Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 185-191.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.02.029

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield

Lifeng Dong1,Xiaohu Lin1,Chunrong Liu2,Guishuang Hou3,Chunlu Zhang1,Jinfeng Fu1,Fengbao Wang1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Heibei Normal University of Science & Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China;
    2 Fengnan Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau of Tangshan City, Tangshan 063300, Hebei, China
    3 Qinhuangdao Agriculture Bureau, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Revised:2018-12-12 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-04-12
  • Contact: Jinfeng Fu

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

208

Abstract:

Three farm chemicals were chosen and compounded, i.e. Liangdun (seed coating agent for preventing root rot), Gaoqiao (insect repellent for indirectly preventing virus disease) and Kaipuke (promoting plant growth) to screen out the suitable compound seed coating for pea seeds. The seeds of four vegetable pea cultivars, Tianwan 3, Lübao, Baofeng 6 and Shijiadacaiwan 1, were coated with the compound seed coating agents. The suitable ratio of agent and seed would be selected on the basis of performance of seedling rate, important agronomic characters and yield. The results were as follows: when the ratio of agent and seed was 1:0.5, the seedling emergence rates of Tianwan 3 and Lübao were restrained; when the ratio was 1:7.5, there was no significant difference in seedling emergence rate, farm characters and yield compared with the control group; when the ratio was 1:5.0, the seedling emergence rate was the highest with the best seedling quality; the average yield was 20.5% higher than that of the control group. Therefore, the best proportion of coating pea seeds with the compound seed coating agent is the formulation of the mixture of Liangdun 10mL, Gaoqiao 20mL and Kaipuke 10mL for pea seeds 5.0kg.

Key words: Pea (Pisum sativum L.), Compound seed coat agent, Growth, Yield

Table 1

The influence of different ratios of agent and seed on growth stages Month-Day"

品种
Cultivar		 药种比
Ratio of agent and seed		 播种期
Sowing date		 出苗期
Seedling stage		 开花期
Flowering date		 结荚期
Podding stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶2.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶5.0 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶7.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
CK 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶2.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶5.0 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶7.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
CK 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶2.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶5.0 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
1∶7.5 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
CK 3-24 4-13 5-17 5-22 6-28
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 3-24 4-13 5-15 5-20 6-21
1∶2.5 3-24 4-13 5-15 5-20 6-21
1∶5.0 3-24 4-13 5-15 5-20 6-21
1∶7.5 3-24 4-13 5-15 5-20 6-21
CK 3-24 4-13 5-15 5-20 6-21

Table 2

The influence of different ratios of agent and seed on percentage of seedling emergence of coated seeds %"

品种Cultivar 药种比Ratio of agent and seed 室内木箱法Laboratory germination test 田间小区试验Field plot experiment
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 82.5dC 58.5cC
1∶2.5 95.0abAB 72.5bB
1∶5.0 97.5aA 80.0aA
1∶7.5 92.0bcAB 71.5bB
CK 90.0cB 70.5bB
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 63.6eD 77.0aA
1∶2.5 87.5bB 78.0aA
1∶5.0 97.5aA 80.5aA
1∶7.5 84.0cBC 78.5aA
CK 80.0dC 77.5aA
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 85.0cC 86.5bB
1∶2.5 90.0bB 91.0aAB
1∶5.0 95.0aA 93.5aA
1∶7.5 92.5abAB 93.0aA
CK 80.5dD 80.0cC
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 82.5bB 85.0bcAB
1∶2.5 90.0aA 85.5bcAB
1∶5.0 92.5aA 89.5aA
1∶7.5 92.5aA 86.5abAB
CK 80.5bB 82.5cB

Table 3

Comparisons of seedling quality among different ratios of agent and seed treatments under room germination"

