Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 153-159.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.02.022

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Dry-Wet Alternate Irrigation on Double Cropping Rice Yield and Quality during Late Development Stage under Seasonal Rain Condition

Liu Ping1(), Shao Caihong2,3(), Zhang Honglin3, Liu Guangrong2()   

  1. 1Yangzhou Polytechnic College/Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Security and Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
    2Soil and Fertilizer & Resources and Environment Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 300200, Jiangxi, China
    3Agricultural Science Institute of Ganzhou City, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2020-06-06 Revised:2021-02-23 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-04-16
  • Contact: Liu Guangrong E-mail:13503040@qq.com;dixushao@126.com;lgrtfs@163.com

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of dry-wet alternate irrigation on double cropping rice during the late development stage under seasonal rain condition, four different irrigation-stop times including the 0, 7th, 14th and 21th (the control) day after rice full heading respectively were set in the field experiment, and the chlorophyll content, dry matter transport, yield, and quality were studied. The results showed that early rice had a lot of rainfall and heavy rainfall during the grain-filling stage. Stopping irrigation after full heading and prolonging the dry-wet alternate irrigation time could significantly improve the dry matter transport to leaves, stems and sheaths, significantly increase the number of ears and seed setting rate, and decrease chlorophyll content and panicles of ineffective tillering. Compared with the control, if the irrigation was stopped at 0 day after the ear was full, the harvested yield increased by 16.0%, and the heading rice rate increased by 8.2%. Based on light rainfall during the late rice grain filling stage, the time of irrigation-stop should be delayed appropriately after full heading, which could increase leaf and stem dry matter transport, and the grains per panicle, seed setting rate, 1000-grain weight, and head rice rate. Compared with the control, stopping irrigation at 7 days after full heading, the harvested yield increased by 11.0%, and the heading rice rate increased by 6.1%. With the increase of dry-wet irrigation time after full heading, the chalkiness rate, chalkiness grain rate, and transparency increased and the adhesive strength reached the maximum under treatments of irrigation-stopping on 7 and 14d after early rice full heading and 14d after late rice full heading and all treatments had no effect on rice quality grade.

Key words: Double cropping rice, Seasonal rain, Dry-wet alternate irrigation, Yield, Quality

Fig.1

The weather at double cropping rice grain filling stage"

Fig.2

Effects of stop-irrigation time after full-heading on chlorophyll content of double cropping rice"

Table 1

Effects of stop-irrigation time after full-heading on dry matter transportation of double cropping rice %"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
干物质输出率Rate of dry matter exportation 干物质转化率Rate of dry matter transfer
叶片Leaf 茎鞘Stem and sheath 叶片Leaf 茎鞘Stem and sheath
湘早籼45号 0d 54.8Aa 38.6Aa 17.3Aa 34.3Aa
Xiangzaoxian 45 7d 53.9Aa 32.3Bb 16.9Aa 29.5Bb
14d 49.2Bb 27.8Cc 15.6Bb 26.1Cc
CK 47.9Bc 26.1Ccd 15.1Bb 24.7Cc
泰优398 Taiyou 398 0d 45.3Aab 34.7Bb 15.2Bb 25.5ABb
7d 49.9Aa 39.0Aa 19.6Aa 27.9Aa
14d 43.8Ab 35.6Bb 15.8Bb 25.9ABb
CK 36.1Bc 28.4Cc 13.5BCc 23.9Bc

Table 2

Effects of stop-irrigation time after full-heading on double cropping rice yield"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Productive panicle
(×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per
panicle
结实率
Seed setting
rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical yield
(kg/hm2)
实际产量
Harvested yield
(kg/hm2)
湘早籼45 0d 370.5Bb 85.2Bb 85.8Aa 23.3Aa 6296.2Bb 6634.5ABa
Xiangzaoxian 45 7d 367.5Bb 92.4Aa 85.5Aa 23.3Aa 6755.1Aa 6826.5Aa
14d 391.5Aa 83.7Bbc 81.2Bb 22.8ABab 6055.5Cc 6304.5Bb
CK 403.5Aa 82.5Bc 81.3Bb 22.3Bb 6031.6Cc 5719.5Cc
泰优398 0d 351.0Aa 143.1Aa 81.2Bc 22.9Bb 8493.0Bb 8419.5ABb
Taiyou 398 7d 355.5 Aa 141.2ABab 85.7Aa 23.6Aa 8724.0Aa 8536.5Aa
14d 357.0Aa 139.8ABb 83.8ABab 23.3Aa 8391.0Bb 8287.5Bc
CK 358.5Aa 137.7Bb 82.2Bbc 23.1ABa 7960.5Cc 7687.5Cd

Table 3

Effects of stop-irrigation time after full-heading on double cropping rice quality"

品质指标Quality trait 湘早籼45 Xiangzaoxian 45 泰优398 Taiyou 398
0d 7d 14d CK 0d 7d 14d CK
整精米率Head rice rate (%) 25.2Aab 26.0Aa 25.0Ab 23.3Bc 60.7Aa 60.5Aa 56.6ABb 57.0ABb
垩白度Chalkiness rate (%) 0.8ABa 0.8ABa 0.9Aa 0.6Bb 1.4Bc 1.7Ab 1.9Aa 0.8Cd
垩白粒率Chalkiness grain rate (%) 6.3Aa 6.7Aa 5.7Bb 4.7Cc 9.3Aa 7.6Bb 7.6Bb 6.3Cc
透明度(级)Transparent 2.0Aa 1.3Bb 1.0Cc 1.0Cc 1.0Aa 1.0Aa 1.0Aa 1.0Aa
碱消值(级)Setback value 6.8Aa 6.8Aa 6.9Aa 6.8Aa 7.0Aa 7.0Aa 6.8Aa 6.8Aa
胶稠度Adhesive strength (mm) 64.0Bb 68.3Aa 68.3Aa 61.3Cc 64.3Dd 68.3Cc 78.3Aa 72.0Bb
直链淀粉含量Amylose content (%) 17.0Aa 16.4Aab 16.6Aab 16.1Ab 17.2Aa 17.1Aa 17.2Aa 17.0Aa
蛋白质含量Protein content (%) 8.26Aa 8.10Aa 8.01Aa 8.10Aa 8.09Aa 7.73Aab 7.56Aab 7.79Aab
[1] 蒋玉兰, 陆凯明, 夏仕明, 等. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量、品质和土壤生物学性状的影响. 作物杂志, 2016(6):20-25.
[2] 张宏路, 朱安, 胡昕, 等. 稻田常用节水灌溉方式对水稻产量和米质影响的研究进展. 中国稻米, 2018,24(6):8-12.
[3] 朱士江, 孙爱华, 张忠学, 等. 不同节水灌溉模式对水稻分蘖、株高及产量的影响. 节水灌溉, 2013(12):16-19.
[4] 杨建昌, 袁莉民, 唐成, 等. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对稻米品质及籽粒中一些酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31(8):1052-1057.
[5] 毛心怡, 王为木, 郭相平, 等. 不同节水灌溉模式对水稻生理生长和产量形成的影响. 节水灌溉, 2020(1):25-29.
[6] 王瑞, 余可信, 田东, 等. 湿润灌溉下3个粳稻品种的生长特性研究. 现代农业科技, 2015(19):71-72.
[7] 邹海波, 单九生, 吴珊珊, 等. 江西持续性强降雨的气候特征及其大尺度环流背景. 气象科学, 2013,33(4):449-456.
[8] 褚光, 展明飞, 朱宽宇, 等. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(7):1026-1036.
[9] 徐芬芬, 曾晓春, 石庆华. 干湿交替灌溉方式下水稻节水增产机理研究. 杂交水稻, 2009,24(3):72-75.
[10] 李昌华, 曾可, 韦善清, 等. 不同耕作方式下水分管理对水稻水分利用的影响. 作物杂志, 2011(4):81-84.
[11] 张自常, 李鸿伟, 陈婷婷, 等. 畦沟灌溉和干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(24):4988-4998.
[12] 顾俊荣, 季红娟, 韩立宇, 等. 不同水氮管理模式对粳稻籽粒结实和主要品质性状的影响. 中国稻米, 2015(4):44-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2015.04.008
[13] 曹树青, 翟虎渠, 钮中一, 等. 不同产量潜力水稻品种的剑叶光合特性研究. 南京农业大学学报, 2000,23(3):1-4.
[14] 陈信波, 廖爱君, 罗泽民. 大穗型水稻生育后期叶片和根系生理的特性. 生命科学研究, 1999,3(3):250-255.
[15] 蔡永萍, 杨其光, 黄义德. 水稻水作与旱作对抽穗后剑叶光合特性、衰老及根系活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2000,14(4):219-224.
[16] 刘少华, 陈国祥, 吕川根, 等. 水分胁迫对高产杂交水稻功能叶光能转换特征的影响. 作物杂志, 2010(4):43-46.
[17] 周娟, 陈平平, 李志斌, 等. 几个杂交早稻品种的产量及光合特性比较. 作物研究, 2015,29(5):468-471,481.
[18] 刘立军, 李鸿伟, 赵步洪, 等. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对稻米品质的影响及其生理机制. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26(1):77-84.
[19] 张自常, 李鸿伟, 陈婷婷, 等. 畦沟灌溉和干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(24):4988-4998.
[20] 吕银斐, 任艳芳, 刘冬, 等. 不同水分管理方式对水稻生长、产量及品质的影响. 天津农业科学, 2016,22(1):106-110.
[21] 柯传勇. 不同水分处理对水稻生长、产量及品质的影响. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2010.
[22] 马群, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 生育类型与施氮水平对粳稻加工品质的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35(7):1282-1289.
[23] 秦阳, 蒋文春, 张城, 等. 不同水稻品种播期与品质的关系. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2004,35(4):328-331.
[24] 邵彩虹, 邱才飞, 钱银飞, 等. 播期对直播早稻湘早籼45产量及米质的影响. 中国稻米, 2019,25(S1):52-54.
[25] 幕永红, 孙建勇. 不同施氮比例对水稻产量与品质的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2000(3):18-19.
[26] 唐成. 结实期干-湿交替灌溉对稻米品质的影响及其机理的研究. 扬州:扬州大学, 2007.
[1] Ji Ping, Liu Jinlong, Liu Hao, Kuang Jiali, Ye Shihe, Long Sha, Yang Hongtao, Peng Bo, Xu Chen, Liu Xiaolong. Effects of Heat Stress on Yield Components and Quality in Different Rice Varieties during Heading Stage [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 117-125.
[2] Zhou Zhenlei, Liu Jianming, Cao Dong, Liu Baolong, Wang Dongxia, Zhang Huaigang. Comparison of Grass Yield, Agronomic Traits and Forage Quality of Different Oat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 132-140.
[3] Xiong Xin, Deng Jun, Shang Liyan, Sheng Tian, Ye Jiayu, Liu Zichen, Huang Liying, Zhang Yunbo. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Interaction on Yield and Radiation Use Efficiency of Hybrid Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 166-173.
[4] Liu Zhewen, Guo Dandan, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Yang Yushuang, Liu Xiwei, Wang Yujiao, Shi Shubing, Wang Yanjie, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Nitrogen Dressing Time and Proportion on Wheat Grain Filling and Its Physiological Mechanism [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 174-179.
[5] Hao Xiaocong, Li Xinyu, Hou Qiling, Yang Jifang, An Chunhui, Wang Changhua, Ye Zhijie, Zhang Fengting. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on the Quality of Two-Line Hybrid Wheat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 187-192.
[6] Zhang Lu, Li Dengming, Zhai Xiaoyu, Wu Junying, Gao Shihua, Zhao Yufei. Differences in Agronomic and Quality Traits of Oat at Cutting Time and Their Relationships with Regeneration Performance [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 220-228.
[7] Shao Meihong, Zhu Defeng, Cheng Siming, Cheng Chu, Xu Qunying, Hu Chaoshui. Study on Seedling Quality and Yield of Machine Transplanting Early Rice with the Seedling Raising of Overlayed-Tray Emergence [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 229-232.
[8] Xie Keran, Gao Ti, Cui Kehui. Research Progress of Potassium Fertilizer Controlling Rice Yield under High Temperature [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 8-15.
[9] Xie Hao, Xue Zhangyi, Shu Chenchen, Zhang Weiyang, Zhang Hao, Liu Lijun, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang, Gu Junfei. Analysis of Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Base Fertilizer of Rice under Different Crop Management Practices by Using 15N Labeling [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 90-96.
[10] Wang Hongbo, Tang Maosong, Li Guohui, GaoYang , Wang Xingpeng. Construction and Evaluation of Cotton Yield Model Based on Logistic Model for Filmless Drip Irrigation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 97-103.
[11] Liu Zhewen, Guo Dandan, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Liu Xiwei, Wang Yujiao, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation after Anthesis in Strong Gluten Wheat to Nitrogen Topdressing Period and Proportion [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 114-120.
[12] Zhou Xu, He Xiaolei, Cao Liang, Li Duo, Fu Chenye, Zhang Mingcong, Zhang Yuxian, Wang Mengxue. Effects of Different Water Stress and Rehydration at Seedling Stage on Antioxidant Properties and Yield of Soybean [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 135-142.
[13] Yang Shanwei, Liang Renmin, Zhao Haihong, Wei Guijian, He Dengmei, Huang Xumou, Hu Zhongyin, Wei Chunxiang, Xu Chang, Wei Minchao, Wei Shuang, Luo Jiteng, Xu Yingying, Zhang Xiuhua, Han Yi, Wang Shiqiang. Effects of Low Temperature Stress at Booting Stage on Yield and Its Components of High Quality Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 143-149.
[14] Liu Xiwei, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Impacts Mechanism of Drought and Heat Stress in the Middle and Late Growing Period on Wheat Grain Yield Formation Process and Mitigation Measures [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 17-25.
[15] Dong Haosheng, Wang Qi, Yan Peng, Xu Yanli, Zhang Wei, Lu Lin, Dong Zhiqiang. Effects of ECK on the Lodging Resistance and Yield of Foxtail Millet Stem [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 181-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!