Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 79-84.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Interaction Effects of Fertilizer and Density on Late Rice after Tobacco in Tobacco-Rice Rotation System in Changsha Tobacco Area

Chen Pingping,Yang Jing,Li Juan,Tu Naimei,Yi Zhenxie   

  1. College of Agronomy,Hunan Agricultural University/South Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China,Changsha 410128,Hunan,China
  • Received:2016-06-21 Revised:2016-07-24 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

125

Abstract:

In order to explore the optimal nitrogen application rate and planting density of late rice after tobacco in tobacco-rice rotation system in Changsha tobacco area, the interaction effects of fertilizer and density on late rice after tobacco were studied with Fengyuanyou 299 as material in Liuyang, Changsha in 2013-2014. The results showed that the whole growth duration of late rice after tobacco was prolonged 2 days by nitrogen application, while which had no relation to density. LAI of rice increased with the increment of nitrogen application rate and planting density, while there existed interaction effect between nitrogen application rate and planting density which showed difference between two years. SPAD value of leaves of late rice after tobacco significantly increased by nitrogen application, while which was not related to density. In yield components of rice, 1000-grain weight was relatively stable, which showed indistinctive change with the change of nitrogen application rate and planting density. The interaction effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on yield components of late rice after tobacco was significant. Under the lower density (152 000~200 000 hill/hm 2), effective panicles, grain number per panicle and yield increased with the increment of nitrogen application rate and planting density. Under higher density (210 000~300 000 hill/hm 2), seed setting rate increased with the increment of nitrogen application rate, while effective panicles, grain number per panicle and yield increased first and decreased afterwards, and interaction effect of 300 000 hill/hm 2+N 90kg/hm 2 was the best.

Key words: Changsha tobacco area, Tobacco-rice rotation, Late rice, Nitrogen application rate, Density, Yield formation

Table 1

Basic fertility in tested fields"

年份
Year		 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 全氮(g/kg)
Total N		 全磷(g/kg)
Total P		 全钾(g/kg)
Total K		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Alkali-hydrolyzable N		 有效磷(mg/kg)
Available P		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available K
2013 23.21 2.11 0.93 13.07 175.73 31.93 202.76
2014 21.47 2.09 0.85 13.34 160.45 30.78 229.08

Table 2

Effects of nitrogen application rate on the growth duration of late rice after tobacco"

处理
Treatments		 播种(月/日)
Sowing		 移栽(月/日)
Transplanting		 孕穗(月/日)
Booting		 齐穗(月/日)
Full heading		 成熟(月/日)
Maturity		 全生育期(d)
Whole duration
N0 6/18 7/20 8/31 9/10 10/07 111
N1 6/18 7/20 9/02 9/12 10/09 113
N2 6/18 7/20 9/02 9/12 10/09 113
N3 6/18 7/20 9/02 9/12 10/09 113

Table 3

Effects of interaction of fertilizer and density on leaf area index of late rice after tobacco"

2013年 2014年
处理Treatments 孕穗期Booting 齐穗期Full heading 灌浆中期Mid-filling 处理 Treatments 孕穗期Booting 齐穗期Full heading
密度处理Treatment of density 密度处理Treatment of density
M1 5.25c 4.26c 3.23c D1 5.54b 4.68b
M2 6.12b 5.14b 3.74b D2 5.94a 5.28a
M3 7.25a 6.06a 4.21a D3 5.84a 5.26a
施氮量处理Treatment of N application rate 施氮量处理Treatment of N application rate
S0 5.33c 4.15c 3.08c N0 4.80d 4.28c
S1 6.11b 5.16b 3.61b N1 5.32c 4.70b
S2 6.39b 5.38b 3.96ab N2 5.97b 5.17b
S3 7.01a 5.92a 4.26a N3 6.99a 6.15a
互作处理Treatment of interaction 互作处理Treatment of interaction
M1S0 4.71g 3.74f 2.92f D1N0 4.18f 3.59e
M1S1 5.20f 4.24e 3.08ef D1N1 5.23de 4.85cd
M1S2 5.31f 4.45e 3.25e D1N2 5.93c 4.78cd
M1S3 5.78e 4.61de 3.67d D1N3 6.81b 5.50b
M2S0 5.24f 3.89f 3.12ef D2N0 4.97e 4.40d
M2S1 5.99de 5.16cd 3.45d D2N1 5.48d 4.73cd
M2S2 6.32d 5.54c 4.13c D2N2 5.91c 5.28bc
M2S3 6.92c 5.97b 4.25c D2N3 7.39a 6.71a
M3S0 6.03d 4.83d 3.19e D3N0 5.25de 4.84cd
M3S1 7.13bc 6.07b 4.30bc D3N1 5.26de 4.51d
M3S2 7.53b 6.15b 4.49bc D3N2 6.07c 5.44b
M3S3 8.32a 7.17a 4.85a D3N3 6.77b 6.24a

Table 4

Effects of interaction of fertilizer and density on leaf SPAD value of late rice after tobacco"

处理
Treatments		 孕穗期
Booting		 齐穗期
Full heading		 灌浆中期
Mid-filling
密度处理Treatment of density
M1 33.4a 44.2a 39.9a
M2 34.0a 43.9a 38.3a
M3 33.0a 44.3a 39.5a
施氮量处理Treatment of N application rate
S0 30.5b 42.3b 35.5b
S1 33.4a 44.6a 39.5a
S2 34.4a 44.7a 40.5a
S3 35.7a 44.9a 41.3a
互作处理Treatment of interaction
M1S0 30.4c 42.4ab 35.6b
M1S1 33.2b 44.7a 41.0a
M1S2 34.1ab 44.8a 41.2a
M1S3 36.0a 44.7a 41.7a
M2S0 30.5c 41.2b 34.8b
M2S1 35.0a 44.5a 38.2ab
M2S2 34.9ab 45.0a 39.6a
M2S3 35.7a 45.0a 40.5a
M3S0 30.6c 43.2ab 36.0b
M3S1 31.9bc 44.6a 39.4a
M3S2 34.1ab 44.3a 40.6a
M3S3 35.5a 45.1a 41.8a

Table 5

Effects of interaction of fertilizer and density on yield and its components of late rice after tobacco in 2013"

处理
Treatments		 有效穗数(万/hm2)
Effective panicle		 每穗总粒数(粒/穗)
Total grain per panicle		 每穗实粒数(粒/穗)
Filled grain per panicle		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
密度处理Treatment of density
M1 173.6c 163.1a 127.5a 77.6a 27.4a 6 073.3c
M2 184.0b 155.1b 124.6ab 80.4a 27.9a 6 391.1b
M3 209.8a 156.4b 120.2b 76.9a 27.9a 7 035.1a
施氮量处理Treatment of N application rate
S0 176.2c 159.4a 121.5a 76.3a 27.5a 5 892.5c
S1 186.3b 158.7a 124.5a 78.6a 27.8a 6 448.9b
S2 192.8ab 158.7a 126.4a 79.7a 27.7a 6 743.0ab
S3 201.3a 155.9a 123.8a 78.6a 27.8a 6 914.9a
互作处理Treatment of interaction
M1S0 168.4e 163.4a 123.2ab 75.4a 27.1a 5 622.4e
M1S1 169.6e 163.5a 125.5a 76.8a 27.6a 5 874.6e
M1S2 174.2de 162.4a 130.7a 80.5a 27.5a 6 261.2d
M1S3 182.1d 163.1a 130.5a 77.5a 27.5a 6 535.1cd
M2S0 171.9de 158.1ab 121.9b 77.1a 27.8a 5 825.4e
M2S1 179.3d 154.8b 127.6a 82.6a 27.9a 6 383.2d
M2S2 185.9cd 155.2b 126.1a 81.3a 27.6a 6 470.0cd
M2S3 199.0bc 152.2b 122.7ab 80.6a 28.2a 6 885.7bc
M3S0 188.2cd 156.6ab 119.5b 76.3a 27.7a 6 229.7d
M3S1 210.1b 157.9ab 120.5b 76.3a 28.0a 7 088.8b
M3S2 218.2ab 158.4ab 122.3ab 77.2a 28.1a 7 497.8a
M3S3 222.7a 152.5b 118.3b 77.6a 27.8a 7 324.0a

Table 6

Effects of interaction of fertilizer and density on yield and its components of late rice after tobacco in 2014"

处理
Treatments		 有效穗数(万/hm2)
Effective panicle		 每穗总粒数(粒/穗)
Total grain per panicle		 每穗实粒数(粒/穗)
Filled grain per panicle		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
密度处理Treatment of density
D1 164.1c 147.6a 122.5a 82.9a 28.7a 5 716.0c
D2 193.6b 142.5b 116.3ab 81.5a 28.6a 6 459.2b
D3 216.4a 141.4b 111.8b 79.0a 28.6a 7 069.3a
施氮量处理Treatment of N application rate
N0 184.6b 134.7c 102.8d 76.4b 28.1a 5 321.8c
N1 200.2a 140.9bc 112.4c 79.8ab 28.6a 6 581.7b
N2 190.1b 155.3a 130.4a 83.9a 28.9a 7 089.1a
N3 190.6b 144.4b 121.8b 84.3a 28.8a 6 666.7b
互作处理Treatment of interaction
D1N0 176.4de 132.6d 106.7cd 80.5ab 27.9a 5 247.2e
D1N1 172.2e 141.6bc 117.0bc 82.6ab 28.4a 5 714.0d
D1N2 145.5g 168.1a 142.8a 85.0a 29.2a 6 069.2cd
D1N3 162.3f 147.9b 123.6b 83.5a 29.1a 5 833.7d
D2N0 183.6d 132.0d 100.9d 76.1b 28.4a 5 255.4e
D2N1 196.4c 143.0bc 114.3c 79.9ab 28.9a 6 481.1c
D2N2 198.9c 149.3b 125.1b 83.8a 28.9a 7 196.7b
D2N3 195.6c 145.1bc 124.8b 86.0a 28.3a 6 903.6b
D3N0 193.8c 138.9cd 100.8d 72.6b 28.0a 5 462.7e
D3N1 231.9a 138.0cd 105.9cd 76.8b 28.5a 7 550.1ab
D3N2 225.9a 148.5b 123.3b 83.0a 28.7a 8 001.3a
D3N3 213.9b 140.1bc 117.0bc 83.5a 29.0a 7 262.9b
[1] 杨志和 . 闽北烟-稻轮作的增产效益及技术要点.福建农业, 2010(3):10-11.
[2] 傅树斌, 黄振才, 吴胜杨 . 优质杂交稻谷优596在上杭作烟后稻示范表现与高产栽培技术.福建稻麦科技, 2011(29):45-46.
[3] 肖步金 . 超级稻“天优3301”烟后作高产栽培技术.现代农业, 2012(9):38.
[4] 翁建凤 . 湘优66在武夷山市岚谷乡作烟后稻的种植表现及高产栽培技术.现代农业科技, 2012(14):28.
[5] 林强, 王洪飞, 郑秀平 . 京福1优943作烟后稻大面积示范高产栽培技术. 杂交水稻, 2012,27(4):53-55.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3956.2012.04.021
[6] 毛和福 . 水稻新组合全优1093在邵武市作烟后稻种植表现及栽培技术.现代农业科技, 2015(16):46.
[7] 裴晓东, 李帆, 钟越峰 , 等. 浏阳烟区烟后晚稻适宜品种筛选研究. 作物研究, 2013,27(6):678-680.
[8] 陈平平, 李艳芳, 黄松青 , 等. 宁乡烟区烟后晚稻适宜品种筛选研究.湖南农业科学, 2015(10):9-11.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2015.10.003
[9] 杨晶, 王元元, 谷子寒 , 等. 长沙烟稻轮作区烤烟正常与推迟采收条件下的适宜晚稻品种筛选. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(21):11-17.
[10] 易镇邪, 傅莉斌, 刘剑 , 等. 烟后晚稻产量形成特性与施氮效应研究.湖南农业科学, 2011(11):13-15.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2011.21.006
[11] 李艳芳, 袁珍贵, 易镇邪 , 等. 3个烟后晚稻品种产量性状与养分利用对氮肥的响应差异. 作物研究, 2013,27(2):103-107.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2013.02.01
[12] 黎娟, 李帆, 钟越峰 , 等. 施氮量对浏阳烟区烟后晚稻产量与光合特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2014,43(8):25-27.
[13] 黎娟, 裴晓东, 李帆 , 等. 浏阳烟稻轮作区烤烟适宜施氮量研究. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(10):58-63.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15100001
[14] 李艳芳, 陈平平, 黎娟 , 等. 长沙烟区烟后晚稻适宜氮肥施用量与运筹方式研究.中国土壤与肥料, 2016(5):37-44.
[15] 李艳芳, 陈平平, 黎娟 , 等. 氮磷钾配比对宁乡烟后晚稻产量和养分积累分配的影响. 作物研究, 2015,29(6):590-594.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2015.06.04
[1] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[2] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[3] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[4] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106-113.
[5] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[6] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[7] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9" [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89-94.
[8] Chunming Zhang,Xueying Zhao,Hubin Yan,Huijun Zhu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Effects of Film Mulching Modes and Population Density on Photosynthesis Characteristics and Yield of Mung Bean in Arid Land [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 108-115.
[9] Lina Jiang,Ying Yue,Jinna Li,Yawen Zhang,Yalin Zhu,Chunxi Li. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Allocation and Nitrogen Utilization after Anthesis in Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 80-86.
[10] Junshuai Lu,Yunxiang Li,Xingfu Wang,Guohua Gao,Xia Yang,Jing Liang. Effects of High-Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Maize Varieties in Yellow River Irrigation Areas of Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 97-102.
[11] Xiaohua Shi,Haiying Yang,Wenqin Kang,Yonglin Qin,Mingshou Fan,Liguo Jia. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Crop Yields and Soil Nitrogen Balance in Potato-Wheat System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 108-116.
[12] Kai Zhu,Fei Zhang,Fulai Ke,Yanqiu Wang,Jianqiu Zou. Effects of Planting Density on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Hybrids Suitable for Mechenization [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 83-87.
[13] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141-146.
[14] Yanfang Hao,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Wei Zhang,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Establishment of Sorghum Cell Suspensions with Young Leaves [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 35-40.
[15] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Xiaoxia Yang,Dongsheng Han,Yuhua Wang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. Technology and Benefit Analysis of High Yield Record Field in Maize [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .