Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 50-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.01.008

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties

Xiaoming Wang1,Dacheng Li1,Zhengda Liao1,Yuanchu Gan1,Huixiu Chen1,Xide Su2,Zenglin Wei3   

  1. 1 College of Food & Biochemical Engineering, Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Laibin 546199, Guangxi, China;
    2 Guangxi Laibin Yongxin Sugar Industry Co., Ltd, Laibin 546100, Guangxi, China
    3 Laibin Xingbin District Station of Sugarcane Technology Promotion, Laibin 546138, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2018-07-15 Revised:2018-11-15 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-02-01
  • Contact: Zhengda Liao

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

148

Abstract:

Five varieties of Guitang 49, Guitang 42, Funong 41, Guitang 43, Guiliu 05136 and Xintaitang 22 (as the control) were selected as materials to achieve high yield, high sugar content and great efficiency.The evaluation method combined with the plot experiment with the field demonstration was adopted. The result of the plot experiment showed that in the Guangxi Laibin area, the sugarcane varieties with commercial value were Guiliu 05136, Guitang 41 and Guitang 49. The yield of the sugarcane varieties of Guitang 49, Guitang 41 and Guiliu 05136 increased by 9.07, 7.40 and 5.99t/hm 2 (increased by 10.31%, 8.41% and 6.81%), respectively than that of the control Xintaitang 22; the theoretical sugar yield increased by 1.34, 1.28 and 0.88t/hm 2 (11.02%, 10.53% and 7.24%), respectively, compared with that of Xintaitang 22. The theoretical sugarcane yield and sugar content of Guiliu 05136, Funong 41 and Guitang 49 were significantly higher than those of Xintaitang 22, and the sucrose contents of Guiliu 05136 and Funong 41 were significantly higher than that of Xintaitang 22. This coincides with the results of the plot test.

Key words: Sugarcane, Agronomic traits, Yield, Comparative analysis

Table 1

Agronomic characters and borer damage in early stage of plot trial"

品种
Variety		 出苗率(%)
Emergence rate		 分蘖率(%)
Tillering rate		 螟虫为害节率(%)
Damage saving rate of borer		 生长速度(cm/month)
Growth rate
新台糖22号（对照）Xintaitang 22 (CK) 47.03bc 27.87bc 15.78a 66.2bc
桂糖49号Guitang 49 75.25a 24.62c 13.55ab 71.4ab
桂糖42号Guitang 42 45.48c 15.25d 12.64b 63.7c
福农41号Funong 41 55.02b 27.42bc 13.66ab 72.1a
桂糖43号Guitang 43 50.48bc 32.28a 8.65c 69.3ab
桂柳05136 Guiliu 05136 48.87bc 29.21ab 11.89b 71.5ab

Table 2

Agronomic characters and theoretical yield of sugarcane in plot test"

品种Variety 有效茎数Effective stem number (stem/hm2) 株高Plant height (cm) 茎粗Stem diameter (cm) 理论产蔗量Theoretical cane yield (t/hm2)
最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
Average		 最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
Average		 最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
Average
新台糖22号（对照）Xintaitang 22 (CK) 62 954 65 826 64 780b 234 264 252b 2.40 2.74 2.62c 88.01bc
桂糖49号Guitang 49 65 764 68 623 67 095a 236 268 254ab 2.48 2.75 2.65bc 94.00a
桂糖42号Guitang 42 60 876 64 345 62 170c 231 273 251b 2.43 2.76 2.63c 84.77c
福农41号Funong 41 65 034 68 104 65 790a 239 271 259a 2.47 2.79 2.67b 95.41a
桂糖43号Guitang 43 61 874 65 230 63 090b 236 268 255a 2.50 2.77 2.68b 90.75b
桂柳05136 Guiliu 05136 62 167 65 328 63 300b 242 275 262a 2.45 2.81 2.73a 97.08a

Table 3

Sucrose content and theoretical sugar yield in plot test"

品种
Variety		 蔗糖分Sucrose content (%) 理论产糖量(t/hm2)
Theoretical sugar yield
最小值Minimum 最大值Maximum 平均值Average
新台糖22号（对照）Xintaitang 22 (CK) 13.12 14.47 13.82b 12.16bc
桂糖49号Guitang 49 13.22 14.52 13.87b 13.04a
桂糖42号Guitang 42 13.31 14.88 13.96ab 11.83c
福农41号Funong 41 13.36 15.02 14.09a 13.44a
桂糖43号Guitang 43 13.29 14.75 13.78ab 12.51b
桂柳05136 Guiliu 05136 13.25 14.90 13.91ab 13.50a

Table 4

Demonstration of theoretical sugarcane yield, sucrose content and theoretical sugar yield in field"

品种
Variety		 理论产蔗量(t/hm2)
Theoretical
sugarcane yield		 蔗糖分Sucrose content (%) 理论产糖量(t/hm2)
Theoretical
sugar yield
最小值
Minimum		 最大值
Maximum		 平均值
average
新台糖22号（对照）Xintaitang 22 (CK) 87.46bc 12.95 14.45 13.59b 11.89c
桂糖49号Guitang 49 93.06a 13.08 14.58 13.63b 12.68b
桂糖42号Guitang 42 85.83c 13.23 14.63 13.60b 11.67c
福农41号Funong 41 92.87a 13.27 14.72 13.89a 12.90a
桂糖43号Guitang 43 88.24b 13.20 14.66 13.64b 12.04c
桂柳05136 Guiliu 05136 93.66a 13.23 15.12 14.05a 13.16a
[1] 王小明, 覃逸明, 李大成 , 等. 绿色双高糖料蔗生产技术现状与发展对策研究——以广西来宾市为例. 作物杂志, 2017(5):14-20.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.05.003
[2] 黄家训, 覃佳佳, 杨武兴 , 等. 来宾市兴宾区甘蔗高产创建的成效及对策. 现代农业科技, 2017(5):105-106.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2014.05.062
[3] 李恒锐, 沈文尉, 邱文武 , 等. 引进木薯优良新品种的适应性研究. 作物杂志, 2017(5):139-143.
[4] 石秋梅, 卢彬彬 . 三问来宾市兴宾区甘蔗发展之路 . 来宾日报, 2016 -01-19(1).
[5] 李翔, 黄伟华, 黄家雍 , 等. 2013 年广西甘蔗中期生长情况调查. 作物杂志, 2017(4):148-152.
[6] 廖楠 . 广西甘蔗根际土壤丛枝菌根(AM)真菌多样性研究. 桂林:广西师范大学, 2016.
[7] 何中国, 朱统国, 李玉发 , 等. 吉林省花生育种现状及发展方向. 作物杂志, 2017(4):8-12.
[8] 王小明, 沈富标 . 湛江农垦蔗糖产业现代化生产与管理的探讨. 广东农工商职业技术学院学报, 2014,30(1):5-9.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-931X.2014.01.002
[9] 李松, 余坤兴, 刘丽敏 , 等. 甘蔗茎尖胚状体脱毒苗快繁技术研究. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(2):83-87.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2010.04.001
[10] 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛, 谭宏伟 , 等. 广西甘蔗栽培技术的发展进步. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(10):1770-1775.
doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2014.10.1770
[11] 黄家训 . 新台糖22号脱毒健康种苗推广现状及其模式创新. 北京农业, 2017(24):282-283.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6966.2014.24.235
[1] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[2] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[3] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[4] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[5] Yunqing Gao,Shutong Li,Qibing Shang,Junchun Shi,Dongxu Xu. Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 164-167.
[6] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[7] Huihui Tang,Yanli Xu,Qingyan Wang,Zhengbo Ma,Guangyan Li,Hui Dong,Zhiqiang Dong. Effects of Foliar Spraying 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Spring Maize Growth and Yield under Different Planting Densities [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 136-141.
[8] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[9] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[10] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[11] Kainan Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Ruiqi Ma,Yingjie Zhu,Zheli Xu,Baojun Zhang,Guangcai Zhao. Effects of Tridimensional Uniform Sowing and Fertilizer on Grain and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 103-110.
[12] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[13] Yang Zhang,Huilin Yu,Yanbo Wang. Study on Yield and Related Traits of Maize Varieties in Different Ecological Regions of Eastern North China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 38-43.
[14] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
[15] Jinghong Tan,Luping Zhang,Qixia Wu,Jianqiang Zhu,Zaizhen Zhang. Comparative Research on the Effects of Reducing Nitrogen from Different Fertilizers on Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 134-140.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .