Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 145-150.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Organic Materials Returning on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Contents,Yield and Economic Benefit in Wheat

Li Chunxi1,Zhang Lingling1,Ma Shouchen2,Shao Yun1,Chen Huiting1,Wang Jingruo1   

  1. 1 College of Life Sciences,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,Henan,China
    2 School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering,Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454000,Henan,China
  • Received:2016-10-19 Revised:2017-01-18 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

273

Abstract:

Long-term field experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of different organic materials returning on soil carbon and nitrogen content, nitrogen use efficiency, yield and economic benefit in wheat. Four treatments were designed as below: CK (without organic materials), J (returning straw totally), F (pig manure), and Z (biogas slurry). The results showed that the contents of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen under F, J and Z treatments were increased compared with CK at mature period. Nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen partial productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of F, J and Z treatments were also higher than CK, increased by 13.85%, 3.23% , 4.67% (2013-2014) and 10.25%, 7.68%, 0.48% (2014-2015), respectively. Yields under F, J and Z treatments were significantly higher than CK (P < 0.05), increased by 14.29%, 11.12%, 4.65% (2013-2014) and 26.61%, 16.18%, 10.96% (2014-2015), respectively. In 2013-2014, economic benefit under F and J treatments were significantly higher than CK (P < 0.05) by 10.73%, 12.34%, respectively; While in 2014-2015, those under F, J and Z treatments were all significantly higher than CK (P < 0.05) by 31.04%, 20.65% and 10.86%, respectively. In summary, organic materials retuning can improve the basic fertility of soil and wheat yield, as well as the economic benefit.

Key words: Organic material returning to field, Wheat, Soil organic carbon, Soil total nitrogen, Nitrogen utilization rate, Yield, Economic benefit

Table 1

Content of organic carbon and total nitrogen of 0-20cm in soil before sowing and mature stage g/kg"

年份Year 处理Treatment 播前Before sowing 成熟期Mature stage
有机碳Organic carbon 全氮Total nitrogen 有机碳Organic carbon 全氮Total nitrogen
2013-2014 CK 19.43b 2.06b 21.21a 2.07b
猪粪Pig manure 25.30a 2.35a 26.25a 2.53a
秸秆Straw 23.62b 2.20ab 24.48a 2.47a
沼液Biogas slurry 23.12b 2.26ab 25.23a 2.30ab
2014-2015 CK 21.49b 2.28b 22.79b 2.31b
猪粪Pig manure 27.20a 2.54a 29.42a 2.78a
秸秆Straw 25.53ab 2.53a 27.83a 2.62ab
沼液Biogas slurry 26.60b 2.44ab 29.44a 2.85a

Table 2

Nitrogen use efficiency of wheat with different materials returning"

年份Year 处理Treatment 氮素积累量(kg/hm2)
Nitrogen accumulation amount		 氮素偏生产力(kg/kg)
Nitrogen partial factor productivity		 氮素利用效率(%)
Nitrogen utilization efficiency
2013-2014 CK 525.49b 29.21b 15.01b
猪粪Pig manure 527.54b 33.39a 17.09a
秸秆Straw 565.69a 32.46a 15.49b
沼液Biogas slurry 525.42b 30.57ab 15.71b
2014-2015 CK 430.32b 29.42c 18.46b
猪粪Pig manure 494.19a 37.25a 20.35a
秸秆Straw 497.56a 34.18ab 18.55b
沼液Biogas slurry 443.44b 32.65bc 19.88ab

Table 3

Effects of different material returning to field on yield and its components in wheat"

年份Year 处理Treatment 穗数(万/hm2)
Ear number		 小穗数
Spikelet number		 穗粒数
Grain number per spike		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 收获指数(%)
Harvest index
2013-2014 CK 832.50b 19.10a 30.30a 39.93b 7 886.94c 33.25b
猪粪Pig manure 911.25a 20.20a 32.20a 44.38a 9 014.51a 36.79a
秸秆Straw 870.80b 19.70a 31.50a 41.68ab 8 764.38ab 34.07b
沼液Biogas slurry 841.50b 19.90a 32.00a 41.26ab 8 254.13ab 34.90ab
2014-2015 CK 928.80b 17.55b 29.85b 41.77b 7 943.97c 35.18b
猪粪Pig manure 1 020.51a 19.55a 34.75a 45.54a 10 058.36a 39.13a
秸秆Straw 987.16a 18.45ab 32.65ab 44.64a 9 229.61ab 35.55b
沼液Biogas slurry 937.14b 17.80b 31.85ab 42.15b 8 814.41bc 33.56b

Table 4

The economic benefit of different materials to the field"

年份Year 处理
Treatment		 经济产量(kg/hm2)
Economic yield		 生产成本Cost (元/hm2) 经济效益(元/hm2)
Economic benefit
生产资料
Means of production		 机械投入
Machine cost		 劳动成本
Labor cost
2013-2014 CK 7 887.28 3 000.00 2 400.00 2 700.00 12 406.92b
猪粪Pig manure 9 014.51 4 500.00 2 400.00 2 800.00 13 737.71a
秸秆Straw 8 764.38 3 000.00 3 150.00 2 700.00 13 937.39a
沼液Biogas slurry 8 254.13 3 750.00 2 400.00 2 850.00 12 460.73b
2014-2015 CK 7 943.97 3 000.00 2 400.00 2 700.00 12 554.32c
猪粪Pig manure 10 058.36 4 500.00 2 400.00 2 800.00 16 451.74a
秸秆Straw 9 229.61 3 000.00 3 150.00 2 700.00 15 146.99ab
沼液Biogas slurry 8 814.41 3 750.00 2 400.00 2 850.00 13 917.45bc
[1] 姜丽娜, 刘佩, 齐冰玉 , 等. 不同施氮量及种植密度对小麦开花期氮素积累转运的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016,24(2):131-141.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150904
[2] 赵金花, 张丛志, 张佳宝 . 激发式秸秆深还对土壤养分和冬小麦产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2016,53(2):438-449.
[3] 李富翠, 赵护兵, 王朝辉 , 等. 渭北旱地夏闲期秸秆还田和种植绿肥对土壤水分、养分和冬小麦产量的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(9):1861-1871.
[4] 吴俊, 樊剑波, 何园球 , 等. 不同减量施肥条件下稻田田面水氮素动态变化及径流损失研究. 生态环境学报, 2012,21(9):1561-1566.
[5] 汪洪焦, 隋鹏, 石彦琴 , 等. 不同培肥措施对土壤养分和小麦产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(18):192-196.
[6] 卫婷, 韩丽娜, 韩清芳 , 等. 有机培肥对旱地土壤养分有效性和酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(3):611-620.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11339
[7] 王淑兰, 王浩, 李娟 , 等. 不同耕作方式下长期秸秆还田对旱作春玉米田土壤碳、氮、水含量及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(5):1530-1540.
[8] 刘晓梅, 余宏军, 李强 , 等. 有机农业发展概述. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(4):1303-1313.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201604.040
[9] 田国成, 王钰, 孙路 , 等. 秸秆焚烧对土壤有机质和氮磷钾含量的影响. 生态学报, 2016,36(2):387-393.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201409231887
[10] 韩鲁佳, 闫巧娟 . 中国农作物秸秆资源及其利用现状. 农业工程学报, 2002,18(3):87-91.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2002.03.022
[11] Deng L W . Review on treatment technology of intensive livestock waste water.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006,14(2):23-26.
doi: 10.1016/S1005-9040(06)60038-X
[12] 高旺盛, 陈源泉, 段留生 , 等. 中国粮食主产区农田生态健康问题与技术对策探讨. 农业现代化研究, 2008,29(1):89-91.
[13] 杨正礼, 王道龙, 李茂松 , 等. 中国粮食与农业环境双向安全战略思考. 中国农业资源与区划, 2006,27(6):1-4.
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.200606109
[14] Li S C, Fu X F, Zheng D . Emergy analysis for evaluating sustainability of Chinese economy. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001,16(4):297-304.
[15] Zhang Y, Yang Z F, Yu X Y . Ecological network and emergy analysis of urban metabolic systems:model development,and a case study of four Chinese cities. Ecological Modelling, 2009,220(11):1431-1442.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.02.001
[16] Ascione M, Campanella L . Environmental driving forces of urban growth and development:an emergy-based assessment of the city of Rome,Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009,93(3/4):238-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.011
[17] Li S C, Cai Y L . Emergy-based analysis on land sustainability. Economic Geography, 2002,22(3):346-350.
[18] 吕军杰, 姚宇卿, 张洁 , 等. 不同耕作方式对坡耕旱地土壤环境及小麦产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2011,40(1):41-44.
[19] Gregorich E G, Rochette P , Vanden B A J,et al.Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in Eastern Canada. Soil and Tillage Research, 2005,83(1):53-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.009
[20] 杜真辉, 董诚明, 熊玉萍 , 等. 菌肥与复合肥组合对地黄产量及品质的影响.作物杂志, 2016(4):146-149.
[21] Chen Z L, Zhang F P, Cai X B , et al. Effect of returning straws to field on microbes of degenerated soil in central Tibet. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005,42(4):696-699.
[22] 李瑞平, 郑金玉, 罗洋 , 等. 鸡粪与立茬还田配合应用对土壤养分和玉米产量的影响.作物杂志, 2015(6):132-135.
[23] Goyal S, Chander K, Mundra M C , et al. Influence of inorganic fertilizers and organic amendments on soil organic matter and soil microbial properties under tropical conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999,29(2):196-200.
doi: 10.1007/s003740050544
[24] 杨晓卡, 米慧玲, 高韩钰 , 等. 不同栽培模式对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统产量、氮素累积和平衡的影响.应用生态学报, 2016(6):1935-1941.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.036
[25] 张玉铭 . 华北太行山前平原冬小麦—夏玉米轮作农田氮素循环与平衡研究. 北京:中国农业大学, 2005.
doi: 10.7666/d.y773955
[26] 张瑞, 张贵龙, 陈冬青 , 等. 不同施肥对农田土壤微生物功能多样性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(2):133-139.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.02.024
[27] 邢月华, 包红静, 蔡广兴 , 等. 连续施用不同量有机肥对土壤肥力及玉米产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2016,45(4):66-70.
doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2016.04.015
[28] 崔全红, 孙本华, 吴得峰 , 等. 有机无机肥配施对旱地塿土碳氮的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016,32(2):289-294.
[29] 邵云, 赵院利, 冯荣成 , 等. 耕层调控和有机物料还田对小麦产量及氮磷钾分配利用的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2013,33(1):117-122.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2013.01.020
[30] 张婉婷, 金成功, 张欢 , 等. 有机无机肥料配施对连作区玉米土壤微生物及养分含量的影响.作物杂志, 2016(3):110-115.
[31] 藏波, 张清勇, 丰雷 , 等. 2015年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2016年展望. 中国土地科学, 2016,30(2):4-22.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wang Hanxia, Shan Fuhua, Tian Liping, Ma Qiaoyun, . Analysis of Stability and Adaptability of Winter#br# Wheat Varieties in the Regional Trials of#br# the Northern Wheat Region of China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 40-44.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Wang Jianan, Li Xiaoyan, Wei Shimei, Zhao Huijie, Zhao Mingqi, Wang Yuexia. Regulation of Exogenous 5-Aminolevulinic#br# Acid on Photosynthesis and D1 Protein of#br# Wheat Seedlings under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 121-126.
[8] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[9] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[10] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[11] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[12] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[13] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[14] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[15] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .