Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 57-65.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.06.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Changes of Cooking and Eating Quality and Its Correlation with Mineral Element Content in Polished Rice under Different Nitrogen Grain Fertilizer Levels

Shi Lü,Xue Yaguang,Wei Yafeng,Li Bo,Shi Xiaoxu,Liu Jian   

  1. Jiangsu Yanjiang Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Recycling Agriculture of Nantong, Rugao 226541, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2019-08-07 Revised:2019-10-23 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-11
  • Contact: Jian Liu

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

175

Abstract:

In order to study the changes of mineral elements content and cooking and eating quality of polished rice under different nitrogen grain fertilizer levels, and determine the correlation between protein, cooking and eating quality and mineral elements. Yangdao 6 and Nanjing 9108 were used as test materials, and three levels of nitrogen grain fertilizer were set, as the control (N1: 0kg/hm 2), medium nitrogen grain fertilizer (N2: 90kg/hm 2) and high nitrogen grain fertilizer (N3: 150kg/hm 2), and the content of mineral elements and the cooking and eating quality of the rice were measured. The results showed that the nitrogen content in polished rice increased with the increasing of nitrogen grain fertilizer level. With the increasing of nitrogen grain fertilizer level, the content of major elements P, K and secondary elements Ca, Mg decreased significantly, while the content of trace elements Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu increased significantly. Simultaneously, the Mg/K, Mg/(N?AC?K) and amylose content also showed a decreasing trend, and the protein content increased significantly. In addition, the peak viscosity, hot viscosity and breakdown of the RVA spectrum eigenvalues gradually decreased while the consistence and setback showed an increasing trend, and the taste value deteriorated significantly at the same time. Correlation analysis found that the protein content was significantly or extremely significantly positively correlated with trace elements, and had significant or extremely significant negative correlation with major and medium elements and taste value. Mg/K and Mg/(N?AC?K) were closely related to the characteristic values of RVA, which were beneficial to the improvement of cooking and eating quality. It can be seen that in the production, the nitrogen fertilizer should be controlled in the appropriate range according to local conditions, so as to improve the mineral nutrient content and cooking and eating quality of rice.

Key words: Rice, Polished rice, Nitrogen grain fertilizer, Mineral element, Protein, Cooking and eating quality

Table 1

Varieties difference of Mg, K, N content and AC content in polished rice under different nitrogen grain fertilizer levels"

品种Variety 处理Treatment Mg(μg/g) K(μg/g) AC(%) N(%) Mg/K Mg/(N·AC·K)
扬稻6号 N1 252.89±1.06a 761.52±2.96a 17.36±0.13a 1.05±0.03c 0.3321±0.0027a 0.0182±0.0005a
Yangdao 6 N2 182.53±2.91b 572.84±11.78b 16.98±0.15b 1.39±0.11b 0.3187±0.0015b 0.0135±0.0001b
N3 167.84±0.16c 560.10±0.94b 16.49±0.10c 1.54±0.08a 0.2997±0.0015c 0.0118±0.0002c
南粳9108 N1 236.28±1.93a 666.11±0.74a 19.21±0.20a 1.09±0.04c 0.3547±0.0025a 0.0170±0.0002a
Nanjing 9108 N2 204.78±0.46b 625.38±1.14b 18.14±0.19b 1.31±0.12b 0.3275±0.0001b 0.0137±0.0001b
N3 178.53±0.88c 606.91±1.02b 17.46±0.08c 1.49±0.21a 0.2942±0.0010c 0.0113±0.0001c
F值Fvalue 品种Variety 37.31** 0.21ns 263.61** 3.24ns 78.40** 13.16*
氮素粒肥
Nitrogen grain fertilizer		 2 270.47** 803.58** 86.09** 254.79** 760.84** 612.62**
品种×氮素粒肥
Variety×Nitrogen grain fertilizer		 167.22** 278.71** 10.51* 4.68ns 69.24** 9.88*

Table 2

Varieties difference of P, Ca content and trace elements Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu content in polished rice under different nitrogen grain fertilizer levels μg/g"

品种Variety 处理Treatment Fe Mn Zn Cu Ca P
扬稻6号 N1 12.86±0.12c 7.04±0.11c 11.73±0.02c 5.54±0.06c 127.41±0.76a 929.54±0.83a
Yangdao 6 N2 19.82±0.45b 7.35±0.07b 12.77±0.32b 6.29±0.03b 115.12±2.67b 907.60±2.10b
N3 29.48±0.15a 8.07±0.01a 16.01±0.02a 7.58±0.01a 105.98±0.62c 849.91±1.06c
南粳9108 N1 10.66±0.04c 9.34±0.04b 10.52±0.01c 4.97±0.02c 86.08±1.25a 983.87±0.30a
Nanjing 9108 N2 13.42±0.05b 9.51±0.07b 13.44±0.08b 5.29±0.04b 78.06±0.21b 969.48±7.54b
N3 20.99±0.09a 11.91±0.06a 14.43±0.03a 5.72±0.02a 74.89±1.27c 897.38±4.17c
F值Fvalue 品种Variety 2 359.38** 5 235.50** 82.13** 4 181.43** 145.50** 68.86**
氮素粒肥Nitrogen grain fertilizer 4 511.92** 870.11** 913.51** 2 104.00** 9.88* 58.82**
品种×氮素粒肥
Variety×Nitrogen grain fertilizer		 248.52** 198.89** 79.06** 465.17** 0.96ns 0.40ns

Table 3

Varieties difference of RVA profile characteristics in polished rice under different nitrogen grain fertilizer levels"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 最高粘度(cp)
Peak viscosity		 热浆粘度(cp)
Hot viscosity		 崩解值(cp)
Breakdown		 最终粘度(cp)
Final viscosity		 回复值(cp)
Consistence		 消减值(cp)
Setback		 峰值时间(min)
Peak time		 糊化温度(℃)
Pasting temperature
扬稻6号 N1 2 640±12.02a 1 855±5.66a 785±17.68a 3 129±0.71a 1 274±6.36b 489±11.31c 6.43±0.03c 73.17±0.03b
Yangdao 6 N2 2 515±11.31b 1 752±8.49b 763±19.80a 3 083±14.14b 1 331±5.66a 568±25.46b 6.53±0.03b 74.94±0.21a
N3 2 304±7.07c 1 619±0.71c 686±6.36b 2 963±1.41c 1 345±0.71a 659±5.66a 6.69±0.00a 75.00±0.13a
南粳9108 N1 3 167±1.41a 2 249±2.83a 918±4.24a 3 412±7.07a 1 163±9.90b 245±5.66c 6.35±0.07c 74.13±0.11b
Nanjing 9108 N2 3 012±1.42b 2 171±2.12b 842±3.54b 3 341±5.66b 1 171±3.54b 329±7.07b 6.49±0.01b 74.15±0.07b
N3 2 811±3.54c 2 028±7.78c 783±11.31c 3 229±2.12c 1 201±9.90a 418±1.41a 6.59±0.04a 75.65±0.07a
F值Fvalue 品种Variety 13 828.68** 16 811.97** 212.04** 4 506.91** 1 220.68** 1 175.28** 9.46* 16.75**
氮素粒肥
Nitrogen grain
fertilizer		 2 144.96** 1 798.08** 91.71** 655.47** 64.09** 198.00** 26.26** 204.42**
品种×氮素粒肥
Variety×Nitrogen
grain fertilizer		 4.31ns 5.16ns 5.18* 3.57ns 13.78** 0.04ns 0.23ns 65.95**

Fig.1

Changes of protein content and taste value in polished rice under different nitrogen grain fertilizer levels Different small letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 probability level between treatments under the same variety"

Table 4

Correlation analysis between protein content and different mineral elements in polished rice"

品种Variety Mg K Fe Mn Zn Cu Ca P
扬稻6号Yangdao 6 -0.988** -0.968** 0.946** 0.878* 0.859* 0.924** -0.874* -0.843*
南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 -0.989** -0.981** 0.938** 0.854* 0.970** 0.980** -0.967** -0.892*

Table 5

Correlation analysis between Mg/K, Mg/(N·AC·K) and characteristic values of RVA"

性状
Trait		 Mg/K Mg/（N·AC·K）
扬稻6号Yangdao 6 南粳9108 Nanjing 9108 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 南粳9108 Nanjing 9108
食味值Taste value 0.909* 0.980** 0.986** 0.999**
最高粘度Peak viscosity 0.989** 0.999** 0.907* 0.986**
热浆粘度Hot viscosity 0.998** 0.991** 0.938** 0.968**
崩解值Breakdown 0.920** 0.988** 0.793 0.993**
最终粘度Final viscosity 0.983** 0.997** 0.857* 0.972**
回复值Consistence -0.897* -0.891* -0.996** -0.874*
消减值Setback -0.969** -0.996** -0.933** -0.995**
糊化温度Pasting temperature -0.821* -0.891* -0.964** -0.819*
[1] 余叔文, 汤章城 . 植物生理与分子生物学. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[2] Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.
[3] Wang J B . Ca 2+ ultrastructural distribution in root apical cells of wheat under aluminum stress . Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2000,65(2):222-227.
doi: 10.1007/s0012800118 pmid: 27658395
[4] 江川, 李秀平, 谢冬容 , 等. 稻米矿质营养元素的研究进展. 福建稻麦科技, 2007,25(2):40-43.
[5] 郑金贵 . 农产品的品质—营养与保健. 福建农业科技,1998(增刊):11-15.
[6] 王夔 . 生命科学中的微量元素. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1991: 115-120.
[7] 吴求亮, 杨玉爱 . 微量元素与生物健康. 贵阳: 贵州科学出版社, 2000: 12-110.
[8] 苗健 . 微量元素与相关疾病. 郑州: 河南医科大学出版社, 1997: 34-35.
[9] 裘凌沧 . 为提高民族素质, 开拓食物优异种质资源. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1992: 1-4.
[10] Welch R M, Graham R D . Breeding for micronutrients in staple food crops from a human nutrition perspective. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004,55:353-364.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh064 pmid: 14739261
[11] 王爽, 赵宏伟, 姚辰 , 等. 氮肥用量和插秧密度对寒地粳稻籽粒转氨酶活性及蛋白质含量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料,2015(2):70-77.
[12] 韩宝吉, 曾祥明, 卓光毅 , 等. 氮肥施用措施对湖北中稻产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(4):842-850.
[13] 石吕 . 水稻精米蛋白质含量与稻米品质变化的关系. 扬州:扬州大学, 2017.
[14] 杨世佳, 韩证仿, 刘美佳 , 等. 氮肥用量对江淮粳稻稻米品质及主要矿质元素含量的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2012,28(4):703-708.
[15] 袁继超, 刘丛军, 俄胜哲 , 等. 施氮量和穗粒肥比例对稻米营养品质及中微量元素含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(2):183-187.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0207
[16] 俄胜哲, 袁继超, 丁志勇 , 等. 氮磷钾肥对稻米铁、锌、铜、锰、镁、钙含量和产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2005,19(5):434-440.
[17] 赵宁春, 张其芳, 程方民 , 等. 氮、磷、锌营养对水稻籽粒植酸含量的影响及与几种矿质元素间的相关性. 中国水稻科学, 2007,21(2):185-190.
[18] 张国发, 王绍华, 尤娟 , 等. 结实期相对高温对稻米淀粉粘滞性谱及镁、钾含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(9):1959-1964.
[19] 曾亚文, 刘家富, 汪禄祥 , 等. 云南稻核心种质矿质元素含量及其变种类型. 中国水稻科学, 2003,17(1):25-30.
[20] 袁可能 . 植物营养元素的土壤化学. 北京: 科技出版社, 1983.
[21] 郝虎林, 魏幼璋, 杨肖娥 , 等. 供氮水平对稻株铁、锰、铜、锌含量和稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007,21(4):411-416.
[22] 张睿, 郭月霞, 南春芹 . 不同施肥水平下小麦籽粒中部分微量元素含量的研究. 西北植物学报, 2004,24(1):125-129.
[23] 湖南省优质稻生产技术体系及其应用理论研究协作组. 施肥对稻米品质和产量影响的研究. 湖南农学院学报, 1989,15(3):1-5.
[24] 熊飞, 王忠, 顾蕴洁 , 等. 施氮时期对扬稻6号颖果发育及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007,21(6):637-642.
[25] Welch R M . Effects of nutrient deficiencies on seed production and quality. Advanced Plant Nutrition, 1986,2:205-247.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210899 pmid: 30673769
[26] Welch R M . Micronutrient nutrition of plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1995,14:49-82.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01369 pmid: 31803198
[27] 张北赢, 陈天林, 王兵 . 长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(11):182-187.
[28] 张国印, 孙世友, 张志鹏 , 等. 施肥耕作等农业措施对土壤质量的影响. 河北农业科学, 2000,4(3):16-22.
[29] 刘树堂, 赵永厚, 孙玉林 , 等. 25年长期定位施肥对非石灰性潮土重金属状况的影响. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(1):164-167.
[30] 徐玲, 张杨珠, 曽希柏 , 等. 不同施肥结构对稻田土壤肥力质量的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,32(4):362-367.
[31] 杨丽娟, 李天来, 付时丰 . 长期施肥对菜园土壤微量元素有效性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(4):549-553.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0415
[32] 崔德杰 . 长期施肥及覆膜栽培对土壤锌铜锰的形态及有效性影响的研究. 土壤学报, 1998,35(2):260-265.
[33] Gregorio G B, Senadhira D, Htut T , et al. Improving iron and zinc value of rice for human nutrition. Agriculture Development, 1999,23(9):77-81.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00121 pmid: 25814994
[34] 周崇松, 刘文宏, 范必威 , 等. 川稻中铜铁锌锰四种微量元素的研究. 广东微量元素科学, 2003,10(10):56-59.
[35] 汤海涛, 马国辉, 廖育林 , 等. 土壤营养元素对稻米品质的影响. 农业现代化研究, 2009,30(6):735-738.
[36] 陈莹莹 . 江苏早熟晚粳品种稻米品质对氮肥的响应及其类型. 扬州:扬州大学, 2012.
[37] 张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根 , 等. 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003,36(7):800-806.
[38] 吕川根, 徐耀垣 . 氮素影响稻米品质的机理初探. 江苏农业学报, 1990,6(3):64-65.
[39] 胡月, 郭晓红, 李猛 , 等. 栽培模式对寒地水稻产量和营养品质的影响. 河南农业科学, 2019,48(3):17-24.
[40] 郭咏梅, 李华慧, 李少明 , 等. 糙米蛋白质含量与矿质元素含量的相关分析及NIRS模型的建立. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013,14(1):173-178.
[41] 曾亚文, 申时全, 汪禄祥 , 等. 云南稻种矿质元素含量与形态及品质性状的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2005,19(2):127-131.
[42] 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽 , 等. 稻米蒸煮食味品质特性间的相关性研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2001,32(1):1-7.
[43] 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽 , 等. 黑龙江省稻米蒸煮食味品质特性的品种间变异研究. 黑龙江农业科学,2000(1):1-4.
[44] 王纪华, 崛野俊郎 . 中日不同来源粟品种籽粒中氮素及矿质元素含量的比较. 作物学报, 1999,25(5):654-656.
[45] Toshiro H . Relationship between mineral element content and rice eating quality. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1990,59:605-611.
[46] Toshiro H, Takashi H, Noriharu A . Phosphorus,potassium and magnesium contents and their balance in cereal grain. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1983,52(4):461-467.
doi: 10.1626/jcs.52.461
[1] Guo Mingming,Fan Jiwei,Wang Kangjun,Sun Zhongwei,Zhang Guangxu,Chen Feng,Li Qiang,Li Jun,Zhang Yueshu,Zhao Guangcai. Difference of Grain Quality of Three Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Tidal Saline Soil [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 134-139.
[2] Wang Lina,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. The Effects of Topdressing Boron Fertilizer on the Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 94-98.
[3] Li Hu,Chen Chuanhua,Liu Guanglin,Wu Zishuai,Huang Qiuyao,Luo Qunchang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate and Planting Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Guiyu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 99-103.
[4] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104-108.
[5] Li Song,Zhang Shicheng,Dong Yunwu,Shi Delin,Shi Yundong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rice Varieties in Tengchong, Yunnan Based on SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 15-21.
[6] Duan Licheng,Guo Ruige,Zhang Kun,Zhang Qiming,Liu Dan,Yang Aiping,Gui Baoyu,Jin Guohua,Cai Zhe. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Dry Matter Accumulation of Direct-Seeded Early Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 186-191.
[7] Li Guannan,Huang Lihua,Zhang Lu,Chen Jiaxing,Yang Jingmin. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Straw Returning on Nutrition and Taste Quality of Rice in Saline-Sodic Soil of Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 82-88.
[8] Ma Fanfan,Xing Sulin,Gan Manqin,Liu Peishi,Huang Yu,Gan Xiaoyu,Ma Youhua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substituting for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Soil Fertility and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 89-96.
[9] Zhou Yanzhi,Wang Wenxia,Chen Liming,Zeng Yongjun,Tan Xueming,Hu Shuixiu,Shi Qinghua,Pan Xiaohua,Zeng Yanhua. Progress on Weed Occurrence and Control in Direct Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 1-9.
[10] Xia Yuanye,Du Zhimin,Yang Yuchen,Gong Yanlong,Yan Zhiqiang,Xu Hai. Effects of Epi-Brassinolide Treatments on Floret Opening Time of Indica and Japonica Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 139-147.
[11] Huang Wan,Li Chenxi,Tan Xueming,Zeng Yongjun,Wu Ziming,Liu Taoju,Shi Qinghua,Pan Xiaohua,Zeng Yanhua. Effects of Different Direct Seeding Methods on Growth and Development Characteristics and Yield of Late-Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 159-163.
[12] Cui Yuefeng,Sun Guocai,Lu Tiegang,Wang Guiyan,Wang Jian,Huang Wenjia,Luan Helin. Effects of Different Straw Return Modes on Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization of Super Rice in Northern China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 164-169.
[13] Gu Jiaojiao,Hu Bowen,Jia Yan,Sha Hanjing,Li Jingwei,Ma Chao,Zhao Hongwei. Effects of Salt Stress on Root Related Traits and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 176-182.
[14] Wang Yu,Ma Hui,Xu Xue,Qin Ruiying,Yang Jianbo,Wang Xiufeng. Screening and Application of Functional Insertion-Deletion Markers (InDel) in Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 84-93.
[15] Zhou Yili,Zhang Yaling,Zhao Hongsen,Jin Xuehui. Molecular Detection and Analysis of Rice Blast Resistance Genes in Main Rice Varieties in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 172-177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong. Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 1 -8 .
[2] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104 -108 .
[3] Li Song,Zhang Shicheng,Dong Yunwu,Shi Delin,Shi Yundong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rice Varieties in Tengchong, Yunnan Based on SSR Markers[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 15 -21 .
[4] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1 -7 .
[5] Cao Tingjie,Zhang Yu’e,Hu Weiguo,Yang Jian,Zhao Hong,Wang Xicheng,Zhou Yanjie,Zhao Qunyou,Li Huiqun. Detection of Three Dwarfing Genes in the New Wheat Cultivars (Lines) Developed in South Huang-Huai Valley and Its Association with Agronomic Traits[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 14 -19 .
[6] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20 -26 .
[7] Wang Yongxing,Shan Feibiao,Yan Wenzhi,Du Ruixia,Yang Qinfang,Liu Chunhui,Bai Lihua. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Code Classification Based on DUS Testing in Sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 22 -27 .
[8] Shi Zhaokang,Zhao Zequn,Zhang Yuanhang,Xu Shiying,Wang Ning,Wang Weijie,Cheng Hao,Xing Guofang,Feng Wanjun. The Response and Cluster Analysis of Biomass Accumulation and Root Morphology of Maize Inbred Lines Seedlings to Two Nitrogen Application Levels[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 28 -36 .
[9] Zhang Zhongwei,Yang Hailong,Fu Jun,Xie Wenjin,Feng Guang. Genetic Analysis of the Kernel Length of Maize with Mixed Model of Major Gene Plus Polygene[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 37 -40 .
[10] Zhang Yongfang,Qian Xiaona,Wang Runmei,Shi Pengqing,Yang Rong. Identification of Drought Resistance of Different Soybean Materials and Screening of Drought Tolerant Varieties[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 41 -45 .