Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 169-176.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.03.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Different Planting Patterns on Starch Formation and Yield of Potato in Semi-Arid Area

Chen Juan1, He Jinhong1, Liu Jili2,3, Kang Jianhong1, Wu Na1()   

  1. 1School of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
    2Institute of Environmental Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
    3Ningxia Key Laboratory of Resource Assessment and Environment Regulation in Arid Region, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China
  • Received:2019-10-24 Revised:2019-12-18 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-10
  • Contact: Na Wu E-mail:nawu2000@163.com

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

268

Abstract:

A field experiment with single factor randomized block design was conducted to determine the effect of different planting patterns on the starch formation and yield of potato in semi-arid area. The starch synthetase activity, starch content and yield of potato under conventional flat planting (A1), single-row planting on ridge without plastic film mulching (A2), double-row planting on ridge without plastic film mulching (A3), double-row planting on ridge with semi-plastic film mulching (A4) and double-row planting on ridge with full plastic film mulching (A5) were compared and analyzed to explore the suitable planting pattern in the Southern Mountainous Region of Ningxia. The results showed that the total starch content in late starch accumulation period under A5, compared with those under A1, A2, A3 and A4, were increased by 34.5%, 26.1%, 18.5% and 12.7%, respectively. During the starch accumulation process, the five starch-forming enzymes have directly or indirectly influenced the amylopectin, amylose and total starch accumulation in potato. The correlation coefficients between total starch content and the activities of ADPG-PPase, UDPG-PPase, SSS, SBE, GBSS were 0.691, 0.264, 0.514, 0.629, 0.130, respectively. In this study, it was observed that different planting patterns had significant effects on potato yield. The yield under A5 treatment is placed the first and A4 treatment ranked the second whereas, the yield increased by 83.8% and 62.9% respectively compared with A1 treatment. Therefore, double-row planting on ridge with full plastic film mulching can effectively improve starch formation, increase the starch forming enzyme activities and potato yield, which is a suitable planting pattern for potato production in semi-arid area of Ningxia.

Key words: Potato, Planting pattern, Starch-forming enzyme, Yield

Fig.1

Distributions of precipitation and average temperature in the experimental area in 2018"

Fig.2

Effects of planting patterns on total starch content in potato tubers Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level between different treatments. The same below"

Fig.3

Effects of planting patterns on contents of amylopectin and amylose in potato tubers"

Fig.4

Effects of planting patterns on the activities of ADPG-PPase and UDPG-PPase in potato tubers"

Fig.5

Effects of planting patterns on SSS activity of potato tubers"

Fig.6

Effects of planting patterns on GBSS activity of potato tubers"

Fig.7

Effects of planting patterns on SBE activity of potato tubers"

Table 1

Path analysis of starch content in potato tubers and key enzyme activities in starch formation"

变量
Variable		 相关系数
Correlation coefficient		 直接通径系数
Direct path coefficient		 间接通径系数Indirect path coefficient
→X1 →X2 →X3 →X4 →X5
总淀粉含量Total starch content R2=0.795 剩余系数=0.453
X1 0.514 0.547 -0.306 0.006 1.055 -0.788
X2 0.130 -0.385 0.435 0.005 0.731 -0.655
X3 0.629 0.007 0.503 -0.252 1.112 -0.741
X4 0.691 1.146 0.503 -0.246 0.007 -0.719
X5 0.264 -0.880 0.490 -0.287 0.006 0.936
支链淀粉含量Amylopectin content R2=0.782 剩余系数=0.467
X1 0.491 0.169 -0.178 0.360 0.953 -0.813
X2 0.151 -0.224 0.135 0.257 0.660 -0.676
X3 0.641 0.392 0.155 -0.147 1.005 -0.764
X4 0.686 1.035 0.156 -0.143 0.380 -0.742
X5 0.252 -0.908 0.151 -0.167 0.330 0.846
直链淀粉含量Amylose content R2=0.928 剩余系数=0.268
X1 0.928 0.635 0.206 -0.372 0.164 0.295
X2 0.859 0.259 0.505 -0.265 0.114 0.246
X3 0.799 -0.405 0.584 0.170 0.173 0.278
X4 0.805 0.178 0.584 0.165 -0.393 0.270
X5 0.896 0.330 0.568 0.193 -0.340 0.146

Table 2

Effects of planting patterns on potato yield and its yield components"

处理
Treatment		 每穴薯块数
Tuber number
per hole		 每穴大薯数
Number of big
tuber per hole		 大薯重
Big tuber
weight (g)		 每穴中薯数
Number of tuber
per hole		 中薯重
Medium tuber
weight (g)		 商品薯率
Commercial
tuber rate (%)		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)
A1 4.47±2.21c 2.02±1.98c 445±71c 1.03±0.11b 193.57±31.00b 68.2±1.7b 1 133.4±98.0c
A2 7.01±3.35a 2.81±3.23b 904±56a 2.67±0.23a 263.67±41.00a 78.1±1.2a 1 359.2±110.0c
A3 5.13±2.65c 3.11±2.11a 764±45b 1.07±0.14b 150.27±27.00c 81.2±2.1a 1 716.9±116.0b
A4 6.07±3.12b 3.81±3.11a 794±34b 1.22±0.12b 183.93±33.00b 82.7±1.9a 1 846.2±201.0b
A5 7.73±2.91a 4.71±1.62a 937±61a 1.83±0.11a 232.13±34.00a 84.5±2.3a 2 083.5±121.0a
[1] 李燕山, 钱彩霞, 刘志祥 , 等. 不同高淀粉马铃薯品系在不同生态条件下的淀粉含量及淀粉产量试验. 现代农业科技, 2010(22):105-108.
[2] 张新永, 郭华春 . 马铃薯淀粉含量与生长特性相关性的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2004(1):48-50.
[3] 刘洋, 罗其友, 高明杰 . 世界马铃薯生产及其贸易的发展现状分析. 世界农业, 2011(8):46-51.
[4] 王效瑜, 钱爱萍, 管存学 , 等. 宁南山区马铃薯生产现状、存在问题与发展对策. 内蒙古农业科技, 2002(S2):99-101.
[5] 李浩然 . 栽培方式对宁南山区马铃薯生理生态特性及产量的影响. 银川:北方民族大学, 2017: 1-5.
[6] 孙梦媛, 刘景辉, 赵宝平 , 等. 全膜垄作对旱作马铃薯土壤含水率、酶活性及产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2017,36(4):1-8.
[7] 金胜利, 周丽敏, 李凤民 , 等. 黄土高原地区玉米双垄全膜覆盖沟播栽培技术土壤水温条件及其产量效应. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010,28(2):28-33.
[8] 包开花 . 覆膜方式和保水剂对旱作马铃薯生长及土壤特性的影响. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2015: 1-3.
[9] 颉炜清, 李燕山, 王鹏 , 等. 山旱地不同栽培方式对马铃薯天薯11号生长及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2014,23(7):80-86.
[10] 王东, 卢健, 秦舒浩 , 等. 沟垄和覆膜连作种植对马铃薯生长、产量及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(7):28-32.
[11] 温宏昌, 杨志奇, 裴国平 , 等. 不同栽培模式对马铃薯生育期的影响. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2017,29(5):66-69.
[12] 陈向东, 潘晓春, 姚彦红 . 马铃薯节水栽培模式试验研究. 中国马铃薯, 2012,26(2):80-83.
[13] 张君君 . 起垄与覆膜对马铃薯产量和品质的影响. 保定:河北农业大学, 2014: 53-54.
[14] 何进勤, 雷金银, 冒辛平 , 等. 马铃薯覆膜方式对土壤氮磷钾养分与产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(2):35-41.
[15] 王耀 . 不同覆膜栽培模式与播期互作对寒旱区马铃薯商品性和产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2016,30(3):149-153.
[16] 慕宇 . 高温对马铃薯块茎淀粉和产量形成的影响机理研究. 银川:宁夏大学, 2017: 40-41.
[17] 程方民, 蒋德安, 吴平 , 等. 早籼稻籽粒灌浆过程中淀粉合成酶的变化及温度效应特征. 作物学报, 2001,27(2):201-206.
[18] 韦威旭, 韦民政, 覃维治 , 等. 地膜覆盖对木薯生长发育和产量及淀粉含量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(19):8939-8940.
[19] 李建奇, 黄高宝, 牛俊义 . 覆膜及氮磷施用量对春玉米主要品质的调控. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2004,39(5):520-523.
[20] 吴利晓 . 不同栽培方式和种植密度对马铃薯产量及品质的影响. 银川:宁夏大学, 2016: 24-25.
[21] 廖金花, 李纪明, 吴瑜 . 小麦淀粉合成酶的研究进展. 贵州农业科学, 2014,42(2):18-22.
[22] Maysaya T, Randi J, Maria A , et al. Effects of environmental factors on cereal starch biosynthesis and composition. Journal of Cereal Science, 2012,56(1):67-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.04.002
[23] 王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞 , 等. 小麦籽粒灌浆过程中有关淀粉合成酶的活性及其效应. 作物学报, 2003,29(1):75-81.
[24] 连玲, 叶冰莹, 陈如凯 , 等. 甘蔗尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶基因(UGPase)转化拟南芥及转基因植株的生理特性分析. 农业生物技术学报, 2012,20(5):481-488.
[25] 刘玉汇, 张俊莲, 王蒂 . 马铃薯等主要农作物淀粉合成酶的研究进展. 中国马铃薯, 2008,22(3):168-172.
[1] Song Xiao, Huang Chenchen, Huang Shaomin, Zhang Keke, Yue Ke, Zhang Shuiqing, Guo Doudou, Zhang Yuting. Effects of Tillage and Organic Fertilization Modes on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Wheat Yield [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 102-108.
[2] Miao Pinggui, Yu Xianfeng, Zhang Xucheng, Fang Yanjie, Hou Huizhi, Wang Hongli, Ma Yifan, Dou Xuecheng. Effects of Vertical Deep Rotary Tillage on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Potato Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 109-116.
[3] Zhang Yang, Zhang Wei, Zhao Weijun, Shao Rongfeng, Wang Guan, Xue Dingding, Li Jinmei. Variety Screening and Study of Cultivation Technology for Forage Triticale Varieties Based on Principal Component and Grey Relation Analysis [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 117-124.
[4] He Wanchun, Huang Kai, Ling Peng, Chen Zixiong, Wang Jingcai, Pan Xiaochun, Zhang Juanning, Li Pengcheng. Effects of Different Ratio of Organic Fertilizer Nitrogen to Fertilizer Nitrogen on the Absorption Capacity and Morphology of Potato Roots [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 132-136.
[5] Lü Guangde, Yin Fuwei, Sun Yingying, Qian Zhaoguo, Xu Jiali, Li Ning, Xue Lina, Wu Ke. Effects of Different Seeding Rates on Yield, Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution of Linmai 4 [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 142-148.
[6] Chai Fangmei, Gao Tiantian, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Song Yali, Lu Qinglin. Effects of Planting Density on Wheat Yield Formation in Different Ecological Regions of Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 154-160.
[7] Zhu Yingjie, Liu Fuqi, Zhang Yan, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effect of Nitrogen Treatment on Wheat Yield and Quality in Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 184-190.
[8] Shi Lijuan, Bai Wenbin, Cao Changlin, Gao Peng. Effects of Exogenous Selenium Application on Yield, Grain Selenium Content and Quality in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 191-196.
[9] Hao Kai, Jia Liguo, Qin Yonglin, Fan Mingshou. Research Progress about Nitrogen Effects on Potato Source-Sink Relationship [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 22-26.
[10] Qiu Cailing, Fan Guoquan, Shen Yu, Gao Yanling, Zhang Wei, Han Shuxin, Zhang Shu, Dong Xuezhi, Ma Ji, Bai Yanju. Establishment of RT-qPCR Detection System for Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 79-84.
[11] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[12] Li Ruijie,Tang Huihui,Wang Qingyan,Xu Yanli,Fang Mengying,Yan Peng,Dong Zhiqiang,Zhang Fenglu. Effects of 5- Aminolevulinic Acid and Ethylene Compounds on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 125-133.
[13] Chen Diwen,Zhou Wenling,Ao Junhua,Huang Ying,Jiang Yong,Han Xihong,Qin Yimin,Shen Hong. Effects of Seaweed Extract on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sweet Corn [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 134-139.
[14] Yan Hua,Yan Zhongwen,Lei Jie. Climate Change Characteristics of Xinyuan during 1981-2018 and Its Impact on Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 140-146.
[15] Zhou Wei,Cui Fuzhu,Duan Hongkai,Hao Guohua,Yang Hui,Liu Ruirui. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Waxy Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 156-161.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!