Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 234-240.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.02.032

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Intercropping Patterns on Sorghum Growth and Development

Li Junzhi(), Dou Shuang, Wang Xiaodong, Zhang Meng, Xiao Jibing()   

  1. Liaoning Institute of Dryland Agriculture and Forestry, Chaoyang 122000, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2024-01-11 Revised:2024-08-06 Online:2025-04-15 Published:2025-04-16

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

62

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of intercropping patterns on growth and development of sorghum, and screen out the suitable intercropping patterns of sorghum-peanut for western Liaoning Province, a randomized block experiment design was adopted. The glutinous sorghum variety (Jinuoliang 1) and peanut variety (Yuanza 6) were used as the experimental materials. Five planting patterns were set up, sorghum single cropping (CK1), peanut single cropping (CK2), 2 rows of sorghum+4 rows of peanuts (T1), 2 rows of sorghum+6 rows of peanuts (T2), 4 rows of sorghum+4 rows of peanuts (T3). The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate and SPAD value of sorghum under different intercropping treatments were higher than those under single cropping. The yield of intercropping was lower than that of single cropping, which was 43.70%-67.22%. The land equivalent ratio of different intercropping treatments were 1.25, 1.11 and 1.16, respectively, and the land productivity was increased by 11.00%-25.00%, which had a significant intercropping advantage. Therefore, it is concluded that T1 intercropping pattern (two rows of sorghum+four rows of peanut) was more suitable for intercropping in western Liaoning Province.

Key words: Intercropping pattern, Sorghum, Photosynthetic characteristics, Yield, Dry matter accumulation

Fig.1

Meteorological data from May to September in 2023"

Fig.2

Effects of intercropping mode on Pn of sorghum leaves"

Fig.3

Effects of intercropping mode on SPAD value of sorghum leaves"

Table 1

Effects of intercropping patterns on yield of sorghum and peanut kg/hm2"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 产量Yield
高粱Sorghum 花生Peanut
2023 T1 4987.86b 2964.97b
T2 3485.22c 3161.30b
T3 5360.73b 2289.57b
CK1 7975.10a －
CK2 － 4745.89a

Table 2

Effects of intercropping patterns on sorghum yield and its components factors"

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)		 千粒重
1000-kernel
weight (g)		 穗粒重
Kernel weight
per panicle (g)		 穗粒数
Kernels per
panicle		 干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation
(kg/hm2)		 收获指数
Harvest
index
T1 4987.86b 22.11a 99.71a 4534a 10 163.42b 0.51a
T2 3485.22c 21.02a 92.89a 4438a 6836.44c 0.51a
T3 5360.73b 18.63a 71.44b 3835a 10 052.58b 0.54a
CK1 7975.10a 18.78a 53.14c 2862a 19 497.17a 0.41a

Table 3

Effects of intercropping patterns on land equivalence ratio"

处理Treatment LERs LERp LER
T1 0.62a 0.62a 1.25a
T2 0.44b 0.67a 1.11a
T3 0.67a 0.48a 1.16a

Fig.4

Effects of intercropping patterns on dry matter accumulation per plant of sorghum"

Fig.5

Effects of intercropping mode on dry matter accumulation in different organs of sorghum"

[1] 曹敏建, 王晓光. 耕作学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022.
[2] 王恭, 段碧华, 石书兵. 作物间作. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2013.
[3] 彭方丽, 汪灿, 周棱波, 等. 不同间作模式对糯高粱干物质、养分积累及产量的影响. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(1):68-79.
[4] 杨玲, 郭茹, 刘洋, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区玉豆间作和带状轮作模式对玉米水氮利用及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2022, 31(6):755-765.
[5] 冯晨, 黄波, 冯良山, 等. 不同配置对辽西玉米‖花生间作系统氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1):61-73.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.01.006
[6] 肖世豪, 潘语卓, 俞霞, 等. 5年间作和施氮对甜玉米和大豆产量、农艺性状的影响. 核农学报, 2023, 37(4):822-832.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.04.0822
[7] 任旭灵, 滕园园, 王一帆, 等. 玉米间作豌豆种间竞争互补对少耕密植的响应. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6):860-869.
[8] 李春宇, 覃潇敏, 肖靖秀, 等. 不同氮磷水平下小麦―蚕豆间作对产量稳定性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(12):114-122.
[9] 刘忠宽, 曹卫东, 秦文利, 等. 玉米-紫花苜蓿间作模式与效应研究. 草业学报, 2009, 18(6):158-163.
[10] 刘浩, 左青松, 刘婧怡, 等. 盐分浓度对油菜干物质积累分配、农艺性状及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(22):19-23.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16070143
[11] 陈俊南, 姜文洋, 昝志曼, 等. 玉米和花生同垄间作对作物光合特性和间作优势的影响. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10):2672-2682.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.010
[12] 白伟, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 风沙半干旱区仁用杏作物间作对作物光合性能和产量形成的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(5):200-207.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.05.030
[13] 范虹, 殷文, 柴强. 间作优势的光合生理机制及其冠层微环境特征. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(11):1750-1761.
[14] 刘思彤, 张东娟, 许锦, 等. 间作对高粱光合特征及物质生产的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(6):52-61.
[15] 蔡倩, 孙占祥, 郑家明, 等. 辽西半干旱区玉米大豆间作模式对作物干物质积累分配、产量及土地生产力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5):909-920.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.05.004
[16] Kızıl A S, Kızılşimşek M. Assessing yield and feed quality of intercropped sorghum and soybean in different planting patterns and in different ecologies. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16(9):5141-5146.
[17] Suleman N N, Ei-Naim A M, Ahmed M F. Agronomic evaluation of groundnut and two varieties of grain sorghum intercropped at different spatial arrangements. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2018, 8(5):171-175.
[18] 张亦涛, 任天志, 刘宏斌, 等. 玉米大豆间作降低小麦玉米轮作体系土壤氮残留的效应与机制. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48 (13):2580-2590.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.010
[19] Liu S, Yang J Y, Zhang X Y. Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean-maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 123(10):32-44.
[20] 贺佳, 安曈昕, 韩学坤, 等. 间作群体生态生理研究进展. 作物杂志, 2011(4):7-11.
[21] 张昆, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 等. 不同玉米花生间作模式对饱果期花生冠层微环境及光合特性的影响. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(8):28-32.
[22] 雷雲翔, 陆思豪, 应晓成, 等. 不同间作方式对玉米/大豆的光合性能、产量和土壤微生态特征的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(3):610-618.
[23] 李妍妍, 丰光, 齐华, 等. 中单808和丹豆14间作系统生理生态指标及产量的比较分析. 作物杂志, 2010(2):44-49.
[24] 焦念元, 陈明灿, 付国占, 等. 玉米花生间作复合群体的光合物质积累与叶面积指数变化. 作物杂志, 2007(1):34-35.
[25] Bargaz A, Noyce G L, Fulthorpe R, et al. Species interactions enhance root allocation, microbial diversity and P acquisition in intercropped wheat and soybean under P deficiency. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017,120:179-188.
[26] 张莹, 孙占祥, 李爽, 等. 辽西半干旱区玉米/大豆单间作田间耗水规律研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(5):43-46.
[27] 刘洋, 孙占祥, 白伟, 等. 玉米大豆间作对辽西地区作物生长和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2011, 30(2):224-228.
[28] 赵建华, 孙建好, 陈亮之, 等. 玉米行距对大豆/玉米间作作物生长及种间竞争力的影响. 大豆科学, 2019, 38(2):229-235.
[29] 焦念元, 李亚辉, 杨潇, 等. 玉米‖花生间作行比和施磷对玉米光合特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):2959-2967.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.019
[30] 高砚亮, 孙占祥, 白伟, 等. 玉米‖花生间作系统作物产量及根系空间分布特征的影响. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(6):79-87.
[31] 张绪成, 王红丽, 于显枫, 等. 半干旱区全膜覆盖垄沟间作种植马铃薯和豆科作物的水热及产量效应. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3):468-481.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.006
[32] 王小英, 王孟, 王斌, 等. 马铃薯与绿豆间作模式研究. 陕西农业科学, 2018, 64(8):19-21,50.
[33] 郭安, 张晓春, 皮竟, 等. 多样性种植模式对糯高粱生长及高粱炭疽病发生的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(32):12-18.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18030074
[34] Zhang L, Werf D V W, Zhang S. Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2007, 103(3):178-188.
[35] 宋日, 牟瑛, 王玉兰, 等. 玉米、大豆间作对两种作物根系形态特征的影响. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2002, 34(3):83-86.
[36] 王雪蓉, 张润芝, 李淑敏, 等. 不同供氮水平下玉米/大豆间作体系干物质积累和氮素吸收动态模拟. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(9):1354-1363.
[37] 高砚亮, 孙占祥, 白伟, 等. 玉米花生间作效应研究进展. 辽宁农业科学, 2016(1):41-46,2.
[38] 赵长江, 高菲, 李祯玮, 等. 玉米大豆不同间作行比对大豆光合生理特性及产量的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(5):820-825,848.
[39] 董宛麟, 张立祯, 于洋, 等. 向日葵和马铃薯间作模式的生产力及水分利用. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(18):127-133.
[40] 黄承建, 赵思毅, 王龙昌, 等. 套作模式下马铃薯干物质生产特性及产量研究. 农机化研究, 2013, 35(4):116-121.
[1] He Yunxia, Ma Jianhui, Zhang Daijing, Liu Donghua, Chao Xiaoyan, Chen Huiping, Li Chunxi. Study on the Effect of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Synergists on Reducing Gaseous Nitrogen Loss and Increasing Yield in Wheat Field of Northern Henan [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 108-115.
[2] Wang Li, Zhang Chengjie, Hu Haoran, Ning Liyun, Wu Yifan, Guo Rensong, Zhang Jusong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Canopy Structure and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sea Island Cotton [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 116-124.
[3] Wang Yi, Ren Yongfu, Zhang Zhengpeng, Ding Defang, Zhang Jing, Liu Yihong, Sun Duoxin, Chen Guangrong. The Effects of Different Covering Materials on Soil Environment and Maize Yield in Hexi Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 149-155.
[4] Li Jiahao, Jia Yonghong, Lian Shihao, Liu Yue, Yu Shan, Tian Wenqiang, Wang Ziqian, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Prohexadione-Calcium and Phosphorus Application Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 165-171.
[5] Cao Zhengnan, Zhao Zhendong, Hu Bo, Yu Han, Ning Xiaohai, Zhao Zeqiang, Cao Liyong. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Promoting Rot Bacteria Fertilizer on Decomposition Effect of Returning Rice Straw to Field and Yield in Cold Regions [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 172-177.
[6] Hou Nan, Wu Fengjie, Qi Xiangkun, Wang Yufeng, Yang Kejun, Fu Jian. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Levels on Carbon Metabolism of Waxy Maize during Filling Period in Black Soil Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 178-184.
[7] Zhu Jindi, Zhu Xuegang, Du Wenqing, Qiu Tuoyu, Zhao Xinbin. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer Application on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Quality and Yield of Tomatoes Cultivated in Facilities [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 185-189.
[8] Li Hu, Huang Qiuyao, Wu Zishuai, Liu Guanglin, Chen Chuanhua, Luo Qunchang, Zhu Qinan. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Rice Quality of High-Quality Conventional Rice Guiyu 12 [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 195-201.
[9] Lan Xiu, Li Hengrui, He Hongliang, Ma Xianhua, Huang Xiaojuan, Li Tianyuan, Wei Haiqiu, Jiang Qingmei, Ruan Lixia, Yang Haixia, Liu Bingji, Tang Danfeng. Effects of Intercropping of Sugarcane and Platostoma palustre on Crop Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 202-209.
[10] Wei Mengyang, Luo Zhenbao, He Shuai, Ma Qian, Ma Guankai, Xi Feihu, Luo Dongsheng, Jing Yanqiu, Yu Qiwei, Wang Maoxian. Effects of Interaction between Photosynthetic Bacteria and the Number of Retained Leaves on Physiological Metabolism, Chemical Quality, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 210-217.
[11] Yang Zepeng, Wan Kejun, Zheng Shenghua, Ao Yuqin, Ma Mingkun, Wan Xue, Li Shanshan, Song Xin, Wang Changtao, Chen Shanghong, Liu Dinghui, Chen Honglin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Seeding Amount Configuration on Yield Formation of Rapeseed by Aerial Seeding [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 225-232.
[12] Liang Hui, Zhang Jianxin, Xue Lihua, Jia Keke. Effects of Drip Irrigation Amount on Root Growth and Yield of Xinnongdou 2 under the Condition of the Postpone of Water and Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 233-240.
[13] Wang Heya, Luo Jingjing, Meng Ling, Ai Haifeng, Wang Bin, Li Huaisheng, Xu Jingpeng, Xu Xiangyang. Yield Sensitivity Analysis of Edible Sunflower Varieties in Taʼe Basin [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 30-37.
[14] Mao Shunxin, Xiao Wuwei, Zhang Zuolin, Huang Jiada, Wang Fei, Huang Jianliang, Peng Shaobing, Cui Kehui. Effects of Different Irrigation Patterns and Fertilizer Managements on the Growth of Axillary Buds and Yield Formation of Ratoon Season in Ratoon Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 226(3): 92-101.
[15] Ren Yongfu, Li Jiayi, Chen Guopeng, Pu Tian, Chen Hong, Wang Xiaochun. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on the Yield and Efficiency of Maize in Strip Intercropping System [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 101-108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .