Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 110-116.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of New Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Growth, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit

Liu Yan1(), Qu Hang1, Xing Yuehua1, Wang Xiaohui2, Gong Liang1()   

  1. 1Institute of Plant Nutrition and Environmental Resource, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
    2Wafangdian Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Wafangdian 116300, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2022-04-07 Revised:2022-06-18 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

172

Abstract:

The new type of nitrogen fertilizer is one of the effective measures to increase rice yield and nitrogen utilization rate and reduce nitrogen loss. In order to achieve high yield and high efficiency of japonica rice in northern China, different types of new nitrogen fertilizers and fertilization methods suitable for rice application in Liaohe Plain were studied. Loss-controlled urea, urea containing zinc and humic acid urea were used to determine their effects on rice yield, economic benefit, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency under N 210kg/ha, and conventional urea was set as control. The results showed that the new types of nitrogen fertilizer could increase the growth of plant height by 9.68%-17.07%, and the formation of effective tillering of rice, and panicle formation rate was increased by 21.28%-27.90%. The application of urea loss-controlled, zinc containing urea and humate urea increased the rice effective panicles, grain number per panicle and panicle length, and had a significant positive correlation with yield. Compared with conventional urea treatment increased the rice yield by 6.09%, 5.65% and 3.26%, respectively, the utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer increased by 23.30%, 26.21% and 30.42%, respectively, and the economic benefit increased by 5.80%-10.25%. The basal application of loss- controlled urea reduced the yield of rice by 17.17%, economic benefit reduced by 35.5%. Therefore, there were three new types of fertilizers combined with basal and topdressing are suitable for rice planting in Liaohe Plain area, which can improve rice yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency and economic benefit.

Key words: New types of nitrogen fertilizer, Rice, Yield, Nitrogen use efficiency, Economic benefit

Fig.1

Plant height of rice under different new types of nitrogen fertilizer"

Fig.2

Dynamic changes of rice tillerings under different new types of nitrogen fertilizer"

Table 1

Effects of new type of nitrogen application on panicle formation rate"

处理
Treatment		 最高茎蘖数
Maximum tillers
(×104/hm2)		 有效穗数
Effective panicles
number (×104/hm2)		 成穗率
Panicle formation
rate (%)
CK 243.47±18.97c 175.33±10.18d 72.01±0.18a
U 380.93±21.42a 233.33±21.77c 61.25±0.09b
FU 355.71±14.21ab 278.89±12.22ab 78.40±0.14a
HU 379.06±11.52a 292.22±12.37a 77.11±0.06a
CU 396.83±9.34a 301.11±19.37a 75.88±0.07a
CUB 338.57±7.26b 242.22±17.36c 71.52±0.13a
Zn-U 376.63±13.45a 280.50±19.25ab 74.34±0.11a
U+Zn 354.00±20.37ab 250.21±20.37c 70.62±0.18a

Table 2

Effects of different new nitrogen fertilizers on rice yield and its components"

处理
Treatment		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 结实率
Seed-setting rate (%)		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 穗长
Panicle length (cm)		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
CK 24.46±0.20a 90.90±0.57a 137.78±5.33c 15.21±0.48b 4201.73±229.44d
U 25.07±0.37a 90.70±0.41a 146.01±9.46b 17.09±0.54ab 7670.13±159.07b
FU 24.62±0.79a 90.13±1.74a 146.22±6.31b 17.67±0.22ab 7970.28±88.41ab
HU 24.14±0.31a 89.13±1.01a 150.81±9.33a 18.32±0.42a 7986.95±120.45ab
CU 25.02±0.98a 90.84±2.14a 155.38±7.17a 18.56±0.12a 8137.03±72.74a
CUB 25.36±1.01a 91.16±1.77a 133.78±9.73c 16.33±0.33b 6352.80±173.29c
Zn-U 24.58±0.33a 92.08±0.37a 158.89±8.89a 18.89±0.39a 8103.68±173.33a
U+Zn 23.14±2.47a 92.33±1.71a 151.45±7.63a 15.91±0.67b 7920.25±142.55ab

Table 3

Correlation coefficients of rice yield and its components"

项目
Item		 产量
Yield		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 结实率
Seed-setting rate		 有效穗数
Effective panicles number		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 穗长
Panicle length
产量Yield 1.000
千粒重1000-grain weight -0.176 1.000
结实率Seed-setting rate -0.038 -0.215 1.000
有效穗数Effective panicles number 0.884** -0.026 -0.225 1.000
穗粒数Grains per panicle 0.759* -0.360 0.160 0.702 1.000
穗长Panicle length 0.754* 0.209 -0.262 0.876** 0.747* 1.000

Table 4

Effects of different new fertilization treatments on nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency"

处理Treatment TN (kg/hm2) NRE (%) NPE (kg/kg) NAE (kg/kg) NPFP (kg/kg) NHI (%)
CK 72.45±4.12d － － － － 63.19±1.18bc
U 137.40±2.25b 30.93±2.08bc 53.28±1.61bc 16.52±1.47a 36.52±0.76a 65.18±0.30b
FU 149.15±1.61a 36.52±1.79ab 49.37±1.55cd 17.95±0.98a 37.95±0.57a 63.97±1.59bc
HU 157.10±1.56a 40.31±1.75a 44.44±1.17e 17.94±1.17a 38.03±0.42a 60.42±0.12d
CU 152.55±5.04a 38.14±2.81a 49.23±1.38cd 18.74±1.17a 38.74±0.35a 62.61±1.52bcd
CUB 112.98±3.26c 19.30±3.05d 56.96±2.14ab 10.24±1.49a 30.25±0.83b 62.27±1.15cd
Zn-U 154.30±1.14a 38.98±1.77a 47.58±2.31de 18.58±1.49a 38.59±0.83a 62.64±0.92bcd
U+Zn 133.60±0.68b 29.12±1.73c 58.68±0.77a 17.71±0.42a 37.72±0.68a 69.94±1.08a

Table 5

"

处理
Treatment		 产值
Output		 肥料
Fertilizer		 人工费
Labour		 秧苗
Seedling		 其他
Other		 成本支出
Cost		 经济效益
Economic benefit		 产投比
Output-input ratio
CK 10 924.49 1150.00 － 2200 4500 7850.00 3074.49 1.39
U 19 942.33 1681.76 300 2200 4500 8681.76 11 260.57 2.30
FU 20 722.72 1808.67 300 2200 4500 8808.67 11 914.05 2.35
HU 20 766.07 1681.76 300 2200 4500 8681.76 12 084.31 2.39
CU 21 156.27 1740.67 300 2200 4500 8740.67 12 415.60 2.42
CUB 16 517.28 1808.67 － 2200 4500 8508.67 8008.61 1.94
Zn-U 21 069.56 1808.67 300 2200 4500 8808.67 12 260.89 2.39
U+ZN 20 592.65 1642.49 300 2200 4500 8642.49 11 950.16 2.38
[1] 崔学军, 陈宏坤.化肥供给侧结构性改革调研报告(2017年). 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018.
[2] 闫湘. 我国化肥利用现状与养分资源高效利用研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008.
[3] Gu J F, Chen Y, Zhang H, et al. Canopy light and nitrogen distributions are related to grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Field Crops Research, 2017, 206:74-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.021
[4] 胡梦甜, 韩永伟, 尚洪磊. 3种水稻种植模式的减氮效应和经济性评估. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(3):577-584.
[5] 成臣, 曾勇军, 王祺. 施氮量对晚粳稻甬优1538产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):222-228.
[6] Galloway J N, Townsend AR, Er Isman J W, et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent-trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science, 2008, 320(5878):889-892.
doi: 10.1126/science.1136674 pmid: 18487183
[7] Feng J F, Li F B, Deng A X, et al. Integrated assessment of the impact of enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer on N2O emission and crop yield. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment, 2016, 231:218-228.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.038
[8] Chen X, Zhang F, Mheld R V, et al. Synchronizing N supply from soil and fertilizer and N demand of winter wheat by an improved Nmin method. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2006, 74(2):91-98.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-005-1701-9
[9] Patil M D, Das B S, Barak E, et al. Performance of polymercoated urea in transplanted rice: effect of mixing ratio and water input on nitrogen use efficiency. Paddy and Water Environment, 2010, 8 (2):189-1898.
doi: 10.1007/s10333-010-0197-3
[10] 郑学博, 崔键, 马超, 等. 施肥措施对砂姜黑土小麦生长性状、营养元素累积及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20 (5):550-555.
[11] 周雯雯, 贾浩然, 张月, 等. 不同类型新型肥料对双季稻产量、氮肥利用率和经济效益的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(4):657-668.
[12] 陈雪丽, 王玉峰, 张磊, 等. 生物型水稻专用肥在黑土上的应用效果. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(4):147-151.
[13] 郑磊, 张民, 杨超越, 等. 控释肥及硫膜对土壤性质和水稻生长发育的影响. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2):193-197.
[14] 杨阳, 刘灿华, 葛树春, 等. 减量配施新型基质缓释肥对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2020, 47(3):442-447.
[15] 郭晓彦, 潘兹亮, 张丽霞, 等. 施用新型尿素对豫南地区水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(15):19-21,131.
[16] 胡时友, 刘凯, 马朝红, 等. 中微量元素肥料配合施用对水稻产量和品质的影响. 农村经济与科技, 2016, 27(23):84-86.
[17] 李淑芬, 陈悦, 王建忠, 等. 辽宁省土壤有效态微量元素丰缺及其分级标准的研究. 辽宁农业科学, 2009(1):31-38.
[18] Hutchinson C M. Influence of a controlled release nitrogen fertilizer program on potato tuber yield and quality. Acta Horticulturae, 2005, 684:99-102.
[19] Kang B K, Han S H. Production of seed potato under the recycling capillary culture system using controlled release fertilizers. Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 2005, 74 (4):295-299.
[20] 许凤英, 秦亚平, 王晓玲. 不同新型功能尿素对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用率的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2014(10):2257-2260,2263.
[21] 刘红恩, 李金峰, 刘世亮, 等. 施用含锌尿素对夏玉米产量、氮素吸收及氮肥利用率的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(9):94-97.
[22] Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Schiavon M, et al. Plant biostimulants:physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Scientia Agricola, 2016, 73(1):18-23.
doi: 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006
[23] 周丽平, 杨俐苹, 白由路, 等. 不同氮肥缓释化处理对夏玉米田间氨挥发和氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1449-1457.
[24] 吴萍萍, 李录久, 耿言安, 等. 不同新型肥料对江淮地区水稻生长及氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):149-153.
[25] 丁武汉, 谢海宽, 徐驰, 等. 一次性施肥技术对水稻-油菜轮作系统氮素淋失特征及经济效益的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1097-1109.
[26] 吴文革, 习敏, 李春红, 等. 不同水稻专用新型肥料减肥增效对比研究. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(2):135-137,140.
[27] 李凯旭, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 等. 不同专用配方肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19 (1):100-107.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.256
[28] 赵胜利, 周凯, 黄卫群, 等. 缓释肥对机插稻生长发育及产量的影响. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(6):91-93.
[1] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[2] Wang Yifan, Ren Ning, Dong Xiangyang, Zhao Yanan, Ye Youliang, Wang Yang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Controlled-Release and Ordinary Urea on Wheat Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 117-123.
[3] Fang Wenying, Zhu Defeng, Huai Yan, Chen Jiaqi, Chen Huizhe, Wang Yaliang. Analysis on the Effects of Precision Drill Sowing in Machine Transplanting for Single-Season Hybrid Rice to Improve Yield of Sparsely Planted Population [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 124-130.
[4] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
[5] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[6] Zhang Rong, Chen Xiaowen, Lu Ping, You Yanrong, Zhou Delu, Li Deming. Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Temperature and Yield of Potato in Dry Land [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 145-150.
[7] Wu Xueqin, Liu Kaiyu, Han Chunhua, Alimujiang·Kelaimu , Cui Yannan, Li Jiangyu, Ma Chunmei, Zhong Wenfan, Zhao Qiang. Effects of 14% Thiobenzene-Dioxalon on Defoliation Ripening, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 164-169.
[8] Hu Rui, Hu Xiangyu, Fu Youqiang, Ye Qunhuan, Pan Junfeng, Liang Kaiming, Li Meijuan, Liu Yanzhuo, Zhong Xuhua. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Rice Root Growth and Development and Its Relationships with Nitrogen Fertilizer Uptake and Utilization [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 179-186.
[9] Guan Qinglin, Piao Shengyuan, Zhang Siwei, Wang Jun, Lei Yunkang, Zhong Qiu, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Combined Application of Medium-Trace Elements on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism, Yield and Quality of Cigar Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 187-196.
[10] Tian Xiaoqin, Wang Dan, Li Zhuo, Liu Yonghong, Li Wei. Effects of Ridge and Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 204-211.
[11] Yi Bing, Liu Jingang, Song Dianxiu, Wang Dexing, Zhao Mingzhu, Liu Xiaohong, Sun Enyu, Cui Liangji. Study on Land Productivity and Interspecific Competition of Sunflower and Millet Intercropping in Arid Areas [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 219-223.
[12] Zhao Weizhe, Du Chunfang, Sun Xuan, Yao Lin, Xian Shuanshi, Zhang Gaoyang. Effects of Stalk Picking on Economic Characteristics and Yield of Oilseed and Vegetable Rape [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 224-230.
[13] Liu Hui, Long Xueyi, Jiao Yan, Wang Lihong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 238-248.
[14] Cao Qingjun, Li Gang, Yang Hao, Lou Yuyong, Yang Fentuan, Kong Fanli, Li Xinbei, Zhao Xinkai, Jiang Xiaoli. The Effects of Different Tillage Practices on Seedbed Quality and Its Relationships with Seedling Population Construction and Grain Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 249-254.
[15] Zhang Dongxu, Hu Danzhu, Yan Jinlong, Feng Liyun, Wu Zhiyuan, Zhang Junling, Li Yanhua. Effects of Spraying Streptomyces on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Late-Sown Wheat under Different Crop Rotations [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 255-263.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!