Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 160-167.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.01.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Potato Leaf Type and Planting Density on Yield Components

Duan Huimin1(), Lu Xiao1(), Zhou Xiaojie1, Li Gaofeng2, Wen Guohong2, Wang Yuping1, Cheng Lixiang1, Zhang Feng1()   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Gansu Agricultural University/Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science/Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Improvement & Germplasm Enhancement, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, China
    2Institute of Potato, Gansu Acadamy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-04-06 Revised:2020-04-30 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-23
  • Contact: Zhang Feng E-mail:1273475789@qq.com;827983642@qq.com;zhangf@gsau.edu.cn

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

193

Abstract:

The optimum planting density is not only beneficial to the field management of potato varieties with different leaf types, but also beneficial to the optimum yield components. In order to obtain the optimal planting density of potato varieties with different leaf types, the relationship between leaf type and planting density was studied. Two typical middle-late erect type potato varieties, Atlantic (uprush-leaf) and Gannongshu 7 (spreading-leaf) were used as materials. Five plant spacing (30, 25, 20, 15 and 10cm) and fixed row spacing (70cm) were set in the experiment. The indexes of plant architecture traits, fluorescence parameters and yield components of two varieties were investigated. In addition, the correlations between plant architecture traits and the yield components under different plant spacings were determined and analyzed. The field experiment showed that, with the increasing of plant spacing, the plant height, plant internode length, leaf bend degree, leaf area index, and the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (Fv/Fm) increased, while the stem diameter, leaf drooping angle, leaf angle, and the actual photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (ΦPSⅡ) decreased. Compared with Atlantic, the leaf bend degree of Gannongshu 7 increased significantly. Within the specific plant spacing ranging from 15 to 30cm, increasing plant spacing could significantly increase the yield per plant, tuber number per plant and plot yield. These results indicated that the optimal planting spacing was 25 and 20cm for spreading-leaf variety (Gannongshu 7) and uprush-leaf type variety (Atlantic), respectively, which had the reasonable canopy structure, the higher commodity rate and plot yield.

Key words: Potato, Plant traits, Leaf type, Plant spacing, Yield component

Fig.1

The plant height, stem diameter and internode length of two potato varieties with different leaf types under different plant spacings Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level among different plant spacings. The same below"

Fig.2

The drooping angles and bend degrees of two potato varieties with different leaf types under different plant spacings"

Fig.3

The leaf angles and leaf area indexes of two potato varieties with different leaf types under different plant spacings"

Fig.4

The fluorescence induction kinetic parameters of two potato varieties with different leaf types under different plant spacings"

Fig.5

The tuber number per plant, yield per plant, plot yield, marketable yield and commodity tuber rate of two potato varieties with different leaf types under different plant spacings"

Table 1

The correlation between plant traits and yield components of potato variety (Atlantic) with uprush-leaf type"

性状
Characteristic		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)		 节间距
Internodes length
(cm)		 垂角
Drooping angle
(°)		 披垂度
Bend degree
(°)		 叶夹角
Leaf angle
(°)		 叶面积指数
Leaf area
index
单株结薯数Tuber number per plant -0.868* -0.595 -0.433 -0.306 -0.369 -0.637 -0.525
单株产量Yield per plant (kg) -0.971** -0.749 -0.554 -0.463 -0.437 -0.786 -0.721
小区产量Plot yield (kg) -0.972** -0.866* -0.633* -0.641 -0.481 -0.892* -0.833*
商品薯产量Marketable yield (kg) -0.537 -0.708 -0.462 -0.712* -0.335 -0.705 -0.574
商品薯率Commodity tuber rate (%) -0.877* -0.607 -0.522 -0.310 -0.440 -0.643 -0.654

Table 2

The correlation between plant traits and yield component on potato variety (Gannongshu 7) with spreading-leaf type"

性状
Characteristic		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)		 节间距
Internodes length
(cm)		 垂角
Drooping angle
(°)		 披垂度
Bend degree
(°)		 叶夹角
Leaf angle
(°)		 叶面积指数
Leaf area
index
单株结薯数Tuber number per plant -0.715 -0.545 -0.365 -0.624 -0.208 -0.538 -0.695
单株产量Yield per plant (kg) -0.456 -0.231 0.005 -0.295 -0.082 -0.287 -0.632
小区产量Plot yield (kg) -0.879* -0.893* 0.807 -0.846* -0.674 -0.845* -0.735
商品薯产量Marketable yield (kg) -0.992** -0.951* 0.795 -0.928* -0.514 -0.960** -0.890*
商品薯率Commodity tuber rate (%) -0.494 -0.664 0.767 -0.590 -0.720 -0.559 -0.205
[1] 周晓洁. 马铃薯植株表型数据分析和株型研究. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2016.
[2] Iritani W M, Thornton R, Weller L, et al. Relationships of seed size,spacing,stem numbers to yield of Russet Burbank potatoes. American Journal of Potato Research, 1972,49(12):463-469.
[3] Entz M H, LaCroix L J. The effect of in-row spacing and seedtype on the yield and quality of a potato cultivar. American Journal of Potato Research, 1984,61(2):93-105.
[4] Bussan A J, Mitchell P D, Copas M E, et al. Evaluation of the effect of density on potato yield and tuber size distribution. Crop Science, 2007,47(6):2462-2472.
[5] Rosati A, Badeck F W, Dejong T M. Estimating canopy light interception and absorption using leaf mass per unit leaf area in Solanum melongena. Annals of Botany, 2001,88(1):101-109.
[6] Sarlikiot V, De Visser P H, Marcelis L F. Exploring the spatial distribution of light interception and photosynthesis of canopies by means of a functional-structural plant model. Annals of Botany, 2011,107(5):875-883.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr006 pmid: 21355008
[7] Vasilyev A A. Dependence of the yield and quality of potato tubers in the forest-steppe zone of Southern Urals on the level of mineral nutrition and planting density. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2015,40(6):422-425.
[8] Blauer J M, Knowles L O, Knowles N R. Manipulating stem number,tuber set and size distribution in specialty potato cultivars. American Journal of Potato Research, 2013,90(5):470-496.
doi: 10.1007/s12230-013-9317-0
[9] 冯辉, 王五宏, 徐娜, 等. 串番茄主要株型性状的遗传研究. 中国农业科学, 2008,41(12):4134-4139.
[10] Takenaka A. Effects of leaf blade narrowness and petiole length on the light capture efficiency of a shoot. Ecological Research, 1994,9(2):109-114.
doi: 10.1007/BF02347485
[11] Bohl W H, Star J C, Mcintosh C S. Potato seed piece size,spacing,and seeding rate effects on yield,quality and economic return. American Journal of Potato Research, 2011,88(6):470-478.
doi: 10.1007/s12230-011-9213-4
[12] Creamer N G, Crozier C R, Cubeta M A. Influence of seed piece spacing and population on yield,internal quality,and economic performance of Atlantic,Superior,and Snowden potato varieties in Eastern North Carolina. American Journal of Potato Research, 1999,76(5):257-261.
doi: 10.1007/BF02853623
[13] 黄承建, 赵思毅, 王龙昌, 等. 马铃薯/玉米套作对马铃薯品种光合特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39(2):330-342.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00330
[14] Lynch D R, Rowberry R G. Population density studies with Russet Burbank II. The effect of fertilization and plant density on growth,development and yield. American Journal of Potato Research, 1977,54(2):57-71.
[15] Jefferies R A. Drought and chlorophyll fluorescence in field-grown potato (Solanum tuberosum). Physiologia Plantarum, 2006,90(1):93-97.
[16] Knowles N R, Knowles L O. Manipulating stem number,tuber set,and yield relationships for Northern- and Southern-Grown potato seed lots. Crop Science, 2006,46(1):284-296.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.05-0078
[17] Imma F, Angel M M. Potato minituber production using aeroponics:effect of plant density and harvesting intervals. American Journal of Potato Research, 2006,83(1):47-53.
doi: 10.1007/BF02869609
[18] Conley S P, Binning L K, Connell T R. Effect of cultivar,row spacing,and weed management on weed biomass,potato yield,and net crop value. American Journal of Potato Research, 2001,78(1):31-37.
doi: 10.1007/BF02874822
[19] Forcella F, Westgate M E, Warnes D D. Effect of row width on herbicide and cultivation requirements in row crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1992,7(4):161-167.
[20] Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density,row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Research, 2001,71(3):183-193.
[21] 宋伟, 赵长星, 王月福, 等. 不同种植方式对花生田间小气候效应和产量的影响. 生态学报, 2011,31(23):7188-7195.
[22] Soratto R P, Souzaschlick G D, Fernandes A M, et al. Narrow row spacing and high plant population to short height castor genotypes in two cropping seasons. Industrial Crops and Products, 2012,35(1):244-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.07.006
[23] Jacob M B, Lisa O K, Richard K N. Manipulating stem number,tuber set and size distribution in specialty potato cultivars. American Journal of Potato Research. 2013,90(5):470-496.
doi: 10.1007/s12230-013-9317-0
[24] Seijo-Rodriguez A, Escuredo O, Rodriguez-Flores M S, et al. Morphological characteristics of Solanum tuberosum varieties cultivated in north-west Spain. American journal of Potato Research. 2017,94:26-37.
[25] Engels C, Bedewy R E, Sattelmacher B. Effects of weight and planting density of tubers derived from true potato seed on growth and yield of potato crops in Egypt. 1. Sprout growth,field emergence and haulm development. Field Crops Research, 1993,35(3):159-170.
[26] Sipos J, Prange R K. Response of ten potato cultivars to temperature as measured by chlorophyll fluorescence in vivo. American Journal of Potato Research, 1986,63(12):683-694.
[27] Jefferies R A. Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). II. Relations between plant growth and measurements of fluorescence. Potato Research, 1992,35(1):35-40.
[28] Engels C, Bedewy R E, Sattelmacher B. Effects of weight and planting density of tubers derived from true potato seed on growth and yield of potato crops in Egypt. 2. Tuber yield and tuber size. Field Crops Research, 1993,35(3):171-182.
[29] Caliskan M E. Effects of plant density on the yield and yield components of true potato seed (TPS) hybrids in early and main crop potato production systems. Field Crops Research, 2009,114(2):223-232.
[30] Robert M, Upenyu M, Tuarira A M, et al. Growth,yield and quality responses to plant spacing in potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015,10(6):571-578.
[31] 姚玉璧, 王润元, 邓振镛, 等. 黄土高原半干旱区气候变化及其对马铃薯生长发育的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(2):379-385.
[32] Wiersema S G. The effect of density on tuber yield in plants grown from true potato seed in seed beds during two contrasting seasons. American Journal of Potato Research, 1986,63(9):465-472.
[33] Knowles L O, Knowles N R. Optimizing tuber set and size distribution for potato seed (Solanum tuberosum L.) expressing varying degrees of apical dominance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2016,35(2):574-585.
[1] Yang Ping, Chen Yuli, Gong Fajiang, Bi Haibin, Gao Minghui. Bulking Characteristics of Potato Tubers and Its Correlation with Tuber Fresh Weight [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 130-134.
[2] Qiu Tian, Niu Lili, Zhu Jiang, Cai Fuge, Wang Qingwei. Effects of Three Growth Regulators on the Growth of Potato Test-Tube Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 160-164.
[3] Yang Yunma, Yang Junfang, Jia Liangliang, Xing Suli, Fan Jianying, Feng Zhiming, Zhang Shuqing, Xiang Congchao, Huang Shaohui, Liu Xuetong. Nutrient Absorption and Suitable Quantity of Spring Potato in Hebei Double Cropping Cultivated Region [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 170-174.
[4] Hao Xiyu, Xiao Huanyu, Liang Jie, Wang Yingjie, Guo Wenyun. Effects and Optimum Rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer for Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 127-132.
[5] Zhang Xiaoyan, Wang Xiaonan, Cao Kun, Sun Yufeng. Correlation Analysis of Fiber Yield and Yield Components in Five Industrial Hemp Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 121-126.
[6] Miao Pinggui, Yu Xianfeng, Zhang Xucheng, Fang Yanjie, Hou Huizhi, Wang Hongli, Ma Yifan, Dou Xuecheng. Effects of Vertical Deep Rotary Tillage on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Potato Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 109-116.
[7] He Wanchun, Huang Kai, Ling Peng, Chen Zixiong, Wang Jingcai, Pan Xiaochun, Zhang Juanning, Li Pengcheng. Effects of Different Ratio of Organic Fertilizer Nitrogen to Fertilizer Nitrogen on the Absorption Capacity and Morphology of Potato Roots [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 132-136.
[8] Chen Juan, He Jinhong, Liu Jili, Kang Jianhong, Wu Na. Effect of Different Planting Patterns on Starch Formation and Yield of Potato in Semi-Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 169-176.
[9] Hao Kai, Jia Liguo, Qin Yonglin, Fan Mingshou. Research Progress about Nitrogen Effects on Potato Source-Sink Relationship [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 22-26.
[10] Qiu Cailing, Fan Guoquan, Shen Yu, Gao Yanling, Zhang Wei, Han Shuxin, Zhang Shu, Dong Xuezhi, Ma Ji, Bai Yanju. Establishment of RT-qPCR Detection System for Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 79-84.
[11] Wang Tianwen,Li Changzhong,Chen Guanghai. Effects of Sowing Dates and Densities on Propagation, Growth and Yield of Potato Seeds [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 162-167.
[12] Guo Qilin,Wu Haiyun,Li Huan,Liu Qing. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Leaves and Stems of Different Types of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 41-47.
[13] Chen Tianxin,Wang Yanjie,Zhang Yan,Chang Xuhong,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Demei,Yang Yushuang,Zhu Yingjie,Liu Akang,Shi Shubing,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Different Nitrogen Rates on Photosyntheticand Physiological Indexes and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 88-96.
[14] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Analysis of the Characteristics of Dry Matter Production and Light Energy Utilization of Waxy Sorghum Applied in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 41-46.
[15] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[2] Ying Chai,Yongqing Xu,Yao Fu,Xiuyu Li,Fumeng He,Yingqi Han,Zhe Feng,Fenglan Li. Characteristics of Cell Wall Degradation Enzyme Produced by Main Pathogenic Fusarium spp. in Potato Dry Rot[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 154 -160 .
[3] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9"[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89 -94 .
[4] Zhengui Yuan,Pingping Chen,Lili Guo,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Varietal Difference in Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Panicle of Rice Affected by Soil Cd Content[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 107 -112 .
[5] Lu Zhao,Zhiwei Yang,Liqun Bu,Ling Tian,Mei Su,Lei Tian,Yinxia Zhang,Shuqin Yang,Peifu Li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evalution of Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Ningxia and Xinjiang Rice Germplasm[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 25 -34 .
[6] Shanshan Lu,Chenglai Wu,Yan Li,Chunqing Zhang. The Molecular Basis of Holding the Feature and Genetic Purity for Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 41 -48 .
[7] Leiyue Geng,Wei Zhang,Tuo Zou,Zhenyu Zheng,Lige Geng,Juan Sun,Qixing Zhang. Analysis on Quality Traits Diversity of Rice Landraces in Hebei[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 49 -55 .
[8] Yaoyan Li,Yanyan Pei,Shanyan Huang,Yingyan Zhang,Songji Wei,Yangjiao Xie,Qiong Zhou. Pharmacognosy of Zhongliuteng (Pileostegia tomentella Hand. Mazz) of Yao Medicine[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 61 -65 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(2): 93 -94 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(1): 93 -94 .