆, 韩伯棠 . 玉米产量潜力实现的限制因素的参与式评估. 科技与经济, 2017(7):53-59.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2006.07.009
[4] 刘淑云, 董树亭, 胡昌浩 , 等. 玉米产量和品质与生态环境的关系. 作物学报, 2005,31(5):571-576.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.05.007
[5] 陈国平, 杨国航, 赵明 , 等. 玉米小面积超高产创建及配套栽培技术研究. 玉米科学, 2008,16(4):1-4.
[6] 陈亮, 史振声, 李凤海 , 等. 辽宁省不同熟期玉米品种的产量及其相关性状比较. 种子, 2010,29(5):68-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2010.05.020
[7] 史振声, 张飞 . 高秆稀植大穗型玉米的密植潜力研究. 玉米科学, 2009,17(2):116-119.
[8] 刘松涛, 刘过, 晋宏宇 , 等. 河北省不同生态区夏玉米丰产、稳产性品种筛选研究. 作物杂志, 2017(2):56-60.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.02.010
[9] 王庆成, 王忠孝, 张秀清 , 等. 紧凑型玉米新杂交群体结构特点和变化动态. 山东农业科学, 2017(5):4-9.
[10] 陈传永, 董志强, 赵明 , 等. 低温冷凉地区超高产春玉米群体生长分析研究. 玉米科学, 2007,15(3):75-79.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2007.03.018
[11] 赵建华, 孙建好, 陈伟 , 等. 不同作物与玉米间套作对玉米产量和生物量累积的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(4):120-125.
[1] Xixi Dai,Heming Zhan,Xinghong Cui,Yinyue Zhao,Dandan Shan,Liang Zhang,Tiejun Wang. A Mathematical Model of Density Coupling and Its Optimization in Maize-Soybean Intercropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 128-135.
[2] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[3] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[4] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[5] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[6] Yunqing Gao,Shutong Li,Qibing Shang,Junchun Shi,Dongxu Xu. Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 164-167.
[7] Yaxing Shi,Li Xu,Jiuran Zhao,Baishan Lu,Yanli Fan. Waxy Maize Industry Advantages in China and Opportunities in the Development of the Belt and Road [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 15-19.
[8] Huihui Tang,Yanli Xu,Qingyan Wang,Zhengbo Ma,Guangyan Li,Hui Dong,Zhiqiang Dong. Effects of Foliar Spraying 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Spring Maize Growth and Yield under Different Planting Densities [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 136-141.
[9] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[10] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[11] Yifei Zhang,Song Yu,Yufeng Wang,Kejun Yang,Zhuangyuan Guo,Yao Li,Yishan Sun,Wenbao Jia,Yafeng Zhang. Research Progress on Agronomic Practice for Grain Moisture Loss of Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 1-8.
[12] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[13] Kainan Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Ruiqi Ma,Yingjie Zhu,Zheli Xu,Baojun Zhang,Guangcai Zhao. Effects of Tridimensional Uniform Sowing and Fertilizer on Grain and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 103-110.
[14] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[15] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .