Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 66-72.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.05.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Cultivation Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Rice

Gu Xiaoping,Yu Fei,Liang Ping,Chen Fang   

  1. Mountain Environment and Climate Research Institute of Guizhou Province/Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Climate and Resources,Guiyang 550002,Guizhou,China
  • Received:2017-05-17 Revised:2017-07-10 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-08-26

Abstract:

To explore the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice under different cultivation methods, the rice variety Yixiangyou 1108 was used as raw material and the growth period length, leaf area index, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, conductance to H2O, intercellular CO2concentration and yield structure were compared among four treatments: seedling raising in dryland with plastic mulch culture, seedling raising in dryland with narrow row culture, semiarid nursery with plastic mulch culture and semiarid nursery with narrow row culture. Results showed that: (1) the length of whole growth period of rice was about 155-159d, which was not significantly different among the four treatments. (2) Leaf area index in each growth period showed a good level under of seedling raising in dryland with plastic mulch culture, semiarid nursery with plastic mulch culture treatments, chich was good for the leaf growth. (3) The photosynthetic rate of rice reached the peak at jointing stage, light response curve was basically the same at heading and jointing stages, the change of stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were basically the same as the net photosynthetic rate, the intercellular CO2 concentration and effective radiation both decreased gradually at first and then was flat after reaching a certain value. (4) The yield of rice under seedling raising in dryland with plastic mulch culture was 7 845.9kg/hm2, which was the highest among the four treatments, increasing by 14.31% compared with that under seedling raising in dryland with narrow row. In conclusion that seedling raising in dryland and plastic mulch culture was the best rice cultivation way, followed by seedling raising in dryland with narrow row culture.

Key words: Rice, Cultivation mode, Leaf area index, Photosynthetic characteristics, Yield structure

"

处理
Treatment
播种期
Sowing
date
出苗期
Emergence
date
移栽期
Transplanting
period
拔节期
Jointing stage
孕穗期
Booting
stage
抽穗期
Heading
stage
乳熟期
Milk
stage
蜡熟期
Dough
stage
成熟期Maturation
period
收获期
Harvest
stage
全生育期(d)
Whole growth
period
A1B1 4/9 4/17 5/28 7/5 7/23 8/19 8/28 9/6 9/15 9/24 159
A1B2 4/9 4/17 5/28 7/5 7/23 8/19 8/28 9/5 9/14 9/24 158
A2B1 4/9 3/36 5/28 7/3 7/21 8/17 8/27 9/4 9/13 9/24 157
A2B2 4/9 4/16 5/28 7/3 7/21 8/16 8/27 9/3 9/11 9/24 155

Table 2

Leaf area index of rice under different cultivation methods"

处理
Treatment
分蘖期Tillering period 拔节期Jointing stage 孕穗期Booting stage
叶长(cm)
Leaf-length
叶宽(cm)
Blade width
LAI 叶长(cm)
Leaf-length
叶宽(cm)
Blade width
LAI 叶长(cm)
Leaf-length
叶宽(cm)
Blade width
LAI
A1B1 51.46±0.05a 1.30±0.03b 4.42±0.041a 51.40±0.68a 1.98±0.82a 6.60±0.65a 50.47±0.47a 1.62±0.018a 6.35±0.049a
A1B2 42.23±0.37d 1.22±0.03c 3.34±0.039c 48.40±0.41b 1.61±0.27b 5.39±0.26ab 45.90±0.52c 1.52±0.023b 5.28±0.032c
A2B1 49.33±0.05b 1.42±0.01a 4.46±0.027a 51.58±0.13a 1.68±0.31b 5.76±0.63a 48.97±0.15b 1.45±0.015c 5.73±0.026b
A2B2 45.51±0.06c 1.33±0.02b 3.81±0.035b 44.52±0.87b 1.44±0.37c 4.42±0.34b 43.63±0.33d 1.43±0.006c 4.30±0.023d

Fig.1

The trend of light response curve of rice at jointing stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.2

The trend of light response curve of rice at heading stage under different cultivation methods"

Table 3

Effects of different cultivation methods on light response curves parameters of rice leaves"

生育期
Growth stage
处理
Treatment
LSP
[μmol/(m2·s)]
LCP
[μmol/(m2·s)]
Q
[μmol(CO2)/(m2·s)]
RD
[μmol(CO2)/(m2·s)]
Amax
[μmol/(m2·s)]
K
拔节期 A1B1 744.972±2.96a 64.292±0.58a 0.072±0.001d 4.557±0.009b 49.081±0.002a 0.105±0.004d
Jointing stage A1B2 484.165±1.53b 19.184±0.33d 0.092±0.001c 1.764±0.002d 42.770±0.021b 0.122±0.003c
A2B1 460.751±0.88c 35.432±0.34c 0.100±0.004b 3.643±0.002c 42.432±0.002b 0.898±0.006a
A2B2 435.896±1.20d 39.241±0.42b 0.125±0.002a 4.955±0.001a 49.532±0.001a 0.188±0.006b
抽穗期 A1B1 226.227±0.58d 24.761±0.30b 0.066±0.001b 4.588±0.001a 15.267±0.004c 0.798±0.033c
Heading stage A1B2 235.528±1.53c 15.267±0.37c 0.089±0.003a 4.341±0.002b 19.710±0.028a 1.000±0.004a
A2B1 365.931±1.89b 36.307±0.42a 0.058±0.007c 2.129±0.002c 19.385±0.003a 0.804±0.015b
A2B2 439.721±0.88a 36.957±0.33a 0.043±0.002d 1.587±0.001d 17.235±0.004b 0.807±0.018ab

Fig.3

Stomatal conductance of rice at jointing stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.4

Stomatal conductance of rice at heading stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.5

Transpiration rate of rice at jointing stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.6

Transpiration rate of rice at heading stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.7

Intercellular CO2 concentration of rice at jointing stage under different cultivation methods"

Fig.8

Intercellular CO2 concentration of rice at heading stage under different cultivation methods"

Table 4

Effects of different cultivation methods on yield components of rice"

处理
Treatment
株高(cm)
Plant height
穗长(cm)
Spike length
有效穗数
(穗/hm2)
Effective panicles
per unit area
穗粒数
(粒/穗)
Grain number
per ear
实粒数
(粒/穗)
Grain
number
结实率(%)
Setting
percentage
千粒重(g)
1000-grain
weight
单位面积产量
(kg/hm2)
Equivalent
hectare yield
比对照
增减(%)
Increase than control
A1B1 118.6±0.39a 27.4±0.09a 180.0±0.153a 231.2±0.12a 190.8±0.12a 82.53±0.024b 29.2±0.06a 7 845.9±0.03a 14.31
A1B2 114.2±0.23b 25.0±0.17b 178.5±0.115b 190.6±0.21c 147.6±0.15c 77.44±0.044c 28.7±0.03b 6 863.7±0.12c -
A2B1 113.6±0.21b 27.2±0.12a 175.5±0.116b 203.6±0.18b 174.6±0.21b 85.76±0.021a 29.0±0.02a 7 564.35±0.09b 10.21
A2B2 110.2±0.12c 24.6±0.09c 169.5±0.058c 188.6±0.12d 140.8±0.09d 74.66±0.042d 28.5±0.09c 6 301.05±0.02d -8.19
[1] 唐海明, 肖小平, 逄焕成 , 等. 双季稻区不同栽培方式对水稻光合生理特性、粒叶比及产量的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2015,20(4):48-56.
[2] 亚当 , Adam.不同覆盖材料对旱作稻田土壤水分和水稻生长的影响. 南宁:广西大学, 2013.
[3] 于晓琦 . 旱作水稻微灌技术试验研究. 银川:宁夏大学, 2013.
[4] 邓飞, 王丽, 刘利 , 等. 不同生态条件下栽培方式对水稻干物质生产和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(10):1930-1942.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01930
[5] 李杰, 张洪程, 常勇 , 等. 不同种植方式水稻高产栽培条件下的光合物质生产特征研究. 作物学报, 2011,37(7):1235-1248.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01235
[6] 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙 , 等. 不同栽培方式对水稻产量和物质生产特征影响. 中国稻米, 2012,18(5):15-19.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2012.05.005
[7] 闫小红, 尹建华, 段世华 , 等. 四种水稻品种的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合. 生态学杂志, 2013,32(3):604-610.
[8] 刘宇锋 . 不同灌溉方式与施肥下水稻生理、生长和土壤微生物生态研究. 南宁:广西大学, 2012.
[9] 王唯逍, 刘小军, 田永超 , 等. 不同土壤水分处理对水稻光合特性及产量的影响. 生态学报, 2012,32(22):7053-7060.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201110121503
[10] 戴红燕, 张荣萍, 华劲松 , 等. 不同栽培方式对粳型巨胚稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(3):179-183.
[11] 徐俊增, 彭世彰, 魏征 , 等. 不同供氮水平及水分调控条件下水稻光合作用光响应特征. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(2):72-76.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.02.014
[12] 邹君, 谢小立, 王凯荣 . 不同水分灌溉下水稻光合特征分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2003,11(1):23-25.
[13] 于艳梅, 徐俊增, 彭世彰 , 等. 不同水分条件下水稻光合作用的光响应模型的比较.节水灌溉, 2012(10):30-33.
[14] 冯世座 . 不同水稻品种冠层内各叶位叶片光合特征和生理生化特性. 金华:浙江师范大学, 2013.
[15] 郑飞翔, 王效科, 张巍巍 , 等. 臭氧胁迫对水稻光合作用与产量的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(11):2217-2223.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2009.11.001
[16] 陈芳, 谷晓平, 于飞 , 等. 不同栽培方式对玉米光合特性及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(10):23-30.
[17] 杨连新, 王余龙, 黄建晔 , 等. 开放式空气CO2浓度增高对水稻生长发育影响的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2006,17(7):1331-1337.
[18] 王志军, 谢宗铭, 田又升 , 等. 膜下滴灌和淹灌对水稻叶片PSⅡ叶绿素荧光光响应曲线的影响. 华北农学报, 2015,30(6):216-225.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.06.033
[19] 汤亮, 李艳大, 张玉屏 , 等. 水稻冠层光分布模拟与应用. 中国水稻科学, 2011,25(4):427-434.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.04.013
[20] 邓仲篪 . 水稻光合日变化与内生节奏的关系. 中国水稻科学, 1994,8(1):9-14.
[21] 王勋, 戴廷波, 姜东 , 等. 不同生态环境下水稻基因型产量形成与源库特性的比较研究. 应用生态学报, 2005,16(4):615-619.
[22] 赵玉国, 王新忠, 吴沿友 , 等. 高温胁迫对拔节期水稻光合作用和蒸腾速率的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2012,40(1):41-43.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2012.01.013
[23] 陈林, 王芬 . 水稻光合特性研究综述. 高原山地气象研究, 2010,30(4):89-92.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2184.2010.04.016
[24] 吴桂成, 张洪程, 钱银飞 , 等. 粳型超级稻产量构成因素协同规律及超高产特征的研究. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(2):266-276.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.02.006
[1] Ji Shengdong, Li Peng, Li Jiangwei, Song Liumin, . Analysis of Peroxidase Zymogram and Genetic#br# Effects between Rice Lines and Their#br# Parents During Grain Filling [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 17-20.
[2] Ma Mengli, Zheng Yun, Zhou Xiaomei, . Genetic Diversity Analysis of Red Rice from#br# Hani’s Terraced Fields in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 21-26.
[3] Chen Yingying, Wangxu Yiling, Zhu Yuhan, . Hyperspectral Estimation of Nitrogen#br# Content in Rice Panicle [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 116-120.
[4] Xiaoyu Liang, Chunyu Lin, Shumei Ma, Yang Wang. Mining Elite Alleles for Germination Ability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Salt and Alkaline Stress [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 48-52.
[5] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[6] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[7] Bo Zeng. Renovation of Main Cultivated Rice Varieties in China in the Past 30 Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 1-7.
[8] Chen He,Guiping Zheng,Haicheng Zhao,Liqiang Chen,Hongyu Li,Yandong Lü,Jiang Song. Effects of Increasing Humic Acid but Reducing Fertilization on Panicle Traits and Yield of Rice in Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 129-134.
[9] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[10] Yong Cui. The Research Progress of Water-Dry Rotation Methods in Paddy Field [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 8-14.
[11] Zhiqiang Tang,Liqiang Dong,Rui Li,Liying Zhang,Na He,Yuedong Li. Effects of Nitrogen and Soil Type on Seedling Quality and Nutrient Absorption in Rice [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 141-147.
[12] Jiao Zhang,Qi Wu,Yufei Zhou,Yitao Wang,Ruidong Zhang,Ruidong Huang. Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 148-154.
[13] Fang Chen,Yupeng Liu,Xiaoping Gu,Jiamin Hu,Fei Yu,Bo Zhang. Effects of Low Temperature on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 155-161.
[14] Lili Zhang,Yizhou Zhao,Xin Li,Ting Mao,Yan Liu,Zhan Zhang,Shanjun Ni,Fucai Liu. Mutant Analysis on Quality Trait of Different Japonica Rice Progenies Induced by 60Co-γ Ray Irradiation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 51-56.
[15] Li Zhang,Zantang Li,Shiyin Wang,Yanchao Ma,Yang Dongfang,Xueyong Li,Jiang Xu. Physiological and Genetic Analysis of Rice Mutant osnad1 Defective in Nitrogen Absorption [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 68-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .