小麦面粉和鲜面片色泽及相关基因组成分析
Analysis of Color Traits and Related Gene Composition in Wheat Flour and Fresh Noodle Sheet
通讯作者:
收稿日期: 2024-12-9 修回日期: 2025-01-17 网络出版日期: 2025-04-09
| 基金资助: |
|
Received: 2024-12-9 Revised: 2025-01-17 Online: 2025-04-09
作者简介 About authors
袁博,主要从事小麦品质育种研究,E-mail:
小麦面粉及面制品白度是影响小麦商品品质的重要指标,以94份小麦品种为试验材料,研究不同品种小麦面粉及面制品白度的差异及其影响因素。结果表明,小麦品种间白度差异显著,但同一材料的面粉和鲜面片色泽相关性分析表现一致;面粉白度与籽粒硬度、籽粒蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量、面团形成时间和稳定时间呈极显著负相关,与低谷黏度、最终黏度和回生值呈显著负相关,与面筋指数、稀懈值和糊化温度正相关;籽粒硬度、籽粒蛋白质含量、沉降值、糊化温度和稀懈值可解释面粉白度80.9%的变异,面筋指数、沉降值、糊化温度和稀懈值对面粉白度产生显著正向影响,籽粒蛋白质含量和籽粒硬度对面粉白度产生显著负向影响。面粉白度与硬度的负相关性最强(r = -0.83),硬度是影响小麦白度色泽的关键因素,软质小麦的面粉和鲜面片白度色泽整体高于硬质小麦。品质相关基因的变异位点Pinb-D1b、Pina-D1b、Ppo-A1b、Ppo-D1a、TaPod-A1b、Lox-B1a、Psy-A1b、Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a、TaPds-B1b、TaZds-A1a和TaLyc-B1b分布频率分别为54.7%、2.2%、21.3%、3.9%、8.0%、0.0%、0.0%、98.9%、96.6%、78.5%、5.3%和53.8%。筛选出扬麦15、扬麦25、川麦93、绵麦902和扬麦45等13个高白度软质小麦品种,以及周麦36、淮麦33、扬辐麦15和宁麦资218等高白度硬质小麦品种。高白度软质小麦品种白度均高于硬质小麦,且其优异色泽基因等位变异的比率高于整体材料。通过加强优良亲本的利用同时注重色泽优异基因的聚合和相关表型的筛选,可逐步改良小麦品种的白度色泽。
关键词:
The whiteness (WI) of wheat flour and its products is a key indicator influencing the commercial quality of wheat. Using 94 wheat varieties as experimental materials, the differences in flour WI and its products among different varieties and their influencing factors were investigated. The results showed significant differences in WI among wheat varieties, while the correlation analysis of flour and fresh noodle sheet color from the same material showed the same performance. Flour WI was highly significantly negatively correlated with grain hardness, grain protein content, wet gluten content, dough development time, and stability time; significantly negatively correlated with trough viscosity, final viscosity, and setback value; and positively correlated with gluten index, breakdown, and pasting temperature. Grain hardness, grain protein content, sedimentation value, pasting temperature, and breakdown accounted for 80.9% of the variation in flour WI. Gluten index, sedimentation value, pasting temperature, and breakdown had significant positive effects on flour WI, while grain protein content and grain hardness exerted significant negative effects. The negative correlation between flour WI and hardness was the strongest (r = -0.83), indicating that hardness is the key factor affecting wheat WI and color. The WI and color of flour and fresh noodle sheets from soft wheat were generally higher than those from hard wheat. The distribution frequencies of variation loci of quality-related genes, namely Pinb-D1b, Pina-D1b, Ppo-A1b, Ppo-D1a, TaPod-A1b, Lox-B1a, Psy-A1b, Psy-B1a/b, Psy-D1a, TaPds-B1b, TaZds-A1a, and TaLyc-B1b, were 54.7%, 2.2%, 21.3%, 3.9%, 8.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 98.9%, 96.6%, 78.5%, 5.3%, and 53.8%, respectively. Thirteen high-WI soft wheat varieties, such as Yangmai 15, Yangmai 25, Chuanmai 93, Mianmai 902, and Yangmai 45, and high-WI hard wheat varieties, such as Zhoumai 36, Huaimai 33, Yangfumai 15, and Ningmaizi 218, were screened. The WI of high-WI soft wheat varieties was higher than that of hard wheat, and the ratio of superior color gene allelic variations in these varieties was higher than that of the overall materials. By strengthening the utilization of elite parents while emphasizing the pyramiding of superior color genes and the screening of related phenotypes, the WI and color of wheat varieties can be gradually improved.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
袁博, 张晓, 方正武, 李曼, 寿路路, 汪尊杰, 江伟, 肖龙飞, 高德荣.
Yuan Bo, Zhang Xiao, Fang Zhengwu, Li Man, Shou Lulu, Wang Zunjie, Jiang Wei, Xiao Longfei, Gao Derong.
面粉白度是小麦磨粉品质的主要指标,也是衡量面粉加工精度和分级的重要指标[1],国内外市场对品质色泽的稳定性要求逐步提高,选育高白度小麦品种对小麦色泽品质改良具有重要意义。前人大部分研究表明面粉白度与面粉吸水率、出粉率、籽粒硬度[2-
1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
供试材料为扬麦25、川麦104、宁麦29、龙麦35、镇麦16、中麦895、山农28和烟农999等94份小麦品种,包含长江中下游麦区、长江上游麦区、黄淮冬麦区、北部冬麦区和东北春麦区的不同品质类型小麦品种,由相关育种科研单位共同提供。
1.2 试验方法
1.2.1 面粉制备
采用MLU-202型磨粉机(Buhler,瑞典),参照AACC26-20方法,分别使用软麦筛网和硬麦筛网磨制面粉。
1.2.2 鲜面片制作
取50 g小麦粉(相对湿度14%),加入小麦粉质量28%~32%的蒸馏水,用针式和面机搅拌5 min,团成面团(相对湿度36%);使用专用面条机在压辊处经3次折叠压片成型(间距4 mm);于醒发箱(20 ℃,相对湿度60%)醒发30 min后经4次压制为厚度2.5 mm的面片;保存于开口自封袋(25 ℃)。
1.3 测定项目与方法
1.3.1 面粉色泽和鲜面片色泽
采用CR-700R型色泽测定仪(北京科美润达仪器设备有限公司)测定不同粉路及统粉的白度(whiteness,WI)和其余色泽指标(L*:亮度、a*:红绿色度和b*:黄蓝色度),本试验同一样品在CR-700R型色泽测定仪白度测定值为70时,WSB-Ⅳ型白度仪(杭州麦哲仪器有限公司)测定结果为80,因此供试面粉中白度大于70即表示基本满足市场要求。测定鲜面片保持0、2、4和24 h的白度和其余色泽指标,每份样品正反面各选择3点重复,结果取6点平均值。
1.3.2 品质指标
采用DA7200近红外分析仪(Perten,瑞典),参照AACC No.39-10方法测定籽粒蛋白质含量;采用JYBD 100×40小麦硬度指数测定仪(无锡穗邦科技有限公司),参照《小麦硬度测定 硬度指数法》(GB/T 21304-2007)[33]测定籽粒硬度指数;采用千粒重测定板测定千粒重;采用SDS沉降仪(Brabender,德国),参照《粮油检验 小麦沉淀指数测定 SDS法》(GB/T 15685-2011)[34]测定沉降值;采用RVA-Super3型快速黏度仪(Perten,澳大利亚),参照《小麦、黑麦及其粉类和淀粉糊化特性测定 快速粘度仪法》(GB/T 24853-2010)[35]测定淀粉糊化特性;采用810104型电子型粉质仪(Brabender,德国),参照AACC54-21方法测定粉质仪参数;采用2200型面筋洗涤仪(Perten,瑞典),参照《小麦和小麦粉 面筋含量 第2部分:仪器法测定湿面筋》(GB/T 5506.2-2008)[36]测定湿面筋含量;采用WSF型小麦粉加工精度测定仪(无锡穗邦科技有限公司)测定麸星含量。
1.3.3 KASP标记检测
于温室发苗培养取新鲜叶片,委托华智生物技术有限公司进行KASP标记检测:将叶片置于2.0 mL离心管中使用液氮速冻,采用CTAB法[37]提取植物基因组DNA。参考Rasheed等[26]的方法对硬度和色泽相关基因的KASP标记进行检测。用Nexar系统(LGC,英国)进行KASP标记的验证和检测。用Nexar进行PCR扩增体系的自动组装PCR扩增,用Soellex(LGC,英国)进行PCR扩增,扩增条件:94 ℃ 15 min;94 ℃ 20 s,65 ℃~57 ℃(每个循环退火温度降低0.8 ℃)60 s,10个循环;94 ℃ 20 s,57 ℃ 60 s,30个循环。PCR反应完成后用Araya(LGC,英国)进行反应体系荧光信号扫描;然后用Intellics(LGC,英国)进行基因型分型和数据分析。
1.4 数据处理
采用Excel 2021进行数据整理,用SPSS 27.01进行数据分析,用Origin 2021作图。
2 结果与分析
2.1 小麦面粉和鲜面片色泽差异分析
94份小麦品种的面粉白度分布范围较大,变幅为56.4~74.7(图1),11份材料的硬度基因未检出(表1)。77份小麦品种的面粉白度在[60,70),占供试材料的81.9%;白度>70的品种占比13.8%,均为软质小麦;白度在[65,70)的品种占比35.1%,包含21个软麦和7个硬麦;白度在[60,65)的品种占比46.8%,包括38个硬麦;白度<60的品种占比4.3%,均为硬质小麦。鲜面片保持0、2、4和24 h时白度变幅分别在16.8~42.6、15.5~39.1、12.7~35.4和13.0~36.9,较面粉白度大幅降低。面粉白度>70的有13份品种,占比12.8%,分别为扬麦15、扬麦20、扬麦25、扬麦13、扬麦42、扬麦45、华麦14号、宁麦资518、川麦104、泛麦8号、绵麦902、川麦42和川麦93,均为软质小麦,可作为高白度小麦新品种培育的优良亲本。4份小麦品种的面粉白度<60,最低为56.4(表2)。
图1
图1
94份小麦材料的面粉和鲜面片白度
Fig.1
WI of flour and fresh noodle sheet of 94 wheat materials
表1 94份小麦材料的面粉白度分布
Table 1
| 面粉 白度 Flour WI | 品种数 Number of varieties | 占比 Percentage (%) | 硬质类型 Hardness type | 粒色 Grain color |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0,60) | 4 | 4.3 | 硬质 | 2白2红 |
| [60,65) | 44 | 46.8 | 38份硬质 | 9白35红 |
| [65,70) | 33 | 35.1 | 21份软质, 7份硬质 | 6白27红 |
| [70,75) | 13 | 13.8 | 软质 | 2白11红 |
表2 94份小麦材料的面粉和鲜面片色泽
Table 2
| 编号 Code | 品种 Variety | 面粉Flour | 鲜面片Fresh noodle sheet | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WI | L* | a* | b* | WI | L* | a* | b* | ||||||||||||||
| 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 24 h | 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 24 h | 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 24 h | 0 h | 2 h | 4 h | 24 h | ||||||
| 1 | 扬麦25 | 70.2 | 90.4 | 0.6 | 6.7 | 32.3 | 27.5 | 23.8 | 23.1 | 78.8 | 74.8 | 73.4 | 66.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 16.2 | 17.6 | 17.8 | 16.0 |
| 2 | 扬麦27 | 69.1 | 91.5 | 0.5 | 7.2 | 31.8 | 26.6 | 23.6 | 17.9 | 78.2 | 75.5 | 74.0 | 68.6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 17.4 | 18.8 | 18.6 | 17.1 |
| 3 | 扬麦28 | 64.7 | 90.3 | 0.5 | 8.4 | 32.7 | 23.8 | 20.8 | 15.0 | 79.0 | 74.9 | 73.8 | 67.3 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 18.5 | 19.9 | 20.2 | 19.5 |
| 4 | 扬麦29 | 62.7 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 8.9 | 29.6 | 23.8 | 20.7 | 14.5 | 79.0 | 74.9 | 73.8 | 65.6 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 18.5 | 19.9 | 20.3 | 17.8 |
| 5 | 扬麦30 | 68.9 | 91.2 | 0.4 | 7.2 | 29.7 | 25.3 | 23.6 | 18.9 | 78.6 | 75.8 | 74.8 | 68.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 17.2 | 19.2 | 19.5 | 18.4 |
| 6 | 扬麦31 | 69.2 | 91.0 | 0.4 | 7.0 | 33.0 | 26.3 | 24.0 | 19.4 | 77.8 | 75.2 | 72.6 | 67.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 17.1 | 18.6 | 18.9 | 17.6 |
| 7 | 扬麦33 | 69.0 | 90.7 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 30.3 | 24.7 | 22.4 | 18.6 | 79.1 | 75.4 | 73.9 | 68.3 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 17.5 | 19.2 | 19.3 | 18.5 |
| 8 | 扬麦34 | 68.2 | 90.8 | 0.4 | 7.2 | 32.6 | 28.1 | 25.6 | 22.7 | 80.0 | 77.0 | 75.3 | 70.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 17.1 | 18.4 | 18.8 | 17.3 |
| 9 | 扬麦35 | 61.8 | 89.8 | 0.7 | 9.3 | 26.9 | 21.5 | 19.9 | 15.2 | 79.9 | 76.5 | 74.4 | 66.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 19.3 | 20.4 | 21.1 | 18.9 |
| 10 | 扬麦36 | 67.2 | 90.7 | 0.5 | 7.6 | 42.6 | 30.2 | 25.2 | 18.8 | 81.0 | 78.0 | 76.6 | 67.8 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 14.8 | 17.9 | 19.0 | 18.1 |
| 11 | 扬麦37 | 59.8 | 89.6 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 27.2 | 16.3 | 13.7 | 13.0 | 76.6 | 73.6 | 71.7 | 63.0 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 20.6 | 23.0 | 23.5 | 22.2 |
| 12 | 扬麦39 | 60.5 | 89.4 | 0.7 | 9.6 | 25.8 | 27.1 | 22.4 | 16.0 | 80.9 | 76.7 | 74.6 | 65.5 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 19.3 | 20.8 | 20.4 | 19.3 |
| 13 | 扬糯麦2号 | 64.4 | 90.3 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 28.1 | 23.5 | 26.1 | 21.2 | 80.0 | 79.6 | 75.8 | 66.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 15.5 | 19.3 | 18.9 | 18.2 |
| 14 | 宁麦29 | 67.5 | 90.8 | 0.6 | 7.5 | 25.1 | 19.1 | 19.4 | 18.3 | 76.0 | 73.0 | 71.3 | 62.5 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 18.0 | 19.8 | 20.5 | 17.6 |
| 15 | 宁麦33 | 66.1 | 90.6 | 0.4 | 8.0 | 26.9 | 21.6 | 19.8 | 17.2 | 78.0 | 74.2 | 72.9 | 64.9 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 17.7 | 20.6 | 21.0 | 18.3 |
| 16 | 宁麦34 | 63.1 | 89.7 | 0.5 | 8.8 | 30.4 | 24.5 | 20.6 | 17.7 | 79.3 | 74.3 | 71.2 | 64.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 17.6 | 19.2 | 19.8 | 17.4 |
| 17 | 镇麦16 | 63.1 | 89.7 | 0.5 | 8.8 | 34.1 | 24.0 | 20.7 | 19.2 | 80.6 | 75.5 | 72.9 | 66.4 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 17.5 | 19.3 | 19.9 | 18.0 |
| 18 | 镇麦18 | 63.5 | 90.1 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 34.4 | 24.7 | 20.1 | 17.9 | 79.9 | 76.3 | 72.4 | 65.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 17.5 | 19.3 | 20.0 | 18.2 |
| 19 | 扬辐麦13 | 63.3 | 90.0 | 0.5 | 8.8 | 30.0 | 23.9 | 20.4 | 19.0 | 79.9 | 76.3 | 73.5 | 67.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 18.3 | 19.6 | 19.9 | 18.3 |
| 20 | 扬辐麦15 | 65.8 | 90.2 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 28.9 | 25.0 | 21.6 | 18.8 | 79.1 | 74.8 | 72.3 | 65.0 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 16.8 | 19.0 | 19.1 | 17.3 |
| 21 | 扬辐麦16 | 63.4 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 31.4 | 25.6 | 21.0 | 20.3 | 79.3 | 75.6 | 73.3 | 69.6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 18.4 | 18.9 | 19.5 | 19.1 |
| 22 | 盐麦1号 | 64.6 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 8.2 | 39.0 | 25.8 | 24.4 | 19.1 | 79.2 | 73.0 | 73.0 | 67.8 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 16.9 | 18.9 | 19.7 | 18.5 |
| 23 | 盐麦2号 | 64.0 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 8.4 | 38.5 | 25.4 | 21.9 | 20.1 | 79.0 | 73.0 | 71.3 | 67.8 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 16.6 | 18.8 | 19.4 | 18.0 |
| 24 | 苏麦0588 | 64.0 | 90.2 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 29.8 | 22.3 | 20.5 | 19.1 | 79.1 | 73.4 | 72.6 | 68.5 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 17.6 | 19.9 | 20.3 | 18.8 |
| 25 | 苏麦198 | 64.1 | 90.5 | 0.7 | 8.7 | 30.8 | 22.8 | 20.2 | 18.1 | 79.1 | 74.0 | 72.6 | 68.3 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 17.5 | 19.7 | 20.4 | 19.1 |
| 26 | 苏麦288 | 65.5 | 90.1 | 0.5 | 8.0 | 31.6 | 26.2 | 22.9 | 22.5 | 77.2 | 75.0 | 71.5 | 66.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16.9 | 18.3 | 18.3 | 16.3 |
| 27 | 华麦10号 | 63.0 | 90.5 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 29.5 | 22.7 | 19.7 | 20.0 | 79.1 | 75.2 | 73.3 | 70.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 18.5 | 20.2 | 20.9 | 18.4 |
| 28 | 华麦11号 | 63.9 | 90.2 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 28.6 | - | 19.8 | 17.4 | 78.9 | 73.1 | 71.2 | 65.3 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 18.0 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 17.9 |
| 29 | 华麦12号 | 68.9 | 90.9 | 0.5 | 7.0 | 32.9 | - | 20.6 | 20.5 | 79.3 | 73.8 | 71.5 | 64.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 18.1 | 18.5 | 19.4 | 17.1 |
| 30 | 华麦13号 | 67.2 | 90.5 | 0.6 | 7.5 | 33.5 | - | 17.5 | 16.9 | 78.8 | 72.9 | 71.4 | 65.0 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 14.8 | 18.5 | 19.6 | 18.5 |
| 31 | 华麦14号 | 71.1 | 92.1 | 0.5 | 6.7 | 35.1 | - | 23.4 | 21.8 | 78.1 | 74.1 | 72.4 | 68.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 15.9 | 17.7 | 18.4 | 17.2 |
| 32 | 华麦15号 | 69.2 | 91.6 | 0.5 | 7.2 | 29.5 | - | 18.1 | 18.1 | 75.9 | 73.5 | 71.3 | 66.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 18.4 | 19.3 | 20.1 | 18.5 |
| 33 | 农麦156 | 63.5 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 27.7 | - | 19.5 | 19.6 | 76.5 | 73.5 | 70.7 | 68.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 18.5 | 19.2 | 19.1 | 18.3 |
| 34 | 农麦179 | 63.4 | 89.8 | 0.7 | 8.7 | 30.5 | 24.5 | 21.3 | 19.6 | 77.5 | 74.2 | 71.6 | 65.8 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 18.4 | 19.7 | 18.9 | 17.8 |
| 35 | 农麦180 | 67.5 | 90.5 | 0.6 | 7.4 | 37.9 | 27.1 | 23.3 | 20.0 | 79.4 | 74.8 | 72.6 | 65.6 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 17.2 | 19.5 | 17.8 | 17.7 |
| 36 | 农麦99 | 63.4 | 89.3 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 37.8 | 27.3 | 22.1 | 18.9 | 78.3 | 73.0 | 70.5 | 64.0 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 17.2 | 18.8 | 18.3 | 17.4 |
| 37 | 润扬麦1号 | 69.8 | 91.1 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 34.4 | 30.0 | 25.5 | 23.2 | 77.3 | 73.9 | 71.9 | 67.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 16.2 | 17.1 | 17.0 | 16.5 |
| 38 | 苏研麦017 | 64.8 | 90.0 | 0.6 | 8.2 | 29.3 | 22.9 | 20.7 | 18.4 | 79.5 | 74.7 | 72.7 | 69.1 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 18.5 | 20.0 | 19.9 | 19.1 |
| 39 | 扬江麦586 | 64.9 | 90.3 | 0.6 | 8.3 | 28.7 | 26.0 | 20.6 | 18.3 | 77.8 | 74.2 | 72.4 | 69.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 17.9 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 18.6 |
| 40 | 瑞华麦590 | 64.0 | 90.0 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 27.6 | 24.6 | 20.4 | 19.0 | 78.4 | 73.7 | 70.8 | 65.1 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 17.8 | 19.5 | 19.5 | 17.7 |
| 41 | 瑞华麦598 | 64.3 | 89.5 | 0.7 | 8.2 | 31.2 | 25.0 | 23.0 | 19.3 | 78.9 | 74.1 | 71.6 | 64.4 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 15.9 | 18.4 | 18.8 | 18.1 |
| 42 | 中垦麦212 | 61.2 | 88.5 | 0.7 | 8.9 | 24.3 | 21.0 | 17.7 | 16.6 | 74.9 | 70.3 | 67.9 | 62.7 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 19.1 | 19.7 | 19.4 | 17.7 |
| 43 | 中垦麦616 | 69.5 | 91.1 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 30.9 | 28.4 | 26.1 | 25.2 | 77.9 | 76.1 | 73.3 | 70.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 17.4 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 16.7 |
| 44 | 泰麦6号 | 59.1 | 87.9 | 0.7 | 9.5 | 25.8 | 17.9 | 16.4 | 15.0 | 74.4 | 68.7 | 66.9 | 61.5 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 18.9 | 20.2 | 20.2 | 18.2 |
| 45 | 泰麦901 | 63.1 | 88.7 | 0.5 | 8.3 | 31.9 | 24.2 | 22.4 | 20.1 | 77.0 | 72.3 | 70.2 | 65.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 17.4 | 18.4 | 18.7 | 17.1 |
| 46 | 宁麦资166 | 63.0 | 89.3 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 27.8 | 23.7 | 22.4 | 18.8 | 78.7 | 73.1 | 71.1 | 64.6 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 17.3 | 19.0 | 19.4 | 17.6 |
| 47 | 宁麦资518 | 71.6 | 91.4 | 0.4 | 6.3 | 36.6 | 30.4 | 27.0 | 24.9 | 80.6 | 75.9 | 74.3 | 69.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 13.4 | 17.1 | 17.6 | 16.9 |
| 48 | 宁麦资958 | 65.8 | 90.1 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 28.1 | 26.0 | 23.0 | 21.0 | 79.5 | 73.6 | 71.6 | 65.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 16.5 | 18.3 | 16.9 | 16.7 |
| 49 | 宁麦资666 | 69.6 | 91.0 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 32.8 | 31.5 | 27.2 | 25.2 | 78.8 | 76.5 | 75.2 | 69.8 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 16.5 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 18.5 |
| 50 | 宁麦资999 | 63.9 | 89.2 | 0.8 | 8.2 | 27.8 | 29.4 | 23.0 | 15.6 | 78.3 | 73.3 | 71.7 | 61.1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 16.8 | 18.4 | 19.3 | 18.5 |
| 51 | 宁麦资218 | 65.6 | 90.4 | 0.6 | 8.1 | 29.8 | 26.5 | 24.4 | 18.8 | 79.7 | 76.0 | 73.5 | 66.1 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 15.7 | 17.3 | 18.6 | 18.8 |
| 52 | 明麦13 | 63.4 | 89.5 | 0.7 | 8.5 | 26.2 | 24.8 | 21.6 | 17.7 | 79.9 | 75.9 | 73.7 | 68.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 19.5 | 20.2 | 20.3 | 20.3 |
| 53 | 明麦133 | 65.6 | 90.1 | 0.6 | 8.0 | 32.2 | 26.8 | 24.7 | 21.2 | 77.6 | 75.2 | 73.6 | 68.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 17.3 | 18.2 | 18.3 | 18.0 |
| 54 | 隆麦30 | 69.2 | 91.2 | 0.6 | 7.0 | 32.9 | 26.8 | 23.3 | 23.1 | 78.4 | 75.7 | 74.2 | 65.8 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 18.3 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 18.3 |
| 55 | 隆麦39 | 69.3 | 91.5 | 0.5 | 7.2 | 33.1 | 25.1 | 26.8 | 17.0 | 78.7 | 73.2 | 75.6 | 70.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 17.2 | 18.5 | 18.6 | 19.3 |
| 56 | 江丰麦1号 | 68.0 | 90.5 | 0.6 | 7.2 | 31.9 | 24.5 | 26.8 | 22.9 | 77.8 | 72.0 | 74.5 | 69.8 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 16.3 | 18.8 | 18.2 | 19.2 |
| 57 | 宁丰麦1号 | 64.2 | 89.4 | 0.6 | 8.2 | 32.6 | 23.7 | 21.1 | 15.0 | 77.0 | 72.8 | 70.9 | 66.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 17.8 | 18.4 | 18.5 | 19.4 |
| 58 | 宁红麦1119 | 69.6 | 91.0 | 0.4 | 6.8 | 29.6 | 26.5 | 23.1 | 22.2 | 76.2 | 75.1 | 72.9 | 67.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 17.0 | 18.2 | 18.4 | 19.6 |
| 59 | 扬麦40 | 66.0 | 90.1 | 0.6 | 7.8 | 30.5 | 25.4 | 23.0 | 20.6 | 76.9 | 74.0 | 72.1 | 65.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 17.4 | 18.0 | 18.5 | 17.9 |
| 60 | 扬麦41 | 63.4 | 89.2 | 0.7 | 8.4 | 31.4 | 25.5 | 21.5 | 18.4 | 77.3 | 73.8 | 71.7 | 63.2 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 13.8 | 19.6 | 19.5 | 18.0 |
| 61 | 扬麦42 | 70.9 | 91.5 | 0.4 | 6.6 | 34.7 | 29.1 | 28.0 | 24.1 | 78.2 | 75.8 | 74.2 | 68.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 16.8 | 17.7 | 17.5 | 15.8 |
| 62 | 扬麦43 | 62.8 | 89.8 | 0.7 | 8.9 | 29.8 | 22.8 | 20.8 | 21.8 | 78.8 | 75.3 | 73.7 | 68.1 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 19.3 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 19.8 |
| 63 | 扬麦45 | 71.1 | 91.8 | 0.3 | 6.6 | 34.1 | 32.1 | 30.1 | 29.3 | 81.0 | 78.6 | 77.1 | 73.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 16.0 | 17.1 | 17.0 | 18.8 |
| 64 | 扬麦46 | 63.6 | 89.5 | 0.7 | 8.5 | 25.7 | 22.9 | 20.9 | 20.4 | 78.2 | 74.1 | 72.7 | 66.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 17.7 | 19.3 | 19.4 | 18.4 |
| 65 | 扬麦44 | 69.8 | 91.3 | 0.3 | 6.9 | 31.7 | 28.2 | 25.6 | 20.6 | 79.0 | 75.4 | 73.8 | 64.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 16.5 | 17.5 | 17.3 | 16.1 |
| 66 | 扬麦23 | 64.4 | 89.7 | 0.7 | 8.3 | 23.2 | 18.3 | 18.6 | 19.5 | 74.4 | 72.1 | 72.2 | 65.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 20.4 | 19.6 |
| 67 | 山农28号 | 64.4 | 90.9 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 20.6 | 25.9 | 23.5 | 23.2 | 68.3 | 76.1 | 74.5 | 68.6 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 18.5 | 18.6 | 19.4 | 17.9 |
| 68 | 烟农999 | 68.1 | 92.2 | 0.3 | 7.9 | 27.5 | 22.7 | 21.8 | 24.7 | 80.1 | 78.0 | 76.8 | 72.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 20.0 | 20.9 | 21.1 | 20.3 |
| 69 | 烟农1212 | 69.6 | 91.8 | 0.3 | 7.2 | 34.9 | 29.7 | 27.4 | 30.0 | 81.5 | 78.9 | 77.7 | 73.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 14.2 | 18.0 | 16.9 | 16.3 |
| 70 | 泛麦8号 | 74.0 | 92.1 | 0.4 | 5.7 | 37.9 | 34.4 | 32.1 | 28.3 | 80.9 | 78.1 | 76.8 | 71.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 16.4 | 14.2 |
| 71 | 周麦36号 | 67.0 | 91.2 | 0.5 | 7.9 | 33.0 | 27.2 | 23.7 | 25.3 | 79.6 | 76.4 | 75.4 | 71.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 17.4 | 19.0 | 19.4 | 18.8 |
| 72 | 百农207 | 64.5 | 90.4 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 32.7 | 27.1 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 79.9 | 77.8 | 76.6 | 71.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 18.1 | 18.8 | 18.5 | 17.0 |
| 73 | 绵麦902 | 74.0 | 92.5 | 0.3 | 5.9 | 39.5 | 33.4 | 30.3 | 29.8 | 81.6 | 78.9 | 77.3 | 72.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 13.8 | 16.3 | 16.4 | 15.9 |
| 74 | 师栾02-1 | 64.3 | 89.9 | 0.6 | 8.4 | 29.1 | 21.4 | 19.2 | 19.4 | 77.1 | 73.9 | 72.4 | 67.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 18.8 | 20.0 | 20.5 | 17.2 |
| 75 | 衡观35 | 59.7 | 89.6 | 0.5 | 10.0 | 19.4 | 15.5 | 14.4 | 17.5 | 76.9 | 74.3 | 73.6 | 65.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 22.4 | 23.3 | 23.2 | 20.1 |
| 76 | 鲁原502 | 61.4 | 90.2 | 0.6 | 9.6 | 25.6 | 19.8 | 17.4 | 19.8 | 77.4 | 74.4 | 73.3 | 65.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 21.1 | 21.6 | 22.2 | 18.9 |
| 77 | 济麦22 | 62.5 | 90.6 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 29.4 | 27.4 | 25.5 | 28.5 | 81.4 | 77.8 | 77.4 | 73.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 18.1 |
| 78 | 西农979 | 62.9 | 90.4 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 28.6 | 22.3 | 19.3 | 22.9 | 79.5 | 76.7 | 75.8 | 70.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 20.8 | 21.7 | 21.8 | 20.0 |
| 79 | 郑麦379 | 56.4 | 89.7 | 0.4 | 11.4 | 16.8 | 15.5 | 12.7 | 21.8 | 79.1 | 77.5 | 75.7 | 72.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 24.8 | 23.8 |
| 80 | 郑麦136 | 60.0 | 90.4 | 0.4 | 10.2 | 23.8 | 20.9 | 16.8 | 24.9 | 80.1 | 77.4 | 76.3 | 74.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 23.4 | 23.9 |
| 81 | 百农4199 | 65.7 | 90.5 | 0.3 | 8.1 | 28.4 | 23.9 | 22.2 | 25.1 | 78.6 | 76.5 | 75.1 | 70.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 19.7 | 20.0 | 20.5 | 18.5 |
| 82 | 川麦104 | 73.0 | 91.9 | 0.2 | 6.0 | 38.3 | 35.7 | 33.5 | 31.7 | 80.9 | 78.6 | 77.0 | 74.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 14.8 | 15.7 | 15.9 | 15.2 |
| 83 | 川麦42 | 74.1 | 92.1 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 38.4 | 33.5 | 31.6 | 32.1 | 82.8 | 78.0 | 77.1 | 72.8 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 13.2 | 15.9 | 15.9 | 15.5 |
| 84 | 川麦93 | 74.7 | 92.5 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 42.2 | 39.1 | 35.4 | 36.9 | 81.9 | 80.0 | 77.8 | 77.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 14.1 | 14.2 | 15.4 | 14.6 |
| 85 | 龙麦35 | 65.4 | 89.7 | 0.6 | 7.9 | 31.7 | 28.7 | 27.0 | 30.5 | 78.9 | 76.2 | 74.4 | 74.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 17.0 | 17.9 | 17.8 | 17.6 |
| 86 | 淮麦33 | 65.9 | 90.2 | 0.4 | 7.9 | 31.2 | 27.1 | 25.8 | 23.9 | 79.5 | 77.0 | 74.6 | 68.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 18.2 | 18.5 | 18.9 | 21.2 |
| 87 | 扬麦13 | 70.6 | 91.4 | 0.3 | 6.6 | 29.9 | 27.4 | 24.1 | 22.3 | 77.3 | 75.2 | 73.0 | 65.7 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 18.3 | 18.5 |
| 88 | 扬麦15 | 70.2 | 91.3 | 0.3 | 6.7 | 33.4 | 30.5 | 28.6 | 22.1 | 78.9 | 78.2 | 76.6 | 70.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 17.6 | 18.9 |
| 89 | 扬麦16 | 63.8 | 89.3 | 0.6 | 8.3 | 31.9 | 25.1 | 22.5 | 18.2 | 79.6 | 75.4 | 74.0 | 67.7 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 17.2 | 19.4 | 19.6 | 20.3 |
| 90 | 扬麦20 | 70.5 | 91.1 | 0.4 | 6.5 | 34.1 | 37.0 | 30.5 | 28.7 | 78.7 | 80.9 | 76.6 | 70.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 16.4 | 15.8 | 16.2 | 17.0 |
| 91 | 农麦88 | 62.5 | 88.7 | 0.5 | 8.6 | 28.7 | 20.9 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 77.9 | 73.3 | 71.1 | 63.7 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 18.3 | 20.3 | 20.7 | 20.3 |
| 92 | 中麦175 | 67.7 | 90.5 | 0.3 | 7.3 | 34.5 | 31.0 | 29.2 | 22.4 | 78.9 | 76.1 | 74.5 | 66.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 16.2 | 16.7 | 16.8 | 17.5 |
| 93 | 中麦578 | 62.8 | 89.7 | 0.4 | 8.8 | 23.3 | 18.8 | 16.7 | 13.3 | 78.5 | 74.1 | 72.3 | 64.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 20.5 | 21.3 | 22.3 | 21.5 |
| 94 | 中麦895 | 60.9 | 89.6 | 0.4 | 9.6 | 29.5 | 24.8 | 23.6 | 19.3 | 80.9 | 76.3 | 75.6 | 67.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 18.5 | 19.4 | 19.8 | 19.3 |
根据面粉和鲜面片0、2、4和24 h的白度和亮度L*值对94份小麦资源进行聚类分析,结果(图2)表明,类群Ⅰ包含8份样品,分别为川麦93、扬麦20、川麦104、川麦42、绵麦902、泛麦8号、烟农1212和扬麦45;面粉白度平均值72.6,变幅69.6~74.7,L*平均值92.0,变幅91.1~92.5;鲜面片0、2、4和24 h白度平均值分别为37.4、34.4、31.4和30.8,变幅分别为34.1~42.2、29.7~39.1、27.4~35.4和28.3~36.9,L*平均值分别为81.2、79.0、77.2和73.3,变幅分别为78.7~82.8、78.0~80.9、76.6~77.8和70.9~77.6。类群Ⅱ包含74份样品,面粉白度平均值65.8,变幅60.0~71.6。类群Ⅲ包含1份样品,面粉白度64.4。类群Ⅳ包含11份样品,面粉白度平均值61.5,变幅56.4~67.5。
图2
图2
94份小麦材料面粉和鲜面片的白度及亮度聚类分析
Fig.2
Cluster analysis of WI and brightness of flour and fresh noodle sheet of 94 wheat materials
面粉与鲜面片色泽的相关性分析中(图3),面粉白度和L*值与鲜面片白度和L*值均呈显著正相关,与面粉的a*值、b*值和鲜面片的a*值、b*值呈显著负相关,这表明鲜面片与面粉色泽指标相关性表现一致,且放置不同时间的鲜面片色泽指标相关性表现一致。
图3
图3
94份小麦材料面粉和鲜面片色泽的相关性分析
“*”和“**”分别表示在P < 0.05和P < 0.01水平显著相关。
Fig.3
Correlation between flour and fresh noodle sheet color of 94 wheat materials
“*”and“**”indicate significant correlation at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 levels, respectively.
2.2 小麦面粉和鲜面片色泽与理化品质分析
由图3可知,94份不同品质类型小麦品种的面粉白度(CR-700R)平均值为65.9,变幅为56.4~74.7,变异系数为5.6%;L*值平均值为90.4,变幅为87.9~92.5,变异系数为1.0%;L*值较面粉白度分布集中,面粉白度变异幅度较大,表明面粉白度更能反映试验样品差异。
籽粒蛋白质含量最大的为师栾02-1(18.0%),最小的为川麦104(9.4%);千粒重最大的为宁麦资999(63.6 g),最小的为明麦13(36.6 g);籽粒硬度最大的为农麦156(74.7),最小的为扬麦25(49.4);湿面筋含量最大的为中麦895(42.9%),最小的为扬麦37(18.0%);沉降值最大的为百农4199(80.5 mL),最小的为郑麦379(38.0 mL)。
粉质质量指数的变异系数(131.4%)在所有理化品质指标分析中最大,其次为稳定时间和面团形成时间;试验品种的面团稳定时间平均值为7.3 min,变幅为0.9~37.8 min,变异系数为88.8%;面团形成时间平均值为2.7 min,变幅为1.2~16.2 min,变异系数为83.8%;表明粉质仪参数对试验样品的分布差异影响较大。淀粉糊化特性指标中低谷黏度的变异系数最大,低谷黏度的平均值为1380.6 cP,变幅为43.5~1891.0 cP,变异系数为28.2%(表3)。每份小麦的品质指标详见网络增强出版附加材料附表1。
表3 94份小麦材料的面粉色泽与品质指标
Table 3
| 指标 Index | 平均值 Average | 变幅 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 面粉白度Flour WI | 65.9 | 56.4~74.7 | 5.6 |
| L* | 90.4 | 87.9~92.5 | 1.0 |
| a* | 0.5 | 0.2~0.8 | 25.4 |
| b* | 8.0 | 5.6~11.4 | 13.6 |
| 籽粒蛋白质含量 Grain protein content (%) | 13.3 | 9.4~18.0 | 9.7 |
| 千粒重1000-grain weight (g) | 48.7 | 36.6~63.6 | 11.1 |
| 籽粒硬度Grain hardness | 64.9 | 49.4~74.7 | 10.7 |
| 面粉麸星含量 Flour gluten content (%) | 2.3 | 0.9~5.9 | 35.1 |
| 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten content (%) | 29.9 | 18.0~42.9 | 14.5 |
| 面筋指数Gluten index (%) | 88.5 | 49.3~100.0 | 14.5 |
| 沉降值Sedimentation value (mL) | 55.0 | 38.0~80.5 | 16.0 |
| 吸水率Water absorption rate (%) | 61.4 | 52.8~72.6 | 6.6 |
| 面团形成时间 Dough development time (min) | 2.7 | 1.2~16.2 | 83.8 |
| 稳定时间Stability time (min) | 7.3 | 0.9~37.8 | 88.8 |
| 弱化度Softness (BU) | 63.0 | -20.0~189.0 | 64.6 |
| 粉质质量指数 Farinograph quality index | 93.0 | 17.0~600.0 | 131.4 |
| 峰值黏度Peak viscosity (cP) | 2335.0 | 722.0~3010.0 | 20.5 |
| 低谷黏度Trough viscosity (cP) | 1380.6 | 43.5~1891.0 | 28.2 |
| 稀懈值Breakdown (cP) | 954.0 | 503.0~1342.0 | 18.9 |
| 最终黏度Final viscosity (cP) | 2635.0 | 301.0~3395.0 | 24.4 |
| 回生值Setback (cP) | 1255.0 | 258.0~1586.0 | 21.0 |
| 峰值时间Peak time (min) | 5.9 | 3.5~6.4 | 6.3 |
| 糊化温度Pasting temperature (℃) | 62.5 | 60.3~64.9 | 1.6 |
2.3 小麦面粉色泽与品质指标的相关性和逐步回归分析
如图4所示,在94份小麦材料中,白度与L*值呈极显著正相关,与a*值和b*值呈极显著负相关;L*值也与a*值和b*值呈极显著负相关;a*值与b*值则呈极显著正相关。在94份小麦材料中,白度与稀懈值和糊化温度呈极显著正相关,与面筋指数显著正相关;与籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、湿面筋含量、面团形成时间和稳定时间呈极显著负相关,与硬度的负相关性最强(r=-0.83);与低谷黏度、最终黏度和回生值呈显著负相关。L*值与糊化温度呈极显著正相关;与籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、湿面筋含量、吸水率、面团形成时间和稳定时间呈显著负相关。a*值则与籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、吸水率、稳定时间、峰值黏度、低谷黏度、最终黏度和回生值呈极显著正相关,与面筋指数和峰值时间呈显著正相关;而与糊化温度呈极显著负相关。b*值则与籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、湿面筋含量、吸水率、面团形成时间和稳定时间呈极显著正相关,和低谷黏度呈显著正相关;而与面筋指数、稀懈值和糊化温度呈极显著负相关。
图4
图4
小麦面粉色泽与品质指标的相关性分析
GPC:籽粒蛋白质含量;TGW:千粒重;GH:籽粒硬度;WGC:湿面筋含量;GI:面筋指数;SV:沉降值;WAR:吸水率;DDT:面团形成时间;ST:稳定时间;PV:峰值黏度;TV:低谷黏度;BD:稀懈值;FV:最终黏度;SD:回生值;PT:峰值时间;PaT:糊化温度。
Fig.4
Correlation analysis of wheat flour color and quality index
GPC: grain protein content; TGW: 1000-grain weight; GH: grain hardness; WGC: wet gluten content; GI: gluten index; SV: sedimentation value; WAR: water absorption rate; DDT: dough development time; ST: stability time; PV: peak viscosity; TV: trough viscosity; BD: breakdown; FV: final viscosity; SD: setback; PT: peak time; PaT: pasting temperature.
以籽粒蛋白质含量、千粒重、籽粒硬度、湿面筋含量、面筋指数、沉降值、糊化温度、峰值时间、回生值、吸水率、面团形成时间、稳定时间、峰值黏度、低谷黏度、稀懈值和最终黏度为自变量,面粉白度为因变量进行逐步回归分析,最终余下籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、面筋指数、沉降值、糊化温度和稀懈值6项指标,可解释面粉白度80.9%的变异(R2=0.809)。公式为:面粉白度=60.759-0.530×籽粒蛋白质含量-0.370×籽粒硬度+0.047×面筋指数+0.054×沉降值+0.413×糊化温度+0.003×稀懈值(F=61.283,P<0.05),未发现显著的共线性问题,自相关性检验表明不存在自相关问题,各变量之间存在良好的关联关系,模型拟合效果较好。面筋指数、沉降值和稀懈值对面粉白度产生显著正向影响;籽粒蛋白质含量和籽粒硬度对面粉白度产生显著负向影响。
2.4 94份小麦的KASP标记检测分析
检测到包含籽粒硬度基因Pinb-D1或Pina-D1任意1个突变型的品种共49份,含Pinb-B2b的品种共18份,频率分别为59.0%和19.2%。低多酚氧化酶活性等位变异Ppo-A1b和Ppo-D1a、高脂肪氧化酶活性等位变异Lox-B1a以及高过氧化物酶活性等位变异TaPod-A1b均为优异等位变异,频率分别为21.3%、3.9%、0.0%和8.0%。籽粒黄色素含量/类胡萝卜素合成优异基因包括Psy-A1b、Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a、TaPds-B1b、TaZds-A1a和TaLyc-B1b,频率分别为0.0%、98.9%、96.6%、78.5%、5.3%和53.8%(表4)。将相关分子标记与面粉和鲜面片的白度值相关联,结果表明,籽粒硬度基因检测为软质(Pinb-D1a或Pina-D1a)的小麦面粉和鲜面片白度整体高于硬质小麦;检测到与色素降解有关的氧化酶基因(Ppo-A1b、Ppo-D1a和TaPod-A1b)表现的品种面粉和鲜面片白度相对较高;检测到籽粒黄色素含量或类胡萝卜素合成有利基因(Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a、TaPds- B1b和TaLyc-B1b)表现的品种面粉和鲜面片白度相对较高,而检测到TaZds-A1a有利基因的品种白度略低。每份小麦的KASP标记检测结果详见网络增强出版附加材料附表2。
表4 94份小麦材料品质及硬度相关基因等位变异的分布频率
Table 4
| 性状 Trait | 基因 Gene | 等位变异 Allele | 数目 Number | 频率 Frequency (%) | 面粉白度 Flour WI | L* | 0 h鲜面片白度 WI of 0 h fresh noodle sheet | 24 h鲜面片白度 WI of 24 h fresh noodle sheet | N | Indet | Heterozygote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 籽粒硬度 Grain hardness | Pinb-D1 | Pinb-D1b | 47 | 54.7 | 63.2 | 89.8 | 28.6 | 19.5 | 7 | 1 | - |
| Pinb-D1a | 39 | 45.4 | 69.2 | 91.1 | 33.2 | 23.0 | |||||
| Pina-D1 | Pina-D1b | 2 | 2.2 | 63.7 | 89.7 | 33.1 | 19.9 | 2 | - | 1 | |
| Pina-D1a | 89 | 97.8 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 30.8 | 21.1 | |||||
| Pinb2-V | Pinb-B2b | 18 | 19.2 | 65.7 | 90.4 | 29.2 | 19.9 | - | - | - | |
| Pinb-B2a | 76 | 80.9 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 31.2 | 21.2 | |||||
| 籽粒色泽 Grain color | Ppo-A1 | Ppo-A1b | 20 | 21.3 | 67.2 | 90.6 | 31.8 | 22.9 | - | - | - |
| Ppo-A1a | 74 | 78.7 | 65.5 | 90.3 | 30.6 | 20.5 | |||||
| Ppo-D1 | Ppo-D1a | 2 | 3.9 | 71.8 | 91.6 | 34.7 | 28.6 | 1 | - | 42 | |
| Ppo-D1b | 49 | 96.1 | 64.9 | 90.2 | 30.5 | 20.5 | |||||
| Lox-B1 | Lox-B1a | 0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | |
| Lox-B1b | 90 | 100.0 | 65.8 | 90.4 | 30.7 | 20.9 | |||||
| TaPod-A1 | TaPod-A1b | 7 | 8.0 | 68.2 | 91.0 | 33.0 | 24.0 | - | 4 | 2 | |
| TaPod-A1a | 81 | 92.1 | 65.6 | 90.3 | 30.6 | 20.7 | |||||
| Psy-A1 | Psy-A1b | 0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| Psy-A1a | 93 | 100.0 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 30.8 | 21.0 | |||||
| Psy-B1 | Psy-B1a/b | 93 | 98.9 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 30.8 | 21.0 | - | - | - | |
| Psy-B1c | 1 | 1.1 | 60.9 | 89.6 | 29.5 | 19.3 | |||||
| Psy-D1/Sr25 | Psy-D1a | 86 | 96.6 | 66.0 | 90.4 | 30.8 | 21.1 | 2 | 3 | - | |
| Sr25/Psy1Da-g | 3 | 3.4 | 62.6 | 89.5 | 31.9 | 19.4 | |||||
| TaPds-B1 | TaPds-B1b | 73 | 78.5 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 31.0 | 20.9 | - | 1 | - | |
| TaPds-B1a | 20 | 21.5 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 30.3 | 21.5 | |||||
| TaZds-A1 | TaZds-A1a | 5 | 5.3 | 64.8 | 90.0 | 27.7 | 16.9 | - | - | - | |
| TaZds-A1b | 89 | 94.7 | 65.9 | 90.4 | 31.0 | 21.2 | |||||
| TaLyc-B1 | TaLyc-B1b | 50 | 53.8 | 66.6 | 90.6 | 30.9 | 21.7 | - | 1 | - | |
| TaLyc-B1a | 43 | 46.2 | 65.1 | 90.2 | 30.7 | 20.2 |
“N”表示无扩增(可能是样品无该位点或PCR失败);“Indet”表示无法确认(样品有扩增,介于杂合和亲本分型之间,无法确定等位型);“Heterozygote”表示杂合基因型。
“N”indicates no amplification (sample lacks the locus or PCR failed); “Indet”indicates indeterminate results (amplification present but ambiguous between heterozygote and parental genotypes);“Heterozygote”indicates heterozygous genotype.
统计发现白度值高的区域划分中软质小麦占比较高,因此以硬度值及相关基因为指标将94份材料分为硬质小麦(Pinb-D1b或Pina-D1b)和软质小麦(Pinb-D1a或Pina-D1a)。结果(表5)表明,硬质小麦面粉a*值和b*值均大于软质小麦;白度和L*小于软质小麦,白度差异显著。硬质小麦面粉白度在56.4~67.0,软质小麦白度在66.1~74.7,其中硬质小麦品种只有周麦36(白度67.0)大于软质小麦中白度值最低的宁麦33(白度66.1)。软质小麦面粉白度达市场标准的包括川麦93、泛麦8号、绵麦902、宁麦资518、华麦14号和扬麦45等13份小麦品种;硬质小麦中周麦36、淮麦33、扬辐麦15和宁麦资218等品种白度较高。白度值大于70的13份材料中Psy-B1a/b和Psy-D1a的频率为100.0%,TaPds-B1b的频率为84.6%,TaLyc-B1b的频率为61.5%,Ppo-A1b的频率为46.2%,Ppo-D1a的频率为16.7%,TaPod-A1b的频率为18.2%,优质基因在高白度材料分布频率比整体材料高。检测含“Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a、TaPds-B1b或TaLyc-B1b”组合的有5份品种,“Ppo-A1b、Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a或TaPds-B1b”组合的有5份品种,“Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a或TaPds-B1b”组合有10份品种,“Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a或TaLyc-B1b”组合有7份品种。优质基因组合在高白度小麦品种中高频率分布。
表5 不同硬度类型小麦的面粉品质性状
Table 5
| 小麦硬质类型 Wheat hardness type | 面粉白度 Flour WI | 粒色 Grain color | 籽粒硬度 Grain hardness | L* | a* | b* | 吸水率 Water absorption rate(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 硬质小麦 | 63.2 | 13白,36红 | 69.6 | 89.8 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 63.8 |
| 软质小麦 | 69.9 | 5白,29红 | 56.8 | 91.3 | 0.4 | 6.9 | 57.1 |
3 讨论
3.1 白度与硬度、蛋白质和淀粉相关品质指标
姜小苓等[9]以216份不同麦区的小麦品种为材料研究发现,面粉白度与籽粒蛋白含量(r=-0.36)和面团形成时间(r=-0.207)呈极显著负相关;而王霖等[10]以8份不同白度的小麦品种为材料研究发现,面粉白度与蛋白质含量、干面筋含量、湿面筋含量和面筋指数相关性极小。本研究相关分析表明,面粉白度与籽粒蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量、面团形成时间和稳定时间等蛋白相关指标呈极显著负相关,与面筋指数显著正相关,这一结果与多数研究[2
3.2 高白度小麦理想基因型及筛选运用
低多酚氧化酶活性、高脂肪氧化酶活性以及低黄色素含量是小麦品质育种的重要目标[29]。其中,多酚氧化酶是导致面粉在存放期间发生褐化的主要原因[44]。张立平等[45]研究发现,多酚氧化酶基因在2AL和2DL上的主效位点对表型变异的解释率均在25%以上。高活性的脂肪氧化酶和高活性的过氧化物酶对面粉具有增白效果[27]。本研究结果显示,Ppo-A1b基因型占比21.3%,Ppo-D1a基因型仅占比3.9%,未检测到Lox-B1a基因型,TaPod-A1b基因型占比8.0%。小麦籽粒黄色素含量主要受主效基因Psy-A1和Psy-B1调控[20]。本研究中未检测到Psy-A1b基因型,Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a和TaPds-B1b基因型的比例较高。目前,国内品种尤其是长江中下游麦区品种,缺乏Ppo-A1b、Ppo- D1a、Lox-B1a和TaPod-A1b等氧化酶优异基因型,以及Psy-A1b和TaZds-A1a等黄色素优异基因型,育种家应予以重视。
如前文所述,面粉白度与籽粒硬度呈极显著负相关。本研究中,软质小麦白度(69.9)整体高于硬质小麦(63.2),因此,硬质小麦白度和色泽改良是一大难题[46]。不过,考虑到供试材料来源广泛,不同地域环境下的种植结果可能存在差异。本研究筛选出周麦36、淮麦33、扬辐麦15和宁麦资218等白度较好的硬质小麦品种。其中,周麦36的蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量和沉降值较高,且其面粉白度略高于软质小麦宁麦33,这可能是因为周麦36聚集了Ppo-A1b、TaPod-A1b、Psy-B1a/b和Psy-D1a等优异等位变异。对于高白度硬质小麦,其硬度基因多为Pinb-D1b或Pina-D1b基因型,应聚合Ppo-A1b、Ppo-D1a、Lox-B1a和TaPod-A1b等氧化酶变异基因型,以及籽粒黄色素含量或类胡萝卜素合成优异基因型[47]。同时,加大育种材料相关酶活性和色素等表型的筛选力度,结合现代新型生物技术,配套相应的栽培措施,全方位加强面粉白度及稳定性的改良。此外,本研究还筛选出了川麦93、绵麦902、泛麦8号、宁麦资518、华麦14号和扬麦45等13个高白度软质小麦品种,其白度均高于硬质小麦,且优异色泽基因等位变异的比率高于整体材料,可作为色泽改良的优异亲本。后续小麦品种改良工作中,应加强优良亲本的利用,注重色泽优异基因的聚合,并强化相关表型的筛选,以逐步提升小麦品种的白度与色泽品质。
4 结论
面粉白度与籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、湿面筋含量、面团形成时间及稳定时间呈极显著负相关;与低谷黏度、最终黏度和回生值呈显著负相关;与亮度L*值、稀懈值和糊化温度呈极显著正相关。籽粒蛋白质含量、籽粒硬度、面筋指数、沉降值、糊化温度和稀懈值可解释面粉白度80.9%的变异。品质基因变异位点Pinb-D1b、Pina-D1b、Ppo-A1b、Ppo-D1a、TaPod-A1b、Lox-B1a、Psy-A1b、Psy-B1a/b、Psy-D1a、TaPds-B1b、TaZds-A1a和TaLyc-B1b的分布频率分别为54.7%、2.2%、21.3%、3.9%、8.0%、0.0%、0.0%、98.9%、96.6%、78.5%、5.3%和53.8%,同一基因的不同变异类型会导致小麦色泽存在差异。筛选出扬麦15、扬麦25、川麦93、绵麦902和扬麦45等13个高白度软质小麦品种,以及周麦36、淮麦33、扬辐麦15和宁麦资218等白度较高的硬质小麦品种。
参考文献
小麦面粉色泽(白度)与DArT标记的关联分析
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.02198
[本文引用: 1]
面粉色泽(白度)是评价小麦加工品质的重要指标之一。在4个环境中检测了109份矮孟牛姊妹系及其衍生系的面粉色泽(白度)参数,并利用混合线性模型分析其与覆盖小麦基因组的971个DArT (Diversity Array Technology)标记的关联性。结果显示,17个DArT标记与面粉色泽显著关联,4个标记与白度显著关联(P≤0.001)。标记wPt-1196和wPt-669693在多个环境中与色泽a*和b*关联,且效应值较大。该研究结果为小麦面粉色泽的分子标记辅助选择育种提供了参考信息。
脱脂大豆粉对小麦粉品质及馒头增白效果的影响及应用稳定性研究
Wheat flour granulometry determines colour perception
DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.06.050 URL [本文引用: 1]
Colour screening of whole meal flours and discrimination of seven Triticum subspecies
DOI:10.1016/j.jcs.2017.07.006 URL
新疆小麦品种面粉色泽(白度)的变异及其影响因素分析
DOI:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.011
[本文引用: 3]
【目的】 研究新疆小麦品种面粉色泽(白度)的变异及其影响因素,为提高新疆小麦品种的面粉白度及选育具有优良面粉色泽的小麦品种提供参考。【方法】 以新疆小麦育成品种和自育成品种(系)为材料,研究新疆小麦面粉白度的分布规律;以37个新疆不同品质类型的冬小麦品种(系)为材料,分析小麦相关品质性状与面粉白度和色泽的相关性及影响。【结果】 71份新疆小麦品种资源的面粉白度平均值的分布范围较大,筛选出13份面粉白度值超过80的小麦种质;面粉的吸水率、籽粒硬度与白度呈极显著的负相关,籽粒硬度、吸水率、淀粉含量和延伸度共同决定了面粉白度变异的 63.3%。籽粒蛋白质含量与面粉白度相关性不显著,仅与面粉色泽红度(a<sup>*</sup>值)呈极显著正相关。【结论】 新疆小麦育成品种和自育成品种(系)中高白度种质少。
Detection of puroindoline (Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1) allelic variation in wheat landraces
DOI:10.1016/j.jcs.2014.07.007 URL [本文引用: 1]
小麦puroindoline及其相关基因分子遗传基础研究进展
DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.06.002
[本文引用: 1]
籽粒硬度是重要的小麦品质性状之一,对小麦的磨粉品质和加工品质有重要影响。控制籽粒硬度的 主效基因puroindoline位于5D染色体的短臂上,可分为Pina和Pinb 2种类型。Pina和Pinb紧密连锁,编 码区均为447个碱基,没有内含子,共同形成小麦籽粒硬度的分子遗传基础。目前,普通小麦和山羊草中均已发现多种puroindoline变异类型,其中引起小麦籽粒硬度大幅度升高的Pina-D1b类型的分子机制为从编码区第23个碱基开始缺失15 380个碱基。Puroindoline除了对小麦籽粒硬度有重要影响之外,对其它品质性状也有重要影响,不同puroindoline变异类型之间小麦品质具有一定差异。另外,与puroindoline紧密连锁的Gsp-1基因变异类型更为丰富,但对籽粒硬度没有明显的调节作用。最近发现的与puroindoline b高度同源的基因Pinb-2v具有4种类型,分别位于小麦7A、7B和7D染色体上,可能对籽粒硬度具有微效的调节作用。本文通过对puroindoline的分子特征和突变类型以及相关功能进行分析和总结,旨在为中国小麦品质的基因工程改良提供参考。
Variation in principal quality factors of durum wheat with a quality prediction test for wheat or semolina
Characterization of phytoene synthase 1 gene (Psy1) located on common wheat chromosome 7A and development of a functional marker
DOI:10.1007/s00122-007-0660-8
PMID:17943267
[本文引用: 2]
Phytoene synthase (Psy), a critical enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway, demonstrated high association with the yellow pigment (YP) content in wheat grain. Characterization of Psy genes and the development of functional markers for them are of importance for marker-assisted selection in wheat breeding. In this study, the full-length genomic DNA sequence of a Psy gene (Psy-A1) located on chromosome 7A, was characterized by in silico cloning and experimental validation. The cloned Psy-A1 comprises six exons and five introns, 4,175 bp in total, and an ORF of 1,284 bp. A co-dominant marker, YP7A, was developed based on polymorphisms of two haplotypes of Psy-A1, yielding 194 and 231-bp fragments in cultivars with high and low YP content, respectively. The marker YP7A was mapped on chromosome 7AL using an RIL population from cross PH82-2/Neixing 188, and a set of Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines and ditelosomic line 7AS. Psy-A1, co-segregating with the STS marker YP7A, was linked to SSR marker Xwmc809 on chromosome 7AL with a genetic distance of 5.8 cM, and explained 20-28% of the phenotypic variance for YP content across three environments. A total of 217 Chinese wheat cultivars and advanced lines were used to validate the association between the polymorphic band pattern and grain YP content. The results showed that the functional marker YP7A was closely related to grain YP content and, therefore, could be used in wheat breeding programs targeting of YP content for various wheat-based products.
Allelic variation at the TaZds-A1 locus on wheat chromosome 2A and development of a functional marker in common wheat
DOI:10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60099-9 URL [本文引用: 1]
Mapping quantitative trait loci for peroxidase activity and developing gene-specific markers for TaPod-Alon wheatchromo some 3AL
Physical mapping of peroxidase genes and development of functional markers for Tapod-D1 on breadwheat chromosome7D
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2019.00523 URL [本文引用: 1]
Development of functional markers for a lipoxygenase gene TaLox-B1 on chromosome 4BS in common wheat
Purification and analysis of wheat grain polyphenol oxidase (PPO) protein
DOI:10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.2.135 URL [本文引用: 1]
Development and validation of KASP assays for genes underpinning key economic traits in bread wheat
DOI:10.1007/s00122-016-2743-x URL [本文引用: 2]
国审4个漯麦品种重要性状功能基因KASP检测与分析
长江中下游地区小麦品种籽粒和面条品质分析
DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.13.001
[本文引用: 1]
【目的】分析长江中下游麦区江苏省、安徽省和湖北省等3个省份间小麦品种的品质性状差异,选出重要品质性状指标,以及对面条等加工品质产生重要影响的因素,为长江中下游地区小麦品种品质评价、优质专用小麦品种选育和品质区划等提供理论依据。【方法】在对各品质性状进行方差分析的基础上,对种植于3个省份6个试点13个小麦品种的25个品质性状进行主成分分析,筛选和评价该地区小麦品种重要品质性状;采用正交偏最小二乘法判别分析区分省份间品质性状的差异;对影响面条品质的因素作通径分析。【结果】供试材料所有品质性状在地点、品种、品种×地点间差异均达到极显著水平;主成分分析将所有品质性状分为淀粉糊化指数、面粉吸水指数、粉质仪指数、蛋白质指数、面粉色泽指数、麦谷蛋白指数、淀粉崩解值指数7个主成分,其累计贡献值达81.250%,涵盖绝大多数的品质性状;对总体的品质评价起第一主导作用的是淀粉糊化指数,其次是面粉吸水指数和粉质仪指数;正交偏最小二乘法判别分析结果表明,该麦区3个省份间品质性状差异表现在反弹值、最终黏度、低谷黏度和峰值黏度等淀粉糊化特性上;通径分析结果显示碳酸钠溶剂保持力对面条感官评价的直接正向效应最大,而淀粉糊化的崩解值和面筋表现指数对面条感官评价的负向作用较大。【结论】长江中下游地区的小麦品质在不同品种间和不同种植区间的品质性状存在着极显著差异;淀粉糊化特性指数等品质性状表现易受环境的影响,且是影响该区总体品质评价的第一主导因子;江苏省、安徽省和湖北省等3个省份间小麦品种在反弹值、最终黏度、低谷黏度和峰值黏度等淀粉糊化特性的差异最大,在选育该区中弱筋小麦品种和评价其品质时,应加强对低谷黏度、最终黏度、峰值黏度等淀粉糊特性的重视;影响面条品质(感官评价)的主要因素是破损淀粉率,破损淀粉率高的面粉,适合制作优质面条。
Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics
The influence of the physical structure of the protein matrix on wheat hardness
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.v28:1 URL [本文引用: 1]
淀粉特性及其表面结合蛋白与裸燕麦籽粒硬度的关系研究
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21064
[本文引用: 1]
籽粒硬度可以反映麦类籽粒胚乳质地, 与其碾磨性能和食用加工品质密切相关。为了探究裸燕麦(Avena nuda L.)籽粒淀粉特性及其表面结合蛋白与籽粒硬度的关系。本文以5份软质和5份硬质裸燕麦种质为材料, 测定总淀粉、支链和直链淀粉含量, 观察淀粉粒特性和粒度, 对淀粉颗粒表面结合蛋白进行质谱鉴定。结果表明: 成熟籽粒中淀粉颗粒的形状有圆形、椭圆形和不规则形, 淀粉粒的数量、体积和表面积均呈现单峰分布; 淀粉粒大小可分为小(粒径<6 μm)、中(6~40 μm)和大淀粉粒(粒径>40 μm), 裸燕麦籽粒主要由小和中淀粉粒组成; 硬度不同的裸燕麦籽粒中淀粉的粒度分布不同, 软质裸燕麦小淀粉粒的数量和体积百分比高于硬质, 中、大淀粉粒的数量和体积百分比低于硬质; 软质裸燕麦小和中淀粉粒的表面积百分比高于硬质, 大淀粉粒表面积百分比低于硬质; 裸燕麦籽粒硬度与支链淀粉含量呈正相关。软质裸燕麦14 kD蛋白在淀粉颗粒表面的含量高于硬质裸燕麦, 该蛋白条带经HPLC/MS共鉴定到41种蛋白, 包括Vromindoline蛋白和燕麦α淀粉酶胰蛋白酶抑制剂等。综上所述, 裸燕麦籽粒淀粉含量、粒度分布和淀粉表面结合蛋白均与籽粒硬度相关, 支链淀粉含量越高, 小淀粉粒的数量、表面积和体积百分比越多, Vromindoline等蛋白含量越高, 裸燕麦籽粒越软, 为揭示裸燕麦籽粒硬度形成机制奠定了基础。
不同筋力面筋蛋白对小麦淀粉糊化特性的影响
淀粉和面筋蛋白是小麦面粉中的主要成分,两者的相互关系与面粉的用途及加工品质密切相关。本文以3个不同小麦品种淀粉(2个普通小麦,1个糯性小麦)为试验材料,添加3种类型的面筋蛋白(强筋,中筋和弱筋),5个添加量处理,分析淀粉和面筋种类及其交互作用对淀粉糊化特性的影响。结果表明淀粉是糊化特性的决定因素,面筋蛋白质直接或通过淀粉交互作用显著影响糊化特性。淀粉和面筋蛋白类型交互作用对峰值黏度、黏度面积、稀懈值、糊化起始时间有极显著影响;淀粉和面筋蛋白含量的交互作用对除了糊化温度和糊化起始时间外的其它糊化指标都有极显著或显著的影响;面筋蛋白类型对稀懈值影响按其降低作用大小的顺序为:弱筋>中筋>强筋;面筋蛋白添加量对淀粉稀懈值和反弹值的影响因淀粉种类的不同呈现显著差异。结果为研究食品加工过程中面筋蛋白与淀粉相互作用和小麦品质育种改良提供依据。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |

