Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 80-85.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Potassium Use Efficiency of Different Flax Genotypes

Yao Yubo,Wu Guangwen,Huang Wengong,Kang Qinghua,Jiang Weidong,Lu Ying,Zhang Shuquan   

  1. Institute of Industrial Crops,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150086,Heilongjiang,China
  • Received:2016-04-05 Revised:2016-06-13 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Qinghua Kang

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

120

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the potassium use efficiency of different flax varieties (lines) and to screen the variety with the highest efficiency among germplasm resources, two potassium levels (K0 and K25), 22 flax varieties (lines) were experimentally designed to investigate height, technical length, straw yield, fiber yield, fiber content and to study the correlation with potassium use efficiency under field condition. The results showed that potassium had a significant improvement on technical length, fiber content and fiber yield of flax. Four germplasm resources with high potassium use efficiency were screened out (shuangya10, yuan 2012-306, yuan 2012-295 and sxy130) under K0 condition, two germplasm resources with high potassium use efficiency were screened out (sxy130 and yuan 2012-306) under K25 condition by cluster analysis. Under K0 condition, potassium use efficiency had a significant positive correlation with height (P﹤0.01), technical length (P﹤0.05) and fiber content (P﹤0.01), under K25 condition,potassium use efficiency had a significant positive correlation with height, technical length and fiber content (P﹤0.05). The results will provide theoretical basis for investigation and breeding of high potassium use efficiency.

Key words: Flax, Potassium use efficiency, Variation

Table 1

Effects of potassium fertilizer on agronomic and yield traits of flax different varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Varieties(Lines)		 处理
Treatments		 株高(cm)
Height		 工艺长度(cm)
Technical length		 原茎产量(kg/hm2)
Straw yield		 纤维产量(kg/hm2)
Fiber yield		 全麻率(%)
Fiber content
9801-1-1-7 K0 84.97Aa 75.40Aa 8 712.70Bb 1 577.89Bb 23.79Bb
K25 82.10Bb 75.07Aa 9 826.24Aa 2 078.09Aa 28.11Aa
白花 K0 65.30Aa 56.73Aa 6 681.90Aa 1 086.77Bb 21.68Bb
K25 64.30Bb 55.40Bb 6 598.87Aa 1 353.36Aa 27.17Aa
r0423-2-2 K0 76.03Bb 68.07Bb 6 973.34Aa 1 244.39Aa 22.74Bb
K25 77.93Aa 72.37Aa 6 776.04Bb 1 327.80Aa 26.53Aa
原2012-305 K0 74.40Aa 65.80Aa 7 456.10Bb 1 380.50Bb 23.07Bb
K25 68.00Bb 60.87Bb 7 650.41Aa 1 491.62Aa 26.09Aa
原2012-302 K0 75.60Aa 65.03Bb 5 018.03Bb 893.61Bb 24.01Bb
K25 72.87Bb 66.87Aa 5 264.75Aa 1 018.94Aa 27.55Aa
原2012-300 K0 66.57Aa 58.43Aa 7 104.17Bb 1 445.30Bb 27.67Bb
K25 65.60Bb 56.63Bb 9 264.57Aa 1 852.34Aa 29.29Aa
m03057-26 K0 82.90Aa 73.90Bb 7 641.40Bb 1 273.39Bb 21.40Bb
K25 82.90Aa 77.57Aa 8 365.36Aa 1 497.72Aa 24.27Aa
r0340-2-2 K0 70.63Bb 63.53Bb 7 493.41Aa 1 437.25Bb 24.89Bb
K25 73.80Aa 65.73Aa 7 528.57Aa 1 602.37Aa 28.37Aa
sxy330 K0 72.93Bb 64.63Aa 7 174.28Bb 1 486.06Bb 26.94Bb
K25 74.97Aa 64.97Aa 7 528.49Aa 1 659.06Aa 28.27Aa
02147-2-6 K0 80.23Bb 72.17Bb 6 976.68Bb 1 488.70Bb 27.65Bb
K25 82.83Aa 73.87Aa 7 282.85Aa 1 711.37Aa 30.06Aa
原2012-281 K0 72.30Bb 67.30Aa 5 821.51Bb 1 227.29Bb 26.48Bb
K25 74.13Aa 67.13Aa 7 444.42Aa 1 597.61Aa 28.32Aa
原2012-306 K0 77.03Bb 67.07Bb 5 102.91Bb 1 151.64Bb 28.57Bb
品种（系）
Varieties(Lines)		 处理
Treatments		 株高(cm)
Height		 工艺长度(cm)
Technical length		 原茎产量(kg/hm2)
Straw yield		 纤维产量(kg/hm2)
Fiber yield		 全麻率(%)
Fiber content
K25 80.20Aa 73.17Aa 5 798.53Aa 1 363.32Aa 30.20Aa
原2012-303 K0 82.53Bb 74.53Bb 6 222.88Bb 1 142.47Aa 23.42Bb
K25 85.97Aa 78.90Aa 6 447.93Aa 1 221.36Aa 25.17Aa
原2012-289 K0 72.93Bb 66.50Aa 7 984.54Aa 1 890.56Aa 30.22Bb
K25 74.07Aa 67.07Aa 7 771.97Bb 1 972.85Aa 33.20Aa
sxy130 K0 79.97Bb 70.03Bb 6 706.88Aa 1 459.86Bb 27.69Bb
K25 81.07Aa 75.17Aa 6 742.07Aa 1 583.29Aa 30.38Aa
sxy303 K0 70.83Aa 63.36Aa 6 109.35Aa 1 410.25Aa 29.47Aa
K25 70.40Aa 60.37Bb 6 017.41Aa 1 426.71Aa 29.98Aa
原2012-283 K0 76.67Aa 68.77Aa 8 082.60Aa 1 620.07Bb 25.60Bb
K25 76.47Aa 69.47Aa 7 632.65Bb 1 785.76Aa 29.68Aa
原2012-295 K0 80.60Bb 72.07Bb 6 516.23Aa 1 318.84Aa 26.05Bb
K25 86.33Aa 79.37Aa 6 252.22Bb 1 336.32Aa 27.82Aa
黑亚20 K0 63.67Aa 50.77Bb 7 180.73Aa 1 273.02Bb 23.49Bb
K25 63.10Aa 55.17Aa 7 356.81Aa 1 552.44Aa 27.25Aa
New K0 66.87Bb 55.07Bb 7 791.40Aa 1 984.41Aa 32.54Bb
K25 67.83Aa 57.83Aa 7 704.33Aa 2 071.75Aa 33.79Aa
双亚10 K0 81.40Aa 72.47Aa 6 564.25Bb 1 685.30Bb 30.84Bb
K25 74.27Bb 68.83Bb 8 805.55Aa 2 429.36Aa 35.54Aa
双亚12 K0 79.17Aa 70.73Bb 7 239.17Bb 1 586.62Bb 27.48Bb
K25 77.67Bb 71.70Aa 7 571.23Aa 1 868.19Aa 31.79Aa

Table 2

Difference of potassium use efficiency among different varieties (lines) kg/kg"

K0 K25
品种（系）
Varieties(lines)		 K利用效率
K use efficience		 品种（系）
Varieties(lines)		 K利用效率
K use efficience
双亚10 87.23Aa 原2012-306 62.30Aa
原2012-306 75.73Bb sxy130 59.67Bb
原2012-295 73.05Cc 02147-2-6 42.45Cc
sxy130 71.88Cc 原2012-281 40.86CDd
原2012-289 60.89Dd 双亚10 39.35DEe
02147-2-6 56.98Ee 原2012-295 38.28Ee
sxy303 56.27Ee sxy303 36.33Ff
原2012-281 50.47Ff 原2012-303 31.92Gg
原2012-283 50.15Ff 原2012-300 29.98Hh
双亚12 40.77Gg 原2012-289 29.65Hh
原2012-303 37.40Hh 9801-1-1-7 26.85Ji
New 34.76Ii 原2012-283 26.79Ii
原2012-300 34.37Ii m03057-26 26.67IJi
m03057-26 23.93Jj 原2012-302 25.54IJKij
9801-1-1-7 23.06JKgk 白花 24.82JKLjk
原2012-305 22.78JKgkl 双亚12 23.90KLMkl
sxy330 22.02KLkl 原2012-305 23.37LMNlm
原2012-302 21.63KLMlm sxy330 23.17LMNlm
r0423-2-2 20.54LMNmn r0340-2-2 22.84MNlmn
黑亚20 20.04MNOno New 22.20MNmn
白花 19.02NOop r0423-2-2 21.46Nn
r0340-2-2 18.62Op 黑亚20 17.72Oo

Fig.1

Clustering analysis diagram of potassium use efficiency among different varieties (lines) under K0 condition"

Fig.2

Clustering analysis diagram of potassium use efficiency among different varieties (lines) under K25 condition"

Table 3

The correlation between potassium use efficiency and agronomic characters"

处理
Treatments		 株高(cm)
Height		 工艺长度(cm)
Technical length		 原茎产量(kg/hm2)
Straw yield		 纤维产量(kg/hm2)
Fiber yield		 全麻率(%)
Fiber content
K0 0.836** 0.741* -0.634 0.473 0.909**
K25 0.720* 0.718* -0.695 -0.267 0.901*
[1] FAO Databank. [2008-12-01].
[2] 姚玉波 . 不同品种亚麻种子萌发期抗旱性鉴定. 核农学报, 2015,29(10):2033-2039.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.10.2033
[3] Clarkson D T, Hanson J B . The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1980,31:239-298.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001323
[4] Rǒmheld V, Kirkby E A . Research on potassium in agriculture:needs and prospects. Plant and Soil, 2010,335(1):155-180.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1
[5] Pettigrew W T . Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize,wheat,soybean and cotton. Physiologia Plantarum, 2008,133(4):670-681.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.2008.133.issue-4
[6] Zǒrb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E . Potassium in agriculture status and perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014,171(9):656-669.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008
[7] Wang Y, Wu W H . Genetic approaches for improvement of the crop potassium acquisition and utilization efficiency. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015,25:46-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.04.007
[8] 王毅, 武维华 . 植物钾高效的分子遗传机制. 植物学通报, 2009,44(1):27-36.
[9] Pettersson S, Jensén P . Variation among species and varieties in uptake and utilization of potassium. Plant and Soil, 1983,72(2):231-237.
doi: 10.1007/BF02181962
[10] 彭克勤, 胡笃敬 .空心莲子草K+吸收的动力学研究.植物生理与分子生物学学报 ,1986(2):81-87.
[11] Dunlop J, Tomkins B. Genotypic differences in potassium translocation in rye-grass.In:Wardlaw I F,Passioura J B.Transport and Transfer Processes in Plants.New York:Academic Press. 1976: 145-156.
[12] Glass A D M, Perley J E . Varietal difference in potassium uptake by barley. Plant Physiology, 1980,65(1):160-164.
doi: 10.1104/pp.65.1.160
[13] Woodend J J, Glass A D M, Person C O . Genetic variation in the uptake and utilization of potassium in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties grown under potassium stress.In:Gabelman W H,Loughman B C.Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition.Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff Publisher. 1987: 323-330.
[14] Siddiqi M Y, Glass A D M, Hsiao A I, et al. Genotypic differences among wild oat lines in potassium uptake and growth in relation to potassium supply. Plant and Soil, 1987,99(1):93-105.
doi: 10.1007/BF02370157
[15] 刘亨官, 刘振兴, 刘放新 .水稻耐低钾品种(系)鉴定筛选及其吸钾特性的研究.福建农业学报,1987(2):10-17.
[16] 刘国栋, 刘更另 .水稻基因型与钾素营养关系的研究.//中国土壤学会第五届青年土壤科学工作者学术讨论会论文编委会.现代土壤科学研究.北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1994: 535-538.
[17] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析(3版).北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 270-271.
[18] 宋秋来, 郭昕, 龚振平 , 等.土壤速效钾水平对大豆钾素积累及产量影响的研究.作物杂志,2014(2):106-109.
[19] 鲁如坤 . 我国土壤氮磷钾的基本状况. 土壤学报, 1989,26(3):280-286.
[20] 严小龙, 张福锁 .植物营养遗传学.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 1-17.
[21] 唐中凡 . 中国钾肥行业现状及发展趋势.新疆化工,2007(1):23-33.
[22] FAO( Ed) :Current World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2016. to 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unitied Nations, 2012.
[23] 侯新村, 范希峰, 武菊英 .氮磷钾肥对能源草柳枝稷苗期生长的影响.作物杂志,2012(3):114-118.
[24] Xie J C, Zhou J M . Advance in soil K research and K fertilizer application in China. Soils, 1999,31:244-254.
[25] Lew R R . Electrogenic transport properties of growing arabidopsis root hairs:the plasma membrane proton pump and potassium channels. Plant Physiology, 1991,97:1527-1534.
doi: 10.1104/pp.97.4.1527
[26] 刘大永, 别之龙, 万兆良 , 等. 钾在云南三种类土壤中的渗透流失. 核农学报, 1997,11(1):49-53.
[27] Helmut B, Hans E, Meinolf L . Water relationships and incorporation of 14C assimilates in tubers of potato plants differing in potassium nutrition . Plant Physiology, 1984,73(4):956-960.
[28] 王月福, 康玉洁, 王铭伦 , 等. 施钾对花生积累氮素来源和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2013,27(1):126-131.
[29] 黄雪丽, 胡应锋, 邹雪 , 等. 钾高效基因型马铃薯钾素利用效率机制研究. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(3):1094-1099.
[30] 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿 , 等. 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011,25(6):645-653.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2011.06.012
[31] 刘国栋, 刘更另 . 籼稻耐低钾基因型的筛选. 作物学报, 2002,28(2):161-166.
[32] Zhang G P, Chen J X, Eshetu A T . Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in wheat. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1999,54(1):41-48.
doi: 10.1023/A:1009708012381
[33] Ali L , Rahmatullah,Ranjha A M,et al.Differential potassium requirement and its substitution by sodiumin cotton genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2006,43(3-4):108-113.
[34] 张国新, 王省芬, 马峙英 , 等. 棉花抗枯、黄萎病品种苗期耐低钾种质筛选研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2009,10(4):583-588.
[35] Damon P M, Rengel Z . Wheat genotypes differ in potassium efficiency under glasshouse and field conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007,58(8):816-825.
doi: 10.1071/AR06402
[36] Chachar K M, Chachar Q I, Chachar N A , et al. Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 2015,11(4):839-853.
[37] George M S, Lu G, Zhou W . Genotypic variation of K uptake and utilization efficiency in sweet potato. Field Crops Research, 2002,77(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00043-6
[38] 台德卫, 张效忠, 苏泽胜 , 等. 全球水稻分子育种核心种质资源耐低钾品种的苗期筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004,5(4):356-359.
[39] Wild A, Skarlou V, Clement C R , et al. Comparison of potassium uptake by four plant species grown in sand and in flowing solution culture. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1974,11(2):801-812.
doi: 10.2307/2402229
[40] 唐忠厚, 张允刚, 魏猛 , 等. 耐低钾和钾高效型甘薯品种(系)的筛选及评价指标. 作物学报, 2014,40(3):542-549.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00542
[1] Wu Ruixiang, Yang Jianchun, Wang Liqin, Guo Xiujuan. Evaluation of the Adaptability of Flax Drought#br# Resistance Based on Multiple Statistics Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 10-16.
[2] Bin Zhang,Jinxiu Li,Zhen Wang,Hao Feng,Jinbang Li. Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Wheat Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 57-60.
[3] Xiujuan Guo,Xuejin Feng,Jianchun Yang,Ruixiang Wu,Liqin Wang. Effects of Interaction between Fertilizer and Density on the Yield and Economic Traits of Flax [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 135-138.
[4] Huan Wang,Bing Liu,Ziyu Bai,Junli Shi,Jinlin Ye. Effects of Laser Irradiation and Hybridization on the DNA Methylation Alteration in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 32-37.
[5] Shuyan Wang,Bing Han,Simin Zhou,Jun Xu. Correlation Analysis between the Expression of Stearoyl Acyl Carrier Protein Dehydrogenase Gene and the Soluble Sugar and Fat Content of Oil Flax [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 56-61.
[6] Hongmei Yuan,Wendong Guo,Lijuan Zhao,Ying Yu,Jianzhong Wu,Lili Cheng,Dongsheng Zhao,Qinghua Kang,Wengong Huang,Yubo Yao,Xixia Song,Weidong Jiang,Yan Liu,Tingfen Ma,Guangwen Wu,Fengzhi Guan. Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Glycosyltransferase Gene LuUGT72E1 in Flax [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 62-67.
[7] Xiuxia Cao,Aiping Qian,Wei Zhang,Chongqing Yang. The Effects of Different Amounts of Zinc Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield of Oil-Flax in Arid Land [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 167-170.
[8] Xiujuan Guo,Jianchun Yang,Xuejin Feng,Chao Jiang. Effects of Different Previous Crops in Rotation System on Dry Matter Accumulation,Quality,and Yield in Flax [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 164-167.
[9] Li Zhao,Limin Wang,Wei Zhao,Zhao Dang,Jianping Zhang,Zhanhai Dang. The Isolation of Crude Fat and Fatty Acid Components in a RIL Population of Oil Flax and Their Correlation Analysis [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 33-37.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .