Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 69-75.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.05.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Main Agronomic Traits Variation and Its Effects on Yield Composition of Mung Bean in Northern Shanxi Province

Liu Xingye1,Xing Baolong2,Wu Ruixiang2,Wang Guimei2,Liu Fei2   

  1. 1 Datong Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Datong 037008, Shanxi, China
    2 High Latitude Crops Institute,Shanxi Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Datong 037008, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2019-05-13 Revised:2019-09-10 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-11-07
  • Contact: Baolong Xing

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

381

Abstract:

This paper aims to study the variation of main agronomic traits and their role in yield composition of new mung bean varieties (lines), so as to provide scientific basis for the establishment of mung bean high-yield system. Using 25 new mung bean varieties (lines) from the joint identification test of new mung bean varieties (lines) of the National Edible Bean Industry Technology System (2016-2017) as the experimental materials, the variability analysis, correlation analysis and path analysis were carried out for eight agronomic traits, including plant height, nodes of main stem and pods per plant, and so on. The results showed that the variation coefficient of seeds per pod was the smallest, only 7.30% (2017), and the variation coefficient of yield was the most extensive, it was 35.86% (2016). Yield was not significantly correlated with other traits, except that yield was significantly positively correlated with pod length (r=0.609) and seeds per pod (r=0.679). Path analysis showed that the direct path coefficient for yield were pod length >plant height > seeds per pod > pods per plant > 100-seed weight > branches of main stem > nodes of main stem, and direct effects of pod length, seeds per pod, plant height, pods per plant and 100-seed weight on yield were positive, while the direct effects of nodes of main stem, branches of main stem on yield were negative. Comprehensive analysis showed that, in the high-yielding mung bean breeding, the seeds per pod was less affected by the external environment, and had the greatest correlation with the yield as well as good performance in both direct and indirect effects, which should be taken as the main research object. The direct and indirect effects of pod length and 100-seed weight were both positive, which should be the main screening objective and the mutual influence and balanced development of characters should be taken into account so as to develope the potential of mung bean germplasm resources.

Key words: Mung bean, Yield components, Agronomic traits, Variation analysis, Correlation analysis, Path analysis

Table 1

List of experimental materials"

编号
Number		 品种(系)
Variety (Line)		 选育单位
Breeding unit
1 品绿2011-06 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
2 品绿2011-12 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
3 冀绿0816 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所
4 冀绿HNZ0810 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所
5 苏绿16-10 江苏省农业科学院
6 苏绿15-11 江苏省农业科学院
7 鄂绿5号 湖北省农业科学院粮食作物研究所
8 1009-2-5 山西省农业科学院作物科学研究所
9 白绿9号 吉林省白城市农业科学院
10 白绿10号 吉林省白城市农业科学院
11 同1188326 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所
12 辽绿10L708-5 辽宁省农业科学院
13 保绿200810-1 保定市农业科学院
14 保绿201012-7 保定市农业科学院
15 科绿2号 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院
16 142-139 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院
17 122-225 黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院
18 潍绿11号 青岛市农业科学研究院
19 潍绿12号 青岛市农业科学研究院
20 宛绿2号 南阳市农业科学院
21 JLPX01 吉林省农业科学院
22 JLPX02 吉林省农业科学院
23 渝黑绿3号 重庆市农业科学院
24 渝绿2号 重庆市农业科学院
25 中绿5号 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所

Table 2

Statistical analysis of main agronomic characters of mung bean in 2016"

品种(系)
Variety (Line)		 株高(cm)
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Nodes of
main stem		 主茎分枝数
Branches of
main stem		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 荚长(cm)
Pod length		 荚粒数
Seeds per
pod		 百粒重(g)
100-seed
weight		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield
品绿2011-06 Pinlü2011-06 31.80 9.20 3.40 42.00 9.90 8.80 6.21 767.10
品绿2011-12 Pinlü2011-12 42.20 10.40 3.20 42.00 8.70 10.20 5.75 423.00
冀绿0816 Jilü 0816 38.20 9.80 2.40 44.60 10.70 11.80 7.36 922.05
冀绿HNZ0810 JilüHNZ0810 35.10 8.20 3.20 24.00 9.10 11.40 6.98 765.00
苏绿16-10 Sulü 16-10 71.00 14.20 3.60 16.60 9.90 10.20 6.98 414.00
苏绿15-11 Sulü 15-11 45.40 11.60 3.20 45.00 10.10 12.20 5.87 633.00
鄂绿5号Elü 5 58.60 12.00 3.00 39.00 10.40 13.00 6.06 611.10
1009-2-5 48.60 11.30 3.20 28.90 9.90 11.80 5.22 1 264.05
白绿9号Bailü 9 49.50 9.50 2.30 28.70 11.20 12.30 7.95 1 034.10
白绿10号Bailü 10 39.20 11.20 2.80 25.00 12.20 11.60 7.35 1 105.05
同1188326 Tong 1188326 76.80 12.20 2.20 35.40 8.60 13.40 5.34 1 347.00
辽绿10L708-5 Liaolü 10L708-5 27.60 6.20 1.20 21.60 8.70 11.80 6.09 477.00
保绿200810-1 Baolü 200810-1 25.20 7.40 1.40 21.80 8.90 10.80 7.32 559.05
保绿201012-7 Baolü 201012-7 29.60 7.20 2.40 20.80 8.50 10.60 7.09 747.00
科绿2号Kelü 2 39.90 9.60 2.00 16.20 10.20 11.60 7.88 1 010.10
142-139 26.70 7.80 2.00 25.40 9.00 10.20 6.07 409.95
122-225 38.10 9.40 1.80 21.40 10.90 11.40 7.51 661.05
潍绿11号Weilü 11 29.20 7.60 1.20 20.80 10.60 10.00 5.95 588.00
品种(系)
Variety (Line)		 株高(cm)
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Nodes of
main stem		 主茎分枝数
Branches of
main stem		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 荚长(cm)
Pod length		 荚粒数
Seeds per
pod		 百粒重(g)
100-seed
weight		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield
潍绿12号Weilü 12 30.20 7.40 1.20 30.40 8.60 10.20 5.87 650.10
宛绿2号Wanlü 2 37.20 9.20 2.20 35.00 9.00 11.60 5.74 859.05
JLPX01 48.00 11.00 2.00 16.60 10.70 11.60 7.65 956.10
JLPX02 42.70 8.30 1.70 27.30 9.70 12.20 5.78 1 437.00
渝黑绿3号Yuheilü 3 55.60 11.20 2.20 21.20 10.80 13.00 5.53 792.00
渝绿2号Yulü 2 30.60 8.20 2.20 32.00 8.40 10.60 5.78 613.05
中绿5号Zhonglü 5 42.60 10.60 2.60 28.40 8.90 11.40 6.73 835.05
平均值Average 41.58 9.63 2.34 28.40 9.74 11.35 6.48 795.15
标准差SD 13.20 1.93 0.72 8.91 1.02 1.08 0.85 285.15
变异系数CV (%) 31.75 20.06 30.54 31.36 10.50 9.50 13.05 35.86
权重Weight (%) 17.38 10.98 16.73 17.17 5.75 5.20 7.14 19.64
位次Rank 2 5 4 3 7 8 6 1

Table 3

Statistical analysis of main agronomic characters of mung bean in 2017"

品种(系)
Variety (Line)		 株高(cm)
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Nodes of
main stem		 主茎分枝数
Branches of
main stem		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 荚长(cm)
Pod length		 荚粒数
Seeds per
pod		 百粒重(g)
100-seed
weight		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield
品绿2011-06 Pinlü2011-06 32.50 7.60 3.60 35.60 8.70 11.00 5.50 837.00
品绿2011-12 Pinlü2011-12 43.50 8.00 3.00 49.20 7.90 10.70 4.98 891.00
冀绿0816 Jilü 0816 34.90 7.70 2.70 33.40 10.00 11.30 6.58 1 161.00
冀绿HNZ0810 JilüHNZ0810 32.50 7.70 3.10 28.00 9.40 10.30 5.94 882.00
苏绿16-10 Sulü 16-10 66.20 9.00 2.80 26.30 8.30 10.30 6.17 771.00
苏绿15-11 Sulü 15-11 47.40 8.40 2.00 33.00 8.70 11.50 5.89 891.00
鄂绿5号Elü 5 53.90 8.00 2.70 32.60 8.70 11.50 5.42 1 159.50
1009-2-5 46.30 7.80 2.20 35.10 8.40 11.30 4.69 606.00
白绿9号Bailü 9 39.90 7.20 2.60 28.90 10.30 12.60 6.07 1 438.50
白绿10号Bailü 10 43.20 7.80 2.60 35.90 9.90 12.10 6.01 1 581.00
同1188326 Tong 1188326 90.60 11.00 2.80 45.80 7.40 12.60 3.88 960.00
辽绿10L708-5 Liaolü 10L708-5 27.20 6.30 2.80 21.60 7.60 11.00 5.27 894.00
保绿200810-1 Baolü 200810-1 29.10 7.10 3.00 25.20 8.20 11.20 6.36 678.00
保绿201012-7 Baolü 201012-7 35.60 7.40 2.80 34.40 8.10 9.90 5.76 891.00
科绿2号Kelü 2 35.20 6.40 2.40 29.10 9.20 11.80 5.93 1 195.50
142-139 37.50 6.60 2.80 28.40 8.90 11.90 5.75 909.00
122-225 52.40 7.50 2.50 30.60 10.10 12.00 6.29 1 245.00
潍绿11号Weilü 11 29.70 7.10 3.00 27.20 7.10 10.70 5.51 834.00
潍绿12号Weilü 12 34.00 7.20 2.70 39.00 7.80 10.10 5.39 1 077.00
宛绿2号Wanlü 2 34.80 6.50 2.60 30.90 8.00 10.90 5.46 718.50
JLPX01 41.80 7.90 2.70 30.60 9.90 12.80 6.78 1 381.50
JLPX02 40.20 7.10 3.00 28.50 7.40 11.00 5.49 786.00
渝黑绿3号Yuheilü 3 52.40 7.30 2.40 32.60 8.60 11.50 5.10 1 165.50
渝绿2号Yulü 2 34.80 7.00 3.10 34.00 7.80 10.30 5.04 811.50
中绿5号Zhonglü 5 48.10 7.90 2.20 34.40 8.30 10.20 5.74 996.00
平均值Average 42.55 7.58 2.72 32.41 8.59 11.22 5.64 990.45
标准差SD 13.60 0.95 0.34 5.99 0.92 0.82 0.63 246.00
变异系数CV (%) 31.96 12.53 12.46 18.49 10.76 7.30 11.11 24.84
权重Weight (%) 24.69 9.68 9.63 14.29 8.31 5.64 8.58 19.19
位次Rank 1 4 5 3 7 8 6 2

Table 4

Correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of mung bean"

性状
Character		 株高
Plant height		 主茎节数
Nodes of main stem		 主茎分枝数
Branches of main stem		 单株荚数
Pods per plant		 荚长
Pod length		 荚粒数
Seeds per pod		 百粒重
100-seed weight		 产量
Yield
株高Plant height -1
主茎节数
Nodes of main stem		 -0.904** -1
主茎分枝数
Branches of main stem		 -0.233 -0.450* -1
单株荚数Pods per plant -0.231 -0.345 -0.401* -1
荚长Pod length -0.077 -0.240 -0.069 -0.147 1
荚粒数Seeds per pod -0.528** -0.396* -0.279 -0.022 0.454* 1
百粒重100-seed weight -0.269 -0.124 -0.065 -0.462* 0.643** 0.016 1
产量Yield -0.301 -0.266 -0.165 -0.043 0.609** 0.679** 0.243 1

Table 5

Path coefficient of agronomic characters and yield"

性状Character 相关系数
Correlation
coefficient		 直接通径系数
Direct path
coefficient		 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient
株高
Plant
height		 主茎节数
Nodes of
main stem		 主茎分枝数
Branches of
main stem		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 荚长
Pod
length		 荚粒数
Seeds
per pod		 百粒重
100-seed
weight		 合计
Total
株高Plant height 0.301 0.508 -0.425 -0.026 0.055 0.041 0.168 -0.021 -0.208
主茎节数Nodes of main stem 0.266 -0.470 0.459 -0.050 0.082 0.127 0.126 -0.010 0.735
主茎分枝数
Branches of main stem		 -0.165 -0.111 0.118 -0.212 0.096 0.037 -0.089 -0.005 -0.055
单株荚数Pods per plant 0.043 0.239 0.117 -0.162 -0.045 -0.078 0.007 -0.036 -0.197
荚长Pod length 0.609 0.530 0.039 -0.113 -0.008 -0.035 0.145 0.051 0.079
荚粒数Seeds per pod 0.679 0.319 0.268 -0.186 0.031 0.005 0.241 0.001 0.360
百粒重100-seed weight 0.243 0.079 -0.137 0.058 0.007 -0.110 0.341 0.005 0.164
[1] 陈新, 程须珍, 崔晓艳 . 绿豆、红豆与黑豆生产配套技术手册. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2012: 1-3.
[2] 赵雪英, 张泽燕, 朱慧珺 , 等. 绿豆全生育期抗旱性鉴定及形态指标研究. 华北农学报, 2017,32(S1):180-184.
[3] 侯小峰, 刘静, 王彩萍 , 等. 绿豆产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析. 作物杂志, 2015(1):53-56.
[4] 朱慧珺, 赵雪英, 闫虎斌 , 等. 利用灰色关联度分析绿豆农艺性状对其产量的影响. 农学学报, 2015,5(6):10-14.
[5] 杨勇, 周斌, 杨超华 , 等. 夏播绿豆不同品种产量与主要农艺性状的相关分析. 作物杂志, 2015(4):65-68.
[6] 郑海泽, 曲运琴, 乔玲 , 等. 绿豆主要农艺性状的遗传效应分析. 华北农学报, 2018,33(增刊):33-37.
[7] 程须珍, 王素华 . 绿豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[8] 欧阳裕元, 余东梅, 杨梅 . 蚕豆主要农艺性状与单株产量的相关及通径分析. 江苏农业学报, 2016,32(4):763-768.
[9] 李艳花, 陈红, 王萍 , 等. 蚕豆高代材料单株产量与农艺性状的相关和通径分析. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(20):79-81.
[10] 宋益民, 章洪娟, 邱海荣 , 等. 南通扁豆品种主要农艺性状的相关性和通径分析. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(7):61-65.
[11] 徐益, 张列梅, 祁建民 , 等. 黄麻纤维产量与主要农艺性状的相关分析. 作物学报, 2018,44(6):859-866.
[12] 张琪, 丛鹏, 彭励 . 通径分析在Excel和SPSS中的实现. 农业网络信息, 2007,22(3):109-111.
[13] 杜家菊, 陈志伟 . 使用 SPSS 线性回归实现通径分析的方法. 生物学通报, 2010,45(2):4-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2010.02.002
[14] 王敏, 徐萍, 刘新江 , 等. 黄淮海地区夏玉米农艺性状与产量的通径分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2011,19(5):1229-1236.
[15] 郭兴燕, 田忠, 梁丹妮 , 等. 11个燕麦品种种子产量与主要农艺性状的通径分析. 草地学报, 2017,25(1):142-147.
[16] 张采波, 吴章东, 徐魏 , 等. 玉米自交系空间诱变后代主要性状的遗传相关及通径分析. 核农学报, 2013,27(8):1061-1068.
[17] 吕莹莹, 张萌, 沈丹丹 , 等. 玉米区域试验品种产量与穗部性状的相关与通径分析. 华北农学报, 2017,32(8):160-165.
[18] 毛彩云, 肖荷霞, 鲁珊 , 等. 玉米主要农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析. 河北农业科学, 2011,15(11):21-23.
[19] 高运青 . 绿豆种质资源农艺性状分析与评价. 河北农业科学, 2018,22(3):70-74,82.
[1] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Variation Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Waxy Sorghum Varieties (Lines) in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 17-23.
[2] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29-36.
[3] Yin Lili,Chen Xiaoliang,Chen Lulu,Fang Yarong,Cao Jiaqi,Zhou Feng,Li Feng,Li Zhen. Effects of NaCl, Na2SO4 and Na2CO3 Stress on the Seed Germination of Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 192-196.
[4] Ye Weijun,Yang Yong,Zhang Liya,Tian Dongfeng,Zhang Lingling,Zhou Bin. Effects of Nitrogen on Agronomic Traits and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Mung Bean Cultivar Wankelü 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 137-141.
[5] Ren Honglei,Li Chunxia,Gong Shichen,Li Guoliang,Hu Guanghui,Wang Mingquan,Yang Jianfei. Genetic Correlation and Path Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize Hybrids in SPSS Software [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 86-90.
[6] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[7] Xiaoming Wang,Dacheng Li,Zhengda Liao,Yuanchu Gan,Huixiu Chen,Xide Su,Zenglin Wei. Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 50-55.
[8] Ruiyu Ren,Jihong He,Kongjun Dong,Lei Zhang,Tianpeng Liu,Tianyu Yang. Analysis on Suitable Sowing Date of Four Main Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet in Huining, Gansu [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 152-158.
[9] Liu Zhenxing,Zhou Guimei,Chen Jian,Zhao Hui. Control Efficiency of Several Biological Pesticides on Mung Bean Leaf Spot Disease [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 154-157.
[10] Meiri· Aheihati,Wumaierxiati· Tahan,Tahan· Ailinbieke,Wang Yuxiang. Phenotypic Diversity of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Germplasm Resources in Xinjiang and Its Surrounding Areas [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 48-52.
[11] Chen Guangzhou,Wang Guangfu,Qu Jianzhou,Si Leiyong,Jin Yan,Xu Shutu,Xue Jiquan,Lu Haidong. Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and Correlation Analysis of Major Related Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[12] Wang Lei,Zhang Xiangping,Li Runxi,Niu Xiaoxia,Yang Shimei,Yan Zongshan,Zhang Ziqiang. Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[13] Wu Ronghua,Zhuang Kezhang,Liu Peng,Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[14] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[15] Chunming Zhang,Xueying Zhao,Hubin Yan,Huijun Zhu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Effects of Film Mulching Modes and Population Density on Photosynthesis Characteristics and Yield of Mung Bean in Arid Land [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 108-115.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong. Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 1 -8 .
[2] Liu Nianxi,Chen Liang,Li Zhi,Liu Baoquan,Liu Jia,Yi Zhigang,Dong Zhimin,Wang Shuming. Advances in Molecular Markers of Soybean Disease Resistance[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 10 -16 .
[3] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104 -108 .
[4] Meng Fanlai,Guo Huachun. Effects of Enhanced UV-B on Photosynthetic Characteristics and UV-Absorbing Compounds of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 114 -119 .
[5] Zhang Yanhua,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Zinc Topdressing Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 109 -113 .
[6] Li Song,Zhang Shicheng,Dong Yunwu,Shi Delin,Shi Yundong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rice Varieties in Tengchong, Yunnan Based on SSR Markers[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 15 -21 .
[7] Wang Yongxing,Shan Feibiao,Yan Wenzhi,Du Ruixia,Yang Qinfang,Liu Chunhui,Bai Lihua. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Code Classification Based on DUS Testing in Sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 22 -27 .
[8] Shi Zhaokang,Zhao Zequn,Zhang Yuanhang,Xu Shiying,Wang Ning,Wang Weijie,Cheng Hao,Xing Guofang,Feng Wanjun. The Response and Cluster Analysis of Biomass Accumulation and Root Morphology of Maize Inbred Lines Seedlings to Two Nitrogen Application Levels[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 28 -36 .
[9] Zhang Zhongwei,Yang Hailong,Fu Jun,Xie Wenjin,Feng Guang. Genetic Analysis of the Kernel Length of Maize with Mixed Model of Major Gene Plus Polygene[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 37 -40 .
[10] Zhang Yongfang,Qian Xiaona,Wang Runmei,Shi Pengqing,Yang Rong. Identification of Drought Resistance of Different Soybean Materials and Screening of Drought Tolerant Varieties[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 41 -45 .