品种
Cultivar		 药种比
Ratio of agent and seed		 苗高(cm)
Seedling height		 主根长(cm)
Main root length		 根鲜重(g)
Fresh root weight		 根干重(g)
Dry root weight
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 09.6bB 12.6aA 4.1aAB 0.32aA
1∶2.5 12.5aA 10.5cC 4.0aAB 0.28aA
1∶5.0 12.7aA 13.2aA 4.3aA 0.33aA
1∶7.5 09.8bB 11.6bB 4.1aAB 0.32aA
CK 09.8bB 10.5cC 3.6bB 0.30aA
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 11.2aAB 10.9bB 4.9aA 0.38aA
1∶2.5 10.5bBC 12.4aA 5.1aA 0.36aA
1∶5.0 11.5aA 12.1aA 5.1aA 0.39aA
1∶7.5 09.7cCD 10.2cB 4.2bB 0.34aA
CK 09.5cD 09.3dC 4.3bB 0.36aA
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 10.2aA 11.7cB 4.4aA 0.38aA
1∶2.5 09.9aA 11.0cB 4.3aA 0.37aA
1∶5.0 10.5aA 13.6aA 4.8aA 0.37aA
1∶7.5 09.7aA 12.8bA 4.7aA 0.35aA
CK 10.0aA 09.4dC 4.6aA 0.39aA
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 11.4aA 11.6cB 12.6aA 0.38aA
1∶2.5 10.4aA 11.9bcAB 12.3aA 0.42aA
1∶5.0 11.5aA 12.5aA 11.2bB 0.43aA
1∶7.5 09.8aA 12.3abAB 12.0aAB 0.37aA
CK 10.2aA 10.1dC 10.2cC 0.40aA

Table 4

Comparisons of aboveground characters among different ratios of agent and seed treatments"

品种
Cultivar		 药种比
Ratio of agent and seed		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 地上部鲜重(g)
Aerial part fresh weight		 单株分枝数
Branches per plant		 叶绿素含量(g/kg)
Chlorophyll content		 叶面积(cm2)
Leaf area
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 46.61aA 21.76bcAB 5aA 564.4cB 9.36aA
1∶2.5 46.56aA 24.34abA 4aA 574.2aA 8.06bB
1∶5.0 45.65aA 26.34aA 5aA 571.0abAB 9.38aA
1∶7.5 45.12aA 18.98cB 4aA 569.0bcAB 9.10aA
CK 45.98aA 21.45bcAB 4aA 542.2dC 7.44cC
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 45.24aA 22.05cC 4aA 540.1cC 16.15aA
1∶2.5 45.32aA 27.56aA 5aA 699.7bB 12.78bcB
1∶5.0 46.23aA 26.38abAB 5aA 728.6aAB 13.44bB
1∶7.5 46.87aA 15.54dD 4aA 745.6aA 13.94bB
CK 45.50aA 24.27bBC 4aA 468.6dD 11.90cB
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 45.35aA 13.94cB 3aA 564.2aA 14.70aA
1∶2.5 45.43aA 17.78bAB 4aA 450.8cB 13.50bAB
1∶5.0 45.76aA 20.75aA 4aA 459.1bcB 11.78cCD
1∶7.5 46.43aA 14.97bcB 4aA 479.9bB 12.96bBC
CK 44.92aA 16.69bcAB 4aA 437.6cB 11.39cD
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 46.23aA 25.44cB 4bB 602.2aA 16.38aA
1∶2.5 45.56aA 36.21aA 3cC 594.9aA 14.60bB
1∶5.0 46.87aA 30.69bAB 4bB 528.4cB 11.34dC
1∶7.5 45.31aA 32.99abA 5aA 538.4bB 14.20bB
CK 45.86aA 16.29dC 3cC 513.3dC 12.06cC

Table 5

Comparisons of main root length and fresh root weight among different ratios of agent and seed treatments"

品种Cultivar 药种比Ratio of agent and seed 主根长Main root length (cm) 根鲜重Fresh root weight (g)
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 16.01bB 6.92aA
1∶2.5 17.30aA 6.84aA
1∶5.0 16.93aA 6.90aA
1∶7.5 16.04bB 4.96bB
CK 13.73cC 4.54bB
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 18.83aA 12.86aA
1∶2.5 18.12aA 13.54aA
1∶5.0 18.24aA 13.40aA
1∶7.5 15.96bB 12.94aA
CK 14.43cC 10.24bB
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 14.68aA 5.10cC
品种Cultivar 药种比Ratio of agent and seed 主根长Main root length (cm) 根鲜重Fresh root weight (g)
1∶2.5 15.15aA 6.70bAB
1∶5.0 14.91aA 6.44bB
1∶7.5 14.82aA 7.26aA
CK 14.43aA 4.28dD
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 13.62bcBC 7.44cC
1∶2.5 14.45abAB 10.70aA
1∶5.0 15.12aA 8.28bcBC
1∶7.5 14.57aAB 9.22bAB
CK 13.19cC 5.20dD

Table 6

Comparisons of yield traits and dry grain yield among different ratios of agent and seed treatments"

品种
Cultivar		 药种比
Ratio of agent
and seed		 单株荚数
Pods
per plant		 荚粒数
Seeds
per pod		 百荚鲜重(g)
100-pod
fresh weight		 双荚率(%)
Double
pods rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-seed
weight		 干子粒产量
(kg/667m2)
Dry grain yield		 增产率(%)
Yield
increase rate
甜豌3号Tianwan 3 1∶0.5 7.4aA 5.2aA 350.1cC 28.6dD 154.9bB 264.4bB 15.3
1∶2.5 6.8abA 5.3aA 363.7bB 33.3cC 157.4bB 253.3cC 10.5
1∶5.0 7.1abA 5.2aA 380.8aA 37.5bB 168.4aA 275.4aA 20.1
1∶7.5 7.1abA 5.0aA 365.1bB 42.8aA 158.4bB 252.8cC 10.3
CK 6.7bA 5.2aA 353.9cC 28.6dD 144.4cC 229.2dD —
绿宝Lübao 1∶0.5 6.6aA 5.7aA 467.0bC 20.0cB 220.4bB 369.0cB 13.5
1∶2.5 6.3aA 6.1aA 485.0aAB 25.0bB 220.6bB 379.6bB 16.7
1∶5.0 6.3aA 6.1aA 493.2aA 33.3aA 231.0aA 394.7aA 21.4
1∶7.5 6.1aA 5.7aA 472.8bBC 33.3aA 221.0bB 342.2dC 5.3
CK 5.9aA 6.0aA 469.4bC 20.0cB 205.2cC 325.1eD —
宝峰6号Baofeng 6 1∶0.5 8.9aA 5.2aA 352.3bB 20.0cC 174.2cB 358.5bcB 11.6
1∶2.5 8.7aA 5.3aA 331.0cC 22.2cBC 175.6cB 364.5bB 13.5
1∶5.0 9.0aA 5.2aA 366.7aA 30.0aA 186.8aA 387.0aA 20.5
1∶7.5 8.5aA 5.2aA 318.8dD 25.0bB 180.4bAB 353.8cB 10.1
CK 8.5aA 5.1aA 311.6eD 25.0bB 166.2dC 321.2dC —
食荚大菜豌1号Shijiadacaiwan 1 1∶0.5 6.4abA 5.5aA 514.6cCD 40.0aA 148.6bB 234.5bB 11.1
1∶2.5 6.5aA 6.0aA 528.0bB 16.6eC 148.4bB 256.5aA 21.5
1∶5.0 6.1abA 5.6aA 547.8aA 28.5cB 172.2aA 253.4aA 20.0
1∶7.5 6.5aA 5.7aA 523.4bBC 20.0dC 152.6bB 252.5aA 19.6
CK 5.9bA 5.7aA 504.3dD 33.3bB 140.6cC 211.0cC —
[1] 颜启传 . 种子学. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2001: 283-292.
[2] 张葳葳, 王玺, 于明艳 . EM包衣对玉米苗期防治丝黑穗病效果的研究. 玉米科学, 2017(3):34-36.
[3] 修英涛, 李学荣, 李勇 , 等. 包衣种子对抗病虫、生长产量的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2017(6):24-27.
[4] Bell J V, Stewart A, Rowarch J S . Application method and growing medium affects the response of cucumber seedling to inoculation with Trichoderm aharzianum. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2000,29:15-18.
doi: 10.1071/AP00002
[5] 宋晓曦, 王玺 . EM包衣对玉米种子萌发及产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2017(6):38-39,42.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2007.06.010
[6] 潘玉荣, 谭亚丽, 谷子秀 . EM菌对水稻种子发芽的影响. 吉林农业科学, 2017(2):61-62.
[7] 杨业圣, 侯立白, 张雯 . 包衣对玉米种子萌发及生长特性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2005,33(4):565-566.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2005.04.003
[8] Zhang H Q, Zou Y B, Xiao G C , et al. Effect and mechanism of cold tolerant seed-coating agents on the cold tolerance of early Indica rice seedlings. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007,6(7):792-801.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(07)60114-X
[9] 武亚敬, 张金香, 高广瑞 , 等. 我国种衣技术的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2017(4):62-66.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2007.04.021
[10] 马文广, 郑昀晔, 李永平 . 种子引发与催芽包衣丸化技术在我国烟叶生产中的应用. 浙江农业科学, 2017(1):211-215.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0528-9017.2011.01.074
[11] 崔华威, 马文广 . 种子包衣剂及包衣方法研究进展. 种子, 2015,34(1):48-53.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2015.01.011
[12] 王绍敏, 国淑梅, 牛贞福 , 等. 45%烯肟菌胺·苯醚甲环唑·噻虫嗪悬浮种衣剂对冬小麦生长发育的影响和主要病虫害的防控研究. 作物杂志, 2017(4):167-171.
[13] 张婷, 衣思瑶, 武向文 , 等. 农药与木霉菌粉剂复配包衣种子对玉米出苗与生长的影响. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2011,29(4):61-66.
doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1671-9964.2011.04.014
[14] 刘金秋, 赵风华, 姜雨萌 , 等. 微生物制剂包衣对冬小麦生长发育的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(4):115-120.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.04.025
[15] 黄文静, 赵宏光, 孙晓春 , 等. 种衣剂包衣对紫苏生长发育和抗病虫害的影响. 种子, 2018,37(6):43-48.
doi: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2018.06.043
[16] 李防洲, 冶军, 侯振安 . 外源调节剂包衣对低温胁迫下棉花种子萌发及幼苗耐寒性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(1):192-197.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.01.29
[17] 田体伟, 雷彩燕, 王怡 , 等. 种衣剂的副作用研究进展. 种子, 2014,33(11):51-55.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2014.11.013
[18] 宗绪晓, 王志刚, 关建平 , 等. 豌豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
[19] 黄穗华, 罗昊文, 黄兴革 , 等. 药剂拌种对直播稻秧苗生长和生理特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):171-176.
[20] 连荣芳, 王梅春, 墨金萍 ,等. 豌豆种质资源抗根腐病鉴定及利用价值分析. 作物杂志, 2017(6):111-114.
[21] 陆建英, 杨晓明 . 豌豆种传花叶病毒病研究综述. 甘肃农业科技, 2017(9):50-53.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2013.09.021
[1] Yonggang Wang,Mingze Ji,Xuhan Zhao,Lihe Yu,Yingwen Xue. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 190(3): 106-111.
[2] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[3] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[4] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[5] Yunqing Gao,Shutong Li,Qibing Shang,Junchun Shi,Dongxu Xu. Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 164-167.
[6] Huihui Tang,Yanli Xu,Qingyan Wang,Zhengbo Ma,Guangyan Li,Hui Dong,Zhiqiang Dong. Effects of Foliar Spraying 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Spring Maize Growth and Yield under Different Planting Densities [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 136-141.
[7] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[8] Jing Yan,Wenxiu Ji,Xianji Shi,Shimiao Zhu,Hulin Li. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 142-149.
[9] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[10] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[11] Kainan Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Ruiqi Ma,Yingjie Zhu,Zheli Xu,Baojun Zhang,Guangcai Zhao. Effects of Tridimensional Uniform Sowing and Fertilizer on Grain and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 103-110.
[12] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[13] Yang Zhang,Huilin Yu,Yanbo Wang. Study on Yield and Related Traits of Maize Varieties in Different Ecological Regions of Eastern North China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 38-43.
[14] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
[15] Jinghong Tan,Luping Zhang,Qixia Wu,Jianqiang Zhu,Zaizhen Zhang. Comparative Research on the Effects of Reducing Nitrogen from Different Fertilizers on Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 134-140.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Ruiqi Ma,Zhen Qi,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Jinfeng Feng,Min Sun,Guangcai Zhao. Regulation Effects of Growth Regulators on Plant Characters, Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 133 -140 .
[5] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[6] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149 -153 .
[7] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[10] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .