Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 51-57.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.06.008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Stability of Potato Varieties (Strains) Starch and Yield Performance

Li Xin(), Jin Guanghui(), Wang Pengcheng, Wang Ziwen   

  1. Agricultural College, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2020-12-22 Revised:2021-07-07 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: Jin Guanghui E-mail:1355267134@qq.com;ghjin1122@163.com

Abstract:

In order to breed high-starch potatoes, twenty-one potato strains and two varieties (Kenshu No.1 and Daxiyang), mainly planted in Heilongjiang Reclamation Area, were used as experimental materials for screening varieties (strains) with excellent characteristics by measuring tuber yield, starch content, starch yield, and amylose content. The results showed that the tuber yield, starch content, starch yield and amylose content of potato had an extreme interaction between environments (years) and genotypes (P < 0.01), but the effect of genotypes were greater than environmental factors (P > 0.05). The yield of the tested genotypes were 17 552-49 639kg/ha, starch contents were 13.17%-19.66%, starch yield were 2428.17-8792.31kg/ha, and amylose contents were 13.21%-21.30%. Compared with the control varieties, four strains with high yield, stable yield, high starch contents and high starch yield were screened out from 21 potato strains. This study provided scientific basis for the selection of potato varieties with high starch and strong stability.

Key words: Potato, Yield, Starch content, Starch yield, Stability

Table 1

Male and female parents and codes of potato varieties (strains)"

序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (strain)
父本
Male parent
母本
Female parent
1 ND17-147-6 实11-1-2 11-1-28
2 ND17-147-26 实11-1-2 11-1-28
3 ND17-32-21 大西洋 早大白
4 ND17-143-13 实11-7-41 11-1-35
5 ND17-147-66 实11-1-2 11-1-28
6 ND17-147-73 实11-1-2 11-1-28
序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (strain)
父本
Male parent
母本
Female parent
7 ND17-115-9 No-3 321-1-1
8 ND17-143-7 实11-7-41 11-1-35
9 ND17-48-26 选8 11-1-1
10 ND17-21-19 红皮坝 垦薯1号
11 ND17-44-21 321-1-1 11-4-1
12 ND17-147-54 实11-1-2 11-1-28
13 ND17-6-25 2191 花心红
14 ND17-25-21 陇薯L08104-12 0899-1
15 ND17-147-4 实11-1-2 11-1-28
16 ND17-26-9 陇薯L08104-12 早大白
17 ND17-26-1 陇薯L08104-12 早大白
18 ND17-48-11 0899-1 11-1-1
19 ND17-58-11 选8 俄红
20 ND17-12-2 垦薯1号 早大白
21 ND17-164-5 陇薯L08104-12 垦薯1号
22 垦薯1号 брянскийнадежный гибрид128-6
23 大西洋 旺西Wauseon B5141-6 Lenape

Table 2

Yield of potato varieties (strains) kg/hm2"

序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (strain)
2019年产量
Yield in 2019
2020年产量
Yield in 2020
平均产量
Average yield
相对标准偏差
Relative standard deviation
1 ND17-147-6 30 955 27 112 29 033 0.09
2 ND17-147-26 19 506 21 041 20 274 0.05
3 ND17-32-21 40 180 32 643 36 411 0.15
4 ND17-143-13 36 790 34 986 35 888 0.04
5 ND17-147-66 17 172 21 687 19 430 0.16
6 ND17-147-73 16 950 18 155 17 552 0.05
7 ND17-115-9 43 237 45 050 44 144 0.03
8 ND17-143-7 41 959 42 714 42 336 0.01
9 ND17-48-26 47 238 45 898 46 568 0.02
10 ND17-21-19 24 341 27 362 25 852 0.08
11 ND17-44-21 26 787 25 801 26 294 0.03
12 ND17-147-54 22 063 23 728 22 895 0.05
13 ND17-6-25 29 899 28 316 29 108 0.04
14 ND17-25-21 33 400 34 425 33 912 0.02
15 ND17-147-4 40 903 39 348 40 125 0.03
16 ND17-26-9 41 681 40 339 41 010 0.02
17 ND17-26-1 38 624 40 160 39 392 0.03
18 ND17-48-11 27 342 28 106 27 724 0.02
19 ND17-58-11 28 343 28 138 28 240 0.01
20 ND17-12-2 23 897 25 474 24 686 0.05
21 ND17-164-5 49 295 49 983 49 639 0.01
22 垦薯1号 48 012 48 970 48 491 0.01
23 大西洋 39 950 41 500 40 725 0.03
平均产量Average yield 33 414 33 519

Table 3

Analysis of yield stability of potato varieties (strains)"

变异来源Source of variation df SS MS FF-value P
区组Block 4.00 31242.35 7810.59 0.00 0.9999
环境Environment 1.00 20016219.20 20016219.20 1.90 0.1820
品种(系)Variety (strain) 22.00 6663453482.22 302884249.19 28.74 0.0001**
品种(系)×环境Variety (strain) × environment 22.00 231854398.30 10538836.29 1465.77 0.0001**
误差Error 88.00 632715.65 7189.95
总误差Total error 137.00 6915988057.72

Fig.1

The starch contents of potato varieties (strains) in each year"

Table 4

Analysis of average starch contents of potato varieties (strains)"

序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety
(strain)
平均淀粉含量
Average starch
content (%)
相对标准偏差
Relative standard
deviation
1 ND17-147-6 19.66 0.08
2 ND17-147-26 18.24 0.08
3 ND17-32-21 18.31 0.06
4 ND17-143-13 17.92 0.07
5 ND17-147-66 18.37 0.00
6 ND17-147-73 19.39 0.09
7 ND17-115-9 18.22 0.02
8 ND17-143-7 16.81 0.08
序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety
(strain)
平均淀粉含量
Average starch
content (%)
相对标准偏差
Relative standard
deviation
9 ND17-48-26 15.90 0.15
10 ND17-21-19 16.38 0.10
11 ND17-44-21 17.33 0.00
12 ND17-147-54 16.41 0.08
13 ND17-6-25 17.13 0.00
14 ND17-25-21 17.02 0.01
15 ND17-147-4 17.89 0.07
16 ND17-26-9 17.33 0.07
17 ND17-26-1 16.53 0.00
18 ND17-48-11 13.17 0.33
19 ND17-58-11 16.31 0.02
20 ND17-12-2 14.77 0.12
21 ND17-164-5 15.77 0.02
22 垦薯1号 18.14 0.03
23 大西洋 17.12 0.01

Table 5

Stability analysis of starch contents in potato varieties (strains)"

变异来源Source of variation df SS MS FF-value P
区组Block 4.00 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.9608
环境Environment 1.00 0.53 0.53 2.09 0.1624
品种(系)Variety (strain) 22.00 3948.25 179.47 703.04 0.0001**
品种(系)×环境Variety (strain) × environment 22.00 5.62 0.26 5.45 0.0001**
误差Error 88.00 4.12 0.05
总误差Total error 137.00 3958.68

Table 6

Starch yield performance of potato varieties (strains) kg/hm2"

序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (strain)
2019年淀粉产量
Starch yield in 2019
2020年淀粉产量
Starch yield in 2020
平均淀粉产量
Average starch yield
相对标准偏差
Relative standard deviation
1 ND17-147-6 6429.10 5032.04 5730.57 0.17
2 ND17-147-26 3758.97 3619.11 3689.04 0.03
3 ND17-32-21 7656.84 5732.15 6694.49 0.20
4 ND17-143-13 6932.09 5944.15 6438.12 0.11
5 ND17-147-66 3162.18 3973.18 3567.68 0.16
6 ND17-147-73 3084.97 3736.40 3410.68 0.14
7 ND17-115-9 7776.24 8316.39 8046.31 0.05
8 ND17-143-7 7462.43 6765.93 7114.18 0.07
9 ND17-48-26 8293.71 6540.56 7417.13 0.17
10 ND17-21-19 4273.70 4159.15 4216.43 0.02
11 ND17-44-21 4645.70 4468.85 4557.27 0.03
12 ND17-147-54 3826.43 3673.14 3749.79 0.03
13 ND17-6-25 5121.46 4850.68 4986.07 0.04
14 ND17-25-21 5721.18 5824.72 5772.95 0.01
15 ND17-147-4 6965.81 7373.84 7169.83 0.04
16 ND17-26-9 6871.99 7333.71 7102.85 0.05
17 ND17-26-1 6368.04 6654.62 6511.33 0.03
18 ND17-48-11 4449.51 2827.49 3638.50 0.32
19 ND17-58-11 4551.64 4662.47 4607.06 0.02
20 ND17-12-2 3434.00 1717.02 2428.17 0.17
21 ND17-164-5 7757.37 3878.69 5485.28 0.03
22 垦薯1号 8872.73 8711.90 8792.31 0.01
23 大西洋 6783.62 7158.89 6971.26 0.04
平均淀粉产量Average starch yield 5834.77 5345.87

Table 7

Analysis of starch yield stability of potato varieties (strains)"

变异来源Source of variation df SS MS FF-value P
区组Block 4.00 3626.57 906.64 0.00 0.9999
环境Environment 1.00 1087263.85 1087263.85 1.90 0.1821
品种(系)Variety (strain) 22.00 244812040.61 11127820.03 19.43 0.0001**
品种(系)×环境Variety (strain) × environment 22.00 12601684.26 572803.83 788.59 0.0001**
误差Error 88.00 63920.49 726.37
总误差Total error 137.00 258568535.77

Fig.2

The amylose contents of potato varieties (strains) in each year"

Table 8

Analysis of average amylose contents of potato varieties (strains)"

序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety
(strain)
平均直链淀粉含量
Average amylose
content (%)
相对标准偏差
Relative standard
deviation
1 ND17-147-6 20.84 0.05
2 ND17-147-26 19.99 0.05
3 ND17-32-21 16.66 0.01
4 ND17-143-13 17.82 0.03
5 ND17-147-66 17.20 0.09
6 ND17-147-73 20.03 0.00
7 ND17-115-9 18.22 0.02
8 ND17-143-7 19.95 0.03
9 ND17-48-26 16.52 0.08
10 ND17-21-19 20.07 0.03
序号
Number
品种(系)
Variety
(strain)
平均直链淀粉含量
Average amylose
content (%)
相对标准偏差
Relative standard
deviation
11 ND17-44-21 16.26 0.05
12 ND17-147-54 21.04 0.04
13 ND17-6-25 21.30 0.00
14 ND17-25-21 19.03 0.04
15 ND17-147-4 18.74 0.01
16 ND17-26-9 19.94 0.06
17 ND17-26-1 19.30 0.02
18 ND17-48-11 18.68 0.11
19 ND17-58-11 19.89 0.02
20 ND17-12-2 17.84 0.03
21 ND17-164-5 13.21 0.21
22 垦薯1号 19.25 0.01
23 大西洋 17.45 0.03

Table 9

Stability analysis of amylose content in potato strains"

变异来源Source of variation df SS MS FF-value P
区组Block 4.00 0.46 0.12 0.33 0.8517
环境Environment 1.00 0.19 0.19 0.54 0.4682
品种(系)Variety (strain) 22.00 4564.14 207.46 599.78 0.0001**
品种(系)×环境Variety (strain) × environment 22.00 7.61 0.35 4.98 0.0001**
误差Error 88.00 6.11 0.07
总误差Total error 137.00 4578.51
[1] 曾凡奎, 许丹, 刘刚. 马铃薯营养综述. 中国马铃薯, 2015, 29(4):233-243.
[2] 张艳萍, 王舰. 国际马铃薯中心马铃薯资源引进、评价及利用. 中国种业, 2008(7):45-46.
[3] 金黎平, 屈冬玉. 我国马铃薯种质资源利用及育种技术//全国蔬菜遗传育种学术讨论会. 中国园艺学会, 2002: 7.
[4] 王秀丽, 马云倩, 孙君茂. 中国马铃薯消费与未来展望. 农业展望, 2016, 12(12):87-92.
[5] 徐建飞, 金黎平. 马铃薯遗传育种研究:现状与展望. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6):990-1015.
[6] 仇菊, 朱宏, 朱大洲, 等. 不同加工用途马铃薯品质特性分析. 中国马铃薯, 2019, 33(6):372-378.
[7] 王子逸, 张宾佳, 赵思明, 等. 不同品种马铃薯淀粉的多层次结构和理化特性研究. 中国粮油学报, 2019, 34(3):24-30.
[8] Han H J, Hou J W, Yang N, et al. Insight on the changes of cassava and potato starch granules during gelatinization. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 126(1):37-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.201
[9] Fredr I H, Silverio J, Andersson R, et al. The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatinization and retrogradation properties of different starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1998, 35(3):119-134.
doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00247-6
[10] 陈博. 谷氨酰胺酶修饰的麦谷蛋白和麦醇溶蛋白对马铃薯淀粉糊化回生特性的影响及相互作用研究. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2018.
[11] Jaspreet S, Narpinder S. Studies on the morphological,thermal and rheological properties of starch separated from some Indian potato cultivars. Food Chemistry, 2001, 75(1):67-77.
doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00189-3
[12] 张攀峰. 不同品种马铃薯淀粉结构与性质的研究. 广州:华南理工大学, 2012.
[13] 刘小晶. 三种马铃薯淀粉颗粒结晶结构的定性定量研究. 西安:陕西科技大学, 2012.
[14] 国家标准化管理委员会. 农作物种质资源鉴定技术规程 马铃薯:NY/T 1303-2007. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[15] 王颖, 潘哲超, 梁淑敏, 等. 4个马铃薯品种淀粉的理化特性. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(11):24-28.
[16] 李明安, 马力, 吕文河. 马铃薯品种淀粉含量和淀粉产量的表现及其稳定性分析. 中国马铃薯, 2020, 34(1):16-21.
[17] 国家标准化管理委员会. 大米 直链淀粉含量的测定:GB/T 15683-2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[18] 亚杰, 李德明, 范士杰, 等. GE双标图在马铃薯品种适应性及产量稳定性分析中的应用评价. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(5):617-622.
[19] 王榛. 浙江省不同生态环境马铃薯品质评价. 西宁:青海师范大学, 2017.
[20] 张小静, 李雄, 陈富, 等. 影响马铃薯块茎品质性状的环境因子分析. 中国马铃薯, 2010, 24(6):366-369.
[21] 李建武, 文国宏, 李高峰, 等. 陇薯系列高淀粉马铃薯品种的淀粉产量及品质性状综合评价. 核农学报, 2020, 34(2):329-338.
[22] 梁晶. 八个马铃薯品种淀粉的生态差异及稳定性分析. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2007.
[23] Li J W, Wang Y H, Wen S H. Mapping QTL underlying tuber starch content and plant maturity in tetraploid potato. The Crop Journal, 2019, 7(2):261-272.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.12.003
[24] 姚玉璧, 张秀云, 卢汉威, 等. 气象条件对西北温凉半湿润区马铃薯块茎形成及产量的影响. 中国农业气象, 2009, 30(2):208-211.
[25] 盛万民. 中国马铃薯品质现状及改良对策. 中国农学通报, 2006(3):166-170.
[26] Varavinit S, Shobsngob S, Varanyanond W. Effect of amylose content on gelatinization,retrogradation and pasting properties of flours from different cultivars of thai rice. Starch‐Stärke, 2003, 55(9):410-415.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-379X
[27] Yeonyongbuddhagal S, Noomhorm A. Effect of physiochemical properties of high-amylose Thai rice flours on vermicelli quality. Cereal Chemistry, 2002, 79(4):481-485.
doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.4.481
[1] Tang Gang, Liao Ping, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Moldboard Plow Tillage under all Straw Returning in Late Rice Season on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Yield in Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 101-107.
[2] Su Wenping, Wang Huan, Aimulaguli·Kuerban , Zhao Xinlin, Xue Lihua, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Jun, Sun Shiren. Comparison of Growth Characteristics and Yields of Different Wheat Varieties Planted in the Approaching Winter in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 108-114.
[3] Yang Na, Xi Jilong, Wang Ke, Xi Tianyuan, Zhang Jiancheng, Yao Jingzhen, Wang Jian. Effects of Spring Irrigation on Yield and Water Utilization of Late-Sowing Winter Wheat in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 115-121.
[4] Liu Yajun, Wang Wenjing, Wang Honggang, Wang Qi, Hu Qiguo, Chu Fengli. Effects of Crop Rotation on Soil Microbial Community in Sweet Potato Field [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 122-128.
[5] Zhou Qiancong, Chen Le, Luo Kang, Liu Mengjie, Song Yongping, Xie Xiaobing, Zeng Yongjun. Effects of Nitrogen Panicle Fertilizer Management on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Late Japonica Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 129-133.
[6] Gao Jia, Wang Jiao, Wang Song, Liu Hongjian, Kang Jia, Shen Hong, Wang Haili, Ren Shaoyong. Effects of Biochar-Based Fertilizer on Soil Urease Activity and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 134-138.
[7] Li Xinhao, Li Jun, Wan Lin, Liu Lixin, Liu Junquan, Ma Ni. Effects of No-Tillage and Drilling on Growth, Root System and Yield of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in Hilly Area [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 139-144.
[8] Wang Qi, Li Meijuan, Zhang Jia’en, Tang Jiaxin, Zeng Wenjing, Zhou Lei, Yang Qingxin, Jiang Mingmin, Wu Jiayuan, Luo Mingzhu. Effects of Rice-Fish Co-Culture on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield in Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 145-151.
[9] Guo Mingming, Wang Kangjun, Zhang Guangxu, Sun Zhongwei, Li Jun, Zhang Yueshu, Dai Dandan, Chen Feng, Fan Jiwei. Regulation of Sowing Date and Row Spacing on Grain Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 152-158.
[10] Zhang Panpan, Zhang Hongpeng, Guo Yaning. Effects of Two Plant Growth Regulators on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Proso Millet [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 159-163.
[11] Li Yang, Yang Xiaolong, Wang Benfu, Zhang Zhisheng, Chen Shaoyu, Li Jinlan, Cheng Jianping. Effects of Main Season Stubble Height on Ratoon Season Yield and Rice Quality [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 164-170.
[12] Wang Xin, Wang Cai. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Seeding Rates on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 182-188.
[13] Cai Lijun, Zhang Jingtao, Liu Jingqi, Gai Zhijia, Guo Zhenhua, Zhao Guifan. Effects of Long-Term No-Tillage Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon and Soybean Yield in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 189-192.
[14] Liu Weixing, Fan Xiaoyu, Zhang Fengye, He Qunling, Chen Lei, Li Ke, Wu Jihua. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Seed Coating Agent Dosage on Peanut Diseases, Pests and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 199-204.
[15] Luo Lei, Li Yajie, Yao Yanhong, Li Fengxian, Fan Yi, Dong Aiyun, Liu Huixia, Niu Caiping, Li Deming. Effects of Planting Small Whole Potatoes with Different Specifications and Seed Dressing on the Growth and Yield of Potatoes in Continuous Cropping Land [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 211-216.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!