Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 118-123.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.06.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application Models on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiencies in Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Xiong Yousheng1(), Xiong Hanfeng2(), Guo Yanlong3, Wang Haisheng4, Liu Wei1, Yan Yuxiang3, Xie Yuanyuan1, Zhou Jianxiong1, Yang Lijun1   

  1. 1Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, Hubei, China
    2Ezhou Vocational University, Ezhou 436000, Hubei, China
    3Ezhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Ezhou 436000, Hubei, China
    4Wuhan Agricultural Testing Center, Wuhan 430023, Hubei, China
  • Received:2021-05-25 Revised:2022-09-18 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-21
  • Contact: Xiong Hanfeng E-mail:yshxiong@126.com;xhfeng987@163.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

207

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different reducing fertilizer application modes on wheat yield, nutrient use efficiency in rice-wheat cropping system, and to provide theoretical basis for achieving high efficient application of chemical fertilizer and its zero increase in China, a 3-year field positioning experiment of rice-wheat cropping system was carried out. Six treatments were set including no fertilizer (T1), conventional chemical fertilization (T2), combination of organic manure and chemical fertilizer (T3), reducing 20% chemical fertilizer plus nitrogen synergist (T4), reducing 20% chemical phosphorus fertilizer plus phosphorus activator (T5), and reducing 20% nitrogen and 20% phosphorus plus nitrogen synergist and phosphorus activator (T6). The results showed that compared with T2 treatment, the effects of fertilizer reduction on wheat yield was not significant. The average production investment ratio of three years of T4 treatment was 3.96%, higher than that of T2 treatment, and that of T5 and T6 treatments were 59.21% and 56.24% lower than that of T2 treatment; T4 treatment increased nitrogen absorption efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency and potassium use efficiency by 9.22%-20.70%, 7.01%-28.67%, and 4.69%-7.67%, respectively. T5 treatment could increase the total phosphorus uptake by 15.53%, the range of phosphorus absorption efficiency, partial productivity and use efficiency were increased by 21.43%-46.67%, 12.18%-52.06%, and 3.77%-4.52%, respectively. T6 treatment increased nitrogen absorption efficiency, phosphorus partial productivity, and potassium utilization efficiency by 5.67%-19.40%, 10.88%-43.43%, and 7.38%-12.97%, respectively. T3 treatment had no significant effects on the absorption and utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus, and significantly reduced the partial productivity of potassium. The comprehensive results showed that T6 treatment could stabilize wheat yield and coordinate crop nutrient absorption, but the economic benefit was low due to high cost of phosphorus activator.

Key words: Wheat yield, Economic benefit, Nutrient use efficiency, Rice-wheat cropping system, Reduced fertilizer application

Table 1

Different fertilizer application models for rice-wheat cropping experiment kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 化肥Chemical fertilizer 有机肥
Organic fertilizer		 氮增效剂
Nitrogen synergist		 磷素活化剂
Phosphorus activator
N P2O5 K2O
T1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0.0
T2 180.0 105.0 120.0 0 0.00 0.0
T3 180.0 105.0 120.0 1500 0.00 0.0
T4 144.0 105.0 120.0 1500 1.67 0.0
T5 180.0 84.0 120.0 1500 0.00 225.0
T6 144.0 84.0 120.0 1500 1.67 225.0

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on wheat yield in rice-wheat cropping system in 2018-2020"

Table 2

Economic benefit analysis of different fertilization modes in 2018-2020"

处理
Treatment		 投入
（元/hm2）
Input
(yuan//hm2)		 产出（元/hm2）
Output
(yuan/hm2)		 产投比
Output-
input ratio		 3年平均
3-year
average
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
T2 1682.86 12 809 5644 7034 7.61 3.35 4.18 5.05
T3 1794.25 11 120 6062 7058 6.20 3.38 3.93 4.50
T4 1648.99 12 177 6589 7186 7.38 4.00 4.36 5.25
T5 3952.37 11 014 6154 7280 2.79 1.56 1.84 2.06
T6 3807.02 11 655 6483 7082 3.06 1.70 1.86 2.21

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on nitrogen uptake and utilization of wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in 2018-2020"

Fig.3

Effects of different treatments on phosphorus uptake and utilization of wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in 2018-2020"

Fig.4

Effects of different treatments on potassium uptake and utilization of wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in 2018-2020"

[1] 王激清. 我国主要粮食作物施肥增产效应和养分的分析与评价. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2007.
[2] 闫湘, 金继运, 何萍. 提高肥料利用率技术研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2):450-459.
[3] 史常亮, 郭嵌, 朱俊峰. 中国粮食生产中化肥过量施用评价及影响因素研究. 农业现代化研究, 2016, 37(4):671-679.
[4] 李东坡, 武志杰. 化学肥料的土壤生态环境效应. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(5):1158-1165.
[5] 汪玉, 赵旭, 王磊, 等. 太湖流域稻麦轮作农田磷素累积现状及其环境风险与控制对策. 农业环境科学学报, 2014(5):829-835.
[6] 晏娟, 沈其荣, 尹斌, 等. 太湖地区稻麦轮作系统下施氮量对作物产量及氮肥利用率影响的研究. 土壤, 2009(3):372-376.
[7] 吴光磊. 麦季氮肥运筹调控冬小麦-夏玉米两作体系氮素利用及氮肥残效研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2012.
[8] 王士坤, 唐振海, 董彦琪, 等. 肥料增效剂与氮肥配施对夏玉米生长发育和产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(12):53-56.
[9] 许猛, 袁亮, 李伟, 等. 复合氨基酸肥料增效剂对新疆棉花生长、产量和养分利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(4):87-92.
[10] 吴海勇, 李明德, 刘琼峰, 等. 肥料增效剂对水稻产量、土壤及地表水中无机氮的短期效应. 湖南农业科学, 2012(7):47-50.
[11] 何威明, 保万魁, 王旭. 氮肥增效剂及其效果评价的研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(3):1-7.
[12] 徐星凯, 周礼恺, Van Cleemput O. 脲酶抑制剂/硝化抑制剂对土壤中尿素氮转化以及形态分布的影响. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(3):339-345.
[13] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[14] 王永华, 黄源, 辛明华, 等. 周年氮磷钾配施模式对砂姜黑土麦玉轮作体系籽粒产量和养分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6):1031-1046.
[15] 田亨达, 张丽, 张坚超, 等. 苏南地区稻麦轮作系统对不同有机无机复混肥的响应田. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(11):2868-2874.
[16] 邢素丽, 韩宝文, 刘孟朝, 等. 有机无机配施对土壤养分环境及小麦增产稳定性的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(增1):135-140.
[17] 马力, 杨林章, 沈明星, 等. 基于长期定位试验的典型稻麦轮作区作物产量稳定性研究. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(4):117-124.
[18] 田秀英, 王正银. 尿素与复合氮肥增效剂配施对水稻氮素利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(6):120-123.
[19] 易琼, 张秀芝, 何萍, 等. 氮肥减施对稻-麦轮作体系作物氮素吸收、利用和土壤氮素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010(5):1069-1077.
[20] 蔡力, 王文伟, 战帅, 等. 氮磷钾肥与皓达肥料增效剂配施对萝卜产量与氮磷钾吸收量的影响. 上海蔬菜, 2018(4):58-61.
[21] 战帅, 王文伟, 王运华, 等. 氮磷钾肥与皓达肥料增效剂配施对大白菜产量及氮磷钾吸收量的影响. 上海蔬菜, 2017(5):55-58.
[22] 刘威, 熊又升, 徐祥玉, 等. 减量施肥模式对稻麦轮作体系作物产量和养分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20 (5):91-99.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0786
[23] Liu M, Yu Z, Liu Y, et al. Fertilizer requirements for wheat and maize in China:the QUEFTS approach. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2006, 74(3):245-258.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9002-5
[24] 杨勇, 蒋宏芳, 荣湘民, 等. 不同肥料增效剂在水稻上的应用效果研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(5):83-87.
[1] Yang Yan, Xu Ningsheng, Pan Zhechao, Li Yanshan, Yang Qiongfen, Zhang Lei. Effects of Paclobutrazol and Nitrogen on Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 139-144.
[2] Li Long, Xiao Rang, Zhang Yongling. Effects of Combined Application of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium on Seed Maize Yield and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 111-117.
[3] Long Ruiping, Zhang Chaozhong, Ge Qinying, Wan Weidong, Wang Qin, Li Guiyong, Xia Qiongmei, Zhu Haiping, Yang Congdang. Analysis of Growth Characteristics and Economic Benefit of Mechanical Transplanted Japonica Rice with Applying Panicle Nitrogen under Rotation of Paddy-Upland [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 124-129.
[4] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[5] Lü Weisheng, Xiao Xiaojun, Huang Tianbao, Xiao Guobin, Li Yazhen, Xiao Fuliang, Han Depeng, Zheng Wei. Application Effect of Slow-Released Formulated Fertilizer on Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) under Late Sowing Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 143-150.
[6] Fan Yuanyuan, Wu Haimei, Pang Lei, Lu Jianlong, Xia Bowen, Yang Xuhai. Effects of Straw Mulching on Wheat Yield in Different Ecological Regions in Northern Semi-Arid Areas of China Based on Meta Analysis [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 143-149.
[7] Yang Yongqing, Gao Fangfang, Ma Yajun, Chen Xin, Zhang Jie. Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Foxtail Millet in Dry Farming Area of Shanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 195-201.
[8] Zhang Kaixuan,Ding Mengqi,Li Faliang,Tang Yu,Yang Keli,Yang Fuyu,Zhang Hanmin,Yuan Rengui,Hu Yongping,Zhou Meiliang. Selective Breeding of Fagopyrum cymosum (Trev.) Meisn Zhongjin No.1 for Medicine and Forage and the Study of the Economic Benefits [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 29-34.
[9] Wan Xiaoju,Zhang Guoqiang,Wang Keru,Xie Ruizhi,Shen Dongping,Chen Jianglu,Liu Chaowei,Li Shaokun. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching and Drip Irrigation on Spring Maize in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 107-112.
[10] Cai Dongfang,Wang Jianping,Zhang Shufen,He Junping,Cao Jinhua,Wen Yancheng,Zhao Lei,Wang Dongguo,Zhu Jiacheng. Effects of N, P and K Fertilization on Rapeseed Yield in Different Rotating Areas of Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 130-137.
[11] Shumin Liang,Lei Zhang,Shengding He,Qunqing Yang,Yanshan Li,Pinggen He,Shaolin Wang,Ying Wang,Qiongfen Yang,Qijun Sui. Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato under the Different Cultivation Patterns in Northwest Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 79-83.
[12] Hong Li,Mengjiao Li,Yuchao Wang,Ruijun Wang,Xuli Zhang. Study on the Pattern of Maize/Brassica juncea var. integlifolia Intercropping in Alpine Regions [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 120-125.
[13] Limin Sang,Jing Xu,Xiaoqing Zhao,Yuanzhang Guo,Jiali Jian,Xiaoyu Hao,Jiulin Guo,Yonghai Gao,Jianguo Han,Guizhen Xu. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching on Agronomic Traits for Different Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 140-146.
[14] Chunxi Li,Lingling Zhang,Shouchen Ma,Yun Shao,Huiting Chen,Jingruo Wang. Effects of Organic Materials Returning on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Contents,Yield and Economic Benefit in Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 145-150.
[15] Haibing He,Ru Yang,Mingming Xue,Liquan Wu. Grain Yield and Economic Returns of Scale Cultivation in Rice [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 152-155.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!