Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 98-103.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.01.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Irrigation Amounts and Spraying Humic Acid on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Oat

Wang Qi(), Sun Wen, Wu Junying, Liu Jinghui, Zhao Baoping()   

  1. Agricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University/Inner Mongolia Coarse Grain Engineering Research Center, Hohhot 010019, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2020-04-17 Revised:2020-07-30 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-23
  • Contact: Zhao Baoping E-mail:512774967@qq.com;zhaobaoping82@163.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

232

Abstract:

The purpose of the study was to clarify the effects of spraying humic acid on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of oats under different irrigation amounts. Under the condition of rain-proof shed pond cultivation, using Mengnongdayan No.1 as the test material, three different irrigation amounts (60, 120 and 180mm), and three spraying treatments of spraying humic acid (HA), spraying water (WT) and no spraying (CK) at booting stage and flowering stage were set to analysis and determine the plant morphology, photosynthetic parameters, yield components, and other indicators. The results showed that under 60mm and 120mm irrigation rates, HA treatment significantly increased plant height, leaf area per plant, stomatal conductance (Gs), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and transpiration rate (Tr) (P < 0.05). The CO2 concentration (Ci) decreased, the increase of each index under 60mm irrigation amount was higher than that of 120mm; Pn increased by 43.4% and 36.3% on average, leaf area per plant increased by 54.3% and 34.7% on average (P < 0.05); Grain yield of HA treatment significantly increased under 60mm and 120mm irrigation amounts by 22.7% and 18.0%, respectively. Ear length and grain number per panicle increased significantly (P < 0.05); while WT treatment had no significant effects on morphology, photosynthetic parameters, yield and other indicators. With an irrigation amount of 180mm, the photosynthetic rate and leaf area per plant under HA treatment were significantly increased compared with CK and WT, and the increase of grain yield was not significant. In summary, spraying humic acid under low irrigation can improve the photosynthetic capacity of oat, thereby promoting grain filling and increasing grain yield.

Key words: Oat, Irrigation amount, Humic acid, Photosynthetic characteristics, Yield

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on plant height of oat HA: Humic acid, WT: Water, CK: Control; Different lowercase letters indicate that the three different spray treatments have significant differences (P < 0.05) under the same irrigation amount, different capital letters indicate extremely significant differences (P < 0.01) under the same spray treatment with three different irrigation rates. The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on the leaf area per plant of oat"

Fig.3

Effects of different treatments on photosynthetic indexes of oat"

Fig.4

Effects of different treatments on the relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) of oat leaves"

Table 1

Effects of humic acid spraying with different irrigation amounts on oat yield and its components"

灌水量
Irrigation
amount		 处理
Treatment		 单位面积穗数
Number of spikes
per square meter		 小穗数
Spikelet
number		 穗长
Panicle length
(cm)		 穗粒数
Grain number
per panicle		 千粒重
1000-kernel
weight (g)		 籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg/hm2)
60mm CK 232.0±36.7Bb 17.1±1.4Aa 20.6±2.0Ba 61.7±1.8Bb 13.7±0.3Ba 2 526.59±155.9Bb
WT 264.0±8.0Bb 18.2±2.8Aa 21.0±2.1Ba 70.3±5.4Cab 14.7±0.6Aa 2 764.66±202.2Bab
HA 344.0±13.9Aa 20.6±2.0Aa 23.5±1.5Ba 81.1±6.4Ba 14.9±2.0Aa 3 099.10±249.7Ba
120mm CK 257.3±18.0ABb 17.8±1.1Aa 22.7±0.3ABc 72.9±8.9Ab 14.6±0.7ABa 2 870.21±175.5Bb
WT 278.7±33.3ABb 19.7±1.8Aa 24.0±0.9Ab 78.3±4.4Bb 15.5±1.7Aa 3 101.85±237.1ABab
HA 354.0±16.4Aa 21.2±1.7Aa 25.4±0.5ABa 96.5±5.2Ba 16.1±1.6Aa 3 387.57±128.1ABa
180mm CK 318.7±36.1Aa 19.4±1.2Aa 24.7±0.9Aa 95.3±0.6Ab 15.5±0.7Aa 3 301.85±240.3Aa
WT 326.7±28.1Aa 20.4±1.3Aa 25.7±0.9Aa 100.7±4.5Ab 15.7±0.8Aa 3 370.21±128.3Aa
HA 357.3±11.7Aa 21.9±2.3Aa 26.7±1.8Aa 107.1±2.4Aa 16.4±1.8Aa 3 605.60±279.6Aa
[1] 薛新平, 刘洁. 水分胁迫对苹果幼苗生理特性的影响. 北方园艺, 2017(20):72-76.
[2] Garg B K, Kathjus S, Burman U. Influence of water stress on water relations,photosynthetic parameters and nitrogen metabolism of moth bean genotypes. Biologia Plantarum, 2011,44:289-292.
[3] 白海波, 吕学莲, 惠建, 等. 灌水量对宁夏春小麦光合特性及产量构成因素的影响. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(34):9-14.
[4] 梁太波, 王振林, 刘娟, 等. 灌溉和旱作条件下腐植酸复合肥对小麦生理特性及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2009,17(5):900-904.
[5] Trevisan S, Francioso O, Quaggiotti S, et al. Humic substances biological activity at the plant-soil interface. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2010,5(6):635-643.
doi: 10.4161/psb.5.6.11211 pmid: 20495384
[6] 程亮, 张保林, 王杰, 等. 腐植酸肥料的研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(5):1-6.
[7] 樊红梅. 腐植酸对菊花光合特性、叶绿体超微结构和瓶插寿命的影响. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2015.
[8] 王东方, 丁炳春, 杜红梅, 等. 大豆叶面喷施腐植酸钾增产效应研究. 大豆科学, 2002,21(4):305-307.
[9] 薛世川, 刘秀芬, 邓景华. 施用腐植酸复合肥对小麦抗旱防衰能力的影响及其机理. 中国生态农业学报, 2006,14(1):139-141.
[10] 韩瑞宏, 卢欣石, 高桂娟, 等. 紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)对干旱胁迫的光合生理响应. 生态学报, 2007(12):5229-5237.
[11] 孙雯. 水分和腐植酸对燕麦光合、糖代谢及产量和β-葡聚糖形成的影响. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
[12] Abdelaal K A A, Hafez Y M, El-afry M M, et al. Effect of some osmo-regulators on photosynthesis,lipid peroxidation,antioxidative capacity,and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under water deficit stress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(30):30199-30211.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3023-x pmid: 30155630
[13] 赵海燕, 甘淳丹, 兰汝佳, 等. 喷施新型腐殖酸型叶面肥对小麦旗叶抗氧化和产量及品质的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2018,41(4):685-690.
[14] Bandiera M, Mosca G, Vamerali T. Humic acids affect root characteristics of fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiformis Pers.) in metal-polluted wastes. Desalination, 2009,246(1/2/3):78-91.
[15] 靳永胜, 仝宝生, 李炎, 等. 腐植酸叶面肥在叶菜上的应用效果. 北京农学院学报, 2010,25(3):5-8.
[16] 程扶玖, 杨道麒, 吴庆生. 腐殖酸对小麦抗旱性的生理效应. 应用生态学报, 1995(4):363-367.
[17] 韩文元. 水分与腐植酸对燕麦抗旱性、产量形成和品质的影响. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2016.
[18] 梁太波, 王振林, 王汝娟, 等. 腐植酸钾对生姜根系生长发育及活性氧代谢的影响. 应用生态学报, 2007(4):813-817.
[19] Legg B J, Day W, Lawlor D W, et al. The effects of drought on barley growth:Models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979,92(3):703-716.
[20] 卢晓萍, 杨丙贤, 徐婵娟, 等. 3种小檗科植物叶片SPAD值与叶绿素的相关性及通径分析. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2013,39(3):261-266.
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2012.04.301
[21] 胡锋, 黄俊丽, 秦峰, 等. 植物叶绿体类囊体膜及膜蛋白研究进展. 生命科学, 2011,23(3):291-298.
[22] 丁瑞霞, 贾志宽, 韩清芳, 等. 宁南旱区微集水种植条件下谷子边际效应和生理特性的响应. 中国农业科学, 2006,39(3):494-501.
[23] 刘伟. 腐植酸水溶肥料对燕麦抗旱生理特性的影响. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
[24] 张春明, 兰汝佳, 甘淳丹, 等. 新型微量元素型叶面肥对春小麦旗叶衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019,35(1):121-127.
[25] 彭正萍, 薛世川, 孙志梅, 等. 腐植酸复合肥对油菜品质及生理指标的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 2001(1):24-27.
[26] Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, et al. Biostimulants and crop responses:a review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 2015,31(1):1-17.
[27] Moghadam H R T, Khamene M K, Zahedi H. Effect of humic acid foliar application on growth and quantity of corn in irrigation withholding at different growth stages. Maydica, 2014,59(1/2/3/4):125-129.
[1] Cao Xiaoyan, Wu Ailian, Wang Jinsong, Dong Erwei, Jiao Xiaoyan. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 108-115.
[2] Liu Akang, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Ma Ruiqi, Gao Tiantian, Wang Yujiao, Kan Mingxi, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Seedling Regulation on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Late Sowing Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 116-123.
[3] Zhang Xiaojuan, Zhang Shangpei, Cheng Bingwen, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Yang Junxue, Wang Xiaojun. Responses of Broomcorn Prosomillet Growth, Yield and Soil Environment to Different Film-Mulching Planting Patterns in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 124-129.
[4] Li Jie, Zhang Xiaoning, Jin Fansheng, Han Yanlong, Li Haijin. Response of Kidney Bean Growth and Yield to Planting Density in the Dry Year [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 140-146.
[5] Liu Ping, Shao Caihong, Zhang Honglin, Liu Guangrong. Effects of Dry-Wet Alternate Irrigation on Double Cropping Rice Yield and Quality during Late Development Stage under Seasonal Rain Condition [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 153-159.
[6] Zhou Yuexia, Fan Yu, Ruan Jingjun, Yan Jun, Lai Dili, Peng Yan, Tang Yong, Weng Wenfeng, Cheng Jianping. Correlation Analysis of Oat Grain Nutrition and Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 165-172.
[7] Shen Jie, Wang Yuguo, Guo Pingyi, Yuan Xiangyang. Effects of Humic Acid on Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle in the Leaves of Foxtail Millet Seedlings under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 173-177.
[8] Li Candong, Guo Tai, Wang Zhixin, Zheng Wei, Zhao Haihong, Zhang Zhenyu, Xu Jiefei, Guo Meiling. Evaluation and Determination of Yield Evaluation Indicators of Soybean Mainly Cultivated Varieties in the Central and Eastern of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 45-51.
[9] Yang Yuchen, Du Zhimin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Kunyi, Shen Jiaqi, Xu Hai. Effects of Spraying Methyl Jasmonate on Yield and Grain Quality of Japonica Rice during Heading and Flowering Stage [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 71-76.
[10] Fu Jing, Yin Haiqing, Wang Ya, Yang Wenbo, Zhang Zhen, Bai Tao, Wang Yuetao, Wang Fuhua, Wang Shengxuan. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing Models on Root Growth and Grain Yield of Japonica Rice in the Region along Yellow River of Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 77-86.
[11] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[12] Li Wenxu, Wu Zhengqing, Lei Zhensheng, Jiang Guiying. The Characteristics of Climate Factors Change and Its Effects on Main Grain Crops Yield per Unit Area in Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 124-134.
[13] Li Ruijie, Yan Peng, Wang Qingyan, Xu Yanli, Lu Lin, Dong Zhiqiang, Zhang Fenglu. Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Ethephon on Photosynthetic Physiology of Leaves and Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 135-142.
[14] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[15] Duan Huimin, Lu Xiao, Zhou Xiaojie, Li Gaofeng, Wen Guohong, Wang Yuping, Cheng Lixiang, Zhang Feng. Effects of Potato Leaf Type and Planting Density on Yield Components [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 160-167.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149 -153 .
[2] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32 -36 .
[3] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37 -41 .
[4] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79 -83 .
[5] Shaohui Huang,Yunma Yang,Ketong Liu,Junfang Yang,Suli Xing,Yanming Sun,Liangliang Jia. Effects of Different Fertilization Method on Wheat Yield and Fertilizer Contribution Rate in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 113 -117 .
[6] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines)[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77 -82 .
[7] Kai Zhu,Fei Zhang,Fulai Ke,Yanqiu Wang,Jianqiu Zou. Effects of Planting Density on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Hybrids Suitable for Mechenization[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 83 -87 .
[8] Yu Fan,Hongli Wang,Feng He,Dili Lai,Jiajun Wang,Yue Song,Dabing Xiang. Nutritional Quality in Seeds of Tartary Buckwheat Affected by After-Ripening[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 96 -101 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2010, 26(6): 15 -19 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2001, 17(6): 18 .