Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 83-88.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.015

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationship between Maize Lodging Resistance and Agronomic Traits,Plant Diseases,and Insect Pests

Wang Liang1,Feng Guang1,Li Yanyan1,Jing Xiqiang1,Huang Changling2   

  1. 1 Dandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Fengcheng 118109,Liaoning,China
    2 Institute of Crop Sciences,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2015-12-21 Revised:2016-02-23 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Xiqiang Jing,Changling Huang

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

181

Abstract:

Four maize hybrids including Xianyu 335, Danyu 336, Zhengdan 958 and Dika 516 were chosen as the materials to do experiment designed by three replications and three planting density in this study. The relationship between stem quality, agronomic traits, plant diseases, occurrence of insect pests and the lodging resistance was analyzed. The results showed that ear height, gravity height, stalk rot, Asia maize borer and planting density were significantly positively correlated with lodging resistance at 0.01 level; plant height, inter node length and sheath blight were significantly positively correlated with lodging resistance at 0.05 level; stem pull, puncture strength, fracture strength and stem diameter were significantly negatively correlated at 0.01 level; crush strength and the number of supporting roots were significantly negatively correlated at 0.05 level. Stem quality traits could be directly used to evaluate maize lodging resistance; ear height, center of gravity height and planting density could be indirectly used to evaluate maize lodging resistance. Based on path analysis, the results showed that the plant density, gravity center height, stem diameter and stem pull strength played a leading role in the lodging resistance; the direct path coefficient of density on lodging resistance was the maximum with a value of 0.8366; that of gravity center height on lodging resistance was the second with a value of 0.5490; that of stem diameter and pull strength was greater.

Key words: Maize, Lodging, Agronomic traits, Correlation analysis, Path analysis

Table 1

Difference comparison of maize hybrids under different plant density"

密度
Density
（株/hm2）		 品种
Varieties		 茎秆拉力
Pull strength
(kg)		 穿刺强度
Puncture strength
(kg)		 折断强度
Break strength
(kg)		 压碎强度
Crush strength
(kg)		 茎腐病病级
Rating of
stalk rot		 纹枯病病级
Rating of
sheath blight		 玉米螟病级
Rating of Asia
corn borer		 倒伏
Lodging
rate(%)
45 000 先玉335 3.62 4.44 3.89 6.33 1 1 5 0
丹玉336 3.44 4.38 3.77 5.86 1 1 3 0
郑单958 3.81 5.12 4.02 6.75 1 1 1 0
迪卡516 3.41 4.09 3.56 5.78 1 1 3 0
平均值 3.57 4.51 3.81 6.18 1 1 3 0
60 000 先玉335 2.55 3.79 3.48 5.98 1 3 5 15
丹玉336 2.43 3.18 3.03 5.12 1 3 3 12
郑单958 3.15 4.22 3.34 6.07 1 3 3 0
迪卡516 2.99 4.05 3.15 5.11 1 3 3 0
平均值 2.78 3.81 3.25 5.57 1 3 3.5 6.8
75 000 先玉335 1.78 2.86 2.54 4.27 1 5 5 36
丹玉336 1.54 2.37 2.28 4.19 1 5 5 26
郑单958 2.11 3.31 2.46 4.65 3 5 3 8
迪卡516 1.97 2.65 2.57 4.92 1 5 3 0
平均值 1.85 2.80 2.46 4.51 1.5 5 4 17.5
密度
Density
（株/hm2）		 品种
Varieties		 株高
Plant height
（cm）		 穗位
Ear height
（cm）		 茎粗
Stem diameter
（cm）		 气生根层数
Supporting roots		 重心高度
Center of gravity height
（cm）		 节间长度
Internode length
（cm）
45 000 先玉335 313.5 115.3 2.44 0 117.8 17.7
丹玉336 319.7 121.8 2.51 1 125.5 17.2
郑单958 278.5 107.6 2.37 1 105.9 15.3
迪卡516 282.1 109.2 2.29 0 104.4 16.2
平均值 298.5 113.5 2.40 0.5 113.4 16.6
60 000 先玉335 315.5 118.2 2.33 0 118.2 17.8
丹玉336 324.2 128.4 2.38 1 135.1 18.3
郑单958 278.8 111.5 2.32 0 107.3 15.3
迪卡516 283.6 113.2 2.25 0 106.6 16.2
平均值 300.5 117.8 2.32 0.25 116.8 16.9
75 000 先玉335 317.3 121.5 2.28 0 122.4 18.1
丹玉336 325.8 134.8 2.19 0 139.6 18.4
郑单958 280.2 115.5 2.25 0 110.7 15.6
迪卡516 284.1 114.6 2.17 0 109.3 16.3
平均值 301.9 121.6 2.22 0 120.5 17.1

Table 2

Correlation analysis coefficient of maize main characters with lodging"

性状Trait y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14
y 1
x1 -0.77** 1
x2 -0.64** 0.73** 1
x3 -0.61** 0.64** 0.59** 1
x4 -0.49* 0.74** 0.77** 0.64** 1
x5 0.47* 0.20 0.19 -0.24 -0.31* 1
x6 0.52** -0.59** -0.32* -0.44* -0.51** 0.74** 1
x7 -0.88** 0.71** 0.80** 0.98** 0.89** -0.08 0.21 1
x8 -0.46* 0.41* 0.62** 0.71** 0.68** -0.20 -0.35* 0.43* 1
x9 0.85** -0.79** -0.57** -0.58** -0.62** 0.92** 0.99** -0.45* -0.44* 1
x10 0.34* -0.30* -0.43* -0.63** -0.70** 0.71** 0.90** -0.21 -0.15 0.56** 1
x11 0.51** -0.38* -0.71** -0.88** -0.81** 0.13 0.21 -0.19 -0.22 0.21 0.01 1
x12 0.41* -0.25 -0.86** -0.79** -0.72** 0.28* 0.33* -0.53** -0.31* 0.39* 0.23 0.39* 1
x13 0.58** -0.18 -0.43* -0.57** -0.43* 0.11 0.10 -0.12 -0.14 0.12 0.08 0.23 0.21 1
x14 0.76** -0.92** -0.84** -0.93** -0.87** 0.31* 0.44* -0.85** -0.78** 0.35* 0.43* 0.37* 0.78** 0.46* 1

Table 3

Partial correlation coefficient of lodging resistance index"

性状指标
Characters index		 偏相关系数
Partial correlation coefficient
r(y, x1) 0.088235
r(y, x7) 0.174638
r(y, x9) 0.223547*
r(y, x14) 0.310603**

Table 4

Path analysis of lodging resistance index"

作用因子
Effect factors		 →倒伏性直接通径系数
→Lodging resistance direct path analysis coefficient		 →倒伏性间接通径系数 →Indirect path analysis coefficient
→x1 →x7 →x9 →x14
x1 0.1089 0.1739 -0.1206 -0.1397
x7 0.1493 -0.3302 -0.0688 -0.1124
x9 0.5490 -0.0965 -0.0714 0.1039
x14 0.8366 -0.4377 -0.3173 0.2078
[1] 程富丽, 杜雄, 刘梦星 , 等. 玉米倒伏及其对产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2011,19(1):105-108.
[2] 任佰朝, 张吉旺, 李霞 , 等. 大田淹水对高产夏玉米抗倒伏性能的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(12):2440-2448.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.005
[3] Kato A . Relationship between root lodging and five nondestructively determined traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 1998,43(1):65-74.
[4] 高鑫, 高聚林, 于晓芳 , 等. 高密植对不同类型玉米品种茎秆抗倒特性及产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2012,20(4):69-73.
[5] Koinuma K , I kegaya F,Ito E.Heterotic effect for root lodging resistance in F1 hybrids among dent and flint inbred lines of maize. Maydica, 1998,43:13-17.
[6] 石洁, 王振营, 何康来 . 黄淮海地区夏玉米病虫害发生趋势与原因分析. 植物保护, 2005,31(5):63-65.
[7] 黄海, 常莹, 胡文河 , 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆农艺性状及抗倒伏性的影响. 玉米科学, 2014,22(4):94-101.
[8] 刘鑫, 谢瑞芝, 牛兴奎 , 等. 种植密度对东北地区不同年代玉米生产主推品种抗倒伏性能的影响.作物杂志, 2012(5):126-130.
[9] 丰光, 李妍妍, 景希强 , 等. 夏玉米根茎主要性状与倒伏性的关系研究.河南农业科学, 2010(11):20-22.
[10] 马飞前, 刘小刚, 王红武 , 等. 玉米茎秆纤维品质性状及其相关分析.作物杂志, 2014(4):44-48.
[11] 刘小刚, 马飞前, 王红武 , 等. 玉米茎秆穿刺强度遗传研究.作物杂志, 2014(4):27-31.
[12] 徐丽娜, 黄收兵, 陈刚 , 等. 玉米抗倒伏栽培技术的研究进展.作物杂志, 2012(1):5-8.
[13] 王娜, 李凤海, 王志斌 , 等. 不同耐密型玉米品种茎秆性状对密度的影响及倒伏的关系.作物杂志, 2011(3):67-70.
[14] 李波, 张吉旺, 崔海岩 , 等. 施钾量对高产夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(11):2093-2099.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02093
[15] 李宁, 李建民, 翟志席 , 等. 化控技术对玉米植株抗倒伏性状、农艺性状及产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2010,18(6):38-42.
[16] 刘佳丽, 杜雄, 边大红 , 等. 种子包衣处理对夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响. 玉米科学, 2013,21(1):85-89,95.
[17] 李霞, 张吉旺, 任佰朝 , 等. 小麦玉米周年生产中耕作对夏玉米产量及抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(6):1093-1101.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01093
[18] 刘魏魏, 赵会杰, 李红旗 , 等. 密度、种植方式对夏玉米茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响. 河南农业科学, 2011,40(8):75-78.
[19] 姚敏娜, 施志国, 薛军 , 等. 种植密度对玉米茎秆皮层结构及抗倒伏能力的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2015,50(11):2006-2014.
[20] Stamp P, Kiel C . Root morphology of maize and its relationship to root lodging. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1992,168(2):113-118.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1992.tb00987.x
[21] 付志远, 邵可可, 陈德芝 , 等. 穗上节间数与玉米抗倒伏能力的相关性分析. 河南农业大学学报, 2011,45(2):149-154.
[22] Pinter L . Effect of plant density and plant distribution with in the row on grain yield and standing ability for maize. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 1993,42(3):337-348.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Wang Lei, Zhang Xiangping, Li Runxi, Niu Xiaoxia, . Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic#br# Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[3] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[4] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[5] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13-19.
[8] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[9] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37-41.
[10] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[11] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[12] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[13] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[14] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Quality of Mechanical Harvesting Maize Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 162-167.
[15] Bin Zhang,Jinxiu Li,Zhen Wang,Hao Feng,Jinbang Li. Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Wheat Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 57-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .